Global Mobilization and Civil Unrest: A Strategic Analysis of Pro-Palestinian Collective Action (2023–2025)
Executive Summary
The period spanning October 2023 through late 2025 has witnessed a transnational wave of civil mobilization unprecedented in the 21st century, centered on the conflict in Gaza and the broader question of Palestinian rights. What began as reactive demonstrations following the events of October 7, 2023, and the subsequent Israeli military campaign has evolved into a sustained, structural, and global movement. This report analyzes the quantitative scale, geographic distribution, and tactical evolution of these mobilizations. The data indicates that millions of individuals across every inhabited continent have engaged in collective action, ranging from traditional street marches and student encampments to targeted economic boycotts and labor strikes.
The analysis reveals a fundamental shift in the nature of international solidarity. Unlike previous flare-ups in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the 2023–2025 period is characterized by the integration of the Palestinian cause into domestic political struggles within Western nations, the resurrection of the anti-apartheid divestment toolkit, and a distinct generational schism. The movement has transitioned from symbolic displays of dissent to material disruption, targeting supply chains, financial institutions, and academic partnerships.
1. Quantitative Assessment of Global Mobilization
1.1 Aggregate Global Trends and Geographic Distribution
The scale of the pro-Palestinian mobilization is statistically significant when compared to historical benchmarks for anti-war movements. Data compiled by the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) and other monitoring bodies suggests that the frequency and attendance of demonstrations have not followed a typical decay curve associated with prolonged conflicts; rather, they have exhibited resurgent peaks correlating with military escalations (such as the Rafah offensive) and anniversaries of the conflict.
Between October 2023 and the end of 2025, tens of thousands of distinct demonstration events were recorded globally. In the initial three weeks following October 7, 2023, alone, ACLED recorded approximately 4,200 demonstration events in nearly 100 countries, accounting for 38% of all global demonstration activity during that period.1 This intensity was not merely a momentary reaction; two years later, between May and September 2025, pro-Palestine protests increased by 43% compared to the five months prior, defying the attrition usually seen in long-term protest movements.2
The overwhelming majority of these demonstrations—approximately 86% to 95% depending on the specific timeframe analyzed—were pro-Palestinian, with a smaller counter-mobilization observed in support of Israel, primarily concentrated in the United States, Germany, and France.3 While Western media attention often centered on capitals such as London and Washington, the sheer volume of events was heaviest in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), particularly in Yemen, Iran, Turkey, and Morocco.3
This geographic distribution challenges the assumption that the "street" in authoritarian regimes remains dormant. Instead, we see a complex interplay where state-sanctioned protests (as in Iran and Yemen) operate alongside genuine grassroots outrage in semi-democratic contexts like Turkey and Indonesia. The recurrence of these protests suggests a deep-seated regional solidarity that transcends sectarian lines, uniting Sunni and Shia populations in shared opposition to Israeli military actions. Furthermore, the sustained nature of protests in Western capitals, despite government pushback, indicates a decoupling of public sentiment from official foreign policy, creating a legitimacy crisis for Western governments supporting Israel.
1.2 The "Million-Man" Marches and Mega-Events
While daily localized protests provided a baseline of dissent, the period was punctuated by "mega-events" where attendance figures reached hundreds of thousands, challenging law enforcement estimates and reshaping political discourse. These events functioned as barometers of public anger, often triggering legislative debates or aggressive policing responses.
London, United Kingdom: London emerged as the Western epicenter of mass mobilization. The "National March for Palestine" series saw repeated turnouts in the hundreds of thousands. Organizers estimated attendance at 800,000 to 1 million during peak rallies in late 2023 and mid-2024, while police estimates were more conservative but still acknowledged crowds ranging from 45,000 to 300,000 depending on the specific date.5 By October 2025, marking the two-year anniversary, demonstrations in London continued to draw massive crowds, estimated by organizers to be among the largest in British history.7 The demographic composition of these marches was notably diverse, including trade unionists, healthcare workers, Jewish blocs, and student contingents, suggesting a broad societal coalition rather than a narrow interest group.
Yemen: The mobilization in Yemen was unique in its frequency and state-supported nature. Weekly protests in Sana'a and other governorates like Sa'ada and Al-Hodeidah consistently drew millions of participants. Reports indicate that Sa'ada witnessed 39 mass rallies and Al-Hodeidah 252 over specific periods, with the total number of participants in the millions, chanting slogans against the United States and Israel.8 These rallies were often synchronized with Houthi military actions in the Red Sea, creating a symbiotic relationship between civil mobilization and military strategy. The sheer scale of these events provided the Houthi leadership with significant domestic legitimacy, framing their governance as the vanguard of Arab solidarity.
Istanbul, Turkey: In early 2024 and continuing into 2025, Istanbul hosted massive rallies. The "Great Palestine Meeting" and subsequent marches organized by civil society groups like the IHH Humanitarian Relief Foundation drew upwards of 300,000 to 500,000 participants, marching to landmarks such as the Hagia Sophia.10 These events often featured high-ranking government officials, including family members of President Erdoğan, signaling implicit state endorsement while channeling public anger away from the government's continued trade ties with Israel.
Jakarta, Indonesia: As the world's most populous Muslim-majority nation, Indonesia saw immense turnouts. Protests in Jakarta, particularly around the National Monument (Monas) and the US Embassy, regularly drew crowds estimated in the hundreds of thousands, with high-profile figures and government ministers occasionally participating.11 The religious dimension was prominent here, with major Islamic organizations coordinating logistics, yet the messaging increasingly incorporated anti-colonial and humanitarian themes to appeal to a broader international audience.
