The Cosmic Overture: A Theological Exegesis of John 1:1-5

Introduction: The Prologue as a Hermeneutical Key

The opening eighteen verses of the Gospel of John, commonly known as the Prologue, represent one of the most profound and densely packed Christological statements in the entirety of the New Testament. Functioning as a theological overture, this passage provides the indispensable hermeneutical key through which the entire subsequent narrative of Jesus's life, ministry, and significance must be interpreted.1 The author of the Fourth Gospel, in a deliberate and strategic move, places his most ultimate and majestic claims about Jesus Christ at the very beginning. This literary choice is not merely for dramatic effect; it is designed to fundamentally shape the reader's perception, ensuring that every miracle, discourse, and passion narrative event is understood through the lens of Jesus's pre-existent, divine, and cosmic identity.4

The Prologue serves as a thematic table of contents for the Gospel, introducing the foundational concepts that will be explored and developed in the chapters that follow. Key Johannine motifs—including life, light, darkness, witness, belief, the world, grace, and truth—are all presented in their nascent, cosmic form within these initial verses.1 Scholarly analysis of the Prologue's structure has suggested it may be a pre-existing hymn adapted by the author or a meticulously crafted chiastic composition, a literary structure in which concepts are presented and then repeated in reverse order.2 Such intricate construction underscores the author's careful literary artistry and profound theological intentionality. While the entire Prologue is significant, the first five verses lay the unshakeable foundation upon which the rest of the Gospel is built, establishing the identity of its protagonist not in the context of human history, but in the timeless expanse of eternity.

Section 1: "In the Beginning" — Eternity, Creation, and New Creation

1.1. The Deliberate Echo of Genesis

The opening phrase of John's Gospel, "In the beginning" (Ἐν ἀρχῇ, En archē), is an unmistakable and deliberate echo of the first words of the Hebrew Bible, Genesis 1:1.8 For any reader familiar with the Jewish scriptures, particularly in their Greek translation (the Septuagint), which also begins with

En archē, this verbal parallel would be immediately striking. The author intentionally invokes the grand narrative of cosmic creation to frame his own account. The intertextual connection is further solidified by the use of shared core vocabulary: "God" (θεός, theos), "light" (φῶς, phōs), and "darkness" (σκοτία, skotia) all feature prominently in both John 1 and Genesis 1.8 This linguistic resonance signals that the story to follow is not merely about a Galilean teacher but is one of cosmic and creational significance.

1.2. Transcending Temporal Beginnings

While the other canonical Gospels anchor their narratives in historical time—Mark with the beginning of Jesus's public ministry, Matthew with his genealogy tracing back to Abraham—John's "beginning" transcends temporal history altogether.10 His focus is not on what

happened in the beginning, but on Who was already there when the beginning began.1 John's Gospel pushes the starting point of its subject's story back beyond the confines of creation, into a timeless eternity. He is establishing a continuous history that runs out of an unmeasured past, identifying the eternal person who is the subject of that history.1

1.3. The Grammar of Pre-existence: Ēn vs. Egeneto

A crucial linguistic and theological distinction is embedded in the author's choice of verbs. To describe the state of the Word in verse 1, John uses the imperfect tense of the verb "to be": ἦν (ēn), meaning "was." This verb denotes continuous, ongoing existence without a specified starting point.8 It implies a state of being that precedes the "beginning" itself. This is placed in stark contrast to the verb used to describe the act of creation in verse 3:

ἐγένετο (egeneto), the aorist tense of γίνομαι (ginomai), meaning "came into being" or "was made." The theological assertion is powerful and precise: the Word timelessly "was," while all other things "came into being" at a point in time.8 This grammatical choice is a profound theological declaration, separating the uncreated, eternal nature of the Word from everything that constitutes the created order.

1.4. A New Creation Perspective

While the connection to Genesis 1 is clear, some scholarly analysis suggests that John's "beginning" may refer not only to the original creation but also, and perhaps primarily, to the inauguration of God's new creation through the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.10 In this view, John uses the familiar language of the first creation to introduce the agent of the new, redemptive creation prophesied in texts like Isaiah 43:18-19 and articulated in Pauline theology (2 Corinthians 5:17). This interpretation finds support in the way the phrase "the beginning" is used elsewhere in Johannine literature, where it often refers to the start of Jesus's earthly ministry and the experience of the first disciples.11

This apparent tension between two interpretations—a beginning in pre-creation eternity versus a beginning in the inauguration of Jesus's ministry—is not a contradiction but a mark of the author's theological sophistication. John's use of "In the beginning" is a profound theological re-appropriation of the foundational text of Jewish cosmology. He deliberately seizes the Genesis narrative and re-centers it on the person of Jesus Christ. This act implicitly declares that the ultimate reality, the true "beginning" that undergirds the Genesis "beginning," is the eternal Word. The language of the first creation is employed to introduce the agent of the new creation precisely because the agent of both is one and the same eternal person. Therefore, the old story of creation can only be fully and properly understood through the lens of its eternal Agent, who has now entered history to redeem and remake it. This is a radically Christocentric redefinition of the very concept of "beginning."

