The Dissolution of Deterrence: An Analysis of the "Red Line" in the Gaza Conflict and Its Geopolitical Aftershocks (2023–2025)
1. Introduction: The Diplomatic Semantics of the "Red Line"
In the lexicon of international relations, a "red line" serves as a definitive threshold of tolerance—a boundary which, if transgressed by an adversary or ally, theoretically necessitates a severe and predetermined punitive response. Throughout the protracted conflict in the Gaza Strip, spanning from the initial Hamas attacks of October 7, 2023, through the geopolitical realignments of late 2025, the concept of the red line became the central mechanism through which the United States attempted to manage the military conduct of its closest regional ally, Israel. However, an exhaustive analysis of diplomatic transcripts, military logs, and policy shifts reveals that these red lines were rarely static boundaries. Instead, they functioned as fluid rhetorical devices that were continuously redefined, eroded, and ultimately bypassed, creating a permissive environment that facilitated not only the devastation of Rafah but also the regional expansion of the war into Lebanon and a direct nuclear-tinged confrontation with Iran.
The most prominent of these thresholds concerned the invasion of Rafah, the southernmost city in the Gaza Strip, which by early 2024 housed approximately 1.4 million displaced Palestinians.1 President Joe Biden’s administration publicly staked its credibility on the assertion that a major ground operation in Rafah would constitute a breach of U.S. policy, threatening a reassessment of offensive military aid. Yet, the subsequent failure to enforce this line when the invasion materialized in May 2024 established a precedent of impunity. This report argues that the "Rafah Red Line" was structurally flawed by a "defensive exception" clause—the guarantee that defensive aid would never be cut—which stripped the threat of its coercive power.
The consequences of this diplomatic failure extended far beyond the Gaza Strip. The perception of American hesitancy and the malleability of its red lines directly influenced the strategic calculus in Jerusalem, Tehran, and Beirut. It emboldened the Israeli security establishment to launch "Operation Northern Arrows" against Hezbollah in late 2024 and to execute preemptive strikes against Iranian nuclear infrastructure in June 2025 during the "12-Day War".3 Furthermore, the transition to the Trump administration in January 2025 marked a paradigmatic shift from attempting to impose humanitarian constraints to a policy of "peace through strength" and the commercial privatization of post-war reconstruction, effectively retiring the concept of the red line in favor of transactional diplomacy.5
2. The Architecture of the Rafah Red Line (October 2023 – March 2024)
To understand the collapse of the red line, one must first dissect its construction. In the initial months following the October 7 attacks, the Biden administration offered unconditional support for Israel’s right to self-defense. However, as the Palestinian death toll mounted and the humanitarian crisis in the enclave deepened, the administration faced intense domestic and international pressure to impose limits on Israeli military conduct.
2.1 The Strategic Ambiguity of the "Ironclad" Commitment
The fundamental contradiction that would plague U.S. policy was evident as early as March 2024. In a pivotal interview with MSNBC on March 9, President Biden was asked if an Israeli invasion of Rafah would cross a red line. His response encapsulated the incoherence of the administration's leverage: "It is a red line, but I’m never going to leave Israel. The defense of Israel is still critical. So there’s no red line [in which] I’m going to cut off all weapons so they don’t have the Iron Dome to protect them".1
This statement introduced a doctrine of conditional permissibility. While the President designated the invasion of Rafah as a prohibited act, he simultaneously removed the most potent lever of influence—the total suspension of military aid—from the table. By explicitly carving out "defense" (encompassing Iron Dome and potentially other interceptor systems) from any potential sanctions, the administration signaled to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that the core security architecture of Israel would remain underwritten by the United States regardless of offensive actions in Gaza. This created a moral hazard; Israel could pursue maximalist offensive goals with the assurance that American assets would mitigate the blowback from regional actors.8
2.2 The Metric of "Smashing Into" Rafah
As Israeli forces mobilized on the periphery of Rafah in April 2024, the White House scrambled to define what exactly would constitute a violation of the red line. National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan and other officials began using specific imagery to qualify the prohibition. The red line was not against any military action in Rafah, but specifically against "smashing into Rafah" with large military units in a manner that would cause massive civilian casualties without a credible evacuation plan.9
This qualification was critical. It transformed a binary threshold (invasion vs. no invasion) into a subjective assessment of tactics and intensity. It allowed for a "salami slicing" strategy by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), where incremental advances and "targeted raids" could be conducted without technically triggering the "major ground operation" designation that the U.S. had forbidden.11
