Operation Al-Aqsa Flood: A Comprehensive Strategic, Operational, and Humanitarian Analysis of the October 7, 2023 Assault
Executive Summary
On October 7, 2023, the paramilitary forces of Hamas, led by the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, executed a coordinated, multi-domain assault on the State of Israel, codenamed "Operation Al-Aqsa Flood" (Amaliyyat Tufan al-Aqsa). This operation, characterized by its unprecedented scale and operational secrecy, resulted in the deadliest day in Israel's history since its independence in 1948 and the largest loss of Jewish life in a single day since the Holocaust.1 The assault shattered the long-standing Israeli strategic doctrine known as "The Concept," which posited that Hamas was deterred and prioritized governance over conflict, and precipitated a regional war with profound geopolitical consequences.
The operation involved the simultaneous breach of the Gaza-Israel security barrier at over 60 locations, the infiltration of approximately 3,000 militants into southern Israel, and a massive rocket barrage that saturated Israel's air defense systems. The assailants targeted civilian communities, military bases, and a music festival, resulting in approximately 1,200 deaths, thousands of injuries, and the abduction of 251 hostages into the Gaza Strip.3 This report provides an exhaustive analysis of the strategic precursors, the intelligence failure, the tactical execution of the assault, the specific battles for control of the "Gaza Envelope" (Otef Aza), the humanitarian atrocities committed, and the immediate Israeli response.
Part I: Strategic Context and the Collapse of Deterrence
To understand the mechanics and success of the October 7 assault, one must first analyze the geopolitical environment and the psychological framework that governed Israeli decision-making in the years leading up to the attack. The event was not merely a tactical surprise but the result of a collision between Hamas's long-term strategic planning and Israel's rigid adherence to a flawed security paradigm.
1.1 The Geopolitical Catalyst: The Saudi Normalization Factor
While Hamas publicly framed the operation as a response to the 16-year blockade of Gaza and perceived Israeli violations at the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound 5, intelligence assessments suggest that the timing was heavily influenced by broader regional dynamics. Throughout 2023, the United States was actively brokering a landmark normalization agreement between Israel and Saudi Arabia. Such a deal threatened to fundamentally reshape the Middle East's security architecture, integrating Israel into the Arab fold and potentially marginalizing the Palestinian cause permanently.6
Hamas leadership, along with its patrons in Tehran, viewed this potential normalization as a strategic threat. The "normalization train," as described by Hamas leaders, risked bypassing the Palestinian issue entirely, treating Israel as a legitimate regional entity without requiring concessions on Palestinian statehood.8 Analysis indicates that disrupting this diplomatic breakthrough was a primary objective. By launching a war of such brutality that it would necessitate a devastating Israeli military response, Hamas sought to inflame Arab public opinion and make it politically impossible for the Saudi leadership to proceed with the deal.9 The assault was thus calculated to re-center the Palestinian issue on the global stage, forcing regional actors to choose sides in a polarized conflict rather than pursuing integration.
1.2 Internal Israeli Division and Perceived Weakness
Simultaneously, Israel was grappling with severe internal sociopolitical turmoil. throughout 2023, the country was convulsed by mass protests against judicial reform proposals advanced by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government. These divisions penetrated the military, with thousands of reservists threatening to refuse service. This internal chaos was closely monitored by Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran, who interpreted it as a sign of the "disintegration" of the Zionist entity.11 Public statements from the "Axis of Resistance" indicated a belief that Israel was at its weakest point in decades, distracted by internal strife and losing its deterrent edge. This perception of fragility likely accelerated Hamas's decision to strike, believing that the Israeli society would crumble under the shock of a massive invasion.
1.3 The Intelligence Failure: "The Concept" (HaKontzeptzia)
The operational success of October 7 was predicated on a catastrophic failure of Israeli intelligence, often compared to the surprise of the 1973 Yom Kippur War. This failure was rooted not in a lack of information—Israel possesses one of the world's most sophisticated surveillance networks—but in a cognitive bias known within the defense establishment as "The Concept" (HaKontzeptzia).
