Order from Chaos: An Exegetical and Comparative Analysis of the Genesis Creation and Flood Narratives

Introduction

This report provides a comprehensive examination of the opening verses of the book of Genesis and their relationship to the broader literary and cultural world of the ancient Near East. Genesis 1 is not merely a simple account of origins; it is a profound theological treatise and a sophisticated polemic that engages directly with the dominant cosmologies of its time. This analysis will proceed in two parts. Part I offers a meticulous exegesis of Genesis 1:1-2, deconstructing its key Hebrew terms to uncover layers of meaning concerning the nature of God and the origins of the universe. Part II situates the Genesis creation and flood narratives in a comparative dialogue with their most significant Mesopotamian parallels—the Enuma Elish and the Epic of Gilgamesh. This comparison will demonstrate how the biblical authors both participated in and radically subverted the mythological traditions of their world to articulate a unique and revolutionary vision of God, humanity, and the cosmos.

Part I: An Exegetical Deep Dive into Genesis 1:1-2

The first two verses of the Hebrew Bible establish the foundational theological and cosmological concepts for the entire narrative that follows. Each Hebrew term is a vessel of meaning, reflecting complex debates and deliberate authorial choices that distinguish the Israelite worldview from that of its neighbors.

The Opening Statement: Analyzing Bereshit Elohim

Deconstructing Bereshit: "In the beginning" vs. "When God began to create..."

The very first word of the Bible, Bereshit (בְּרֵאשִׁית), has been the subject of intense grammatical and theological debate. Traditionally, it is translated as an absolute temporal clause: "In the beginning".1 This rendering, familiar from most English Bibles, suggests a definitive, absolute start to time and space, an event initiated solely by God.1 This interpretation strongly supports the theological doctrine of creatio ex nihilo (creation out of nothing), positing that God existed prior to all things and brought the universe into being from no pre-existing matter.1

However, a significant body of modern scholarship, based on the principles of Hebrew grammar, argues that Bereshit functions as a dependent clause in a construct state. This would render the phrase as "When God began to create..." or "In the beginning of God's creating...".3 This grammatical distinction carries profound theological weight. If Genesis 1:1 is a dependent clause, then Genesis 1:2 is not a description of what God created in verse 1, but rather a description of the pre-existing state of the world upon which God began to act. This reading aligns more closely with other ancient Near Eastern creation accounts, which typically involve a deity bringing order to pre-existing chaotic matter rather than creating ex nihilo.4

Later hermeneutical traditions have found even deeper layers of meaning. For example, some Jewish midrashic interpretations suggest that the preposition be- in bereshit should be understood as "with" or "by means of." Since the word reshit ("beginning" or "first") is sometimes used as a poetic term for wisdom or the Torah, this leads to the reading, "With wisdom God created the heavens and the earth".3 Similarly, some Christian typological readings analyze the individual Hebrew letters of Bereshit to find a prefiguration of the Gospel message, suggesting the entire plan of salvation is encoded in this single word.6 While theologically rich, these interpretations represent later developments in interpretive history and are distinct from the most likely meaning of the text in its original historical and literary context.

The Plurality of Elohim: Majesty, Trinity, or Divine Council?

The title for God used throughout the first creation account is Elohim (אֱלֹהִים). This term presents a linguistic and theological puzzle: it is grammatically plural, marked by the standard Hebrew plural suffix -im, yet it is almost always paired with singular verbs when referring to the God of Israel.8 This tension has given rise to several major interpretations.

The standard view within both Jewish and much of Christian scholarship is that Elohim is a "plural of majesty" or "royal plural".8 In this grammatical form, the plural is not used to indicate a numerical quantity but to express the grandeur, supreme authority, and all-encompassing power of the being described.10 This stylistic device is not unique to the name of God; it appears elsewhere in the Hebrew Bible to denote human figures of great authority, such as a master ('adonim, literally "lords") referring to a single person.11 Thus, Elohim signifies the God who possesses the plenitude of all divine powers and attributes.8