The administration’s insistence on a "credible plan" for civilian evacuation also proved to be a moving goalpost. International humanitarian organizations and the UN repeatedly stated that no such plan was logistically feasible given the destruction of Gaza’s infrastructure and the lack of safe zones.12 Nevertheless, the U.S. continued to engage in discussions regarding these plans, arguably buying time for Israel to prepare the operational battlespace rather than preventing the operation itself.14
3. The Collapse of the Threshold: The Rafah Offensive (May 2024)
The theoretical debate over red lines collided with reality on May 6, 2024, when the IDF commenced its ground offensive into eastern Rafah, seizing the pivotal border crossing with Egypt and effectively sealing the Gaza Strip from independent humanitarian access.16
3.1 The "Pause" on Heavy Munitions
In response to the imminent invasion, the Biden administration executed its only significant enforcement action of the war: a pause on a single shipment of high-payload munitions. This shipment consisted of 1,800 2,000-pound (MK-84) bombs and 1,700 500-pound bombs.17 President Biden publicly acknowledged this pause, stating that "civilians have been killed in Gaza as a consequence of those bombs" and asserting that the U.S. would not supply weapons for a full-scale assault on population centers.17
However, this pause was isolated. Other weapons transfers continued, and the administration went to great lengths to clarify that this was not a general embargo. State Department officials emphasized that the pause was specific to the Rafah context and that Israel still received the "vast, vast majority" of required weaponry.11 This hesitancy to fully leverage the arms supply chain diluted the deterrent effect of the pause. Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Netanyahu, reacted with public defiance, vowing to "fight with their fingernails" if necessary, while privately understanding that the flow of other critical systems remained uninterrupted.16
3.2 The Semantic Redefinition of "Major Ground Operation"
As Israeli tanks pushed deeper into Rafah throughout May, reaching the central districts and engaging in heavy combat, the White House faced repeated questioning on whether the red line had been crossed. The administration’s response was a masterclass in semantic evasion. National Security Communications Advisor John Kirby repeatedly asserted that the U.S. had "not seen a major ground operation".11
When asked to define what would constitute such an operation, Kirby described it as "large units, large numbers of troops in columns and formations, in some sort of coordinated maneuver against multiple targets".19 He contrasted this with what he described as Israel’s "limited," "precise," and "targeted" operations against tunnels and specific Hamas battalions.11 This definition clashed with the reality on the ground reported by journalists and humanitarian agencies, who described intense bombardment, tank shelling in densely populated areas, and the displacement of nearly a million people from the city.9
3.3 The Tel al-Sultan Massacre and the Denial of Violation
The tension between rhetoric and reality reached a breaking point on May 26, 2024, when an Israeli airstrike hit a tent camp for displaced people in the Tel al-Sultan neighborhood of western Rafah—a designated "safe zone." The strike and resulting fire killed at least 45 people, including women and children, sparking global outrage.21
Despite the horrific imagery and the high civilian death toll, the Biden administration maintained that the incident did not constitute a violation of the red line. John Kirby stated, "We have not seen them smash into Rafah," and emphasized that the strike was under Israeli investigation.19 The State Department argued that while the loss of life was "heartbreaking," it did not indicate a wholesale invasion or a systemic abandonment of civilian protections that would trigger a policy shift.19
This refusal to acknowledge a breach effectively nullified the red line mechanism. It demonstrated to Israel that even mass casualty events in prohibited zones would be managed diplomatically rather than punished materially. This "green light by omission" allowed the Rafah offensive to continue until Israel established full operational control over the city and the Philadelphi Corridor by mid-2024.16
3.4 Internal Dissent and the "Smokescreen"
The administration's stance was not monolithic; it faced significant internal opposition. Leaked memos and resignation letters from within the State Department and USAID revealed a deep frustration with what officials termed a "smokescreen" policy.24 Experts within the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM) and the Office of global Criminal Justice argued that Israel was violating international humanitarian law (IHL) and impeding U.S. aid, which should have triggered sanctions under the Foreign Assistance Act and the Leahy Laws.24
However, Secretary of State Antony Blinken and other senior officials consistently overruled these assessments. In reports to Congress, such as the NSM-20 report delivered in May 2024, the administration concluded that while it was "reasonable to assess" that U.S. weapons had been used inconsistently with IHL, there were no "definitive" findings to warrant a suspension of aid.20 This deliberate ambiguity prioritized the strategic imperative of the alliance over statutory legal compliance, creating a permission structure for continued escalation.