The Pillar of Stability Assumption
The prevailing assessment among the Military Intelligence Directorate (Aman) and political leadership was that Hamas had been successfully deterred. The logic held that Hamas, as the de facto sovereign of Gaza, was prioritizing economic stability and governance over jihad. Israel had facilitated the transfer of Qatari funds to pay civil servant salaries and had issued thousands of work permits for Gazans to enter Israel, believing that these economic incentives served as a "golden cage" that would restrain Hamas from risking a major war.12 This assumption led analysts to interpret Hamas's military preparations not as signs of an imminent invasion, but as performative signaling for domestic consumption or negotiation leverage.
The "Jericho Wall" Blueprint
The most glaring evidence of this cognitive failure is the existence of a detailed Hamas battle plan, code-named "Jericho Wall," which Israeli intelligence had obtained more than a year prior to the attack.14 This 40-page document outlined a devastating invasion of southern Israel with chilling accuracy. It called for:
An opening barrage of rockets to provide cover.
The use of drones to neutralize security cameras and automated machine guns.
The infiltration of gunmen into Israel en masse via paragliders and motorcycles.
The specific targeting of the Gaza Division headquarters and civilian communities.14
Despite the document effectively serving as a script for October 7, senior analysts dismissed it. The plan was categorized as "aspirational" and beyond Hamas's actual operational capabilities.15 When a veteran analyst in Unit 8200 warned in July 2023 that Hamas was conducting a major training exercise that perfectly mirrored the "Jericho Wall" plan—including practicing the takeover of a mock kibbutz—her warnings were dismissed by senior officers as "imaginary scenarios".16 The belief that Hamas would not attack blinded intelligence chiefs to the evidence that Hamas could and was preparing to attack.
1.4 The Warning Signs: Unit 8200 and the Tatzpitaniot
In the months leading up to the assault, the most frantic warnings came from the lowest rungs of the intelligence hierarchy: the Tatzpitaniot (field observers) of the Border Defense Corps. These female soldiers, stationed in operations rooms monitoring the border cameras 24/7, reported highly suspicious activity. They documented Hamas fighters digging holes near the fence, training with explosives, and practicing hostage-taking scenarios. They noted that senior Hamas commanders, who usually visited the border area, had suddenly stopped appearing—a classic signature of operational security before an attack.18
Reports indicate that these warnings were systematically ignored, partly due to the rigid adherence to "The Concept" and, according to some critiques, an element of gender bias and institutional arrogance where senior male officers dismissed the concerns of young female observers.18 The spotters were reportedly told to stop raising the issue or face disciplinary action, a silencing that would have tragic consequences when their bases were the first to be overrun.
The Night of Red Flags (October 6-7)
In the late hours of October 6 and the early morning of October 7, technical indicators began to flash red. Israeli intelligence detected the simultaneous activation of hundreds of Israeli SIM cards by Hamas operatives in Gaza—a specific signature previously identified as a potential precursor to an attack, intended to allow fighters to communicate inside Israel.20
01:00 AM: Shin Bet Director Ronen Bar held urgent consultations regarding these signals.
03:30 AM: IDF Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi was briefed.
The Decision: The assessment remained that Hamas might be conducting a drill or planning a minor localized action. No general alert was raised to the border troops, the Nova festival was not cancelled, and the Air Force was not placed on high alert. A small Shin Bet "Tequila" team was dispatched to the south, but the massive military machine remained asleep.20
Part II: Operational Tactics and The Breach
2.1 The "Iron Wall" Illusion
Israel's defense strategy relied heavily on the "Iron Wall," a billion-dollar high-tech barrier completed in 2021. This barrier included an underground concrete wall to block tunnels, a 6-meter high surface fence, and a network of radar, cameras, and remote-controlled machine guns ("Sentry Tech").22 The system was designed to allow a small number of soldiers to monitor a vast area. However, this reliance on technology created a single point of failure: if the "eyes" (cameras) and "arms" (remote guns) were blinded, the physical fence was merely a wire obstacle.