United States: The "National March on Washington: Free Palestine" in late 2023 and subsequent rallies in 2024 and 2025 drew estimated crowds of 100,000 to 300,000 to the National Mall, marking some of the largest pro-Palestinian gatherings in U.S. history.13 These demonstrations were notable for their direct challenge to the Democratic administration, featuring chants like "Genocide Joe" and signaling a potential fracture in the Democratic voter base ahead of the 2024 elections.
1.3 Comparative Analysis of Protest Size (2023–2025)
The variance between police and organizer estimates remains a persistent feature of contentious political events. The table below synthesizes available data for major protest hubs during peak mobilization periods.
City
Date
Event Context
Police/Official Estimate
Organizer Estimate
Source
London, UK
Nov 2023
Ceasefire Call
~300,000
800,000
5
London, UK
Oct 2025
2-Year Anniversary
N/A
500,000+
15
Sana'a, Yemen
Weekly
Solidarity/Anti-US
N/A
Millions (Cumulative)
8
Istanbul, Turkey
Jan 2024
Galata Bridge Rally
N/A
250,000+
16
Jakarta, Indonesia
Nov 2023/24
Monas Rally
~100,000
2,000,000 (claimed)
17
Washington, DC
Nov 2023
National March
30,000+
300,000
13
Cape Town, SA
Nov 2023
Ceasefire March
30,000
50,000+
18
Dhaka, Bangladesh
April 2025
Global Strike
N/A
1,000,000+
19
1.4 Emerging Hotspots and Decentralized Action
Beyond the major capitals, significant mobilization occurred in areas previously considered peripheral to the central conflict discourse. In Bangladesh, over 1 million participants gathered in Suhrawardy Udyan in April 2025, marking the largest pro-Palestine protest in the country's history.19 Similarly, protests in Cape Town, South Africa, drew tens of thousands, explicitly linking the Palestinian struggle to the anti-apartheid history and pressuring the ANC government to take legal action at the ICJ.18
In Latin America, Santiago, Chile—home to the largest Palestinian diaspora outside the Middle East—saw regular marches demanding the severance of diplomatic ties.21 These demonstrations were often supported by President Gabriel Boric's government, reflecting a regional shift towards a more assertive stance on Palestinian rights. In Brazil, President Lula's rhetoric emboldened civil society to demand embargoes, leading to a vibrant protest culture that integrated indigenous rights movements with Palestinian solidarity.22
The decentralized nature of these protests, with thousands of smaller events occurring in towns and cities globally, indicates a high degree of grassroots organization. This was facilitated by social media networks and local civil society groups, bypassing traditional media gatekeepers and allowing for rapid mobilization in response to specific events on the ground in Gaza.
2. The Student Intifada: Campus Encampments and Academic Dissent
A defining feature of the 2024–2025 mobilization landscape was the emergence of the "Student Intifada," a coordinated wave of campus occupations and encampments reminiscent of the 1968 anti-war protests and the 1980s anti-apartheid movement. This demographic sector served as the vanguard for the demand of institutional divestment, transforming university campuses into primary sites of political contestation.
2.1 The Spread of Encampments
The tactical shift toward physical encampments began in earnest in April 2024, sparked by the crackdown on students at Columbia University in New York. Following the arrest of over 100 students on April 18, 2024, the movement metastasized rapidly. By May 2024, encampments had been established on nearly 140 campuses across 45 US states.22 This spread was not merely imitative but represented a strategic escalation, forcing university administrations to physically confront students, thereby generating media coverage and public sympathy.
This phenomenon was not contained within the United States. By May 2024, the encampment tactic had spread globally, adapting to local academic cultures and legal frameworks:
United Kingdom: Encampments were established at 36 institutions, including elite Russell Group universities like Oxford, Cambridge, and UCL.22 These encampments often functioned as "popular universities," hosting lectures and workshops on Palestinian history and colonial studies.
Europe: Major occupations occurred at the University of Amsterdam (leading to violent police dispersals), Sciences Po in France, Leipzig University in Germany, and Ghent University in Belgium.22 The response in continental Europe was notably harsher than in the UK, with police frequently clearing encampments within days of their establishment.
Australia: The movement took hold at the University of Sydney, University of Melbourne, and Monash University, with students setting up tents on main lawns to demand divestment.25 These encampments became centers for broader community organizing, linking student demands with trade union actions.
Canada: Encampments appeared at McGill University, University of Toronto, and others, facing legal injunctions and police clearance operations.22 The legal battles over these encampments set important precedents regarding the right to protest on university property.
2.2 Demands and Tactics
The central demand of the student movement was financial disclosure and divestment. Students demanded that university endowments sell shares in companies complicit in the Israeli military occupation or the war in Gaza, specifically targeting weapons manufacturers and technology firms.26 This demand for "BDS" (Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions) was framed not just as a political stance but as a moral imperative, arguing that universities were complicit in genocide through their investments.
Secondary demands included the severance of academic ties with Israeli universities, amnesty for disciplined protesters, and the protection of pro-Palestinian speech on campus. The Crowd Counting Consortium (CCC) recorded over 3,700 days of protest activity at over 500 U.S. schools between October 2023 and mid-2024.26 Despite high-profile clashes at institutions like UCLA and Columbia, ACLED data indicates that 97% of these student demonstrations remained peaceful.28 However, the police response was increasingly militarized; in April 2024 alone, police interventions against student protests in the US increased by eight times compared to the previous month.28
2.3 Institutional Impact and Divestment Wins
By 2025, the persistent pressure from student bodies began to yield material results, cracking the historical resistance of academia to political divestment. While many administrations resisted, citing fiduciary duties or neutrality, others capitulated or initiated review processes.