Section 2: The Identity of the Logos — A Synthesis of Intellectual Worlds

2.1. The Problem of Translation

The translation of the Greek term Λόγος (Logos) as "Word" in English versions of the Bible, while standard, fails to capture the immense philosophical and theological weight the term carried in the first-century Mediterranean world.13 To a modern reader, "word" can seem mundane. To an ancient reader,

Logos was a "concept word" loaded with centuries of intellectual history.15 The term had a wide semantic range, encompassing concepts such as "speech," "message," "reason," "reckoning," "account," and, most significantly, the rational principle governing the cosmos.13

2.2. The Hellenistic Context

The concept of the Logos has deep roots in Greek philosophy. As early as the 6th century B.C., the philosopher Heraclitus used the term to describe a universal, divine, and ordering principle that underlies all of existence, a cosmic reason that, though common to all, was understood by few.17 Later, Stoic philosophers developed this idea, conceiving of the

Logos as the impersonal divine intelligence or rational principle that created, ordered, and sustained the universe.2 For the Stoics, living a virtuous life meant aligning one's personal reason with this universal, divine

Logos.

2.3. The Judaeo-Alexandrian Bridge (Philo)

In the first century, the Jewish philosopher Philo of Alexandria sought to synthesize Greek philosophy with Hebrew scripture. He adopted the term Logos to describe a mediating entity that bridged the impassable gulf between a transcendent, unknowable God and the corruptible material world.13 For Philo, the

Logos was the immanent reason of God, a "second God" who acted as the agent of creation.17 However, key distinctions separate Philo's concept from John's. Philo's

Logos was a metaphysical necessity born of philosophical dualism, it remained largely impersonal, and, crucially, it could never become flesh, as matter was considered a principle of evil.13

2.4. The Hebrew Foundations

Despite these Hellenistic parallels, the primary intellectual and theological source for John's Logos Christology is the Old Testament itself. Two major streams of Hebrew thought converge in John's presentation.

First is the concept of the creative Word of God, the Hebrew davar. In Genesis 1, creation is accomplished through divine speech: "And God said...".8 Throughout the Old Testament, the "word of the Lord" is not a static communication but a dynamic, powerful, and effective agent of God's will in creation, salvation, and judgment (e.g., Psalm 33:6).16

Second is the personification of divine Wisdom, Hebrew Hochmah and Greek Sophia. In Jewish wisdom literature, particularly Proverbs 8, Wisdom is depicted as a pre-existent, divine agent who was with God before creation and acted as the master worker in the formation of the world.21 This personified Wisdom shares many attributes with John's

Logos: pre-existence, an intimate relationship with God, a role in creation, being the source of life, and seeking to dwell among humanity only to be rejected.23 The author of the Gospel may have chosen the masculine noun

Logos over the feminine Sophia as a more fitting designation for the historical male person of Jesus.22

The author's selection of Logos was a brilliant strategic choice, functioning as an 'intellectual funnel.' He intentionally chose a term rich with meaning for the multiple, diverse audiences of his day—Greeks familiar with Stoicism, Hellenized Jews versed in Philo, and traditional Jews steeped in the concepts of davar and Sophia.2 By offering no initial definition, he draws each of these groups into his argument on their own terms.2 He then proceeds to radically redefine the concept in a way that challenges and subverts the presuppositions of every group. The climax of this redefinition comes in John 1:14: "And the Word became flesh." This statement is revolutionary. For the Greek, the impersonal, universal Reason could not become a particular man. For the Philonic Jew, the divine mediator could never touch "evil" matter. For the traditional Jew, the personified Word or Wisdom was a powerful literary metaphor, not a historical person of flesh and blood. John's strategy is thus to use the term's familiarity as a point of contact and its subsequent, shocking redefinition as the point of conversion. He effectively proclaims, "That ultimate reality you all seek—be it Reason, a divine Mediator, or God's creative Utterance—I will now tell you who

He is." It is a masterstroke of contextual theology.

