The Ideological Architecture of Genocide: A Structural and Thematic Analysis of Mein Kampf and the Construction of the Jewish World Conspiracy
I. Introduction: The Textual Artifact and the Prison Context
1.1 The Genesis of a Weltanschauung
The genesis of Mein Kampf (My Struggle) is inextricably linked to the crisis of the Weimar Republic and the personal trajectory of its author, Adolf Hitler. Written during his incarceration at Landsberg Prison following the failed Beer Hall Putsch of November 1923, the text represents more than a political manifesto; it is a desperate attempt to impose intellectual order upon a chaotic world.1 The imprisonment, which lasted from April to December 1924, provided Hitler with a period of enforced isolation, during which he transitioned from a mere agitator to the self-conceived philosopher-king of the Völkisch movement. It was within the walls of Landsberg that he dictated the first volume to his loyal subordinates, Emil Maurice and later Rudolf Hess, transforming his spoken demagoguery into a written canon that would eventually become the "bible" of the National Socialist state.2
The work was published in two volumes: Eine Abrechnung (A Reckoning) in July 1925 and Die Nationalsozialistische Bewegung (The National Socialist Movement) in December 1926.3 While widely regarded in retrospect as a blueprint for the Third Reich, its initial reception was modest. However, its sales trajectory mirrors the rise of the Nazi party itself, exploding from sluggish beginnings to over 5.2 million copies by 1939, and roughly 10 million by the war's end in 1945.2 This ubiquity ensured that the text’s central thesis—the existential struggle between the Aryan and the Jew—permeated the consciousness of the German populace.
The ambition of the text is staggering in its arrogance. As noted by modern scholarship, Mein Kampf attempts to provide a "complete explanation of the world".5 Hitler did not limit himself to political grievances regarding the Treaty of Versailles or the French occupation of the Ruhr; he ventured into fields as diverse as hominization, the history of syphilis, Japanese naval history, ancient and modern city planning, and the federal structure of the United States.5 This eclecticism was not accidental but served to bolster the "Führer principle" (Führerprinzip), positioning Hitler not just as a politician but as a genius capable of synthesizing all human knowledge into a single, racial theory of history.5
1.2 The Narrative Strategy: Autobiography as Propaganda
One of the critical insights into understanding Mein Kampf is recognizing its duality as both autobiography and propaganda. Hitler utilizes the story of his own life—his "struggle"—as a microcosm for the struggle of the German nation. However, historians have long noted that much of the autobiographical detail in Volume I is fabricated or heavily mythologized to serve ideological ends.1 The narrative arc serves a specific purpose: to demonstrate how a "naive" provincial boy was awakened to the "dreadful knowledge" of the Jewish menace through hard experience in Vienna.
By framing his antisemitism as a learned "insight" rather than an innate prejudice, Hitler invites the reader to undergo a similar awakening. He describes his initial cosmopolitan tolerance, his hesitation to believe in the conspiracy, and his eventual "epiphany" when observing a Hasidic Jew in Vienna: "Is this a Jew?... Is this a German?".7 This narrative device is calculated to lead the reader, step by step, from skepticism to the same fanatical conclusion: that the Jew is an alien entity orchestrating the destruction of the Aryan world.
The text also functions as a "propaganda playbook." Hitler is surprisingly candid about his methods, devoting significant space to the psychology of the masses. He argues that the "mass of people is lazy," possesses a "brief attention span," and is moved not by logic but by emotional volatility.8 Therefore, political leadership requires the reduction of complex problems to simple, binary slogans. In Mein Kampf, the ultimate simplification is the reduction of all Germany's enemies—Marxists, capitalists, democrats, pacifists, and journalists—into a single enemy: the Jew.
1.3 The Scope of the Report
This report provides an exhaustive analysis of the content of Mein Kampf, specifically interrogating the mechanism by which Hitler concluded that the world was on the brink of Jewish domination. It dissects the text’s racial pseudo-science, its economic theories of "productive" versus "parasitic" capital, and its geopolitical obsessions. Furthermore, it integrates the broader intellectual currents that influenced Hitler, including the role of White Émigrés in spreading the myth of "Jewish Bolshevism" and the legacy of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. The analysis demonstrates that Hitler’s conclusion was not a peripheral aspect of his worldview but the central axis upon which his entire understanding of the universe revolved.