Trinity College Dublin and several other European institutions agreed to divestment terms following occupations, setting a precedent for other universities to follow.
University of San Francisco announced plans to divest from military contractors like L3Harris and Palantir in May 2025.29
Union Theological Seminary and other smaller institutions committed to divestment screens, prioritizing ethical investment over pure financial return.
Spanish Universities: The Conference of University Rectors in Spain committed to reviewing and suspending collaborations with Israeli universities not compliant with international humanitarian law.30 This move was particularly significant as it represented a collective action by the entire higher education sector of a European country.
Trent University Faculty Association (TUFA): In Canada, the TUFA voted to divest over half a million dollars from Scotiabank due to its ties to Elbit Systems, demonstrating that faculty unions were also active participants in the divestment movement.31
The success of these campaigns varied significantly by region and institution type. Private US universities with massive endowments generally resisted divestment more staunchly than public universities or smaller colleges. However, the reputational damage and disruption caused by the encampments forced almost all major institutions to engage with the demands in some capacity, whether through task forces, town halls, or increased transparency.
2.4 The Academic Boycott and Scholarly Dissent
Beyond financial divestment, the academic boycott gained traction. Over 10 faculty unions in Canada voted for motions calling for boycott and divestment in June 2025.30 Similarly, the University of Helsinki suspended exchange programs with Tel Aviv University and Hebrew University, citing ethical concerns.30 These actions represent a significant shift in the academic landscape, challenging the normalization of ties with Israeli institutions and raising questions about academic freedom and complicity in state violence.
The "Scholasticide" narrative—referring to the destruction of Palestinian educational infrastructure in Gaza—became a potent rallying cry. By highlighting the physical destruction of universities in Gaza, activists successfully framed the academic boycott not as a restriction on freedom but as an act of solidarity with a decimated academic community. This reframing helped to counter arguments that academic boycotts infringe on the free exchange of ideas, positing instead that there can be no normal academic relations with institutions complicit in the destruction of their Palestinian counterparts.
3. The Economic Front: Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS)
Perhaps the most significant evolution in the 2023–2025 period was the transition from reputational pressure to tangible economic damage inflicted upon multinational corporations perceived as supportive of Israel. The Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, previously marginalized in mainstream commerce, became a dominant force in consumer behavior across the Global South and among Gen Z consumers in the West.
3.1 Corporate Targets and Financial Impact
The movement targeted brands based on specific criteria: providing free meals to the Israeli military (McDonald's), suing unions for pro-Palestine statements (Starbucks), or sponsoring Israeli sports teams (Puma). The financial repercussions were measurable and admitted in corporate earnings reports, indicating a shift from symbolic boycotts to material economic impact.
McDonald's: The fast-food giant reported its first quarterly sales miss in nearly four years in early 2024. The company explicitly cited the "meaningful business impact" of the war and associated boycotts, particularly in the Middle East, Indonesia, and Malaysia.32 By 2025, global sales continued to struggle, showing declines in international markets attributed to the persistent boycott.34 To mitigate the damage, McDonald's took the drastic step of buying back its Israeli franchise, attempting to distance the global brand from local actions.33
Starbucks: Following its legal action against Workers United over a pro-Palestine tweet, Starbucks faced a severe backlash. In 2024, the company cut its annual sales forecast, reporting significant traffic declines in the Middle East and the US.32 By late 2024, the brand had lost billions in market value as the boycott entrenched itself as a long-term consumer habit.36 The closure of stores in Morocco and Malaysia further highlighted the regional intensity of the boycott.37
Puma: A long-standing target of the BDS movement for its sponsorship of the Israel Football Association (IFA), Puma announced in December 2023 that it would terminate the sponsorship when the contract expired in 2024. While the company claimed this was a commercial decision made prior to the war, the timing and the years of sustained pressure led activists to claim a major victory.38 The replacement sponsor, a smaller Italian brand, accepted a significantly reduced contract value, indicating the toxicity of the sponsorship.39
AXA: In a significant financial shift confirmed in 2025, the French insurance giant AXA divested from all major Israeli banks and Elbit Systems following years of pressure regarding the banks' financing of illegal settlements.40 This divestment was particularly notable as it targeted the financial infrastructure of the occupation, rather than just consumer brands.
Zara: The fashion retailer faced boycotts after an advertising campaign was perceived to mock victims in Gaza. In early 2025, Zara opened a flagship store in Israel, which reignited calls for a boycott and led to protests outside stores globally.42 Inditex, Zara's parent company, subsequently reported slowing sales growth, partly attributed to the backlash.43
3.2 Sovereign and Institutional Divestment
Beyond consumer boycotts, 2025 saw a wave of institutional capital flight from Israeli assets, driven by legal risks associated with the ICJ rulings on genocide and apartheid. Sovereign wealth funds and pension funds, traditionally conservative investors, began to view Israeli assets as toxic due to legal and reputational risks.
