The Architecture of Power: An In-Depth Analysis of Governance in the People's Republic of China



Introduction: Understanding the Paradox of Chinese Governance


This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the government of the People's Republic of China (PRC), a system characterized by its unique synthesis of Leninist political structures, dynamic economic development, and deep historical and cultural traditions. The central argument is that the Chinese government cannot be understood through the lens of Western political models. It is fundamentally a "party-state," a unitary system where the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the formal state apparatus are inextricably fused, with the Party holding ultimate authority.1

The report deconstructs this system, examining its core components: the Party's leadership structure, the formal state organs, the ideological underpinnings, the complex policy-making process, the tools of economic and social control, and its ambitious foreign policy. It will conclude by synthesizing these elements to present a holistic picture of a governance model that is both resilient and fraught with internal contradictions, and which poses a significant and complex challenge to the existing global order.4


I. The Core Duality: The Party-State System



The Primacy of the Party


The foundational principle of governance in the PRC is the absolute and constitutionally guaranteed leadership of the Chinese Communist Party.2 The CCP is not merely a political party in a pluralistic sense; it is the supreme political authority that predates the state it created in 1949.1 The state apparatus, including the government, military, and judiciary, functions as the administrative vehicle for implementing the Party's agenda.1 The state structures' sole purpose is to aid the Party in governing China effectively and guaranteeing its monopoly on power.1 This principle is explicitly articulated in the CCP's constitution, which states: "Government, the military, society and schools, north, south, east and west – the party leads them all".2 This comprehensive mandate ensures that no sector of society or governance operates outside the Party's purview.


Interlocking Structures


The Party's dominance is operationalized through a system of parallel and interlocking hierarchies that extend from the central government down to the smallest towns and villages.3 Party committees are embedded within all government departments, state-owned enterprises (SOEs), and public institutions, where they supervise and direct decision-making.2 This structure acts as the state's "nervous system," transmitting decisions made within the Party into the multi-level state apparatus for execution.1

Key government officials are invariably senior Party members, appointed through the Party's powerful Organization Department. This ensures that state power is wielded by individuals whose primary loyalty is to the CCP.1 At every level of the hierarchy, Party rank takes precedence over government rank, meaning a Party secretary at the provincial level, for example, holds more authority than the provincial governor.3 This system of personnel control is a fundamental mechanism for ensuring the Party's will is translated into government action.


Democratic Centralism: The System's Operating Principle


The entire political structure of the PRC operates on the Leninist principle of "democratic centralism".6 This authoritarian model permits internal discussion, consultation, and debate

before a decision is made. However, once the central leadership has issued a final decision, the principle demands absolute, unified adherence from all members and lower-level organs.7 This operational code ensures top-down control and Party unity, effectively precluding any form of institutionalized opposition, which is a core feature of parliamentary systems.7 The minority must submit to the majority, and lower levels of the hierarchy must submit to higher levels, guaranteeing total unity in action.7

This principle functions as a sophisticated mechanism of control. The "democratic" component refers to the managed process of consultation within the Party, creating an internal perception and an external narrative of consensus-building. This allows the leadership to gather information and absorb limited feedback from various bureaucratic and regional actors. However, the "centralism" component is the operational core. Once a decision is reached by the Politburo Standing Committee or the General Secretary, all debate ceases, and unified implementation becomes mandatory. Any deviation is considered a serious breach of Party discipline. In this way, the principle provides the ideological framework that justifies the suppression of dissent and opposition, framing them not as legitimate political discourse but as violations of Party unity and stability.

A key manifestation of this fusion is the "one institution, two names" system, most notably seen in the Central Military Commission (CMC) and the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection (CCDI), which share offices with the state's National Supervisory Commission (NSC).9 The practice of merging party and state bodies has accelerated under Xi Jinping.2 This arrangement resolves a fundamental challenge for the CCP: how to exercise direct, legal command over state functions in a system that maintains the formal trappings of a state constitution. By creating parallel state institutions that are identical in leadership and function to their Party counterparts, the Party can project state authority while ensuring its own power remains supreme and extra-constitutional. The state version provides a veneer of constitutional legitimacy and a formal interface for international relations, but because the personnel and decision-making power reside within the Party structure, the CCP's absolute control is never compromised. The expansion of this model under Xi Jinping signifies a deliberate move to further erase the already blurry lines between Party and state, reversing the Deng-era trend of attempting to create some separation.2


Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Organ

Corresponding State (PRC) Organ

Notes on Relationship

General Secretary of the Central Committee

President of the People's Republic of China

The General Secretary is the paramount leader; the Presidency is a largely ceremonial head-of-state role held concurrently to legitimize this status.10

Politburo Standing Committee (PSC)

State Council (Plenary and Executive Meetings)

The PSC is the supreme decision-making body. The State Council, led by the Premier (a PSC member), is the chief administrative body responsible for implementing PSC decisions.11

Central Military Commission (of the CCP)

Central Military Commission (of the PRC)

"One institution, two names." Identical membership and leadership, chaired by the General Secretary. Ensures the Party's absolute control over the military.9

Central Commission for Discipline Inspection (CCDI)

National Supervisory Commission (NSC)

The CCDI is the Party's top anti-graft body. The NSC is its state counterpart, extending anti-corruption oversight to all public-sector employees, not just Party members.9

Central Political and Legal Affairs Commission

Supreme People's Court (SPC) & Supreme People's Procuratorate (SPP)

This Party commission oversees the entire political-legal system, ensuring the judiciary and procuratorate align with Party policy and directives.1


II. The Pillars of the Party: The Locus of Real Power


While the state possesses a formal government structure, real power is concentrated within the top leadership bodies of the Chinese Communist Party. Understanding these institutions is essential to comprehending how China is actually governed.