II. The Biological Imperative: Race as the Engine of History
2.1 The Aryan as the "Prometheus of Mankind"
The foundational premise of Mein Kampf is that history is governed by biological laws, specifically the Darwinian struggle between races. Hitler rejects the Marxist view of history as class struggle and the liberal view of history as the progress of freedom. Instead, he posits a racial hierarchy that he claims is scientifically demonstrable. At the apex of this hierarchy stands the "Aryan," a category he conflates with the Germanic or Nordic peoples.6
In Chapter 11, "Nation and Race," Hitler defines the Aryan not merely as a superior biological specimen but as the sole possessor of "idealism"—the capacity to sacrifice individual self-interest for the preservation of the community. This trait, which he terms Pflichterfüllung (fulfillment of duty), is the prerequisite for all state-building and civilization.7 He writes: "All the human culture, all the results of art, science, and technology that we see before us today, are almost exclusively the creative product of the Aryan".2 By framing the Aryan as the "Prometheus of mankind," Hitler establishes a zero-sum game: the preservation of the Aryan is synonymous with the preservation of civilization itself. If the Aryan perishes, "the dark veils of an age without culture will again descend on this globe".1
This racial supremacy drew heavily from 19th-century theorists such as Arthur de Gobineau and Houston Stewart Chamberlain. Gobineau’s theory that the fall of civilizations is caused by "racial intermixing" and the dilution of noble blood becomes the central anxiety of Mein Kampf.6 Hitler argues that the Aryan’s greatest threat is not military defeat, but biological contamination—a loss of the racial purity that is the source of his genius.
2.2 The Semitic Antithesis: The Anti-Culture
To sustain this Manichaean worldview, Hitler required an "anti-race" that embodied the opposite of Aryan idealism. He found this in the Jew. If the Aryan is the "culture-founder" (Kulturbegründer), the Jew is defined in Mein Kampf as the "culture-destroyer" (Kulturzerstörer).6
Hitler constructs a specific anthropological argument to deny Jews the status of a legitimate people. He argues that because Jews (historically) lacked a territorial nation-state, they could not possess true culture, which he believed sprang from the soil (Blut und Boden). Consequently, he posits that the Jewish people are not a nation but a "nomadic" entity. However, unlike traditional nomads who wander from place to place, Hitler argues the Jew remains in one place, infiltrating the existing states of other peoples.7
This logic leads to the conclusion that Jewish survival is inherently predatory. Lacking "productive capacities" of their own, Jews cannot build a state but must subsist by exploiting the labor and creativity of others.10 This characterization is essential to his conspiracy theory: if the Jew cannot create, he must steal; if he cannot build, he must rule those who can.
2.3 The "Parasite" Metaphor and the Medicalization of Hate
A critical insight into the text is Hitler’s reliance on biological metaphors to strip the Jew of humanity. The language of Mein Kampf shifts from political terminology to the lexicon of parasitology and pathology. The Jew is described as a "parasite in the body of other peoples," a "maggot in a rotting corpse," a "bacillus," "germ," and "leech".11
This is not merely rhetorical excess; it is a cognitive framework that dictates policy. As analyzed by cognitive linguist Andreas Musolff, Hitler’s metaphor system operates on a "source scenario" of illness and cure.12
The Nation: Conceptualized as a living biological organism (the body politic).
The Jew: Conceptualized as a deadly pathogen or parasite invading this body.
The Solution: Medical intervention. One does not negotiate with a tumor or a parasite; one excises it to save the life of the host.
This "bio-parasite" metaphor allows Hitler to bypass moral inhibitions against murder. By framing the extermination of the Jews as a medical necessity—a "delousing" or "surgical procedure"—he transforms genocide into an act of national hygiene.13
Table 1: The Metaphorical System of Mein Kampf
Metaphor Domain
Terminology Used
Implication for Policy
Parasitology
Parasite, Leech, Vampire, Maggot
The Jew drains the resources of the host nation; coexistence is impossible.