Christian theology has traditionally seen a deeper significance in this plurality, viewing it as an early, veiled intimation of the doctrine of the Trinity.9 From this perspective, the use of a plural noun with a singular verb suggests a "complex unity" within the Godhead—one God existing in three persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.8 Passages such as Genesis 1:26, where God says, "Let us make man in our image," are often cited to support the idea of a plurality within the divine nature, a concept more fully revealed in the New Testament.10

A third interpretation, arising from a historical-critical approach, posits that the term Elohim may be a linguistic remnant from an earlier stage of Israelite religion that was not strictly monotheistic but rather polytheistic or henotheistic (the worship of one god while acknowledging the existence of others). In this framework, Elohim would have originally referred to the pantheon of gods or a "divine council," a concept common in the ancient Near East.13 The use of the same word, elohim, to refer to pagan deities like Dagon and Chemosh, as well as to human judges acting as divine representatives, supports the idea that the term had a broader semantic range before it became exclusively associated with the one God of Israel.8

These interpretations need not be seen as mutually exclusive but can be understood as reflecting a theological evolution. The term elohim likely originated in a wider West Semitic cultural context where it could denote a council of deities. As Israelite theology developed toward a radical monotheism, the term was retained but fundamentally re-semanticized. The plural form was reinterpreted to signify the majesty and all-encompassing power of the one true God, who had absorbed all divine functions into His singular being. The grammatical tension in the text—a plural noun with a singular verb—can thus be seen as a linguistic fossil of this profound theological transformation, marking the adaptation of an older, potentially polytheistic term for a strictly monotheistic purpose.

The Primordial Canvas: Tohu wa-bohu and the Cosmic Tehom

Defining the Undefined: The Nature of the "Formless and Void" State

Genesis 1:2 describes the primordial state of the earth with the iconic Hebrew phrase tohu wa-bohu (תֹהוּ וָבֹהוּ), traditionally translated as "without form and void".14 A closer analysis of these terms reveals a state that is not absolute nothingness, but rather a condition of chaos, disorder, and unproductivity.

The word tohu signifies formlessness, confusion, emptiness, and futility. In other biblical contexts, it is used to describe a desolate wasteland, a pathless desert, or the vanity of idols.14 Bohu is a much rarer word, appearing only three times in the Hebrew Bible, always in conjunction with tohu, where it serves to intensify the sense of emptiness and desolation.14 Together, the phrase paints a picture of a world that is unformed, uninhabited, and non-functional—a "wild and waste" awaiting divine intervention to impart structure, purpose, and life.15

Within the history of interpretation, this verse has given rise to the "Gap Theory." This view posits that a significant, unstated period of time—a "gap"—exists between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2. Proponents argue that the verb hayeta ("was") should be translated as "became," suggesting that the earth became formless and void as the result of a cataclysmic judgment, often associated with the fall of Lucifer.17 While this remains a minority interpretation, it highlights the textual ambiguities that have allowed for diverse theological readings.

The Deep and its Echoes: Tehom and the Demythologization of Chaos

The state of tohu wa-bohu is further characterized by "darkness...over the face of the tehom (תְּהוֹם)"—"the deep".20 The tehom is the primordial, undifferentiated cosmic ocean that, in the cosmology of the ancient Near East, was believed to exist before the created order.20 It represents the boundless, chaotic waters from which a habitable world must be carved out.20

The theological significance of this term is immense, particularly in its linguistic connection to Mesopotamian mythology. The Hebrew word tehom is a direct cognate of Tiamat, the name of the primordial saltwater goddess in the Babylonian creation epic, the Enuma Elish.4 In that epic, Tiamat is a monstrous, serpentine deity who embodies the violent and destructive forces of chaos. Creation can only begin after she is defeated and killed in a fierce cosmic battle by the hero-god Marduk, who then forms the heavens and the earth from her dismembered corpse.4