Intellectual Stream

Key Proponents/Texts

Core Concept of Logos/Wisdom

How John Adopts & Transforms It

Greek Philosophy (Stoicism)

Heraclitus, Zeno

An impersonal, universal principle of Reason that orders the cosmos.

John personalizes the Logos, making it not a principle but a divine Person who can be known and related to.

Hellenistic Judaism (Philo)

Philo of Alexandria

A mediating, semi-divine entity; God's immanent Reason, bridging the gap to the material world.

John's Logos is not a subordinate mediator but is fully God (1:1c). Crucially, John's Logos "became flesh" (1:14), an idea abhorrent to Philo's dualism.

Hebrew Scripture (The Word/Davar)

Genesis 1, Psalm 33

The dynamic, powerful, creative, and revelatory speech of God.

John identifies this creative Word not as an action of God, but as a Person who is God.

Jewish Wisdom Lit. (Sophia)

Proverbs 8, Sirach 24

A personified, pre-existent female figure of divine Wisdom, active in creation and seeking to dwell with humanity.

John applies the attributes of Sophia to the Logos, but makes the personification a full-blown incarnation in the historical person of Jesus.

Section 3: The Triadic Declaration of Divinity (John 1:1-2)

3.1. Clause 1: "In the beginning was the Word" (En archē ēn ho logos)

This opening clause, as previously discussed, serves as the foundational statement of the Word's absolute eternality. The continuous force of the verb ēn ("was") establishes that the Word did not come into being at the beginning but was already in a state of existence when time and creation began.1

3.2. Clause 2: "and the Word was with God" (kai ho logos ēn pros ton theon)

This second clause introduces a crucial distinction. The Greek preposition πρός (pros), when used with the accusative case as it is here, implies more than simple proximity or accompaniment ("beside"). It denotes an active, dynamic relationship, often translated as "toward" or "face-to-face with".26 The grammar establishes both an intimate communion and a clear personal distinction. The Word is not merely an attribute or an emanation of God; He is a distinct Person in a living, eternal relationship with another Person, here designated as "God" (understood in this context as God the Father).1 This phrasing stands as a direct refutation of modalism, the later heresy which taught that the Father, Son, and Spirit are merely different modes or manifestations of a single divine person.

3.3. Clause 3: "and the Word was God" (kai theos ēn ho logos)

This third clause is the theological apex of the verse, a direct assertion of the Word's divinity. The grammatical construction is precise and vital for correct interpretation. In the Greek, the word theos ("God") appears before the verb and lacks the definite article ("the"). This construction, an anarthrous pre-verbal predicate nominative, does not mean "the Word was a god," a translation used to support Arian-like views that deny Jesus's full divinity.1 Instead, Greek grammar dictates that this structure emphasizes the nature or quality of the subject. The clause does not mean that the Word is identical to the person of the Father (which would have likely been written

ho logos ēn ho theos). Rather, it declares that the Word shares the very same nature, essence, and quality of being that defines God.27 He is God in His essential being.

3.4. Verse 2: "He was in the beginning with God" (Houtos ēn en archē pros ton theon)

This second verse is not new information but a deliberate, emphatic repetition that synthesizes and solidifies the claims of the first. It gathers the concepts of eternality ("in the beginning") and distinct, relational personhood ("with God") into a single, unambiguous summary statement.29 The author ensures that the reader cannot misunderstand or bypass the profound implications of verse 1: the one who is the subject of this Gospel is an eternal, distinct divine Person who shares the very nature of God.

The syntax of John 1:1 is not merely descriptive; it is prescriptive. The grammatical structure itself compels the reader to grapple with the core tenets of what would later be articulated as Trinitarian theology. The author has encoded a description of the inner, relational life of the Godhead into the very grammar of his opening sentence. The first clause's use of ēn establishes timeless co-eternality. The second clause's use of pros ton theon establishes a relationship between two distinct co-equal Persons. The third clause's use of theos ēn establishes their shared divine nature. These three grammatical pillars are not just a list of attributes; they form an inseparable relational matrix. One cannot affirm the Word's distinction from God without also affirming His shared nature with God, all within a framework of eternal existence. Long before the formal creeds of Nicaea and Chalcedon, John's grammar provided the essential linguistic and theological data for the doctrine of the Trinity. The theology is not just contained in the words; it is expressed in the way the words are syntactically arranged.