Bacteriology
Bacillus, Germ, Plague, Pestilence
The Jew spreads disease (political and biological); requires quarantine and eradication.
Mycology
Fungus, Sponging
The Jew grows on the decay of the state; thrives in times of national crisis.
Oncology
Cancer, Tumor, Growth
The Jew is a lethal growth within the nation that must be cut out.
2.4 Syphilis and the "Blood Poisoning" Narrative
Closely related to the parasite metaphor is Hitler’s obsession with "blood poisoning" (Blutvergiftung). In Mein Kampf, he devotes significant space to the history of syphilis, using the disease as a potent allegory for Jewish influence.5 He conflates the physical spread of syphilis with the metaphorical spread of Jewish ideas, suggesting that both lead to "paralysis" and madness.
He explicitly argues that the Jew plans to rule the world by systematically "bastardizing" the white race. In one of the text’s most infamous passages, he writes of the "black-haired Jewish youth" lurking in wait to rape the "unsuspecting Christian girl".10 For Hitler, this is not just a sexual crime but a strategic act of war. He reasons that "a racially pure people which is conscious of its blood can never be enslaved by the Jew".10 Therefore, the prerequisite for Jewish world domination is the biological degradation of the Aryan stock. By polluting the blood, the Jew lowers the cultural and physical level of the host population, making them docile subjects for a Jewish tyranny. This logic directly underpinned the Nuremberg Laws of 1935, which banned marriage and sexual relations between Jews and Germans.14
III. The Epistemology of Conspiracy: The Protocols and the "Inner Truth"
3.1 The Role of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
If the racial hierarchy provided the why of the conspiracy, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion provided the how. This document, a Czarist forgery first published in 1903, purports to record a secret meeting of Jewish elders plotting global domination through the manipulation of gold, the press, and liberal democracy.11 Despite being exposed as a fraud by the Frankfurter Zeitung in 1924, Hitler embraces the text in Mein Kampf with a chillingly circular logic that defines the conspiratorial mindset.
Hitler writes: "The Frankfurter Zeitung moans and screams once every week that they are based on a forgery: the best proof that they are authentic".10 In Hitler's epistemology, the very fact that the "Jewish press" denied the authenticity of the Protocols was confirmation of their veracity. He argued that the document possessed an "inner truth"—even if the text was historically forged, it accurately described the reality of Jewish behavior and goals.16
3.2 The Prophetic Function of the Protocols
For Hitler, the Protocols were not just a document but a prophecy that explained the chaos of the post-WWI world. The Protocols describe a strategy of destabilizing nations by promoting liberalism, economic crises, and class warfare. Hitler looked at the Weimar Republic—wracked by hyperinflation, political violence, and cultural shifts—and saw the exact fulfillment of this plan.
The text gave him a framework to interpret disparate events as part of a single, unified will. The rise of Bolshevism in Russia and the dominance of finance capitalism in London and New York were not contradictory forces; they were two arms of the pincer movement described in the Protocols. By creating chaos, the Jew prepares the exhausted masses to accept a "benevolent" Jewish dictatorship to restore order. Hitler believed that by publishing Mein Kampf and disseminating the Protocols, he was breaking the code of the conspiracy. "For once this book has become the common property of a people, the Jewish menace may be considered as broken," he declared.10
3.3 The Fiction of "Biarritz" and the Persistence of the Hoax
It is noteworthy that the Protocols themselves were plagiarized from an 1868 German novel, Biarritz, by Hermann Goedsche, which featured a fictional scene of Jewish tribes meeting in a Prague cemetery to report on their subversion of Christian nations.17 Despite its origins in fiction, the narrative of a secret cabal manipulating world events resonated deeply with Hitler’s paranoid style. This reliance on a known forgery demonstrates that Hitler’s antisemitism was immune to empirical refutation; it was a belief system that generated its own evidence.