4. Operational Reality: The "Yellow Line" and the Occupation of Gaza (Mid-to-Late 2024)
As the political debate over "red lines" faded, a new reality emerged on the ground: the "Yellow Line." This term, increasingly used by military analysts and journalists by late 2024, referred to the shifting demarcation of permanent Israeli military control within the Gaza Strip.
4.1 The Consolidation of Control
By October 2025, Israeli forces had established direct control over approximately 53% of the Gaza Strip.26 This included:
The Netzarim Corridor: A fortified zone bisecting the strip south of Gaza City, preventing the unauthorized return of Palestinians to the north.
The Philadelphi Corridor: The border zone with Egypt, which Israel seized during the Rafah offensive to cut off Hamas smuggling routes.
Buffer Zones: Expanded perimeters along the eastern border where all structures were razed to clear lines of sight.
This territorial reconfiguration rendered the pre-war status quo obsolete. The Rafah offensive, once the subject of intense diplomatic wrangling, became a fait accompli. The civilian population, compressed into an ever-shrinking humanitarian zone in Al-Mawasi and Deir al-Balah, faced catastrophic conditions. UNRWA reported that "safe zones" were a fiction, with displaced populations forced to move repeatedly under fire.12
4.2 The May 2025 Offensive and Humanitarian Collapse
Despite the formal "conclusion" of the Rafah offensive, high-intensity operations continued well into 2025. In May 2025, Israel launched a renewed offensive (codenamed "Operation Gideon's Chariots") aiming to clear re-emergent Hamas cells in areas previously declared secure.27 This operation, lasting until August 2025, resulted in the occupation of 75% of the strip at its peak and was condemned by the UN Human Rights Office as "tantamount to ethnic cleansing" due to the forced displacement protocols implemented.27
The humanitarian toll of these sustained operations was staggering. By December 2025, UNRWA reported over 70,000 Palestinians killed since the war's inception.28 The agency itself was effectively dismantled in the territory, with Israel banning its operations and seizing its assets, a move that went largely unopposed by the U.S. administration at the time.29
5. Regional Spillover: The Failure of Containment (2024–2025)
The most damning indictment of the red line failure in Gaza was its ripple effect across the Middle East. The Biden administration had consistently argued that its support for Israel was necessary to prevent the conflict from widening. In reality, the failure to restrain Israel in Gaza convinced regional actors that the U.S. was either unwilling or unable to enforce its will, leading to a catastrophic breakdown of deterrence.
5.1 Hezbollah and the Northern Front
Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah had explicitly tied the Lebanese front to Gaza, stating that his forces would cease fire only when the aggression in Gaza stopped.30 For nearly a year, the conflict on the Israel-Lebanon border was contained within an implicit set of "rules of engagement," with strikes limited to military targets near the border.31
However, witnessing the U.S. acquiescence to the destruction of Rafah, the Israeli security cabinet concluded that the risks of escalation were manageable. In September 2024, Israel initiated "Operation Northern Arrows," a maximalist campaign designed to decapitate Hezbollah and push its forces north of the Litani River.3
5.2 The Pager Attacks and Assassination of Nasrallah
The escalation began with an unprecedented intelligence operation on September 17-18, 2024, in which thousands of pagers and walkie-talkies used by Hezbollah operatives were detonated remotely.3 This attack, which killed dozens and injured thousands (including civilians), signaled the abandonment of all previous restraints.