Section 4: The Architect of Existence: The Word as Exclusive Agent of Creation (John 1:3)

4.1. The Scope of Creation: "All things" (Panta)

Following the declaration of the Word's identity, the author immediately moves to His function. The statement "All things were made through him" (πάντα δι' αὐτοῦ ἐγένετο, panta di' autou egeneto) is absolute and comprehensive. The Greek word panta leaves no room for exceptions. It encompasses the entire created order, every entity in the universe, both visible and invisible, material and abstract.32

4.2. The Role of Agency: "Through Him" (Di' autou)

The preposition διά (dia) with the genitive case denotes instrumentality or agency. The Word is the agent through whom God the Father brought the universe into existence.8 This theological formulation aligns perfectly with other key New Testament passages that describe Christ's role as the agent of creation, such as 1 Corinthians 8:6, Colossians 1:16, and Hebrews 1:2.32 This establishes a distinctly Trinitarian pattern in the act of creation: the Father is the ultimate source or planner, and the Son is the active agent or architect through whom the plan is executed.35

4.3. The Uncreated Creator: The Negative Clause

The author reinforces this claim with a powerful rhetorical negation: "without him nothing was made that has been made." This emphatic restatement serves to close any potential loophole, underscoring the Word's indispensable and exclusive role in every single act of creation, from the grandest galaxy to the smallest particle.32 If something has "been made," it was made through the agency of the Word.

This verse functions as a concise and elegant logical proof of the Word's uncreated nature and, by extension, His full divinity. The argument is embedded within the structure of the statement itself. The first premise is that "ALL things (panta) were made through the Word".33 The set of "all things" logically includes every single created entity without exception. The critical question then becomes: Is the Word Himself a created entity? If one were to hypothesize that the Word is a created being, He would necessarily have to be included in the set of "all things." This leads to a logical contradiction, for if the Word is part of "all things," then according to the first premise, He must have been made "through Himself." This is a logical and metaphysical absurdity; a being cannot be the agent of its own creation. Therefore, the initial hypothesis must be false. The Word cannot be a created entity. He must stand outside of, and prior to, the entire created order. In this way, John uses cosmology as the primary evidence for his Christology, making the universe itself the first witness to the uncreated divine status of the Word.

Section 5: Life, Light, and the Unconquered Radiance (John 1:4-5)

5.1. The Source of Being: "In him was life" (en autō zōē ēn)

The Prologue now shifts from the Word's role in the creation of the cosmos to His relationship with humanity. The declaration "In him was life" introduces one of the Gospel's most central themes. The Greek word for life here is ζωή (zōē), which signifies more than mere biological existence (βίος, bios). Zōē denotes divine, uncreated, self-existent life—the very essence of God Himself.36 The Word does not simply possess life; He is the aboriginal source of all life.38 This theme will resonate throughout the Gospel in Jesus's great "I am" statements, such as "I am the resurrection and the life" (John 11:25) and "I am the way, and the truth, and the life" (John 14:6).

5.2. The Revelation of Life: "The life was the light of all mankind" (hē zōē ēn to phōs tōn anthrōpōn)

The author establishes a direct causal link: this divine life inherent in the Word is the source of spiritual "light" (phōs) for humanity.38 In the biblical lexicon, light is a rich metaphor for divine revelation, truth, knowledge, holiness, and the very presence of God.10 Darkness, its antithesis, represents ignorance, sin, and alienation from God. By stating that the life

was the light, John asserts that the Word is the ultimate and exclusive revelation of God to the world.34 To know the Word is to be brought out of darkness and into the light of God's presence.

5.3. The Cosmic Conflict: "The light shines in the darkness" (to phōs en tē skotia phainei)

This clause introduces the central conflict that will drive the entire narrative of the Gospel. The "darkness" (skotia) is the state of the world alienated from its Creator—a realm of spiritual ignorance, moral evil, and rebellion.10 The use of the present tense verb "shines" (

phainei) indicates a continuous, ongoing reality. The divine light did not just appear once, but has entered the realm of darkness and continues to shine, press, and exert its influence.

5.4. The Ambiguous Victory: "The darkness has not overcome it" (hē skotia auto ou katelaben)

The final clause of this section is a masterpiece of theological depth, hinging on the deliberate ambiguity of the Greek verb κατέλαβεν (katelaben). The term carries a rich double meaning, and both senses are critical to understanding the Gospel's message.5

1. To overcome, overtake, extinguish: In this sense, the clause is a proclamation of victory. The darkness, for all its hostility, could not conquer, suppress, or extinguish the light. This foreshadows the ultimate triumph of Christ over the forces of sin and death in His resurrection.