IV. The Economic Conspiracy: Raffendes vs. Schaffendes Capital
4.1 The Distinction of Gottfried Feder
A major intellectual hurdle for the Nazi movement was reconciling its base of anti-capitalist workers with its need for support from nationalist conservatives and industrialists. Mein Kampf resolves this tension through a specific economic theory derived from the economist Gottfried Feder and the earlier writer Otto Glogau.18 This theory involves a sharp distinction between two types of capital:
Schaffendes Kapital (Creative/Productive Capital): This refers to industrial capital—factories, machinery, and technology. Hitler viewed this capital as "national" and "Aryan" because it involved hard work, produced tangible goods, and was rooted in the German soil.20
Raffendes Kapital (Grasping/Rapacious Capital): This refers to loan capital, stock market speculation, and interest. Hitler viewed this as "Jewish" because it made money from money, without labor, and was "international," flowing across borders without loyalty to the nation.18
4.2 The Stock Exchange as an Instrument of Alienation
In Mein Kampf, Hitler identifies the stock exchange as the primary weapon of Jewish economic warfare. He argues that by transforming family-owned German industries into public stock companies (Aktiengesellschaften), the Jew alienates the property from the worker. The "impersonal" nature of shareholding breaks the bond between the employer and the employee.7
This mechanism allows the Jew to gain control over the national economy without doing any productive work. Through the "magic" of interest and speculation, the Jewish financier siphons off the wealth created by the German worker. Hitler describes this as "interest slavery" (Zinsknechtschaft). He concludes that the Jew uses this financial power to hollow out the state, creating economic crises (like the hyperinflation of 1923) that dispossess the middle class and force the nation into dependency on international loans.18
This economic conspiracy theory allowed Hitler to attack "capitalism" (meaning Jewish finance) while defending "private property" (meaning German industry), a synthesis that was crucial for his political rise.
V. The Political Conspiracy: Judeo-Bolshevism and the stab in the Back
5.1 The Russian Revolution as a Racial Event
While Hitler despised Western finance, he viewed Soviet Bolshevism as the most immediate and violent manifestation of Jewish world ambition. In Mein Kampf, he explicates the theory of "Judeo-Bolshevism" (Judenbolschewismus), which asserts that the Russian Revolution of 1917 was not a working-class uprising but a Jewish coup d'état.23
Hitler points to the high prominence of Jews in the early Bolshevik leadership (such as Leon Trotsky, Grigory Zinoviev, and Yakov Sverdlov) as proof that Marxism is a Jewish instrument. He writes: "In Russian Bolshevism we must see the attempt undertaken by the Jews in the twentieth century to achieve world domination".24
According to Hitler, the strategy in Russia was the physical extermination of the "Germanic" intelligentsia that had historically ruled the Russian Empire. Once the Aryan leadership was slaughtered, the Jews installed themselves as the new masters of the Slavic "subhumans" (Untermenschen).23 This interpretation was heavily influenced by White Émigrés fleeing the Russian Civil War, who congregated in Munich and joined the Aufbau organization, feeding the Nazis with tales of Jewish atrocities and reinforcing the link between Judaism and Communism.23
5.2 The "Stab in the Back" (Dolchstoß)
The link between the Jewish conspiracy and the German defeat in World War I is the emotional core of Mein Kampf. Hitler aggressively propagates the Dolchstoßlegende—the myth that the German army remained undefeated on the battlefield but was "stabbed in the back" by traitors at home.25
He identifies these traitors as the "November Criminals"—the Socialists, Jews, and democrats who organized strikes in munitions factories and led the revolution of November 1918. Hitler argues that while the "good" German soldier was dying at the front, the "Jewish" agitator was poisoning the home front with Marxist propaganda.5 This betrayal proved to Hitler that the Jew was an internal enemy who would never allow Germany to be strong. The Weimar Republic, founded by these "criminals," was therefore viewed not as a legitimate state but as a "Jewish vassalage" designed to keep Germany enslaved to the Treaty of Versailles.6
5.3 Supra-National Conspiracies: Jesuits and Freemasons
Hitler’s paranoia in Mein Kampf extends beyond Jews to other supra-national organizations that he believed threatened the sovereignty of the nation-state. He frequently conflates Catholicism (specifically the Jesuits) and Freemasonry with the Jewish conspiracy.26
He argues that Freemasonry serves as a trap for the bourgeoisie. While the Jew uses Marxism to radicalize the working class, he uses Freemasonry to preach "pacifism," "tolerance," and "universal brotherhood" to the upper classes.7 By infiltrating the Masonic lodges, the Jew supposedly pulls the strings of politicians and business leaders, ensuring they are too "soft" to resist the coming revolution. This belief led to the persecution of Freemasons in the Third Reich, where lodges were forcibly closed and members equated with Jews.29 Similarly, the Jesuits were viewed with suspicion due to their loyalty to the Pope over the State, a dynamic Hitler conflated with the "stateless" nature of the Jews.