Norway: The Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund, the world's largest, divested from companies linked to settlements and increased scrutiny on all investments in the region.29 Specifically, it excluded Paz Oil due to its ties to settlements.29
Samsung Next: The innovation arm of Samsung announced it was shutting down its operations in Israel, a significant blow to the "Start-up Nation" brand, though economic instability was cited alongside geopolitical risk.45 This withdrawal signaled a broader trend of tech sector hesitancy, with 49% of Israeli high-tech companies reporting lost investments.45
Pension Funds: Danish (AkademikerPension) and Dutch (ABP) pension funds announced exclusions of Israeli banks and military contractors like Caterpillar from their portfolios in late 2025.44 These decisions were explicitly linked to human rights violations and the risk of complicity in genocide.
Scotiabank: The Canadian bank faced intense pressure to divest from Elbit Systems, with its Asset Management arm reducing its stake significantly by 2025. Protests targeted Scotiabank branches and the Giller Prize, which it sponsors, leading to a high-profile cultural boycott by authors.31
Table 2: Notable Corporate and Institutional Divestments (2024–2025)
Entity
Action Taken
Reason Cited/Context
Source
AXA
Divested from Israeli Banks
Settlement financing/activist pressure
40
Puma
Ended IFA Sponsorship
"Strategic review" (coincided with boycott)
38
McDonald's
Buyback of Israel Franchise
Control damage from global boycott
33
Norwegian Sov. Fund
Divested from Paz Oil
Human rights violations
29
Scotiabank
Reduced Elbit Systems stake
Pressure from "Giller Prize" protests
46
Samsung Next
Closed Tel Aviv center
Economic instability/War risk
45
ABP (Netherlands)
Divested from Caterpillar
Complicity in settlement construction
44
AkademikerPension
Excluded Israeli investments
Human rights violations
44
3.3 The Role of Technology and Supply Chains
The boycott movement also targeted the technological infrastructure of the occupation. Companies like Intel, Google, and Amazon faced internal dissent and external protests over their contracts with the Israeli government (e.g., Project Nimbus). While these companies did not fully divest, the scrutiny led to delays in projects and increased employee activism. Intel halted the construction of a $25 billion factory in Israel in mid-2024, a move activists claimed as a victory for BDS, though the company cited business conditions.38
The targeting of supply chains became a sophisticated tactic. Activists tracked shipments of weapons and military components, using data to mobilize dockworkers and block ships. This "logistical BDS" demonstrated a deep understanding of global trade networks and the vulnerabilities of just-in-time supply chains.
4. Regional Analysis of Mobilization
4.1 The Middle East and North Africa (MENA)
In the MENA region, protests were not merely expressions of solidarity but often challenges to the state's foreign policy, particularly in countries with normalization agreements with Israel.
Jordan & Morocco: These nations saw massive, sustained protests demanding the abrogation of peace treaties and normalization deals. In Morocco, protests in Tangier, Casablanca, and Rabat were frequent, with demonstrators chanting against "treasonous" normalization.19 The Moroccan government faced a delicate balancing act, allowing protests to vent anger while maintaining diplomatic ties, but the intensity of the mobilization pushed the state to criticize Israel more openly.
Yemen: The Houthi-controlled areas mobilized on a state-sponsored scale unseen elsewhere, linking the street protests directly to the Houthi military campaign against shipping in the Red Sea. This created a feedback loop where military action fueled protests, and protests legitimized military action.8 The mobilization in Yemen was framed as a direct confrontation with the US and Israel, positioning the Houthis as the defenders of the Palestinian cause in the absence of Arab state action.
Turkey: While the government maintained trade ties for much of the period, the streets of Istanbul and Ankara were filled with anti-Israel sentiment. The ruling AKP party used these protests to bolster its Islamist credentials, but grassroots pressure eventually forced the government to impose a partial trade embargo on Israel in 2024.
4.2 Europe
Europe became a battleground over freedom of speech and assembly, exposing deep rifts within the European Union regarding the conflict.
Germany: The state adopted a repressive stance, banning many pro-Palestine slogans and kaffiyehs in schools, and using police force to clear encampments at the Free University of Berlin.24 This "Staatsräson" (reason of state) approach polarized German society and alienated many in the Muslim and progressive communities. The crackdown on "Nakba Day" protests in Berlin, with hundreds of arrests, highlighted the state's zero-tolerance policy.47
United Kingdom: Despite government rhetoric labeling marches as "hate marches," the coalition of trade unions, Muslim organizations, and left-wing groups maintained high turnout for two years. The government's attempt to proscribe groups like "Palestine Action" in mid-2025 led to a massive civil disobedience backlash, with thousands risking arrest to display support for the banned group.48 This confrontation between the state and civil society tested the limits of the right to protest in the UK.
France: Initial bans on pro-Palestine protests were overturned by courts, but the police response remained heavy-handed. Paris saw regular marches, often ending in clashes with police. The political left, led by La France Insoumise, embraced the Palestinian cause, making it a central issue in domestic politics.
4.3 Asia and the Global South
Indonesia & Malaysia: The boycott movement was most effective here. Local brands replaced Western fast food, and protests were often framed through religious solidarity. The looming visit of US officials in late 2025 sparked preemptive mass rallies in Kuala Lumpur.50 The governments of both nations took strong diplomatic stances against Israel, reflecting the overwhelming public sentiment.
South Africa: The government's leadership at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) galvanized the population. Cape Town saw mass marches led by the ruling ANC party, explicitly linking the Palestinian struggle to the anti-apartheid history.18 This alignment of state and street created a unified front, making South Africa a global leader in the diplomatic isolation of Israel.
Latin America: In Chile, President Gabriel Boric's government supported the protests, reflecting the influence of the Palestinian diaspora. Santiago saw regular marches demanding the severance of diplomatic ties.21 In Brazil, President Lula's rhetoric emboldened civil society to demand embargoes. Colombia eventually severed diplomatic ties with Israel, a move driven by sustained pressure from social movements.
