Totalitarian and autocratic regimes often arise in societies facing significant hardship, such as economic instability and social trauma. Historical examples, particularly in Western Europe between the world wars, illustrate how economic depression and political instability can pave the way for authoritarian movements. In contemporary America, there are parallels to this trend, with rising economic inequality and stagnating median incomes creating disillusionment with democratic institutions. The wealth gap has widened dramatically, particularly affecting Black, Hispanic, and Indigenous communities. Additionally, the U.S. invests heavily in military expenditures—approximately $820 billion in 2023—burdening the national treasury and diverting funds from social programs. The chronic financial commitment to military operations has led to substantial interest payments on national debt, limiting investment in poverty alleviation. Furthermore, the psychological toll of ongoing warfare manifests in increased mental health issues for veterans and military families, contributing to societal fragmentation. Amid these challenges, many Americans turn to populist movements like Trumpism, seeking solutions to feelings of neglect and economic insecurity, often fueled by nationalist rhetoric and anti-elite sentiments reminiscent of historical authoritarianism. This combination of socioeconomic distress and political discontent may further entrench authoritarian tendencies in the future.

The perception of Donald Trump as a father figure is rooted in the "strict father" moral framework, identified by cognitive linguist George Lakoff, which underpins Republican political thought. This framework posits that the world is dangerous and requires a strong authority to protect and guide. Supporters of Trump embrace the "Daddy Trump" concept, interpreting it as a moral alignment rather than something odd, as seen in statements from various Republican leaders who describe him in paternal terms. Psychologically, Trump appeals to those longing for a protective father, presenting himself as a fixer and defender of traditional values. His paternalistic language reinforces this dynamic, promising to solve national problems directly, which resonates with individuals seeking stability in a tumultuous world. Additionally, Trump's relationship with running mate J.D. Vance exemplifies this father-son dynamic, where Vance sees Trump as a significant father figure, reflecting his own complex childhood experiences and desire for parental stability. Moreover, the concept of God as a father in Christianity parallels this framework, emphasizing a personal relationship characterized by redemption rather than mere creation. This intertwining of political and religious paternalism reveals deep cultural desires for authority, protection, and moral guidance.