The General Secretary: The Paramount Leader


At the apex of the entire system is the General Secretary of the CCP Central Committee, a position that holds ultimate power and authority over the state and government.10 The powers of the General Secretary are vaguely defined in the Party constitution, a feature that grants the holder immense personal influence and flexibility.10 Since the mid-1990s, starting with Jiang Zemin, the General Secretary has concurrently held the positions of President of the PRC and Chairman of the Central Military Commission.6

The presidency is a largely ceremonial role that confirms the leader's status as head of state for diplomatic purposes.10 The chairmanship of the CMC, however, is a position of substantive power, making the holder the supreme commander of the armed forces.13 This trifecta of the top Party, state, and military posts concentrates enormous power in one individual, who is referred to as the "paramount leader".10


The Politburo and its Standing Committee (PSC): The Epicenter of Power


The de facto highest decision-making body in China is the Politburo Standing Committee (PSC), a small, elite group (currently seven members) selected from the larger Politburo (currently 24 members).3 The PSC operates as the epicenter of the CCP's power, conducting policy discussions and making final decisions on all major national issues, from economic strategy to foreign policy.12 Because China is a one-party state, the decisions of the PSC effectively have the force of law.12 Its membership and their ranking in the protocol sequence are closely watched by observers worldwide as key indicators of political power and policy direction.12

The General Secretary is an ex officio member of the PSC and, as its most senior member, sets the agenda for its meetings, as well as for those of the full Politburo and the Central Committee.10 This agenda-setting power is a crucial lever of control, allowing the General Secretary to guide the focus and direction of all high-level policy deliberation.


The Central Committee and the National Congress


Theoretically, the PSC is responsible to the Politburo, which is in turn responsible to the Central Committee, a body of several hundred top officials from across the country and various sectors.12 The Central Committee is elected every five years at the National Party Congress, a gathering of over two thousand delegates.6 While the National Congress is the highest body of the Party in theory, its primary functions in practice are to formally approve the political report delivered by the General Secretary, ratify policy directions already set by the leadership, and elect the new Central Committee.6 It serves more as a grand political theater for legitimizing the leadership's agenda and signaling Party unity than as a genuine legislative or decision-making body.

The governance model of the CCP has historically oscillated between two poles: a model of "collective leadership" and one dominated by a single "core" leader. This cyclical shift reflects a fundamental tension within the party-state system. The profound instability and chaos of Mao Zedong's one-man rule, which led to national catastrophes like the Cultural Revolution, created a strong incentive for a more stable and predictable system of governance.1 In response, Deng Xiaoping instituted a system of "collective leadership," designed to prevent the recurrence of such excesses and to better manage the complexities of economic reform.14 This model, particularly under Hu Jintao's tenure (2002-2012), was characterized by consensus-based decision-making within the Politburo Standing Committee, where each member held a portfolio and a degree of autonomy, thereby limiting the power of the General Secretary.14

However, this collective model was eventually perceived by a significant faction within the Party as leading to systemic weaknesses, including indecisiveness, factional gridlock, and rampant corruption, which were seen as threatening the CCP's long-term grip on power.1 Xi Jinping's rise and his rapid consolidation of power as the "core" of the leadership can be understood as a direct reaction to these perceived failings. His tenure represents a "conservative turn" aimed at restoring discipline, centralizing authority, and making the state more manageable in the face of mounting internal and external challenges.1 This reveals a deep-seated dilemma in the CCP's governance model: a constant tension between the fear of chaotic, arbitrary one-man rule and the fear of a weak, divided collective leadership unable to act decisively. The current system under Xi represents a definitive shift back toward the former, prioritizing central control, ideological unity, and personal authority over the principles of consensus and deliberation that characterized the preceding era.


III. The Formal Apparatus of the State


While real power resides within the CCP, the People's Republic of China maintains a complete and complex state apparatus that is constitutionally mandated to govern the country. These state organs provide the legal and administrative framework through which Party policy is implemented.


The National People's Congress (NPC): The Supreme Organ of State Power


According to the PRC Constitution, the National People's Congress is the highest organ of state power.11 It is a unicameral legislature composed of nearly 3,000 deputies elected for five-year terms from provinces, autonomous regions, municipalities, special administrative regions, and the armed forces.11 The NPC's formal powers are vast; it is the only body with the authority to amend the Constitution, and it is responsible for enacting and amending basic laws governing all aspects of the state.16

Furthermore, the NPC elects the President and Vice President, appoints the Premier of the State Council upon the President's nomination, and elects the heads of the Central Military Commission, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate.17 It also examines and approves the national economic plan and the state budget.17 However, the CCP's control over the nomination process and its supermajority of delegates ensures that the NPC's role in practice is to formalize and grant legal authority to decisions and personnel choices already made by the Party leadership.2 Its annual full session is a major political event, but its function is primarily one of legitimation rather than independent legislation.


The State Council: The Central People's Government


The State Council is the executive body of the state and the supreme organ of state administration, effectively functioning as China's cabinet.11 Headed by the Premier, who is assisted by several Vice-Premiers and State Councillors, it is responsible for implementing the laws and decisions passed by the NPC.11 Its primary functions include formulating administrative measures, issuing decisions and orders, drafting legislative bills for submission to the NPC, and preparing the national economic plan and state budget.18 The State Council oversees a vast bureaucracy of ministries and commissions (e.g., the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the National Development and Reform Commission) that carry out the day-to-day administration of the country.11


The President of the PRC: A Ceremonial Head of State


The functions of the President of the People's Republic of China are largely ceremonial and diplomatic, akin to a head of state in a parliamentary system.19 In pursuance of decisions made by the NPC and its Standing Committee, the President promulgates statutes, formally appoints and removes the Premier and other State Council members, and represents the PRC in state affairs, such as receiving foreign diplomatic representatives and ratifying treaties.19 The real power of the individual holding the presidency derives not from the office itself, but from their concurrent and far more powerful post as General Secretary of the CCP.10