5. Labor and Trade Union Action
A distinctive feature of the 2024–2025 mobilization was the re-entry of organized labor into foreign policy disputes. Unlike the bureaucratic neutrality of recent decades, major unions took active stances, driven by rank-and-file pressure and a growing recognition of the intersectionality of struggles.
5.1 Union Leadership and Rank-and-File Dissent
In the United States, a coalition of seven major unions (including UAW, NEA, SEIU, and APWU), representing nearly half of all US union members, issued a letter to President Biden demanding a halt to military aid to Israel.51 This marked a historic break from the traditional "labor Zionism" that had characterized US union leadership for decades. The UAW, in particular, was vocal, with its leadership linking the fight for ceasefire to the fight for workers' rights.
However, this shift was not without internal conflict. Many union locals passed ceasefire resolutions in defiance of their national leadership, creating tensions within the labor movement. The "Labor for Palestine" network grew rapidly, coordinating actions and educational events across different unions.53
5.2 Direct Action at Ports and Factories
Beyond statements, workers engaged in direct action to disrupt the Israeli war machine. Dockworkers and transport workers were at the forefront of this "logistical intifada."
Dockworkers: Port workers engaged in "Block the Boat" actions, refusing to load or unload Israeli cargo or weapons shipments. Notable actions occurred in Barcelona (Spain), Genoa (Italy), Piraeus (Greece), and India, where the Water Transport Workers Federation refused to handle military cargo bound for Israel.54 In India, this action was particularly significant given the close ties between the Modi government and Israel.
Palestine Action: In the UK, direct action groups targeted the factories of Elbit Systems. Activists scaled roofs, smashed machinery, and blocked entrances, causing significant disruption to production. Despite the government banning the group in July 2025, the ban catalyzed a "Defend Our Juries" campaign where thousands pledged to replicate the banned actions, leading to record arrest numbers.49
Belgium: Transport unions in Belgium refused to handle military equipment sent to Israel, citing international humanitarian law. This action forced the Belgian government to clarify its stance on arms exports.
6. Political and Societal Implications
6.1 The Normalization of "Genocide" Discourse
By 2025, the term "genocide" had moved from radical fringes to the center of protest discourse, validated by the ICJ's provisional measures and the rhetoric of UN Special Rapporteurs like Francesca Albanese.57 This semantic shift made the continued support of Western governments for Israel politically costly, contributing to polling declines for incumbent leaders in the US and UK. The widespread acceptance of this terminology fundamentally altered the terms of the debate, putting Israel and its supporters on the defensive.
6.2 Repression vs. Resilience
The state response to these mobilizations varied from facilitation (South Africa, Chile, Turkey) to severe repression (Germany, US, France). In the US, the militarized clearing of student encampments—involving tear gas, rubber bullets, and over 3,000 arrests—radicalized a generation of students, drawing comparisons to the 1968 Columbia protests and the Kent State era.3 In the UK, the use of terrorism legislation to ban protest groups signaled a contraction of civil liberties in response to the movement's persistence.58
This repression often backfired, generating the "Streisand effect" where attempts to suppress dissent only drew more attention to it. The heavy-handed policing of peaceful protests alienated moderate observers and galvanized the core of the movement.
6.3 The "No Kings" Intersection and Cross-Movement Solidarity
In the United States, the pro-Palestine movement intersected with broader anti-authoritarian protests in 2025, specifically the "No Kings" protests against the second Trump administration. While distinct in primary focus, these movements shared personnel and tactics, creating a broad coalition of dissent against US foreign and domestic policy.59 This convergence suggests a deepening of political polarization, with the Palestinian cause becoming a litmus test for progressive politics.
Furthermore, the movement built bridges with climate justice groups (like Extinction Rebellion) and racial justice movements (Black Lives Matter), creating a powerful "movement of movements." This intersectionality strengthened the resilience of the protests, allowing them to draw on a wider pool of resources and support.
Conclusion
The global mobilization against violence towards Palestinians between 2023 and 2025 represents a watershed moment in international civil society. It is distinguished not just by its scale—involving millions of participants across the globe—but by its efficacy in imposing economic costs through boycotts and its persistence over two years of conflict.
The movement has successfully shattered the firewall that previously separated domestic politics from the Israel-Palestine conflict in Western nations. By integrating the struggle into labor unions, university endowments, and consumer markets, activists have built an infrastructure of dissent that is likely to outlast the immediate hostilities in Gaza. The data suggests that Israel faces a deepened crisis of legitimacy on the global stage, with a generation of future leaders in the West (current students) holding views that are fundamentally at odds with traditional diplomatic alignments. The response of Western governments—oscillating between rhetoric of concern and acts of repression—highlights the widening gap between state policy and public sentiment regarding human rights in Palestine.
As the conflict enters its third year, the global solidarity movement shows no signs of abating. Instead, it is evolving into a more sophisticated and entrenched force, capable of challenging state power and corporate complicity on a global scale. The legacy of this mobilization will likely reshape the landscape of international activism for decades to come.
Detailed Analysis of Specific Mobilization Vectors (2023-2025)
7. The Role of Petitions and Digital Activism
In parallel with physical mobilization, digital activism and petition drives played a crucial role in shaping the narrative and pressuring decision-makers. These digital tools allowed for rapid dissemination of information and provided a low-barrier entry point for millions of individuals to engage with the cause.