The Genesis account performs a radical and deliberate polemical act. It retains the concept of a primeval watery chaos but completely demythologizes it. The tehom in Genesis is not a rival deity that must be fought and conquered. It is an inanimate, impersonal, and passive element of the pre-creation landscape.19 It has no will, no power, and poses no threat to the Creator. God does not engage it in battle; His spirit simply and peacefully hovers over it. This transformation of a chaos-goddess into a mere geographic feature is a powerful theological statement. It asserts that what other cultures worship as a powerful, divine force is, to the God of Israel, merely a part of the raw material of creation, entirely subject to His sovereign will. The primary argument of Genesis against Babylonian cosmology is not just monotheism versus polytheism, but a fundamentally different conception of divine power. Power in the Enuma Elish is demonstrated through cosmic warfare. In Genesis, divine power is demonstrated through effortless, sovereign command. The passivity of the tehom is one of the most potent theological arguments in the entire chapter.

The Active Presence: Identifying the Ruach Elohim

Hovering over the dark, chaotic waters is the ruach Elohim (רוּחַ אֱלֹהִים), the entity described as the "spirit that roamed a formless earth." The Hebrew word ruach has a broad semantic range, capable of meaning "wind," "breath," or "spirit," which has led to three primary scholarly interpretations of its function in this verse.24

Interpretation 1: "The Spirit of God" (A Personal, Divine Presence)

This is the most traditional and widely held interpretation. It understands ruach Elohim as the personal Spirit of God—an active, creative, and divine presence.25 In Christian theology, this is identified as the Holy Spirit, the third person of the Trinity.28 This reading is strongly supported by the verb used to describe its action, merahefet (מְרַחֶפֶת), which means "hovering," "fluttering," or "brooding." This same verb is used in Deuteronomy 32:11 to describe an eagle tenderly hovering over its young, suggesting a gentle, nurturing, and purposeful superintendence of the nascent creation.28 This imagery portrays God's immanent and personal involvement from the very outset, preparing the chaotic world for the ordering work to come.25

Interpretation 2: "A Mighty Wind" (An Impersonal Force of Nature)

A second interpretation argues that ruach should be translated here as "wind." In this grammatical construction, the word Elohim does not mean "of God" but functions as a superlative, intensifying the noun it modifies.30 Thus, ruach Elohim would mean "a mighty wind" or "a great wind," much like "mountains of God" (Psalm 36:7) means "great mountains".30 In this view, the wind is not a divine agent acting upon the chaos but is rather another elemental feature of the primordial chaotic state, alongside the darkness and the deep.32 This reading presents a less personal, more naturalistic picture. However, this interpretation is challenged by the fact that in all other occurrences of the phrase ruach 'elohim in the Old Testament, it refers to the Spirit of God, not a strong wind.28

Interpretation 3: "The Breath of God" (The Creative Life-Force)

A third view mediates between the personal and impersonal interpretations. Ruach as "breath" is a common biblical metaphor for God's life-giving power, as seen in the creation of Adam (Genesis 2:7) and the vision of the dry bones (Ezekiel 37).24 In this sense, the ruach Elohim is the dynamic, energizing power of God, the divine "breath" that pulses through the inert chaos, imbuing it with potentiality and preparing it for the creative commands that will follow.31 It is less a distinct person and more the active manifestation of God's own vitality and power.

Conclusion on the Identity of the Spirit

While the "mighty wind" interpretation is grammatically plausible, the context of divine creation and, most significantly, the specific verb merahefet ("hovering") lend greater weight to an interpretation that sees the ruach Elohim as God's active, creative presence. The specific name of the spirit is Ruach Elohim. It can be best understood as the Spirit of God or the Creative Presence of God, a divine power that superintends creation, bringing potentiality to the chaos and preparing it for the ordering work of the divine word. The inherent ambiguity of ruach allows for a rich theological reading that encompasses the concepts of divine presence, power, and life-giving energy.

Part II: Genesis in Dialogue with the Ancient Near East

The Genesis narratives of creation and the flood were not composed in a cultural vacuum. They use shared cultural motifs and narrative structures from the ancient Near East to advance a theology that is profoundly different from that of its neighbors, particularly Mesopotamia.