VI. The Cultural Mechanisms: Lügenpresse and Degeneracy
6.1 The "Lügenpresse" (Lying Press) and Public Opinion
Hitler attributes an immense, almost magical power to the press in Mein Kampf. He claims that the Jew "seizes possession" of the press and uses it to manufacture public opinion, which he equates to a "spiritual terror".7 He details the concept of the Lügenpresse (Lying Press), arguing that Jewish-owned newspapers systematically distort the truth to manipulate the masses.30
Hitler identifies the "Big Lie" technique—a falsehood so colossal that no one would believe it could be invented—as a primary Jewish weapon. Through the press, the Jew:
Ridicules national heroes and traditions to destroy national pride.
Promotes "pacifism" to weaken the nation’s military resolve.
Incites class hatred to divide the Volk.
He argues that democracy is a sham because the "public opinion" upon which it rests is entirely manufactured by Jewish media moguls.1 This justified the Nazi policy of total state control over media; to free the nation, the "Jewish press" had to be destroyed.
6.2 Cultural Bolshevism and the Attack on Art
In Mein Kampf, cultural decline is a symptom of racial decay. Hitler attacks modern art, theater, and literature as "Cultural Bolshevism" (Kulturbolschewismus), a term implying that Modernism was a conspiracy to prepare the German soul for political Bolshevism.32
He specifically targets:
Modern Art: Movements like Dadaism and Cubism are described as "degenerate" (entartet), the product of "sick" minds or Jewish subversion designed to mock traditional beauty.33
Music: Atonal music and Jazz are viewed as "Negro" or Jewish influences that undermine the German musical tradition of Beethoven and Wagner.32
Architecture: He criticizes modern architecture for lacking "rootedness" (Wurzelgefühl), contrasting it with the monumental, eternal style he preferred.34
Hitler believed that the Jew, lacking a soul, could not create true art. Therefore, Jewish influence in the arts was necessarily destructive, aimed at severing the German people from their heritage and dragging them down to a "base" level of materialism.10
VII. Geopolitics: Lebensraum and the Binary Future
7.1 The Pivot to the East
The culmination of Hitler’s logic in Mein Kampf is the geopolitical strategy of Lebensraum (Living Space). He argues that Germany is trapped in a precarious geographical position with a growing population and limited resources. He rejects the restoration of the 1914 borders as inadequate and dismisses the acquisition of overseas colonies as a strategic error that would antagonize Britain.4
Instead, Hitler looks to the East. He declares: "We stop the endless German movement to the south and west, and turn our gaze toward the land in the east".2 This territory—primarily Russia and its vassal states—is identified as the necessary "living space" for the Aryan master race to expand, farm, and thrive.
7.2 The Intersection of Race and Geography
The invasion of Russia is justified in Mein Kampf by the theory of Judeo-Bolshevism. Hitler argues that Russia is no longer a sovereign state but a "Jewish fortress." By attacking Russia, Germany would accomplish two goals simultaneously:
Biological Survival: Securing the land required to feed the German people and ensure their independence from global markets.