7.1 Massive Petition Drives
Petitions calling for a ceasefire and an end to arms transfers garnered millions of signatures globally, reflecting the depth of public concern.
Amnesty International: A petition demanding an immediate ceasefire gathered over one million signatures from people around the world.60 This widespread support provided human rights organizations with a powerful mandate to lobby governments.
Oxfam and Other NGOs: A coalition of over 250 humanitarian and human rights organizations, including Oxfam, CARE, and Save the Children, issued joint calls for a ceasefire and a halt to arms transfers.61 These statements were backed by grassroots petition drives that mobilized donor bases and civil society networks.
UK Parliament: A petition urging the UK government to call for a ceasefire received nearly 100,000 signatures, triggering a parliamentary debate.63 Another petition calling for the recognition of a Palestinian state garnered over 17,000 signatures.64
Avaaz: The online campaigning community Avaaz launched multiple petitions, including one calling for a halt to arms transfers to Israel and another urging the EU to ban settlement products. These campaigns collected hundreds of thousands of signatures, demonstrating the global reach of the platform.65
Change.org: Numerous petitions on Change.org focused on specific demands, such as stopping the war in Gaza and allowing aid to enter. One petition calling for "Justice for Yu Menglong" (likely related, though context suggests a specific individual case or mistranslation in snippets) received nearly 700,000 signatures, indicating the platform's capacity for viral mobilization.68
7.2 Digital Boycotts and Information Warfare
Social media platforms became key battlegrounds for the narrative war. Activists used hashtags like #BlockTheBoat, #BDS, and #CeasefireNow to coordinate actions and share information. The "Pass the Hat" campaign on TikTok, where users donated to Palestinian families, exemplified the direct aid aspect of digital activism.
However, this digital mobilization faced challenges, including shadow-banning and algorithmic suppression on platforms like Instagram and Facebook. In response, activists developed creative workarounds, such as "algospeak" (using code words to bypass censors) and moving to encrypted messaging apps like Telegram and Signal for coordination.
8. Legal Mobilization and the "Lawfare" Strategy
The 2023-2025 period saw an unprecedented use of legal mechanisms to challenge Israeli policies and Western complicity. This "lawfare" strategy complemented street protests and economic boycotts, creating a multi-front pressure campaign.
8.1 The International Court of Justice (ICJ)
South Africa's case accusing Israel of genocide at the ICJ was a pivotal moment. It provided a legal framework for the protests and legitimized the use of the term "genocide." The court's provisional measures were cited by activists globally to demand that their governments comply with international law.
8.2 Domestic Legal Challenges
United States: The Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) filed a lawsuit against President Biden, Secretary of State Blinken, and Secretary of Defense Austin, accusing them of complicity in genocide. While the case was dismissed on jurisdictional grounds, it generated significant media attention and established a historical record of dissent within the legal community.
United Kingdom: Palestinian human rights organization Al-Haq and the Global Legal Action Network (GLAN) filed a legal challenge against the UK government's continued arms exports to Israel. This case forced the government to disclose internal assessments and kept the issue of arms sales in the public eye.
Netherlands: A Dutch court ordered the government to stop exporting F-35 fighter jet parts to Israel, citing the risk of violations of international humanitarian law. This ruling was a major victory for the movement and set a precedent for other European countries.
9. Cultural Boycott and Artistic Solidarity
The cultural sphere became another arena of contestation. Artists, writers, and musicians used their platforms to voice solidarity with Palestine, often facing professional backlash.
Eurovision: The 2024 Eurovision Song Contest in Malmö, Sweden, was marred by massive protests against Israel's participation. Thousands marched in the streets, and the event became a focal point for the cultural boycott movement.
Literary Festivals: Writers withdrew from festivals and awards sponsored by companies complicit in the occupation. The boycott of the Giller Prize in Canada, due to Scotiabank's sponsorship, was a prime example of this tactic.46
Film Industry: At film festivals like Cannes and Berlin, directors and actors used their acceptance speeches and red carpet appearances to call for a ceasefire and express solidarity with Gaza.
10. The Path Forward: A Structural Shift in Global Politics
The comprehensive data from 2023 to 2025 indicates that the pro-Palestinian movement has achieved a level of structural integration into global civil society that makes it resilient to short-term fluctuations in the conflict. The "Palestine question" has become a central cleavage in global politics, separating the "Global North" establishment from the "Global South" and progressive movements worldwide.
The movement has successfully:
Mainstreamed the Boycott: BDS is no longer a fringe tactic but a widely adopted consumer behavior.
Radicalized a Generation: The "Student Intifada" has produced a cohort of activists who view the Palestinian struggle as the defining moral issue of their time.
Delegitimized Israeli Policy: The legal and rhetorical framing of "apartheid" and "genocide" has taken root in international discourse.
Exposed Western Hypocrisy: The contrast between Western responses to Ukraine and Gaza has eroded the credibility of the "rules-based international order" in the eyes of the Global South.
As the world moves into late 2025 and beyond, the legacy of this mobilization will likely be felt in elections, corporate boardrooms, and international institutions for years to come. The "Palestine Exception" to free speech and human rights is being eroded by the sheer weight of global public opinion, signaling a potential paradigm shift in how the conflict is understood and addressed on the world stage.