2.2 The "Blinding" Phase
Hamas initiated the assault by systematically dismantling this technological advantage. At 06:29 AM, synchronized with the rocket barrage, Hamas launched a "blinding" operation:
Drone Warfare: Commercial quadcopters, modified to drop explosive payloads, hovered over IDF positions and dropped charges directly onto the communication towers and the "Sentry Tech" machine gun nests. This tactic, likely adapted from lessons observed in the Russia-Ukraine war, neutralized the remote weapons systems that were supposed to stop the initial wave.23
Sniper Teams: Simultaneously, Hamas sniper units targeted the optical sensors and cameras on the fence. Within minutes, the screens in the IDF observation rooms went black, leaving the commanders blind.25
2.3 The Breach and Infiltration Vectors
With the defensive systems neutralized, Hamas engineering units approached the fence. They used explosive charges and heavy bulldozers to blow gaps in the physical barrier. The fence was breached at approximately 60 different locations.25
The infiltration occurred in three distinct waves:
The Nukhba Wave: The first wave consisted of approximately 1,500 elite Nukhba commandos. Their mission was to storm military bases to decapitate the command structure and to seize civilian communities. They entered on motorcycles, pickup trucks, and via motorized paragliders that flew over the fence.27
The Secondary Wave: A second wave of fighters focused on consolidating control, taking hostages, and looting.
The Mob Wave: A third wave of unorganized armed groups (such as Palestinian Islamic Jihad) and civilians flooded through the breaches to loot and participate in the violence.29
The table below details the multi-vector nature of the infiltration and the primary targets associated with each vector.
Infiltration Vector
Mechanism
Primary Targets
Key Outcome
Land (Vehicular)
Motorcycles and pickup trucks through ~60 fence breaches created by explosives and bulldozers.
Civilian communities (Be'eri, Kfar Aza, Nir Oz), Sderot, Ofakim.
Allowed rapid, deep penetration into Israel (up to 25km).
Air (Paragliders)
Motorized paragliders flying over the barrier.
Nova Music Festival, Netiv HaAsara, IDF bases.
Bypassed checkpoints; psychological shock; ambush of reinforcements.
Sea (Naval)
Zodiac rubber boats launched toward Zikim Beach.
Zikim military base, Ashkelon power plant (attempted).
Mostly intercepted by Israeli Navy, but some landed at Zikim Beach initiating a massacre.
Land (Tunnel/Foot)
Limited use of offensive tunnels (most blocked by underground wall), primarily foot infiltration near Erez.
Erez Crossing, Nahal Oz outpost.
Capture of the Erez fortified facility; isolation of the northern sector.
2.4 Command and Control Collapse
The effectiveness of the Hamas plan was magnified by the immediate collapse of the IDF's command and control. The simultaneous attack on the Gaza Division headquarters at Re'im and the severing of communication lines meant that for the first several hours, the central command in Tel Aviv had no clear picture of the invasion. Brigade commanders were fighting for their lives or killed early in the battle (such as Col. Yonatan Steinberg of the Nahal Brigade and Col. Asaf Hamami of the Southern Brigade), leaving battalion and company-level units to fight in isolation without reinforcement or air support.30
Part III: The Battle for the Communities (The "Otef")
The true scale of the tragedy unfolded in the kibbutzim, moshavim, and towns of the "Gaza Envelope" (Otef Aza). In these tight-knit communities, residents and small civilian security squads (Kitat Konenut) fought desperate, lonely battles against overwhelming numbers of well-armed terrorists.
3.1 The Massacre at Kibbutz Be'eri
Kibbutz Be'eri, a community of approximately 1,100 residents, suffered one of the most devastating attacks. Nukhba forces infiltrated the kibbutz around 07:00 AM, entering from multiple directions. The local security team fought bravely but was quickly outgunned.
The Slaughter:
Terrorists moved systematically from house to house. When residents locked themselves in their reinforced safe rooms (mamad), the attackers set fire to the houses to force them out or suffocate them. Those who emerged were often shot or abducted. Over 100 residents (nearly 10% of the population) were killed, and 30 were taken hostage.29 The arrival of the first IDF reinforcements was delayed until after 09:00 AM, and significant forces did not engage until the afternoon.