The Central Military Commission (CMC): Command of the Armed Forces


The state Central Military Commission is the supreme military leadership body of the PRC, directing the country's armed forces, which include the People's Liberation Army (PLA), the People's Armed Police (PAP), and the Militia.11 The Chairman of the CMC assumes overall responsibility for its work and is responsible to the National People's Congress.11 Crucially, its leadership, structure, and functions are identical to the Party's Central Military Commission, an arrangement that ensures the CCP's foundational principle that "the Party commands the gun".13 Unlike in many other countries, China's Ministry of National Defense does not have command authority; it exists primarily for military diplomacy and liaison with foreign militaries.13


The Judiciary: Organs of Legal Supervision and Trial


The state's judicial branch consists primarily of the Supreme People's Court (SPC) and the Supreme People's Procuratorate (SPP).11

  • The Supreme People's Court (SPC) is the highest trial organ in the country. It supervises the trial practices of local and special people's courts and can hear cases of national importance, appeals, and protests against lower court decisions.21

  • The Supreme People's Procuratorate (SPP) is the state organ for legal supervision. It oversees lower-level procuratorates, acts as the public prosecutor in major criminal cases, and ensures the proper enforcement of state laws.22

Both the SPC and the SPP are created by and responsible to the National People's Congress, placing them firmly within the hierarchy of the party-state rather than as a separate, co-equal branch of government.11

While the Constitution asserts that the courts exercise their right of trial "independently," this is fundamentally contradicted by their structural subordination to the NPC, the Party's absolute control over judicial appointments, and their explicit function as enforcers of Party policy.1 The concept of judicial independence in the PRC must be understood not as independence from the CCP, but as a directive for courts to be free from interference by other government bodies or individuals

outside the Party's established chain of command.

The most telling evidence of the judiciary's political function is its extraordinarily high conviction rate. Official statistics show that conviction rates in Chinese criminal courts have consistently exceeded 99.9%.23 In 2022, the rate reached a record high of 99.975%, with only 354 not-guilty verdicts out of 1.43 million judgments.23 Such a figure is statistically improbable in any system based on a presumption of innocence and indicates that by the time a case reaches trial, the outcome is largely predetermined. Reports from organizations like Amnesty International corroborate this, concluding that courts are used as "tools of systematic repression," particularly in politically sensitive cases where fair trial rights are systematically denied.25 The judiciary's primary role is not to be an impartial arbiter of justice, but to be a reliable instrument for maintaining social order and enforcing the will of the ruling party. This is the essence of a system of "rule

by law," where the law is a tool of the state, as opposed to the "rule of law," where the state itself is subject to the law.


IV. The Engine of Governance: Ideology and Policy-Making


The governance of China is driven by a combination of an evolving official ideology, a structured long-term planning process, and a complex interplay between central authorities and local governments.


The Evolution of Guiding Ideology


The CCP's ideology is not a static dogma but has evolved pragmatically to meet the challenges of different eras, serving as the official justification for major policy shifts.27 This adaptability is a key source of the Party's resilience.

  • Mao Zedong Thought: The foundational ideology of the PRC emphasized perpetual class struggle, revolutionary zeal, and the rapid establishment of a socialist system through mass mobilization.27 This ideology drove radical and tumultuous campaigns like the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution, which, despite their disastrous consequences, fundamentally reshaped Chinese society.29

  • Deng Xiaoping Theory: Following Mao's death, this theory marked a profound ideological and practical shift. By championing the principle of "seeking truth from facts," it de-emphasized dogmatic class struggle and re-centered the Party's work on the primary task of economic development.30 This theory provided the crucial ideological foundation for the "Reform and Opening Up" policy, which introduced market mechanisms into a socialist framework under the novel concept of a "socialist market economy".32 It argued that China was in the "primary stage of socialism" and needed to use market forces to develop its productive capacity.32

  • Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era: This is the current official ideology and represents another major recalibration. It reasserts the absolute centrality of Party leadership over all aspects of society and governance.34 It integrates economic goals with a strong emphasis on national security, technological self-reliance, and the "great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation".34 It also promotes a "people-centered" approach to development and seeks to create a "shared faith" in the Party's mission, ensuring it remains the "strong leadership core" for China's future.35

The dramatic shifts in ideology from Mao to Deng to Xi are not signs of ideological inconsistency but rather of pragmatic adaptation aimed at preserving the CCP's rule. The CCP's original legitimacy was based on its revolutionary success. The economic and social failures of the late Maoist era severely eroded this legitimacy, creating a crisis of confidence. Deng Xiaoping Theory was a masterstroke of ideological reframing; it allowed the Party to abandon failed Maoist economic policies while claiming to be a better, more practical interpreter of Marxism, thereby justifying market reforms.30 The new source of legitimacy became performance: delivering rapid economic growth and raising the living standards of hundreds of millions of people. As China now faces new challenges—slowing growth, vast inequality, environmental degradation, and increased international hostility—Xi Jinping Thought represents another adaptation. It seeks to build a new, more robust basis for legitimacy rooted in national pride, social stability, Party discipline, and the powerful narrative of "national rejuvenation" 34, moving beyond a model based purely on economic performance. This demonstrates that ideology in China is not a rigid set of beliefs but a flexible political tool used to rationalize policy, mobilize the population, and, above all, ensure the continued political monopoly of the CCP.


The Policy-Making Process


The process of creating and implementing policy in China is a multi-layered system characterized by top-down strategic direction and bottom-up experimentation.