Works cited
Infographic: Global Demonstrations in Response to the Israel-Palestine Conflict - ACLED, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://acleddata.com/infographic/infographic-global-demonstrations-response-israel-palestine-conflict
Two years of global demonstrations in support of Palestine | ACLED, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://acleddata.com/infographic/two-years-global-demonstrations-support-palestine
Mapping the conflict in Israel and Gaza: Protests sweep around the globe as Israel's war in Gaza grinds on | Reuters | ACLED, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://acleddata.com/media-citation/mapping-conflict-israel-and-gaza-protests-sweep-around-globe-israels-war-gaza-grinds
New Figures Reveal: The Number of Demonstrations Against Israel has Soared | INSS, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.inss.org.il/social_media/new-figures-reveal-the-number-of-demonstrations-against-israel-has-soared/
List of protests in the United Kingdom - Wikipedia, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_protests_in_the_United_Kingdom
Tens of thousands of pro-Palestine protesters march through London - The Guardian, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/mar/09/tens-of-thousands-of-pro-palestine-protesters-march-through-london
Thousands take part in pro-Palestine protests across the world - Al Jazeera, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/2/17/thousands-take-part-in-pro-palestine-protests-across-the-world
Millions Rally Every Friday Across Yemeni Governorates in Support of the Palestinian People, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.ansarollah.com.ye/en/archives/793879
More than 100 pro-Palestine demonstrations held across Yemen - Anadolu Ajansı, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/more-than-100-pro-palestine-demonstrations-held-across-yemen/3243616
Massive Gaza March in Istanbul Joined by 300,000 People | İHH Humanitarian Relief Foundation, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://ihh.org.tr/en/news/massive-gaza-march-in-istanbul-joined-by-300000-people
Thousands rally in Jakarta to mark one year since start of Gaza war - Arab News, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.arabnews.com/node/2574156/world
Thousands rally near US Embassy in Jakarta to protest Israeli bombardment of Gaza, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/middle-east/thousands-rally-near-us-embassy-in-jakarta-to-protest-israeli-bombardment-of-gaza/3237206
National March on Washington: Free Palestine - Wikipedia, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_March_on_Washington:_Free_Palestine
300000 People March in Largest Pro-Palestine Protest in Washington, DC, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.palestine-studies.org/en/node/1654576
Europe and Central Asia Overview: June 2025 - ACLED, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://acleddata.com/update/europe-and-central-asia-overview-june-2025
Massive pro-Palestine rally brings together thousands in Istanbul - Daily Sabah, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.dailysabah.com/turkiye/massive-pro-palestine-rally-brings-together-thousands-in-istanbul/news
Central Jakarta Police Deploys 1700 Police to Guard Pro-Palestine Rally | INP, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://inp.polri.go.id/artikel/central-jakarta-police-deploys-1700-police-to-guard-pro-palestine-rally
Tens of thousands march in Cape Town in solidarity with Palestinians under Israeli aggression - WAFA, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://english.wafa.ps/Pages/Details/139206
Gaza war protests - Wikipedia, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaza_war_protests
Thousands march in Cape Town in support of Gaza people - Chinadaily.com.cn, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202509/28/WS68d8dc73a3108622abca3597.html
Thousands rally in Santiago, Chile, in solidarity with Palestine - WAFA, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://english.wafa.ps/Pages/Details/144897
2024 pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses - Wikipedia, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_pro-Palestinian_protests_on_university_campuses
New HEPI report tells the inside story of the pro-Palestine encampments on UK campuses, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.hepi.ac.uk/2025/01/30/new-hepi-report-tells-the-inside-story-of-the-pro-palestine-encampments-on-uk-campuses/
Europe student Gaza protests spread, sparking clashes, arrests - AL-Monitor, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2024/05/europe-student-gaza-protests-spread-sparking-clashes-arrests
List of pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses in 2024 - Wikipedia, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_pro-Palestinian_protests_on_university_campuses_in_2024
Crowd Counting Consortium: An Empirical Overview of Recent Pro-Palestine Protests at U.S. Schools - Ash Center, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://ash.harvard.edu/articles/crowd-counting-blog-an-empirical-overview-of-recent-pro-palestine-protests-at-u-s-schools/
Protests in the United States on Palestine and Israel, 2023–2024 | Harvard Kennedy School, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/protests-united-states-palestine-and-israel-2023-2024
US Student Pro-Palestine Demonstrations Remain Overwhelmingly ..., accessed on November 22, 2025, https://acleddata.com/brief/us-student-pro-palestine-demonstrations-remain-overwhelmingly-peaceful-acled-insight
Divesting for Palestinian Rights - American Friends Service Committee, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://afsc.org/divest
Mapping academic boycotts across the world, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://academicsforpalestine.dk/academic-boycott/boycott-map/
TUFA Divests from Scotiabank - Trent University Faculty Association, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.trentfaculty.ca/2025/05/tufa-divests-from-scotiabank/
McDonald's records first sales miss in nearly four years amid boycotts - The Guardian, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/feb/05/mcdonalds-mdc-earnings-boycott-report
U.S. brands caught in middle of Israel-Hamas conflict, with protests and boycotts hitting profits | The Reynolds Center, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://businessjournalism.org/2024/03/middle-east-boycotts/
2 years into Gaza genocide, global boycotts batter brands linked to Israel | Daily Sabah, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.dailysabah.com/business/economy/2-years-into-gaza-genocide-global-boycotts-batter-brands-linked-to-israel