The Pessi Cohen House and the Hannibal Directive:
One of the most controversial incidents of the day occurred at the home of resident Pessi Cohen, where Hamas militants held 14 Israeli hostages. As IDF forces, including the elite Yamam unit, surrounded the house, a standoff ensued. Brig. Gen. Barak Hiram, commander of the 99th Division, eventually ordered a tank to fire shells at the house to end the engagement. The resulting blasts and firefight killed 13 of the 14 hostages; only two people survived the incident (Yasmin Porat and Hadas Dagan). This event has sparked intense public and internal military debate regarding the application of the "Hannibal Directive"—a controversial doctrine aiming to prevent soldier abductions even at the risk of the captive's life—and whether it was applied to civilians in this instance.32
3.2 The Abandonment of Kibbutz Nir Oz
If Be'eri was a tragedy of overwhelming force, Nir Oz was a tragedy of total abandonment. The kibbutz was infiltrated at 06:49 AM. Unlike other locations where fierce battles raged, Nir Oz saw almost no IDF resistance for hours. The terrorists operated with impunity, looting homes, burning structures, and hunting residents.
IDF troops did not arrive at Nir Oz until 13:47 PM—nearly seven hours after the attack began and roughly 40 minutes after the last terrorists had already departed with their captives.30
The Result: Without military intervention, the kidnappers abducted 76 residents (roughly 20% of the community) and killed 46. Among those taken were the Bibas family—mother Shiri and her two young red-headed sons, Ariel (4) and Kfir (9 months)—whose abduction became a symbol of the hostage crisis.36
3.3 The Battle of Kfar Aza
At Kfar Aza, the attack began around 06:45 AM with paragliders landing inside the community, followed by a ground breach. The layout of the kibbutz, with its "Young Generation" neighborhood located close to the fence, made it particularly vulnerable. These young adults were slaughtered in their homes.
The battle for Kfar Aza was prolonged and chaotic. It took the IDF more than two days (until October 10) to fully clear the kibbutz of all terrorists, as small cells remained barricaded in homes. The aftermath revealed scenes of extreme brutality, with 62 residents killed and 19 abducted.37
3.4 The Battle of Sderot and the Police Station
In the city of Sderot, a squad of Nukhba terrorists targeted the local police station. They stormed the building, killing the officers inside and taking control of the upper floors. The station, a symbol of Israeli sovereignty, became a fortress for the attackers.
IDF and police forces engaged in a fierce, day-long gun battle to retake the station. With the terrorists refusing to surrender and commanding a strategic view of the city, the order was given to demolish the building. Tanks fired shells into the structure, and armored bulldozers eventually leveled the station with the terrorists still inside, ending the siege only on the morning of October 8.39
3.5 Ofakim and the Story of Rachel Edri
Hamas forces penetrated deep into Israeli territory, reaching the city of Ofakim, approximately 25 kilometers from the Gaza border.41 This depth of penetration shocked the Israeli defense establishment.
In Ofakim, five terrorists broke into the home of Rachel and David Edri, taking them hostage. In a display of remarkable psychological fortitude, Rachel Edri served the terrorists cookies, coffee, and a meal, engaging them in conversation and singing to keep them calm. She signaled to police outside by holding up five fingers to indicate the number of captors. Her actions bought time for the Yamam special forces to prepare a breach. After 20 hours, the forces stormed the house, killing the terrorists and rescuing the couple unharmed. Rachel Edri became a national folk hero for her resourcefulness.42
3.6 The Massacre at the Nova Music Festival
Perhaps the most iconic and horrifying event of the day was the massacre at the Supernova music festival near Kibbutz Re'im. Approximately 3,500 young people had gathered for an outdoor trance music party.
At 06:30 AM, the rocket fire caused the music to stop. As attendees attempted to flee in their cars, they created a traffic jam on Route 232. Terrorists, waiting in ambush along the road, opened fire on the trapped vehicles.