  • Five-Year Plans: At the highest level, policy is guided by Five-Year Plans, which are comprehensive strategic documents that set the major social and economic development goals for the nation.36 These plans, a legacy of the Soviet model, provide a roadmap for the entire bureaucracy. The current 14th Five-Year Plan (2021-2025), for example, prioritizes "high-quality development" over sheer speed of growth, with a focus on technological innovation and self-reliance, green development and carbon reduction targets, and the "dual circulation" strategy, which aims to strengthen the domestic economy and make it less reliant on international markets.37

  • Leading Small Groups (LSGs): These are powerful and flexible interagency committees that are crucial for coordinating policy-making and implementation across China's vast and often fragmented bureaucracy.40 LSGs cut across government, party, and military systems, bringing key officials together to forge consensus and issue high-level guiding principles (
    fangzhen) on major policy issues.40 Under Xi Jinping, who personally chairs many of the most important LSGs (such as those for comprehensively deepening reform and national security), their role has expanded significantly, serving as a key mechanism for centralizing policy control at the very top.41

  • Fragmented Authoritarianism and Bargaining: While the top leadership sets the strategic direction, the process of formulating specific policies often involves intense bargaining and negotiation among competing ministries, commissions, and local governments, each with its own bureaucratic interests, resources, and priorities.43 This dynamic, often described as "fragmented authoritarianism," can lead to a "disjointed, protracted and incremental policy process" as different parts of the state apparatus jockey for influence and resources.43


Central-Local Government Relations


Ruling a country of China's continental size and vast population has always required a careful balance between central control and local discretion.44

  • Administrative Divisions: The country is divided into 34 province-level administrative divisions, which fall into four main types: provinces (23), autonomous regions (5), municipalities directly under the central government (4), and special administrative regions (2).45 Each type has a different relationship with the central government. While provinces exercise significant autonomy over local economic policies, autonomous regions (created for major ethnic minority groups) are granted more legislative rights in theory.46 The municipalities (Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin, Chongqing) are massive urban centers with the same administrative rank as provinces.46 Finally, the Special Administrative Regions of Hong Kong and Macau operate under the "One Country, Two Systems" principle, which grants them a high degree of autonomy over their own economic, legal, and political systems.46

  • Tension and Conflict: A constant tension exists between the priorities of the central government in Beijing (e.g., maintaining fiscal stability, controlling inflation, meeting environmental targets) and the interests of local governments (e.g., maximizing local GDP growth, attracting investment, and increasing local revenue).44 This can lead to conflicts and behaviors at the local level that contradict or undermine central initiatives, creating a persistent governance challenge for the leadership.44


Division Type

Number

Governing Body (Typical)

Degree of Autonomy

Province (省)

23

Provincial Party Committee & Provincial Government

Significant autonomy over local economic policy and implementation.46

Autonomous Region (自治区)

5

Regional Party Committee & Regional Government

More legislative rights than provinces; leadership positions are often held by members of the titular ethnic group.11

Municipality (直辖市)

4

Municipal Party Committee & Municipal Government

Highest level of city classification, equal in rank to provinces; includes large urban and surrounding rural areas.46

Special Administrative Region (SAR) (特别行政区)

2

Chief Executive & Local Government

High degree of autonomy under "One Country, Two Systems"; maintain separate legal systems, currencies, and customs territories.46


V. The Instruments of State Power: Economic and Social Control


The Chinese government employs a wide array of instruments to manage the economy and maintain social stability, combining state-led capitalism with sophisticated technological systems of surveillance and control.


Economic Management and State Capitalism


The state plays a dominant and directive role in the economy, utilizing industrial policy and a vast network of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) to achieve national strategic objectives.47

  • The Role of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs): SOEs remain a pillar of the Chinese economy, accounting for approximately 25% of the national GDP.48 They dominate strategic sectors such as energy, telecommunications, banking, and defense, and 85 of the 135 Chinese companies on the 2023 Fortune Global 500 list are state-owned.48 SOEs are crucial instruments for implementing national industrial policy (e.g., Made in China 2025), developing critical infrastructure, providing social stability through mass employment, and spearheading international economic initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative.48 They also serve a redistributive function by channeling investment into China's less developed interior provinces.48

  • Industrial Policy and its Costs: The government directs the economy through extensive industrial policies, using tools like cash subsidies, tax benefits, and subsidized credit to support favored sectors and companies. This support is estimated to have a fiscal cost equivalent to around 4% of China's GDP annually.47 While this state-led approach has produced some notable successes, such as in the electric vehicle (EV) industry, it has also led to massive systemic problems. These include severe overcapacity, as seen in the EV and battery sectors, significant misallocation of resources, and widespread inefficiency.47 Research indicates that government-supported firms and SOEs often perform worse than their more market-oriented private counterparts, and this misallocation is estimated to reduce China's aggregate total factor productivity by about 1.2%, potentially lowering the level of GDP by up to 2% relative to a baseline without such distortions.47

Under Xi Jinping, the CCP has systematically expanded its control and oversight of the private sector, deliberately blurring the lines between public and private enterprise. This represents a significant evolution of the party-state model. The "Reform and Opening Up" era created a dynamic private sector that became the engine of China's economic miracle, but this also created a potential alternative power base outside of direct Party control. The CCP under Xi views this separation as a systemic risk. The response has not been to crush the private sector but to fuse it with the party-state. This is achieved through mechanisms such as the mandatory establishment of Party cells within private companies, revising corporate governance codes to require support for Party-building activities, and using state capital to take equity stakes in private firms.50 These measures are designed to ensure that private firms, while pursuing profit, also align their activities with and serve the Party's broader strategic objectives. For international actors, this fusion has profound implications. It means that even a nominally "private" Chinese firm has a limited ability to reject CCP requests for information, data access, or direct cooperation, as its operations are intertwined with the party-state's interests and authority.50 This reality complicates global supply chains, data security, and national security assessments for countries and companies engaging with China.