2. To comprehend, grasp, understand: In this sense, the clause describes a tragedy of reception. The darkness was intellectually and spiritually incapable of recognizing or understanding the light. This points directly to the theme of rejection that permeates the Gospel, summarized in John 1:11: "He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him."

This progression from creation to conflict reveals a profound theological structure. Verse 3 establishes the Word as the Creator of the macrocosm, the universe. Verse 4 shifts to the microcosm of humanity, presenting a causal chain: the Creator Word is the source of divine Life, and this Life is the source of revelatory Light. Verse 5 then introduces the inevitable conflict as this divine Light enters a pre-existing state of "darkness," setting the stage for the entire Gospel drama. The resolution is provided by the final, ambiguous word, katelaben. This double entendre brilliantly encapsulates the entire plot of the Gospel in a single term. The failure to "comprehend" explains the tragedy of the narrative—the rejection of the Light by a blind and hostile world, culminating in the cross. The failure to "overcome" explains the triumph of the narrative—that despite this rejection, the Light cannot be extinguished, pointing definitively to the victory of the resurrection. This one word, therefore, serves as a prophecy in miniature, summarizing the entire passion narrative—both its rejection and its ultimate triumph—before the story has even begun.

Conclusion: The Lens of Divine Identity

The first five verses of the Gospel of John constitute a dense, majestic, and carefully constructed theological overture. They establish a high Christology from the very first sentence, presenting a vision of Jesus Christ that is cosmic in scope and eternal in nature. In this brief but profound passage, the author declares that Jesus, as the eternal and divine Logos, is the uncreated agent of all creation, the aboriginal source of all life and light, who has entered into a cosmic conflict with the darkness of a world alienated from God.

These verses are not merely an introduction but the indispensable hermeneutical lens through which everything that follows must be viewed. The author's primary purpose is to ensure that the reader interprets every word, miracle, claim, and action of the historical Jesus of Nazareth in light of this initial revelation of His true identity. The man who will walk the dusty roads of Galilee, who will turn water into wine, who will teach in the Temple, and who will ultimately be crucified outside Jerusalem, is none other than the eternal Word who was with God and was God, the one through whom the entire universe came into being. This divine identity is the foundational truth upon which the entire Gospel rests.

Works cited

1. Enduring Word Bible Commentary John Chapter 1, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://enduringword.com/bible-commentary/john-1/

2. John's prologue: Christological and doxological significance for the ..., accessed on September 24, 2025, https://www.pharosjot.com/uploads/7/1/6/3/7163688/article_29_vol_102_2021_up.pdf

3. An Exegetical Study of The Prologue of John (John 1:1-18) By Richard Van Egmond Introduction In the opening verses of each of th, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://repository.globethics.net/bitstream/handle/20.500.12424/160483/a_4.1.1._An_Exegetical_Study.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

4. In the Beginning Was the Word | Desiring God, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://www.desiringgod.org/messages/in-the-beginning-was-the-word

5. The Johannine prologue: A hermeneutical key to the community theme, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2074-77052022000100053

6. How John's Prologue Placards the Glory of God's Son: 10 Things About John 1:1–18, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://davidschrock.com/2022/01/26/how-johns-prologue-placards-the-glory-of-gods-son-10-things-about-john-11-18/

7. The Pivot of John's Prologue | New Testament Studies | Cambridge Core, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/new-testament-studies/article/pivot-of-johns-prologue/A043D1FB936B43954FF5E48F20567F47

8. In the Beginning . . . John 1:1 and Genesis 1:1 | Answers in Genesis, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://answersingenesis.org/jesus/beginning-john-1-and-genesis-1/

9. “In the Beginning”: Genesis 1:1-5 and John 1:1-5 - Mere Pensees, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://merepensees.com/2024/02/in-the-beginning-genesis-11-5-and-john-11-5/

10. Genesis 1 and John 1: the new creation Jesus brings - Josh Benner, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://joshbenner.org/2020/11/19/genesis-1-and-john-1-the-new-creation-jesus-brings/

11. John 1:1 The Beginning of God's New Creation - Land and Bible, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://landandbible.blogspot.com/2020/02/john-11-beginning-of-gods-new-creation.html

12. 1 John 1-5 NIV - The Incarnation of the Word of Life - Bible Gateway, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20John%201-5&version=NIV

13. The Meaning of 'Logos' in the Prologue of John's Gospel, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://www.bible-researcher.com/logos.html