The Killing Fields:
Thousands fled on foot into the open fields and orchards. Terrorists on motorcycles hunted them down. Many hid in portable toilets, dumpsters, or under bushes, where they were executed. The festival site witnessed the highest death toll of any single location, with over 360 murdered and 40 abducted.44
Heroism: Stories of heroism emerged, such as that of Aner Shapira, an off-duty soldier who stood at the entrance of a crowded bomb shelter, catching and throwing back seven grenades lobbed by terrorists before the eighth killed him.47
Part IV: Humanitarian Impact and Atrocities
4.1 Casualties and Demographics
The assault resulted in a catastrophic loss of life, with the final death toll estimated at approximately 1,200 people. The demographic breakdown reveals the indiscriminate nature of the violence.
Civilians: The majority of casualties (over 800) were civilians, including children, the elderly, and entire families killed together.
Security Forces: 314 soldiers and 58 police officers were killed. Many died in the first wave of fighting or while attempting to rescue civilians without proper equipment.4
Foreign Nationals: The attack deeply affected the community of foreign agricultural workers, primarily from Thailand, who lived and worked in the kibbutzim. Approximately 30-39 Thai nationals were murdered, and over 30 were taken hostage. Other victims included citizens from Nepal (10 killed), the United States (31 killed), France, Russia, and Ukraine.48
The table below provides a detailed breakdown of the casualties by category and nationality, highlighting the international scope of the tragedy.
Category
Sub-Group
Estimated Fatalities
Notes
Israeli Civilians
Residents, Festival Goers
~800+
Includes children, elderly, and families. Highest toll at Nova Festival (~360).
Security Forces
IDF Soldiers
314
Includes senior officers (Col. Steinberg, Col. Hamami) and many female observers.
Israel Police
58
Includes officers defending Sderot station and Nova festival.
Shin Bet (ISA)
10
Agents killed in initial response.
Foreign Nationals
Thailand
33-39
Agricultural workers in Otef Aza. Largest foreign casualty group.
United States
31
Many dual citizens.
Ukraine
21
Russia
19
Dual citizens.
France
35
Nepal
10
Agricultural students/workers (e.g., at Alumim).
Total
~1,200
4.2 Sexual Violence as a Weapon of War
A particularly harrowing dimension of the assault was the widespread use of sexual violence. Initial reports from first responders (ZAKA) were later corroborated by comprehensive investigations.
UN Report: The UN Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict, Pramila Patten, released a report finding "reasonable grounds to believe" that conflict-related sexual violence occurred at multiple locations, including the Nova festival site and Road 232. The report documented incidents of rape and gang rape, often followed by the execution of the victim.52
Systematic vs. Opportunistic: The Association of Rape Crisis Centers in Israel (ARCCI) submitted a report arguing that the similarities in patterns across different locations—victims found undressed, bound, and mutilated in specific ways—indicate that sexual violence was a systematic operational strategy designed to weaponize trauma and humiliate the enemy, rather than merely isolated opportunistic acts by individual fighters.54
4.3 The Hostage Crisis
Hamas abducted 251 people, dragging them into the Gaza Strip. This hostage-taking was indiscriminate, violating international norms by targeting non-combatants.
Demographics: The hostages ranged in age from 9 months (Kfir Bibas) to 86 years. They included soldiers, peace activists, foreign workers, and entire families.3
Conditions: Freed hostages have described harsh conditions in the tunnels, including physical and psychological abuse, lack of medical care, and in some cases, sexual assault in captivity.52
Status: A week-long ceasefire in November 2023 saw the release of 105 hostages (mostly women, children, and foreign nationals) in exchange for Palestinian prisoners. As of late 2024, approximately 100 hostages remain in Gaza, with Israeli intelligence estimating that at least one-third are no longer alive.3
Part V: The Israeli Response and Strategic Aftermath
5.1 The Immediate Military Response
For the first 6 to 8 hours of the attack, the IDF's response was fragmented and chaotic. With the command chain severed, the defense of the south fell to "start-up" initiatives: retired generals driving south in private cars (such as Maj. Gen. Noam Tibon who rescued his son's family in Nahal Oz), individual tank crews engaging terrorists on their own initiative, and pilots launching airstrikes without ground controllers.56
It took approximately 48 hours for the IDF to regain full operational control of the border communities. By October 8, Sderot was cleared, but fighting in Be'eri and Kfar Aza continued until October 9-10.