Social Governance and Control


The government has developed and deployed some of the world's most sophisticated technological systems to monitor its population, control the flow of information, and enforce social norms.

  • The Social Credit System (SCS): This is a national system of record-keeping, blacklisting, and "redlisting" (rewarding) designed to evaluate the "trustworthiness" of individuals, companies, and government institutions.51 Contrary to a common misconception in the West, it is not a single, unified "score" that dictates a citizen's life.51 Instead, it operates through a series of distinct blacklists for various infractions and "redlists" for exemplary behavior.51 Punishments for being placed on a blacklist—for example, for failing to comply with a court order to repay a debt—are concrete and can include being barred from booking flights or high-speed train tickets, public shaming (with names and ID numbers displayed in public spaces), and ineligibility for government jobs or certain licenses.52 The stated aim of the system is to enhance societal trust, combat fraud, and improve the enforcement of laws.51 In practice, it functions as a powerful tool of digital social control, using data to regulate behavior and enforce compliance with state directives.52

  • The "Great Firewall" and Internet Censorship: The PRC operates the world's most extensive and sophisticated system of internet censorship, popularly known as the "Great Firewall".56 This system is a combination of legislative actions and a wide array of technologies, including IP blocking, DNS injection, and deep packet inspection to filter for sensitive keywords.58 It is used to block access to thousands of selected foreign websites (including Google, Twitter, Facebook, and Wikipedia) and to censor domestic online content that is deemed to subvert state power, undermine national unity, or is otherwise critical of the CCP and its policies.56 This system effectively creates a national intranet, insulating the domestic information environment, limiting citizens' access to foreign information sources, and allowing the state to shape public discourse to a significant degree.60


VI. China on the World Stage: Foreign Policy and Global Ambitions


As its economic and military power has grown, the People's Republic of China has pursued an increasingly ambitious and assertive foreign policy, seeking to reshape the international environment to better suit its interests and values.


Core Interests and Foreign Policy Goals


China's foreign policy is officially guided by the goal of preserving its "core interests," which are defined as: maintaining the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party, ensuring national sovereignty and territorial integrity, and sustaining the country's economic development and social stability.61 Officially, China claims to "unswervingly pursue an independent foreign policy of peace".62 Under the leadership of Xi Jinping, this vision has been articulated through the grand concept of building a "global community of shared future," which promotes a vision of common development and shared interests under a more multipolar global order.63


The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)


The Belt and Road Initiative is China's signature foreign policy and its primary vehicle for global economic and infrastructure development.64 Launched in 2013, it is a massive, multi-trillion-dollar strategy to connect China with over 150 countries across Asia, Europe, Africa, and Latin America through a network of overland corridors (the "Belt") and maritime routes (the "Road").65

The BRI's five officially stated goals are policy coordination, infrastructure connectivity, unimpeded trade, financial integration, and people-to-people bonds.64 Strategically, the initiative serves multiple purposes for Beijing: it creates new markets for Chinese firms and exports excess industrial capacity, secures access to critical natural resources and energy, increases China's economic and political influence in participating countries, and offers a state-led alternative to the development models promoted by Western nations and institutions.66 The initiative has been met with both enthusiasm from developing countries seeking infrastructure investment and suspicion from others, particularly the United States and its allies, who raise concerns about debt sustainability, lack of transparency, and the geopolitical leverage it grants Beijing.67


Territorial Disputes


China is party to numerous territorial disputes, many of which stem from unclear historical boundaries and the legacy of colonialism in Asia.61 Its approach to resolving these disputes varies significantly between its land borders and its maritime claims.

  • Land Disputes: China has successfully resolved 12 of its 14 land border disputes through bilateral negotiations.69 In many of these settlements, such as those with Central Asian republics, China made substantial compromises, often accepting less territory than it had originally claimed.61 This pragmatic approach was likely motivated by a strategic desire to secure its borders, foster stability in neighboring regions, and prevent internal instability in its own ethnically diverse frontier regions.61 The two remaining unresolved land disputes are with India (over Aksai Chin and Arunachal Pradesh) and Bhutan.62

  • Maritime Disputes: In stark contrast to its approach on land, China has been far more assertive in its maritime disputes in the South China Sea and the East China Sea. It has actively sought to revise the territorial status quo in its favor.71 Beijing claims sovereignty over nearly the entire South China Sea under its expansive "nine-dash line," a claim that antagonizes competing claimants such as the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia, and Brunei, and which was rejected in a 2016 international arbitration ruling that China has ignored.62 To enforce its claims, China has engaged in a massive campaign of land reclamation, building and militarizing artificial islands with airstrips, ports, and missile systems, and using its coast guard and maritime militia to harass the vessels of other claimant states.72


Reshaping Global Governance


China is pursuing a sophisticated, multipronged strategy to increase its influence over the institutions and norms of global governance.73 This approach is not one of simple opposition to the existing order, but rather a dual-track strategy of selective integration and revisionism.

China has benefited immensely from the post-World War II global order, particularly in terms of trade and economic integration through institutions like the World Trade Organization. A complete overthrow of this system would be counterproductive to its own development goals. Therefore, China actively participates in and supports existing institutions where they align with its interests, such as in global trade, climate agreements, and UN peacekeeping.73 This represents the "integrationist" track of its foreign policy.