Creation: Divine Word vs. Divine Warfare (Genesis & Enuma Elish)

Shared Structures, Divergent Worldviews

A comparative analysis of Genesis 1 and the Babylonian creation epic, the Enuma Elish, reveals striking structural and thematic parallels.23 Both accounts begin with a state of primordial watery chaos (tehom in Hebrew, Tiamat in Akkadian).23 Both describe the creation of a firmament or sky by separating these waters.5 The sequence of creation events—light, sky, dry land, celestial bodies, and finally humanity—is remarkably similar.35 Furthermore, both narratives are organized within a seven-part framework (the seven days of Genesis and the seven tablets of the Enuma Elish), with humanity being created on the sixth stage of the process.23

Theological Polemics: Monotheism, Goodness, and Human Dignity

Despite these structural similarities, the theological content of Genesis 1 represents a direct and systematic refutation of the Babylonian worldview.35 The biblical author appears to have used a familiar narrative template to present a radically different message. The key contrasts include:

• Monotheism vs. Polytheism: Genesis posits one, transcendent, pre-existent Creator God who stands outside of creation.5 The Enuma Elish, by contrast, describes a theogony—the birth of the gods themselves from the pre-existing chaotic matter of Apsu (freshwater) and Tiamat (saltwater). Creation is a consequence of violent conflict among these gods.5

• Peaceful Fiat vs. Violent Conflict: In Genesis, God creates effortlessly and peacefully through the power of His spoken word ("And God said...").38 In the Enuma Elish, creation is the result of a brutal cosmic war. The god Marduk must first slay the chaos-monster Tiamat, and only then can he construct the world from her carcass.23

• Inherent Goodness vs. Amoral Nature: A recurring refrain in Genesis 1 is the declaration of creation's goodness ("And God saw that it was good"), culminating in the assessment that the whole is "very good." This imparts an intrinsic moral and aesthetic value to the cosmos.35 The Babylonian universe, born of violence and divine strife, is fundamentally amoral.

• Dignity of Humanity vs. Humanity as Slaves: This is perhaps the most profound theological divergence. In Genesis, humanity is the pinnacle of the creative process, uniquely made in the "image and likeness of God" and given the noble task of serving as stewards of the earth.35 In the Enuma Elish, humans are an afterthought. They are created from the blood of Kingu, a slain, rebellious god, for the sole purpose of being slaves to the gods, relieving them of their labors.35

These contrasts are summarized in the following table:

Feature

Genesis 1 Account

Enuma Elish Account

Primordial State

An impersonal, watery chaos called tehom 20

A divine pair of watery chaos: Apsu (male, freshwater) and Tiamat (female, saltwater) 5

Nature of the Divine

One transcendent, eternal, and all-powerful God (Elohim) 35

A pantheon of gods born from chaos, who plot, fight, and fear 5

Method of Creation

Peaceful, orderly creation through spoken divine command (fiat) 38

Violent cosmic battle; creation from the slain corpse of the chaos-goddess Tiamat 23

Creation of the Sky

A firmament created to separate the "waters above" from the "waters below" 5

Marduk splits Tiamat's body in two to form the heavens and the earth 4

View of Celestial Bodies

Created objects ("greater and lesser lights") to mark time; not divine 37

The gods are often identified with natural forces and celestial bodies

Creation of Humanity

The climax of creation; made in God's "image and likeness" 37

An afterthought; created from the blood of a rebellious god, Kingu 35

Purpose of Humanity

To act as stewards and rulers over God's good creation 35

To be slaves who perform the menial labor of the gods so the gods can rest 35

Ultimate State

A cosmos declared "very good" by its Creator 35

The establishment of the city of Babylon as the earthly residence for the gods 23

The Great Flood: Divine Judgment vs. Divine Annoyance (Genesis & Gilgamesh)

Echoes of a Global Catastrophe

The narrative of the great flood in Genesis 6-9 shares undeniable parallels with the flood story recounted in Tablet XI of the Mesopotamian Epic of Gilgamesh.39 The similarities are so extensive and detailed that the majority of scholars conclude that the two traditions are literarily related, with the Mesopotamian versions (including older Sumerian and Akkadian precursors) predating the final form of the biblical text.39