5.2 Political Mobilization: The War Cabinet
On the political front, the attack necessitated an immediate suspension of the internal political divisions. On October 11, a National Emergency Government was formed. Benny Gantz's National Unity party joined Netanyahu's coalition, and a specialized "War Cabinet" was established to direct the war effort. This cabinet included Netanyahu, Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, and Benny Gantz, signaling a unified front to the Israeli public and the international community.58
5.3 The "Swords of Iron" Doctrine
Israel declared a state of war on October 7. The military response, dubbed Operation "Swords of Iron," marked a strategic paradigm shift. The previous strategy of "mowing the grass"—conducting limited rounds of fighting to degrade Hamas's capabilities before returning to a ceasefire—was abandoned.
New Objectives: The stated goals became the total destruction of Hamas's governing and military capabilities and the return of all hostages. This necessitated a massive mobilization of 360,000 reservists and the launch of a high-intensity ground invasion of the Gaza Strip, commencing in late October 2023.2
5.4 Regional and Global Implications
The October 7 assault triggered a regional escalation that continues to reverberate.
The Northern Front: Hezbollah began launching attacks from Lebanon on October 8 in solidarity with Hamas, leading to the evacuation of northern Israel and a low-intensity war that has gradually escalated.11
The Iranian Axis: The Houthi movement in Yemen and militias in Iraq joined the fray, launching missiles and drones at Israel, confirming the "Unity of Fronts" strategy promoted by Iran.
Diplomatic Freeze: The Saudi-Israel normalization process was effectively frozen, handing Hamas a strategic diplomatic victory in the short term, although Saudi officials have maintained that normalization remains on the table contingent on a pathway to a Palestinian state.9
Conclusion
Operation Al-Aqsa Flood was a watershed moment in the history of the Middle East. It represented a catastrophic intelligence failure for Israel, born of a rigid conceptual bias that underestimated Hamas's ideological commitment to armed struggle. For Hamas, it was a tactical masterstroke that achieved complete surprise but unleashed a strategic cataclysm, resulting in the devastation of the Gaza Strip and a war of survival for its regime.
The assault shattered the status quo, proving that the containment of the conflict was an illusion. It has re-traumatized Israeli society, revived the existential nature of the Arab-Israeli conflict, and placed the Palestinian issue back at the center of global geopolitics. As the war continues, the long-term consequences of that Saturday morning—for the hostages, for the people of Gaza, for Israeli society, and for the regional order—remain profoundly uncertain and deeply scarred by the atrocities of October 7.
Report prepared by: Senior Analyst, Geopolitical & Security Desk.
Date: December 16, 2025.