However, certain core elements of the global order directly challenge China's domestic political system and core interests. These include liberal norms regarding human rights, democracy, freedom of the press, and an open internet. In these areas, China pursues a "revisionist" track. It works to weaken or reinterpret these norms within existing institutions, for example, by promoting the concept of "cyber sovereignty" at the United Nations to legitimize state control over the internet.73 Simultaneously, it builds parallel, China-led institutions, such as the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), that operate on its own terms, emphasizing state sovereignty, non-interference in internal affairs, and state-led development models.73 This pragmatic dual strategy allows China to reap the benefits of globalization while simultaneously insulating its authoritarian system from perceived external threats and gradually shaping the international environment to be more conducive to its own values and priorities.


VII. An External Assessment: International Critiques and Human Rights


The Chinese government's official narrative of its political system stands in stark contrast to assessments made by major international human rights organizations, which document a system of widespread and systematic repression.


Systematic Repression of Fundamental Freedoms


Organizations such as Human Rights Watch (HRW) and Amnesty International consistently describe the PRC as an authoritarian state where fundamental freedoms are severely curtailed.75 Their reports document the absence of an independent civil society and the denial of freedom of expression, association, peaceful assembly, and religion.75 The period under Xi Jinping's rule has been characterized by a deepening of repression across the country, the creation of a vast high-tech surveillance state to achieve total social control, and an intense attack on the global system for defending human rights.4


Crimes Against Humanity in Xinjiang


There is a strong international consensus among human rights groups, UN experts, and several governments that the Chinese government's policies in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region amount to crimes against humanity.77 This assessment is based on evidence of the mass arbitrary detention of more than one million Uyghurs and other Turkic Muslims in a network of internment camps, where they are subjected to political indoctrination.79 Widespread and credible reports document the use of torture, forced labor, forced sterilization and abortions, and a systematic campaign to eradicate the ethnic, cultural, and religious identity of these groups.75


Repression in Tibet and Hong Kong


Authorities impose similarly heavy-handed control in Tibet, where policies are aimed at suppressing Tibetan culture, language, and religion.80 The government has implemented a coercive residential school system for Tibetan children and severely punishes individuals who maintain contact with Tibetans abroad or express dissent online.80

In Hong Kong, the central government's imposition of a sweeping National Security Law in 2020 has been used to systematically dismantle the city's long-protected freedoms and autonomy.77 The law has led to the arrest of hundreds of pro-democracy activists, politicians, and journalists; the closure of independent media outlets and civil society organizations; and the erosion of the "One Country, Two Systems" framework that was supposed to guarantee the city's way of life.80


Weaponization of the Legal System


Amnesty International has concluded that China's courts are systematically weaponized as "tools of systematic repression rather than justice".25 Vague and overly broad national security laws, with charges such as "subversion of state power," "inciting subversion," and "picking quarrels and provoking trouble," are routinely used to criminalize peaceful speech, activism, and any form of international engagement deemed undesirable by the state.25 Fair trial rights are systematically violated. Defendants in politically sensitive cases are often held incommunicado for months, sometimes under a system of enforced disappearance known as "Residential Surveillance at a Designated Location" (RSDL), denied access to lawyers of their own choosing, and subjected to coerced confessions. Allegations of torture are routinely dismissed by courts without investigation.25


Transnational Repression


The Chinese government's efforts to silence dissent are not confined within its borders. It engages in a sophisticated and global campaign of transnational repression, targeting critics, activists, and members of ethnic minority groups living abroad.4 These tactics include digital threats, harassment and intimidation of individuals and their family members still in China, and surveillance of students at foreign universities, creating a chilling effect on diaspora communities and academic freedom in other countries.75

These external assessments reveal a fundamental conflict between the nature of China's domestic political system and its desire for global leadership and respect. The country's foreign policy aims to project an image of a responsible, peaceful power building a "community of shared future".62 However, its domestic governance model is based on principles—the absolute supremacy of the Party, the systematic suppression of dissent, the absence of the rule of law, and the persecution of minorities—that are antithetical to the liberal democratic values that underpin much of the current international order. This creates a deep credibility gap. The severe human rights abuses detailed by international observers undermine China's soft power and generate suspicion and pushback against its global initiatives like the BRI.67 Furthermore, the extension of its domestic repressive tactics abroad is perceived by other nations not as legitimate diplomacy but as a direct infringement on their own sovereignty and a threat to their citizens. The very tools the CCP uses to ensure its absolute security and control at home are thus becoming the biggest obstacles to achieving its goals of trusted global leadership abroad. This contradiction is a central dynamic shaping China's relationship with the world.


VIII. Conclusion: The Resilience and Contradictions of the Chinese Model


The government of the People's Republic of China is a highly sophisticated and resilient authoritarian system. Its core feature is the complete fusion of the Chinese Communist Party and the state, a party-state model where a Leninist political structure exercises absolute and comprehensive control over all levers of national power. This system has demonstrated remarkable flexibility, pragmatically adapting its guiding ideology from revolutionary fervor to developmentalism to nationalist rejuvenation in order to maintain its legitimacy and monopoly on power.

The model's strengths are evident in its ability to mobilize national resources for strategic long-term goals, implement large-scale infrastructure projects, and maintain a high degree of social stability through extensive and technologically advanced control mechanisms. This capacity has enabled decades of unprecedented economic growth that has lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty.33 However, the system's weaknesses are equally profound. They include a complete lack of political accountability and institutionalized checks on power, the systematic violation of fundamental human rights, the stifling of civil society and individual expression, and significant economic inefficiencies that stem from politically-driven resource allocation and industrial policy.47

Under the leadership of Xi Jinping, the system has trended decisively towards greater centralization of power, heightened ideological control, and a more assertive and often confrontational international posture. The key challenge for the future is whether this model of technologically-enhanced "digital authoritarianism" 5 can successfully navigate mounting internal pressures—including a structural economic slowdown, pressing demographic challenges, and growing social expectations—and increasing external resistance to its repressive domestic policies and revisionist foreign policy. The inherent contradiction between the CCP's paramount need for absolute domestic control and its ambitious quest for global influence and leadership will be the defining feature of the Chinese government's trajectory in the 21st century.