The shared narrative elements are numerous: a divine decision to destroy humanity with a flood; the selection of a hero (Noah in Genesis, Utnapishtim in Gilgamesh) to survive; divine instructions to build a massive, sealed boat; the command to bring family and animals aboard; a catastrophic, world-covering flood; the boat coming to rest on a mountain; the hero releasing birds (a raven and doves in Genesis, a dove, swallow, and raven in Gilgamesh) to determine if the waters have receded; and the offering of a sacrifice upon disembarking, which is met with a divine response.39

Contrasting Theologies: Moral God vs. Capricious Gods

As with the creation stories, the biblical author uses this shared narrative framework to present a theology that stands in stark contrast to its Mesopotamian counterpart.42 The differences reveal a deliberate theological reinterpretation of the event.

• Motivation for the Flood: The reason for the flood is the central theological divergence. In Genesis, the motivation is explicitly moral and judicial. God observes the pervasive wickedness (ra'ah) and violence (hamas) of humanity and acts as a righteous judge to cleanse the earth.42 The decision is portrayed as a source of divine grief ("it grieved him to his heart"), not anger.39 In the Epic of Gilgamesh, the gods' motivation is trivial and amoral: the humans have become too numerous and noisy, and their clamor disturbs the gods' sleep.41 The flood is an act of divine annoyance, not divine justice.

• Character of the Divine: The God of Genesis is depicted as sovereign, omnipotent, and in complete control of the flood from start to finish. He acts with moral purpose and concludes the event with a solemn promise.43 The gods of the Gilgamesh epic are portrayed as capricious, fearful, and deeply flawed. They decide on the flood in a contentious assembly, one god (Ea) secretly warns the human hero, and when the storm arrives, the gods themselves are terrified, "cowering like dogs" and retreating to the highest heaven.43 After the flood, they are depicted as being desperately hungry and swarming "like flies" over Utnapishtim's sacrifice.43

• Outcome for Humanity: The conclusion of each story reveals its ultimate theological message. The Genesis flood ends with a universal and everlasting covenant between God and all of humanity, represented by Noah and his descendants. The rainbow is established as a sign of God's promise never again to destroy all life by water, ensuring the stability and continuity of the created order.39 In Gilgamesh, the outcome is arbitrary and exclusive. The hero Utnapishtim and his wife are granted personal immortality as a unique reward and are removed from the human realm to live "far away." This offers no hope, promise, or new beginning for the rest of humanity, for whom death remains the unalterable and bleak fate.43

The following table highlights these critical distinctions:

Narrative Element

Genesis Account

Epic of Gilgamesh Account

Divine Reason for Flood

The moral corruption and violence of humanity 43

The excessive noise of humanity disturbing the gods' rest 41

Character of the Divine

A single, sovereign, moral Judge who is grieved by sin but acts righteously 39

A pantheon of capricious, amoral, and fearful gods who bicker and are terrified by their own creation 43

Hero Selection

Noah, a man described as "righteous" and "blameless in his generation" 41

Utnapishtim, a clever man chosen and warned in secret by one god, Ea 43

The Vessel

A rectangular ark with specific, seaworthy proportions (300x50x30 cubits) 43

A perfect cube (120x120x120 cubits), an unseaworthy design 43

The Flood's Duration

A prolonged, year-long cataclysm involving 40 days of rain and months of receding water 43

A short, intense storm lasting six days and seven nights 43

Post-Flood Divine Reaction

God smells the "pleasing aroma" of the sacrifice and establishes a covenant 39

The hungry gods "swarm like flies" over the sacrifice 43

Outcome for Hero/Humanity

A universal covenant of preservation for all humanity and creation, symbolized by the rainbow 39

The hero and his wife are granted personal immortality and removed from the human world; no hope for humanity 43

Conclusion

The analysis of Genesis 1:1-2 reveals a carefully constructed theological prologue that defines God as a singular, transcendent, and all-powerful Creator who brings order from chaos through His sovereign word and active presence. The Ruach Elohim, the "Spirit of God," is the first indication of this divine purpose, hovering over the primordial chaos as the agent of creative potential.