Works cited
Statement by Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III Marking One ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3927710/statement-by-secretary-of-defense-lloyd-j-austin-iii-marking-one-year-since-ham/
Israel-Hamas War (Gaza conflict) | Explanation, Summary, Ceasefire ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/event/Israel-Hamas-War
Israel and Hamas Conflict In Brief: Overview, U.S. Policy, and ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R47828
Detailed findings on attacks carried out on and after 7 October 2023 ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/documents/hrbodies/hrcouncil/sessions-regular/session56/a-hrc-56-crp-3.pdf
Our Narrative… Operation Al-Aqsa Flood - Palestine Chronicle, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.palestinechronicle.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/PDF.pdf
Hamas attacks part of Tehran's effort to stymie Saudi-Israeli peace ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://ezell.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=374
Hamas Tried to Sabotage Israeli-Saudi Normalization - CNAS, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.cnas.org/publications/commentary/hamas-tried-to-sabotage-israeli-saudi-normalization-u-s-can-make-it-backfire
Gaza war - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_war
Is Saudi-Israel normalization still on the table? | Middle East Institute, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.mei.edu/publications/saudi-israel-normalization-still-table
Hamas document shows Oct. 7 attack aimed at derailing Saudi ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/hamas-document-shows-oct-7-attack-aimed-at-derailing-saudi-normalization-report/
October 7: Before and After – Israel Policy Forum, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://israelpolicyforum.org/october-7-before-and-after/
Future Center - Analyzing the Intelligence Failures of October 7th, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://futureuae.com/en-US/Mainpage/Item/10237/cassandras-shadows-analyzing-the-intelligence-failures-of-october-7th
Israel's Shin Bet says Netanyahu policies helped pave way for 7 ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/05/israeli-security-agency-says-netanyahus-policies-paved-the-way-for-2023-hamas-attack
'New York Times' report says Israel knew about Hamas attack over a ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://english.elpais.com/international/2023-12-01/new-york-times-report-says-israel-knew-about-hamas-attack-over-a-year-in-advance.html
Israel knew of Hamas attack plan a year before attack, but didn't take ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://mind.ua/en/news/20266353-israel-knew-of-hamas-attack-plan-a-year-before-attack-but-didnt-take-it-seriously-nyt
Report: IDF unit sent dramatic warning before Oct. 7, but no one read it, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.jns.org/report-idf-unit-sent-dramatic-warning-before-oct-7-but-no-one-read-it/
Israeli Intelligence Failures Prior to Hamas's October 7 Attack - IDA, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.ida.org/-/media/8e5040cc7ee5457dba26c8127b47c8e0.ashx
IDF Ignored Female Soldiers' Warnings Pre-Oct. 7. Then They Were ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.wabe.org/tv-episodes/idf-ignored-female-soldiers-warnings-pre-oct-7-then-they-were-massacred-cilcxu/
Hamas Attack: It Wasn't An “Intelligence Failure” - Modern Diplomacy, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2023/12/25/hamas-attack-it-wasnt-an-intelligence-failure/
Shin Bet dismissed Hamas SIM card warning hours before Oct. 7, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.jns.org/shin-bet-dismissed-hamas-sim-card-warning-hours-before-oct-7/
IDF identified but ignored 5 warning signs of Hamas attack on eve of ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/idf-identified-but-ignored-5-warning-signs-of-hamas-attack-on-eve-of-oct-7-its-probe-shows/
The October 7 Hamas attack: An Israeli overreliance on technology?, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://mei.edu/publications/october-7-hamas-attack-israeli-overreliance-technology
Drones and the Hamas-led Attack of 7 October 2023: Innovation and ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://pt.icct.nl/article/drones-and-hamas-led-attack-7-october-2023-innovation-and-implications
Hamas' October 7 Attack: The Tactics, Targets, and Strategy ... - CSIS, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.csis.org/analysis/hamas-october-7-attack-tactics-targets-and-strategy-terrorists
How the Hamas October 7 Attack Happened, and How Israel ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://idsf.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Iron-Swords-Step-by-step-how-the-Hamas-massacre-happened-and-Israels-reaction-1.pdf
Map of Hamas invasion - 7 October 2023 - Gov.il, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.gov.il/BlobFolder/news/swords-of-iron-war-in-the-south-7-oct-2023/en/English_Swords_of_Iron_Hamas%20Invasion%20-%20Full%20Map%20-%20v5.pdf
How Hamas Executed a Paraglider Attack on Israel - CNAS, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.cnas.org/press/in-the-news/how-hamas-executed-a-paraglider-attack-on-israel