Works cited

  1. OSW Report | The Chinese Communist Party and its state. Xi Jinping's conservative turn, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.osw.waw.pl/sites/default/files/REPORT_The-Chinese-Communist-Party_net.pdf

  2. Government of China - Wikipedia, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_of_China

  3. China Primer: China's Political System - Congress.gov, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF12505

  4. Chinese Government Poses Global Threat to Human Rights, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/01/14/chinese-government-poses-global-threat-human-rights

  5. Global China: Domestic politics and foreign policy - Brookings Institution, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/global-china-domestic-politics-and-foreign-policy/

  6. Chinese Communist Party - Wikipedia, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Communist_Party

  7. article 15 of the common program of the people's republic of china 1949-1954, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.commonprogram.science/art15.html

  8. Democratic Centralism in Revolutionary China: Tensions within a People's Democratic Dictatorship - Scirp.org., accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=79608

  9. Order of precedence in China - Wikipedia, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_precedence_in_China

  10. General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party - Wikipedia, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Secretary_of_the_Chinese_Communist_Party

  11. The National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China, accessed on October 4, 2025, http://www.npc.gov.cn/zgrdw/englishnpc/stateStructure/node_3826.htm

  12. Politburo Standing Committee of the Chinese Communist Party - Wikipedia, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politburo_Standing_Committee_of_the_Chinese_Communist_Party

  13. Central Military Commission (China) - Wikipedia, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Military_Commission_(China)

  14. The Politburo Standing Committee under Hu Jintao - Hoover Institution, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.hoover.org/sites/default/files/research/docs/CLM35AM.pdf

  15. China's State Organizational Structure - CECC.gov, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.cecc.gov/chinas-state-organizational-structure

  16. en.wikipedia.org, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_People%27s_Congress#:~:text=Under%20China's%20Constitution%2C%20the%20NPC,the%20Supreme%20People's%20Procuratorate%2C%20the

  17. The National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China, accessed on October 4, 2025, http://www.npc.gov.cn/zgrdw/englishnpc/Special_11_2/2007-11/15/content_1471912.htm

  18. en.wikipedia.org, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Council_of_China#:~:text=Constitutionally%2C%20the%20main%20functions%20of,budget%20for%20deliberation%20and%20approval

  19. The President and Vice-President of the People's Republic of China are elected by the National People's Congress., accessed on October 4, 2025, http://www.npc.gov.cn/zgrdw/englishnpc/stateStructure/2007-12/06/content_1382097.htm

  20. www.npc.gov.cn, accessed on October 4, 2025, http://www.npc.gov.cn/zgrdw/englishnpc/stateStructure/2007-12/06/content_1382097.htm#:~:text=The%20President%20of%20the%20People's%20Republic%20of%20China%2C%20in%20pursuance,Auditor%2DGeneral%20and%20the%20Secretary%2D

  21. The National People's Congress of the People's Republic of China, accessed on October 4, 2025, http://www.npc.gov.cn/zgrdw/englishnpc/stateStructure/2007-12/06/content_1382076.htm

  22. uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/0-530-5897?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)#:~:text=The%20SPP's%20functions%20include%3A,public%20prosecutor%20in%20criminal%20cases.

  23. China's judiciary 2022 - Safeguard Defenders, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://safeguarddefenders.com/en/blog/chinas-judiciary-2022

  24. High rates of prosecution and conviction in China: The use of passive coping strategies, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/261185102_High_rates_of_prosecution_and_conviction_in_China_The_use_of_passive_coping_strategies

  25. China: Courts used as tools of systematic repression against human rights defenders, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2025/10/china-courts-used-as-tools-of-systematic-repression-against-human-rights-defenders/

  26. People's Republic of China: Establishing the rule of law and respect for human rights - Amnesty International, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.amnesty.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/asa170522002en.pdf

  27. Official Ideology in the People's Republic of China - Evolution and Impact on Foreign Policy, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/html/tr/ADA349755/index.html

  28. Ideology of the Chinese Communist Party - Wikipedia, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideology_of_the_Chinese_Communist_Party

  29. Chinese Communist Party (CCP) | History & Party Structure - Britannica, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Chinese-Communist-Party

  30. Party Constitution, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.idcpc.org.cn/english2023/tjzl/cpcjj/PartyConstitution/

  31. QuQingshan:Deng Xiaoping Theory and its Practical Significance-ACADEMY OF MARXISM CHINESE ACADEMY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, accessed on October 4, 2025, http://marxism.cass.cn/en/ScholarsProfiles/202312/t20231219_5719367.shtml

  32. Deng Xiaoping Theory - Wikipedia, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deng_Xiaoping_Theory

  33. Reform and opening up - Wikipedia, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reform_and_opening_up

  34. Xi Jinping Thought - Wikipedia, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xi_Jinping_Thought

  35. Fact Sheet on the Education Campaign on the Study and Implementation of Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.idcpc.gov.cn/english2023/dzwk/zgkx/202307/P020230717028713963011.pdf

  36. Five-year plans of China - Wikipedia, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five-year_plans_of_China

  37. Fourteenth five-year plan, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteenth_five-year_plan

  38. The 14th Five-Year Plan of the People's Republic of China—Fostering High-Quality Development | Asian Development Bank, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.adb.org/publications/14th-five-year-plan-high-quality-development-prc

  39. China's 14th Five-Year Plan – strengthening the domestic base to become a superpower, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://merics.org/en/comment/chinas-14th-five-year-plan-strengthening-domestic-base-become-superpower

  40. Leading Small Group - Wikipedia, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leading_Small_Group

  41. Xi's Signature Governance Innovation: The Rise of Leading Small Groups - CSIS, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.csis.org/analysis/xis-signature-governance-innovation-rise-leading-small-groups