The comparative study of the creation and flood narratives demonstrates that the biblical authors were not writing in isolation. They were sophisticated theologians who were deeply engaged with the powerful mythologies of their cultural landscape. They adopted familiar narrative structures and motifs—a primordial ocean, a world-destroying flood, a chosen survivor—not to plagiarize, but to subvert. By systematically stripping these stories of their polytheistic, conflict-driven, and amoral elements, the Genesis accounts present a revolutionary worldview. They offer a polemical re-reading of the cosmos, one in which a single, moral God creates an inherently good world for a dignified humanity. In this vision, the relationship between the divine and the human is defined not by the fear, servitude, and caprice found in Mesopotamian myth, but by purpose, righteousness, and covenant. The "spirit that roamed a formless earth" is thus the opening signal of this divine purpose, the active presence of the Creator preparing to transform a chaotic world into a home for humanity.

Works cited

1. firmisrael.org, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://firmisrael.org/learn/where-do-i-begin-the-hebrew-meaning-of-bereshit/

2. Bereishit in a Nutshell - Texts & Summaries - Parshah - Chabad.org, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://www.chabad.org/parshah/article_cdo/aid/3137/jewish/Bereishit-in-a-Nutshell.htm

3. Genesis 1:1 – The meaning of b'reishit - Topics in Biblical Studies: B ..., accessed on October 7, 2025, https://www.genesis-1-1.com/

4. Was "the deep" created by God in Genesis or had it always existed? : r/AcademicBiblical - Reddit, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AcademicBiblical/comments/aa1wb4/was_the_deep_created_by_god_in_genesis_or_had_it/

5. Genesis creation narrative - Wikipedia, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genesis_creation_narrative

6. Bereshit and the depth of meaning in the first word of Bible - Assembly of Called-Out Believers, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://www.calledoutbelievers.org/bereshit-and-the-depth-of-meaning-in-the-first-word-of-bible/

7. The Bereshit (Jesus in Genesis) Argument Has No Merit - Griffin, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://gsgriffin.com/2017/07/29/the-bereshit-jesus-in-genesis-argument-has-no-merit/

8. What is the meaning of the word Elohim? | GotQuestions.org, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://www.gotquestions.org/meaning-of-Elohim.html

9. Elohim, First Name - Genesis 1:1 - InspiritEncourage, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://www.inspiritencourage.com/mini/elohim

10. Elohim in Genesis: A Plural God in Christian Theology - Catholic 365, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://www.catholic365.com/article/42010/elohim-in-genesis-a-plural-god-in-christian-theology.html

11. ONENESS OF GOD - The Meaning of Elohim - Jews for Judaism, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://jewsforjudaism.org/knowledge/articles/oneness-of-god-the-meaning-of-elohim

12. Theological Implications of Elohim - Topical Bible, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://biblehub.com/topical/t/theological_implications_of_elohim.htm

13. Does 'Elohim' in Genesis Refer to God—or a Pantheon of 'Powerful Ones' - Reddit, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/theology/comments/1i9xc84/does_elohim_in_genesis_refer_to_godor_a_pantheon/

14. Tohu wa-bohu - Wikipedia, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tohu_wa-bohu

15. The Meaning of "Tohu wa-Bohu" (Formless and Void) in Genesis 1:2 - Dr. Eitan Bar, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://eitan.bar/articles/tohu-wa-bohu-formless-void-genesis-1-2/

16. Tohu wa Bohu - WordExplain, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://www.wordexplain.com/Word_Study_tohu_wa_bohu.html

17. Tohu wa -bohu, Earth “Was” or “Became,” Waste and Void? - Robert Clifton Robinson, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://robertcliftonrobinson.com/2014/07/29/tohu-wa-bohu-earth-was-or-became-waste-and-void/

18. Creating Order from Tohu and Bohu - TheTorah.com, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://www.thetorah.com/article/creating-order-from-tohu-and-bohu

19. tehom Archives - Redeeming God, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://redeeminggod.com/bible-theology-topics/tehom/

20. Tehom - Wikipedia, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tehom

21. Tehohm: A Dive into the DEEP - Hebrew Word Lessons, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://hebrewwordlessons.com/2020/07/12/tehohm-a-dive-into-the-deep/