How Hamas executed a paraglider attack on Israel - Task & Purpose, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://taskandpurpose.com/news/hamas-paraglider-attack-israel/
Be'eri massacre - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Be%27eri_massacre
First troops reached Kibbutz Nir Oz 40 minutes after last terrorists left, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/massive-failure-first-troops-reached-kibbutz-nir-oz-40-minutes-after-last-terrorists-left/
Hundreds of soldiers waited outside Be'eri with terrorists still inside ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/hundreds-of-soldiers-stood-outside-beeri-as-massacre-took-place-survivor-says/
IDF officers invoked defunct 'Hannibal Protocol' during Oct. 7 fighting, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/idf-officers-invoked-defunct-hannibal-protocol-during-oct-7-fighting-report/
Kibbutz Be'eri Oct. 7 recordings documents talks with Hamas terrorist, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.jpost.com/middle-east/article-836034
Israeli army probe covered up "friendly fire" killings on 7 October, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://electronicintifada.net/content/israeli-army-probe-covered-friendly-fire-killings-7-october/48046
'40 minutes too late': IDF report details Hamas' attack on Nir Oz and ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.ynetnews.com/article/hkan00ib3jx
Nir Oz attack - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nir_Oz_attack
Terrorists took Kfar Aza in an hour. Recapturing it took the IDF days ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/terrorists-took-kfar-aza-in-an-hour-recapturing-it-took-the-idf-days-probe-finds/
Kfar Aza massacre - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kfar_Aza_massacre
Kan 7.10.360| The story of the Sderot police station on October 7th, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.710360.kan.org.il/en/sderot/police
Battle of Sderot - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Sderot
Ofakim - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ofakim
The story of Rachel and David Edri from Ofakim - כאן 7.10.360, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.710360.kan.org.il/en/ofakim/edri
Woman becomes Israeli folk hero for plying Hamas militants with ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-hamas-war-militants-hero-75f145487afbc74fe28451fe49f79a50
A timeline of the Israel-Hamas conflict - Western Oregon University, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://wou.edu/westernhowl/a-timeline-of-the-israel-hamas-conflict/
Nova music festival massacre - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova_music_festival_massacre
Timeline of the Gaza war (7 October 2023, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_the_Gaza_war_(7_October_2023_%E2%80%93_27_October_2023)
Timeline of the 7th of October massacre - Albert Tours Israel, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.albert-tours-israel.com/7-october-timeline
The Israeli-Palestinian conflict - Parliament UK, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5901/cmselect/cmfaff/488/report.html
Breakdown of foreign nationals killed or held hostage by Hamas, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.arabnews.com/node/2398951/middle-east
Gaza war hostage crisis - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_war_hostage_crisis
Caught in the crossfire – Foreign and security policy - IPS Journal, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.ips-journal.eu/topics/foreign-and-security-policy/caught-in-the-crossfire-7190/
October 7th Sexual Violence as Crimes Against Humanity, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.minervacenter.huji.ac.il/october-7th-sexual-violence-crimes-against-humanity
Mission Report: Official Visit of the Office of the SRSG-SVC to Israel ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.un.org/sexualviolenceinconflict/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/report/mission-report-official-visit-of-the-office-of-the-srsg-svc-to-israel-and-the-occupied-west-bank-29-january-14-february-2024/20240304-Israel-oWB-CRSV-report.pdf
Sexual Violence Crimes on October 7 - Gov.il, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.gov.il/BlobFolder/news/arcci-submits-first-report-to-un-21-feb-2024/en/English_Swords_of_Iron_DOCUMENTS_Sexual%20violence%20crimes%20on%20Ocober%207-Feb.%202024.pdf
A/HRC/58/NGO/223 - General Assembly, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://docs.un.org/en/A/HRC/58/NGO/223
Minute by minute, IDF orders issued in response to 1st wave of Oct ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.ynetnews.com/article/bkehxlcqyx
IDF Details Failure to Defend Kibbutz Be'eri During October 7 ... - FDD, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.fdd.org/analysis/2024/07/11/idf-details-failure-to-defend-kibbutz-beeri-during-october-7-atrocities/
Israeli war cabinet - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_war_cabinet
Netanyahu sets up emergency Israeli unity government and war ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/oct/11/netanyahu-sets-up-emergency-israeli-unity-government-and-war-cabinet
Possible U.S.-Saudi Agreements and Normalization with Israel, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R48162