Racial Salvation: destroying the headquarters of the Jewish world conspiracy.24
This fusion of imperial ambition and antisemitic paranoia meant that the war in the East was conceived from the start as a "war of annihilation" (Vernichtungskrieg), not just against the Red Army, but against the "Jewish-Bolshevik" population.
7.3 The Apocalyptic Conclusion
Hitler’s analysis concludes with a terrifying binary. He believed the world was at a tipping point. The "Jewish conspiracy" was so advanced—controlling finance in the West and government in the East—that the Aryan race faced an immediate choice between victory or extinction.
He writes apocalyptically: "If, with the help of his Marxist creed, the Jew is victorious over the other peoples of the world, his crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity and this planet will, as it did thousands of years ago, move through the ether devoid of men".1
This passage reveals the ultimate depth of his delusion. Hitler concluded that because the Jew was a "parasite," a Jewish victory would result in the death of the host (humanity) and subsequently the death of the parasite itself. Therefore, he framed his "struggle" not as a crime, but as a cosmic duty. "I believe that I am acting in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator: by defending myself against the Jew, I am fighting for the work of the Lord".10
VIII. Conclusion: The Architecture of Delusion
The research into Mein Kampf demonstrates that Hitler’s conclusion that the world would be ruled by Jews was not a rhetorical device, but the fundamental axiom of his reality. It was a closed ideological system that absorbed all contradictory evidence and reconfigured it as proof of the conspiracy.
Biology: The Jew was the anti-nature, the parasite.
Politics: The Jew was the Marxist revolutionary and the liberal democrat.
Economics: The Jew was the rapacious financier.
Culture: The Jew was the modernist corrupter.
By utilizing the "proof" of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the economic theories of Raffendes capital, and the "stab in the back" myth, Hitler constructed a scenario where Germany was under siege from within and without. This paranoid architecture transformed the Holocaust into a "rational" policy within the Nazi framework: if the Jew is a lethal pathogen threatening the life of the planet, then extermination is the only logical cure. Mein Kampf stands as the permanent record of how this monstrous logic was assembled, piece by piece, until it unleashed a catastrophe that nearly destroyed the civilization Hitler claimed to save.
Table 2: Key Influences on Hitler’s Worldview in Mein Kampf
Influence / Figure
Concept Contributed
Citation
Arthur de Gobineau
Racial degeneration caused by blood mixing.
6
Gottfried Feder
Distinction between Raffendes (Jewish) and Schaffendes (Aryan) capital.
18
Otto Glogau
Early formulation of the capital distinction.
19
White Émigrés (Aufbau)
Transmission of "Judeo-Bolshevism" and Protocols to Nazis.
23
Henry Ford
The International Jew; reinforced the global conspiracy idea.
35
Hermann Goedsche
Author of Biarritz, the fictional source of the Protocols.
17
The Protocols of Zion
The "blueprint" for Jewish world domination.