This was followed by a rapid sequence of decapitation strikes:
September 20, 2024: An airstrike in Beirut killed Ibrahim Aqil and the command structure of the elite Radwan Force.3
September 27, 2024: A massive airstrike on Hezbollah's headquarters in Dahiyeh killed Hassan Nasrallah.33 Crucially, this strike utilized U.S.-supplied 2,000-pound bunker-busting bombs—the very munitions that had been subject to the "Rafah pause" months earlier.34
The use of these weapons to assassinate Nasrallah confirmed that the "red line" on heavy munitions was geographically limited to Gaza and did not apply to high-value targets in Lebanon. By October 1, 2024, Israel launched a ground invasion of Southern Lebanon, aiming to dismantle Hezbollah infrastructure.3 Hezbollah’s retaliation, degraded by the loss of leadership and communications, failed to deter the Israeli advance, leading to a ceasefire in late 2024 that largely favored Israeli security terms.30
5.3 The 12-Day War: The Nuclear Red Line (June 2025)
The erosion of U.S. restraint reached its apex in June 2025 with the outbreak of direct war between Israel and Iran. Following the degradation of Hezbollah, Iran accelerated its nuclear program, which Israel defined as an existential threat.35 With the Trump administration back in power (see Section 6), Israel perceived a window of impunity to strike.
Table 1: Key Events of the Israel-Iran 12-Day War (June 2025)
Date
Event Description
Strategic Significance
June 13
Operation Rising Lion: Israel launches massive airstrikes on Iranian nuclear sites (Natanz, Fordow) and missile facilities (Isfahan).
First direct, overt attack on Iranian soil by Israel, shattering the "Shadow War" paradigm. 36
June 14-16
Iranian Retaliation: Iran fires waves of ballistic missiles. Hits recorded on Israeli airbases (Negev) and energy infrastructure (Haifa oil refinery).
Demonstrated Iranian capability to breach Israeli air defenses; significant escalation from April 2024 exchange. 4
June 19
Soroka Strike: Iranian Sejjil missile strikes Soroka Medical Center in Beersheba; 71 injured.
Mass casualty event involving civilians/medical infrastructure; solidified Israeli resolve for further strikes. 39
June 22
U.S. Entry: U.S. forces conduct suppression strikes on Iranian missile launch sites to protect allied airspace.
Direct U.S. military intervention, fulfilling the "Ironclad" defense commitment in an offensive context. 4
June 24
Ceasefire: President Trump announces a cessation of hostilities.
Iran's nuclear program reportedly set back by years; regional deterrence architecture reset. 39
The 12-Day War confirmed that the "red lines" of 2024 had been completely rewritten. The concern for regional stability that once constrained U.S. policy was replaced by a strategy of overwhelming force to re-establish deterrence.
6. The Trump Shift: Transactional Diplomacy and Privatization (2025)
The return of Donald Trump to the presidency in January 2025 marked the final nail in the coffin for the "red line" as a tool of humanitarian restraint. The new administration viewed the conflict not through the lens of international law or human rights, but through the prism of "Peace through Strength" and commercial opportunity.
6.1 Unlocking the Arsenal
One of President Trump's first executive actions was to lift the hold on the heavy munitions that Biden had paused. Speaking on Air Force One in late January 2025, Trump declared, "We released them. They paid for them and they’ve been waiting for them for a long time".41 This statement explicitly rejected the use of arms transfers as leverage for human rights compliance, reframing military aid as a simple commercial transaction between sovereign states.
6.2 The "Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict"
In September 2025, President Trump unveiled his administration’s grand strategy: a 20-point "Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza Conflict".5 The plan was a radical departure from previous peace process parameters (such as the Oslo Accords).
Key Components of the Trump Plan:
Deradicalization: Gaza designated as a "terror-free zone" with complete disarmament enforced by Israel.
Governance: The establishment of a "Board of Peace" to administer civil affairs, bypassing the Palestinian Authority.