  42. THE IMPORTANCE OF LEADING SMALL GROUPS, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://orcasia.org/article/203/the-importance-of-leading-small-groups

  43. Policy Making in China: Leaders, Structures, And Processes. By ..., accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/5C63B4F0CF7D0B0A27E25B1A218895EB/S0305741000013540a.pdf/policy_making_in_china_leaders_structures_and_processes_by_kenneth_lieberthal_and_michel_oksenberg_princeton_nj_princeton_university_press_1988_445_pp_us3995.pdf

  44. Introduction: Understanding central-local relations in China - InK@SMU.edu.sg, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/context/soss_research/article/3289/viewcontent/Understanding_Central_Local_Relations_China_intro.pdf

  45. Province-level divisions of China - Wikipedia, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Province-level_divisions_of_China

  46. Provinces And Administrative Divisions Of China - World Atlas, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/provinces-and-administrative-divisions-of-china.html

  47. Chinese Industrial Policy Is an Anchor, Not an Engine, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://thedispatch.com/newsletter/capitolism/chinese-industrial-policy-downsides-drag-economy/

  48. State-owned enterprises of China - Wikipedia, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State-owned_enterprises_of_China

  49. state-owned enterprises in the chinese economy today: - University of Alberta, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.ualberta.ca/en/china-institute/media-library/media-gallery/research/policy-papers/soepaper1-2018.pdf

  50. Fused Together: The Chinese Communist Party Moves Inside China's Private Sector, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.cna.org/our-media/indepth/2024/09/fused-together-the-chinese-communist-party-moves-inside-chinas-private-sector

  51. Social Credit System - Wikipedia, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Credit_System

  52. Social Control in the Digital Transformation of Society: A Case Study ..., accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/6/229

  53. CHINA'S SOCIAL CREDIT SYSTEM - Bertelsmann Stiftung, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/aam/Asia-Book_A_03_China_Social_Credit_System.pdf

  54. CHINA'S SOCIAL CREDIT SYSTEM - ORCA | Organisation for Research on China and Asia, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://orcasia.org/chinas-social-credit-system

  55. Big data and the social credit system: The security consequences - Canada.ca, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.canada.ca/en/security-intelligence-service/corporate/publications/china-and-the-age-of-strategic-rivalry/big-data-and-the-social-credit-system-the-security-consequences.html

  56. Internet censorship in China - Wikipedia, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_censorship_in_China

  57. China's Great Firewall - Stanford Computer Science, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/cs181/projects/2010-11/FreeExpressionVsSocialCohesion/china_policy.html

  58. Great Firewall - Wikipedia, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Firewall

  59. The complete guide to the Great Firewall of China (GFoC), accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.goclickchina.com/insights/the-complete-guide-to-the-great-firewall-of-china-gfoc/

  60. The Chinese Firewall - Internet Society, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/internet-fragmentation/the-chinese-firewall/

  61. Territorial disputes of the People's Republic of China - Wikipedia, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Territorial_disputes_of_the_People%27s_Republic_of_China

  62. Foreign relations of China - Wikipedia, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_relations_of_China

  63. The Belt and Road Initiative: A Key Pillar of the Global Community of Shared Future, accessed on October 4, 2025, http://www.beltandroadforum.org/english/n101/2023/1010/c124-895.html

  64. About the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) - Green Finance & Development Center, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://greenfdc.org/belt-and-road-initiative-about/

  65. Belt and Road Initiative - Wikipedia, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belt_and_Road_Initiative

  66. China's “One Belt, One Road” Initiative: Economic Issues - Congress.gov, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IF11735

  67. What is China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)? - Chatham House, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.chathamhouse.org/2021/09/what-chinas-belt-and-road-initiative-bri

  68. Belt and Road Initiative | Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://carnegieendowment.org/china/belt-and-road-initiative

  69. Chinese Historical experience in settling territorial Issues on Land and the Implications in Handling Maritime territorial Disputes, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.iiss.pku.edu.cn/fj/PDF/ciss_cn/upload/docs/2021-04-26/doc_4481619405094.pdf

  70. Regime Insecurity and International Cooperation: Explaining China's Compromises in Territorial Disputes - Belfer Center, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/regime-insecurity-and-international-cooperation-explaining-chinas-compromises

  71. China's Use of Force in Territorial Disputes: Discontinuities Between Land and Sea, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://jpia.princeton.edu/news/china%E2%80%99s-use-force-territorial-disputes-discontinuities-between-land-and-sea

  72. Territorial Disputes in the South China Sea | Global Conflict Tracker, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/territorial-disputes-south-china-sea

  73. China's Approach to Global Governance | Council on Foreign ..., accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.cfr.org/china-global-governance/

  74. China's New Concept of Global Governance and Action Plan for International Cooperation, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.cigionline.org/static/documents/documents/no.233.pdf

  75. World Report 2025: China | Human Rights Watch, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2025/country-chapters/china

  76. China - Amnesty International USA, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.amnestyusa.org/countries/china/

  77. China and Tibet | Country Page | World - Human Rights Watch, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/asia/china-and-tibet

  78. World Report 2023: China | Human Rights Watch, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2023/country-chapters/china

  79. China's Disregard for Human Rights - United States Department of State, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://2017-2021.state.gov/chinas-disregard-for-human-rights/

  80. Human rights in China - Amnesty International, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.amnesty.org/en/location/asia-and-the-pacific/east-asia/china/report-china/

  81. World Report 2024: China | Human Rights Watch, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/world-report/2024/country-chapters/china

  82. The Chinese Communist Party | Council on Foreign Relations, accessed on October 4, 2025, https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinese-communist-party