28
Works cited
Mein Kampf Outlines Nazi Thought | Research Starters - EBSCO, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/literature-and-writing/mein-kampf-outlines-nazi-thought
Mein Kampf | Quotes, Summary, Banned, & Analysis - Britannica, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Mein-Kampf
Mein Kampf - Wikipedia, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mein_Kampf
Mein Kampf - Yad Vashem, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://wwv.yadvashem.org/odot_pdf/Microsoft%20Word%20-%206644.pdf
Tactical Guidelines in Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/704567
Nazism - Wikipedia, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism
USHistory--Chapter11--PrimarySources--AdolfHitler - Mira Costa High School, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://www.miracostahigh.org/ourpages/users/ssingiser/documents/US%20History--Chapter%2011%20Files/USHistory--Chapter11--PrimarySources--AdolfHitler.pdf
'Mein Kampf' as a Propaganda Playbook | The MIT Press Reader, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/mein-kampf-as-a-propaganda-playbook/
Nazi racial theories - Wikipedia, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_racial_theories
NAZI IDEOLOGY | Echoes & Reflections, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://echoesandreflections.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/02-02-04-01_StudentHandout_Nazi-Ideology.pdf
At 100, Mein Kampf Casts a Haunting Shadow - NYU, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://www.nyu.edu/about/news-publications/news/2025/july/at-100--mein-kampf-casts-a-haunting-shadow.html
What role do metaphors play in racial prejudice? The function of antisemitic imagery in "Mein Kampf" - University of East Anglia, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://research-portal.uea.ac.uk/en/publications/what-role-do-metaphors-play-in-racial-prejudice-the-function-of-a
The socio-parasite and bio-parasite metaphorical concepts in racist discourse, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://repozytorium.uwb.edu.pl/jspui/bitstream/11320/7067/1/Crossroads_17_2017_M_Wasniewska_The_socio-parasite_and_bio-parasite_metaphorical_concepts.pdf
Nazi Racism | Holocaust Encyclopedia, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/nazi-racism
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion - Wikipedia, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion
Believing in “Inner Truth”: The Protocols of the Elders of Zion in Nazi Propaganda, 1933–1945 | Holocaust and Genocide Studies | Oxford Academic, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/hgs/article/29/2/212/562402
Why the 'Protocols of the Elders of Zion' is still pushed by anti-Semites | BrandeisNOW, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://www.brandeis.edu/now/2020/september/whitfield-conversation.html
hitler - MTDA, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://mtda.hu/books/lengyel_emil_hitler.pdf
Glossary of Nazi Germany - Wikipedia, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_Nazi_Germany
66A CITY WITHOUT JEWS", accessed on November 23, 2025, https://www.acsa-arch.org/proceedings/International%20Proceedings/ACSA.Intl.1997/ACSA.Intl.1997.70.pdf
GERMANY: National Revolution! - Time Magazine, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://time.com/archive/6750852/germany-national-revolution/
"We Are Socialists" - What Hitler was talking about and, more importantly, what he wasn't, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/CapitalismVSocialism/comments/93oan3/we_are_socialists_what_hitler_was_talking_about/
Jewish Bolshevism - Wikipedia, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_Bolshevism
The Nuremberg Race Laws | The National WWII Museum | New Orleans, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/nuremberg-laws
Stab-in-the-back myth - Wikipedia, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stab-in-the-back_myth
Jesuits, Jews, Christianity, and Bolshevism: An Existential Threat to Germany? in - Brill, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://brill.com/view/journals/jjs/5/1/article-p33_33.xml?language=en
Anti-Masonry - Wikipedia, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Masonry
An Antisemitic Conspiracy: The Protocols of the Elders of Zion | Holocaust Encyclopedia, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/protocols-of-the-elders-of-zion
Certificate confirming Siegmund Baruch's membership of the "Zur Bruderkette" Freemason lodge « 1933 - Jüdisches Museum Berlin, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://www.jmberlin.de/1933/en/09_28_certificate-confirming-siegmund-baruchs-membership-of-the-zur-bruderkette-freemason-lodge.php
2. FROM MISINFORMATION TO MODERN L Ü GENPRESSE - Cambridge Core - Journals & Books Online, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://resolve.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/1D78828B9061FF28BF41194E3DCF2B1F/9781839700422c2_p11-30_CBO.pdf/from-misinformation-to-modern-lugenpresse-the-redefinition-of-fake-news.pdf
The Hugo Valentin Centre - DiVA portal, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1675096/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Politics, Culture, Political Culture: Recent Work on the Third Reich and Its Aftermath* | The Journal of Modern History: Vol 78, No 3 - The University of Chicago Press: Journals, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/509150
Entartete Kunst: The War against Modern Art in the Third Reich - Bryant Digital Repository, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://digitalcommons.bryant.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1037&context=honors_history
(PDF) The Modernism of Nazi Culture - ResearchGate, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304701425_The_Modernism_of_Nazi_Culture
Pathway to the Shoah: The Protocols, "Jewish Bolshevism", Rosenberg, Goebbels, Ford, and Hitler, accessed on November 23, 2025, https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1044&context=history_books