The "Riviera" Vision: A reconstruction plan heavily influenced by advisors like Jared Kushner, viewing Gaza’s coastal real estate as a prime investment opportunity for high-end tourism and development.6
Displacement: A tacit acceptance of the "voluntary" relocation of Palestinians, with the plan emphasizing "encouraging" residents to leave areas designated for security or development.43
6.3 The Privatization of Aid and Security
Perhaps the most striking aspect of the Trump doctrine was the privatization of the "red line." Instead of relying on UN agencies like UNRWA (which the administration sought to designate as a terror-linked entity), the plan proposed a "Master Contractor" model for logistics and reconstruction.6
Leaked documents reviewed by The Guardian in late 2025 revealed plans for a "Gaza Supply System Logistics Architecture" that would grant a private contractor the exclusive license to manage the flow of 600 trucks a day into the strip. This contractor would charge fees ($2,000 per humanitarian truck, $12,000 per commercial truck), effectively monetizing the siege. Under this model, the "red line" for aid entry became a contractual KPI rather than a humanitarian obligation. If a contractor controls the gates for profit, access is determined by solvency and security clearance rather than need.6
7. Conclusion: The Legacy of the Failed Threshold
The trajectory of the "red line" regarding Gaza from 2023 to 2025 offers a stark lesson in the limitations of diplomatic rhetoric when divorced from political will. President Biden’s red line on Rafah failed because it was constructed with a fatal flaw: the "ironclad" defensive exemption. By guaranteeing that Israel’s shield would never be lowered, the U.S. inadvertently subsidized the sword. Israel correctly calculated that it could cross the red line with impunity, provided it did so incrementally and framed its actions within the language of counter-terrorism.
The humanitarian cost of this calculation was the destruction of Rafah and the displacement of its population into conditions of abject misery. But the strategic cost was arguably higher. The failure to restrain Israel in Gaza shattered the credibility of U.S. containment, signaling to Hezbollah and Iran that the rules of the game had changed. This paved the way for the explosive regional escalation of late 2024 and 2025.
By the time the Trump administration instituted its policy of transactional control in 2025, the concept of the "red line" had been rendered obsolete. It was replaced by a starker reality: a region where force is the primary arbiter of outcomes, and where humanitarian protections are privatized, securitized, or simply ignored. The "red line" did not just fade away; it was actively dismantled, leaving behind a new Middle Eastern order defined by the "Yellow Line" of permanent military occupation and the commodification of reconstruction.
Works cited
Biden makes contradictory comments on Gaza 'red line' in TV interview, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.straitstimes.com/world/middle-east/biden-makes-contradictory-comments-on-gaza-red-line-in-tv-interview
I interviewed Biden after the State of the Union. He had plenty to say., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.ms.now/opinion/msnbc-opinion/biden-state-of-the-union-interview-red-line-illegals-rcna142887
2024 Israeli invasion of Lebanon - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Israeli_invasion_of_Lebanon
Iran: Impacts of June 2025 Israel and US strikes and outlook, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-10292/CBP-10292.pdf
President Donald J. Trump's Comprehensive Plan to End the Gaza ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/white-house-press-release-president-donald-j-trumps-comprehensive-plan-end-the-gaza
‘They’re trying to get rich off it’: US contractors vie to rebuild Gaza, with ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ team in the lead, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/dec/14/gaza-rebuild-us-contractors
Biden makes contradictory remarks on 'red lines' for Israel in Gaza, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/3/10/biden-makes-contradictory-remarks-on-red-lines-for-israel-in-gaza
Full transcript of "Face the Nation," March 10, 2024 - CBS News, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/face-the-nation-full-transcript-03-10-2024/
Rafah: Was Biden's red line crossed? By most measures ... - Sky News, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://news.sky.com/story/rafah-was-biden-s-red-line-crossed-by-most-measures-yes-by-biden-s-measure-probably-not-13144218
Press Briefing by Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre and National ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/press-briefings/2024/03/12/press-briefing-by-press-secretary-karine-jean-pierre-and-national-security-advisor-jake-sullivan-12/
On-the-Record Press Gaggle by White House National Security ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/press-briefings/2024/05/09/on-the-record-press-gaggle-by-white-house-national-security-communications-advisor-john-kirby-11/
“Hopeless, Starving, and Besieged”: Israel's Forced Displacement of ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.hrw.org/report/2024/11/14/hopeless-starving-and-besieged/israels-forced-displacement-palestinians-gaza
Was invading Rafah really a red line? - The Electronic Intifada, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://electronicintifada.net/content/was-invading-rafah-really-red-line/46361