14. gospel of john - What is the relation between the Logos of Greek Philosophy and the Logos in Christianity?, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/55244/what-is-the-relation-between-the-logos-of-greek-philosophy-and-the-logos-in-chri

15. How do you interpret John 1:1, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God”? - Reddit, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenChristian/comments/zwxrq4/how_do_you_interpret_john_11_in_the_beginning_was/

16. What Does the Greek Word “Logos” Mean?, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://www.logos.com/grow/greek-word-logos-meaning/

17. Logos (Christianity) | Research Starters - EBSCO, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/religion-and-philosophy/logos-christianity

18. Word Made Flesh — The “Logos” Philosophy Falls Short | Mind Renewers, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://mindrenewers.com/2014/12/26/word-made-flesh-the-logos-philosophy-falls-short/

19. JESUS IS THE LOGOS THE WORD OF GOD - Bill Bolin, accessed on September 24, 2025, http://www.billbolin.net/jesus-is-the-logos-the-word-of-god/

20. “Logos, a Jewish Word” – Vridar, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://vridar.org/2019/02/26/logos-a-jewish-word/

21. What is Logos? A look at John 1:1-3 | Free Thinking Ministries, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://freethinkingministries.com/what-is-logos-a-look-at-john-11-3/

22. John's Logos and Jewish Wisdom - The Bart Ehrman Blog, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://ehrmanblog.org/johns-logos-and-jewish-wisdom/

23. www.logos.com, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://www.logos.com/grow/greek-word-logos-meaning/#:~:text=the%20New%20Testament.-,The%20significance%20of%20Jesus%20as%20the%20Logos,behind%20Jesus%20as%20the%20Logos.

24. Is the "Word" (Logos) of God in John the Wisdom (Sophia) of God in Judaism?, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://ehrmanblog.org/is-the-word-logos-of-god-in-john-the-wisdom-sophia-of-god-in-judaism/

25. John's view of Jesus as the Logos – jesus and the gospels - UO Blogs - University of Oregon, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://blogs.uoregon.edu/rel317w15drreis/2015/01/14/johns-view-of-jesus-as-the-logos/

26. What does it mean that the Word was with God (John 1:1 ..., accessed on September 24, 2025, https://www.gotquestions.org/the-Word-was-with-God.html

27. Does John 1.1 mean 'The Word was a god'? - Psephizo, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://www.psephizo.com/biblical-studies/does-john-1-1-mean-the-word-was-a-god/

28. en.wikipedia.org, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_1:1#:~:text=The%20Word%20is%20not%20God,with%20whom%20he%20eternally%20exists.

29. John 1:1-5 NIV-UK - Biblica, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://www.biblica.com/bible/?osis=niv-uk%3Ajhn.1.1-jhn.1.5

30. John 1 - NIV - In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was wi... - Bible Study Tools, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://www.biblestudytools.com/john/1.html

31. John 1:1-5 NIV - Bible.com, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://www.bible.com/bible/111/JHN.1.1-5.NIV

32. John 1:3 Decoded: How “Through Him All Things Were Made | by M. J. Kelley II | Medium, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://medium.com/@mjkelleyII/john-1-3-decoded-how-through-him-all-things-were-made-c787c94b394b

33. John 1:3 | Bible Exposition Commentary, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://versebyversecommentary.com/2016/07/29/john-13/

34. John 1:3 Commentaries: All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being. - Bible Hub, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://biblehub.com/commentaries/john/1-3.htm

35. Creation: From, Through, and By the Triune God - Reasons to Believe, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://reasons.org/explore/publications/connections/creation-from-through-and-by-the-triune-god

36. Sermon: I Show It - John 1:4-5 | Lifeway, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://www.lifeway.com/en/articles/sermon-hello-my-name-is-jesus-i-show-it-john-1

37. What does it mean that “in Him was life, and the life was the light of ..., accessed on September 24, 2025, https://www.gotquestions.org/in-Him-was-life-light-men.html

38. John 1:4 Commentaries: In Him was life, and the life was the Light of men. - Bible Hub, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://biblehub.com/commentaries/john/1-4.htm

39. Jesus, The Light of Men – John 1:4-5 | Jon Beck…Sermon Notes and Stuff, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://pastorjonbeck.com/jesus-the-light-of-men-john-14-5/

40. How Is Jesus the Light of the World? A Study Starting in John - Logos Bible Software, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://www.logos.com/grow/nook-light-of-the-world/

41. John 1:1–5 NIV - In the beginning was the Word - Biblia, accessed on September 24, 2025, https://biblia.com/bible/niv/john/1/1-5