Global Economic Boycotts Are Profoundly Impacting Corporate Earnings, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://internationalbanker.com/news/global-economic-boycotts-are-profoundly-impacting-corporate-earnings/
Impact of Boycotts: McDonald's and Starbucks Sales Decline Amid War on Gaza, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/impact-of-boycotts-mcdonalds-and-starbucks-sales-decline-amid-war-on-gaza/
Is Starbucks on the Boycott List and Why? - Riwaya, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://riwaya.co.uk/riwaya-blog/is-starbucks-on-the-boycott-list-and-why/
Palestine/Israel: PUMA announces end of sponsorship of Israel Football Association after years of boycott pressure over complicity in illegal settlements in Palestine - Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/palestineisrael-puma-announces-end-of-sponsorship-of-israel-football-association-after-years-of-boycott-pressure-over-complicity-in-illegal-settlements-in-palestine/
Puma No Longer Sponsors the Israel Football Association. New Sponsor Erreà Is on Notice., accessed on November 22, 2025, https://bdsmovement.net/news/puma-no-longer-sponsors-israel-football-association-new-sponsor-errea-notice
In huge victory, Palestine activists force AXA to divest from all Israeli banks and Elbit Systems, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.ipsc.ie/bds/axawin
AXA DIVEST | BDS Movement, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://bdsmovement.net/axa-divest
Boycott ZARA: Dressing Up Apartheid and Genocide - BDS Movement, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://bdsmovement.net/news/boycott-zara-dressing-apartheid-and-genocide
Poor results at Puma and Zara owner fuel fears of slowing US consumer demand, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/business/2025/mar/12/inditex-puma-zara-owner-poor-sales-us-consumer-sales
BDS is unstoppable: Recent important divestment wins in Europe, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://bdsmovement.net/news/bds-unstoppable-recent-important-divestment-wins-europe
Nearly Half of Israeli High-Tech Companies Lost Funding since October 7 - Report, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.palestinechronicle.com/nearly-half-of-israeli-high-tech-companies-lost-funding-since-october-7-report/
How Canadian Artists Brought Cultural Boycotts of Israel to the Mainstream, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.thegrindmag.ca/how-canadian-artists-brought-cultural-boycotts-of-israel-to-the-mainstream/
In Berlin, Nakba Day Took Place Under the Threat of Violence - Jacobin, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://jacobin.com/2025/05/nakba-day-berlin-police-palestine
Major Pro-Palestinian Protests Erupt All Over the World | Democracy Now!, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.democracynow.org/2025/10/6/headlines/major_pro_palestinian_protests_erupt_all_over_the_world
Palestine Action protest in London could set arrest record, say organisers - The Guardian, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/oct/01/palestine-action-protest-london-could-set-record-number-arrests-say-organisers
Pro-Palestine protests escalate in Malaysia - The Straits Times, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/pro-palestine-protests-spill-over-to-malaysian-petrol-stations-apple-store-as-trump-visit-nears
Seven major US labor unions call on Biden to 'shut off military aid to Israel' - The Guardian, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/23/labor-unions-israel-letter-biden
Major Unions Are Calling for an End to Israeli Military Aid - Jacobin, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://jacobin.com/2024/07/labor-unions-cease-fire-gaza
The National Labor Network for Ceasefire - Home, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.laborforceasefire.org/
Dockworkers in Genoa and Livorno block Israeli arms shipment, as mass protests denounce genocide in Gaza - World Socialist Web Site, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2025/10/01/ltqa-o01.html
Dockworker strikes in solidarity with Gaza have a long legacy | Waging Nonviolence, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://wagingnonviolence.org/2025/10/dockerworker-strikes-gaza-legacy/
Indian port workers refuse to handle arms shipments to Israel - World Socialist Web Site, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2024/03/01/ouee-m01.html
Forever-Occupation, genocide, and profit: Special Rapporteur's report exposes corporate forces behind destruction of Palestine | OHCHR, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/07/forever-occupation-genocide-and-profit-special-rapporteurs-report-exposes
1500 Pledge to Risk Arrest at 'Largest Ever' Protest Against Palestine Action Ban, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://bylinetimes.com/2025/10/01/1500-pledge-to-risk-arrest-at-largest-ever-protest-against-palestine-action-ban/
June 2025 No Kings protests - Wikipedia, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/June_2025_No_Kings_protests
Amnesty petition demanding ceasefire in Gaza, Israel backed by over million signatures, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/11/israel-opt-amnesty-petition-demanding-ceasefire-to-end-civilian-suffering-backed-by-more-than-one-million-signatures/
More than 250 humanitarian and human rights organisations call to stop arms transfers to Israel, Palestinian armed groups - Amnesty International, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/01/more-than-250-humanitarian-and-human-rights-organisations-call-to-stop-arms-transfers-to-israel-palestinian-armed-groups/
More than 100 organizations are sounding the alarm to allow lifesaving aid into Gaza, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.oxfamamerica.org/press/more-than-100-organizations-are-sounding-the-alarm-to-allow-lifesaving-aid-into-gaza/
93,900 people urged the UK government to call for a ceasefire in Gaza - Amnesty UK, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://www.amnesty.org.uk/people-urged-uk-government-call-ceasefire-gaza
Open petitions, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions?state=open
Stop the ship of death – End arms to Israel now! - Avaaz, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://secure.avaaz.org/campaign/en/ship_of_death_spain_end_arms_to_israel_1_2/
Sanction Israel NOW - Avaaz, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://secure.avaaz.org/campaign/en/sanction_israel_v1_3/
Stop sending arms to Israel now! - Avaaz, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://secure.avaaz.org/campaign/en/lebanon_stop_the_all_out_war_1_0/
Avaaz Community Petitions, accessed on November 22, 2025, https://secure.avaaz.org/community_petitions/en/