22. The Deep – The Place of the Dead - Redemptive Bible Studies, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://redemptivebiblestudies.com/the-deep-tehom/

23. The Enuma Elish and the Bible - Bible Odyssey, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://www.bibleodyssey.org/articles/the-enuma-elish-and-the-bible/

24. Ruach and the Hebrew Word for the Holy Spirit - Fellowship of Israel Related Ministries, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://firmisrael.org/learn/ruach-the-hebrew-word-for-holy-spirit/

25. 'Ruach': The Breath That Moves through Everything - Logos Bible Software, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://www.logos.com/grow/the-breath-that-moves-through-everything-a-survey-of-ruach/

26. The Holy Spirit in the Pentateuch - Bible Study With Randy, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://www.biblestudywithrandy.com/author/randymccracken/page/25/

27. The Sustainer of Life: The Role of the Spirit of God in Creation - Australasian Pentecostal Studies, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://aps-journal.com/index.php/APS/article/download/5/2?inline=1

28. The hovering of the Spirit of God - Ministry Magazine, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://www.ministrymagazine.org/archive/2013/08/the-hovering-of-the-spirit-of-god

29. Genesis 1:2 Commentaries: The earth was formless and void, and darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was moving over the surface of the waters. - Bible Hub, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://biblehub.com/commentaries/genesis/1-2.htm

30. "ruach elohim" in Genesis 1.2 translated with "a very strong wind" - Mi Yodeya, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/121624/ruach-elohim-in-genesis-1-2-translated-with-a-very-strong-wind

31. How is God's spirit hovering over the waters in Genesis not the Holy Spirit? - Reddit, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AcademicBiblical/comments/2zcncn/how_is_gods_spirit_hovering_over_the_waters_in/

32. The Earth of Genesis 1:2 Abiotic or Chaotic? Part III - Biblical eLearning, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://biblicalelearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Ouro-Gen1_2_Pt3_AUSS.pdf

33. And the Spirit...moved | The Institute for Creation Research, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://www.icr.org/books/defenders/7

34. What similarities are there between the Enuma Elish and the Genesis creation account?, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://www.gotquestions.org/Enuma-Elish.html

35. Two Accounts of Creation in Genesis - Deliriums Realm, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://www.deliriumsrealm.com/genesis-and-enuma-elish/

36. Enuma elish and creation stories. : r/AcademicBiblical - Reddit, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AcademicBiblical/comments/zjqduw/enuma_elish_and_creation_stories/

37. Did the Jews steal their creation and flood story from the Enuma Elish? - Evidence Unseen, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://evidenceunseen.com/old-testament/genesis/difficulties/did-the-jews-steal-their-creation-and-flood-story-from-the-enuma-elish

38. Is Genesis just an alteration of the myth “Enuma Elish”? - Quora, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://www.quora.com/Is-Genesis-just-an-alteration-of-the-myth-Enuma-Elish

39. Genesis flood narrative - Wikipedia, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genesis_flood_narrative

40. What similarities are there between the Gilgamesh flood account and the biblical flood account? | GotQuestions.org, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://www.gotquestions.org/Gilgamesh-flood.html

41. The Influence of Gilgamesh on the Bible | Bible Interp, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://bibleinterp.arizona.edu/articles/influence-gilgamesh-bible

42. Comparing Flood Myths In Genesis And Epic Of Gilgamesh - 632 Words - Bartleby.com, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://www.bartleby.com/essay/Comparing-Flood-Myths-In-Genesis-And-Epic-3A008465099359CB

43. Why the Epic of Gilgamesh Has Nothing to Do with Noah's Flood ..., accessed on October 7, 2025, https://medium.com/@jeffreybarlatier/why-the-epic-of-gilgamesh-has-nothing-to-do-with-noahs-flood-story-2e97b644403d

44. Gilgamesh and Noahs Flood part 1 - Creation Ministries International, accessed on October 7, 2025, https://creation.com/gilgamesh-and-noahs-flood-part-1