US says Israeli gov't has not presented plan for Rafah in case of ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/us-says-israeli-govt-has-not-presented-plan-for-rafah-in-case-of-operation/3161851
US to pitch Israel on securing Egypt-Gaza border as alternative to ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-to-pitch-israel-on-securing-egypt-gaza-border-as-alternative-to-smashing-into-rafah/
Rafah offensive - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rafah_offensive
Biden finally appears to find his red line on Gaza, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.ms.now/top-stories/latest/biden-israel-gaza-rafah-invasion-weapon-shipments-rcna151436
US to resume sending 500lb bombs to Israel while withholding ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/jul/10/biden-resumes-sending-israel-bombs
Press Briefing by Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre and National ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefing-room/press-briefings/2024/05/28/press-briefing-by-press-secretary-karine-jean-pierre-and-national-security-communications-advisor-john-kirby-5/
Why Biden administration says Israel hasn't crossed a red line on ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/rafah-biden-gaza-israel-hamas-war-2b13ba81805c4b7ad988f7959abc1a7a
White House says Israel's latest actions in Rafah do not cross US ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/29/white-house-israel-rafah-red-line
US says Rafah red line not breached despite domestic and global ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/biden-administration-rafah-redline-not-breached-despite-domestic-global-outrage
Department Press Briefing - May 28, 2024, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://2021-2025.state.gov/briefings/department-press-briefing-may-28-2024/
How the State Dept. Let Israel Get Away With Gaza Horrors, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.propublica.org/article/biden-blinken-state-department-israel-gaza-human-rights-horrors
Israel strikes Gaza as US report criticizes war conduct - VOA Africa, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.voaafrica.com/a/israel-strikes-gaza-as-us-report-criticizes-war-conduct-/7607141.html
Gaza war - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_war
May 2025 Gaza offensive - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_2025_Gaza_offensive
UNRWA Situation Report #200 on the Humanitarian Crisis in the ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.unrwa.org/resources/reports/unrwa-situation-report-200-situation-gaza-strip-and-west-bank-including-east-jerusalem
Israeli-Palestinian Conflict | Global Conflict Tracker, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/israeli-palestinian-conflict
Rafah operation and Gaza war are winding down; Israel is no closer ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/rafah-operation-and-gaza-war-are-winding-down-israel-is-no-closer-to-its-goals/
Israel and Hezbollah are destroying the meaning of red lines, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.chathamhouse.org/2024/06/israel-and-hezbollah-are-destroying-meaning-red-lines
Israel and Lebanese Hezbollah: Current Violence and Potential ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/IF/PDF/IF12770/IF12770.3.pdf
War in Lebanon – 2024-25 – Timeline - Israel Legal Advocacy Project, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.lawandisrael.org/library/historical/israels-wars/war-in-lebanon-2024/
With a deadline looming, Lebanon is under pressure to disarm ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.uwa.edu.au/news/article/2025/december/with-a-deadline-looming-lebanon-is-under-pressure-to-disarm-hezbollah-or-risk-another-war
Israeli ex-general warns Iran of new strikes over missiles, nuclear sites, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.iranintl.com/en/202512124162
Israel-Iran Conflict: 2025 Update - RMC Global, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://rmcglobal.com/israel-iran-conflict-2025-update/
Israel’s high-risk strategy has made an already unstable region more dangerous over the weekend, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/opinion/et-commentary/israels-high-risk-strategy-has-made-an-already-unstable-region-more-dangerous-over-the-weekend/articleshow/121867928.cms
Israel and Iran on the brink: Preventing the next war, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.iss.europa.eu/publications/briefs/israel-and-iran-brink-preventing-next-war
Iran Israel US Strikes Timeline Explainer: June 2025 Key Events, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://fanack.com/politics/features-insights/iran-israel-us-strikes-timeline-explainer~270644/
Timeline: key events in Israel-Iran conflict - Xinhua, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://english.news.cn/20250625/da57ea401a194463824ddf749973923a/c.html
Trump ends hold on delivery of 2000-pound bombs to Israel, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.timesofisrael.com/trump-confirms-lifting-hold-on-delivery-of-2000-pound-bombs-to-israel/
Trump confirms 2,000-pound bombs 'on their way' to Israel, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/americas/trump-confirms-2-000-pound-bombs-on-their-way-to-israel/3462515
Gaza peace plan - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_peace_plan
2025 Donald Trump Gaza Strip takeover proposal - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Donald_Trump_Gaza_Strip_takeover_proposal
