The October Earthquake: A Strategic, Operational, and Geopolitical Analysis of the 1973 Yom Kippur War
I. Introduction: The Collapse of the Status Quo
On October 6, 1973, at 14:00 hours, the geopolitical architecture of the Middle East, which had calcified into a rigid assumption of Israeli hegemony following the 1967 Six-Day War, was violently dismantled. The conflict that erupted on the holiest day of the Jewish calendar—Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement—was not merely a territorial dispute over the Sinai Peninsula and the Golan Heights. It was a systemic shock that reverberated through the Cold War power structures, revolutionized modern armored warfare doctrines, and fundamentally restructured the global economic order through the weaponization of energy.
For the State of Israel, the war began as an existential nightmare. The coordinated surprise attack by the Egyptian Armed Forces in the south and the Syrian Armed Forces in the north achieved near-total strategic surprise, a failure of intelligence and political imagination so profound that it is remembered in Israeli history simply as "The Blunder" (HaMehdal). For the first time in the history of the Arab-Israeli conflict, Arab armies seized the initiative, executing a complex, multi-front offensive that neutralized Israel’s traditional advantages in air superiority and maneuver warfare.1
The war’s significance extends far beyond the nineteen days of high-intensity combat. It marked a decisive transition from wars of annihilation to wars of limited political objectives, a concept masterminded by Egyptian President Anwar Sadat. Sadat’s "Grand Strategy" was not the conquest of Tel Aviv, but the shattering of the Israeli perception of invincibility—a psychological and political victory deemed necessary to unlock the diplomatic stalemate that had persisted since 1967.4 Conversely, for Israel, the war ended the political careers of its founding generation, including Prime Minister Golda Meir and Defense Minister Moshe Dayan, and forced a painful, existential reevaluation of its security doctrine that continues to influence its strategic posture to this day.5
This report provides an exhaustive analysis of the conflict. It examines the prelude to war, the systemic intelligence failures, the tactical evolutions on the Sinai and Golan fronts, the superpower brinkmanship that brought the United States and the Soviet Union to the precipice of nuclear conflict, and the economic warfare that reshaped the 20th century.
II. The Geopolitical Prelude (1967–1973)
The Post-1967 Stupor and the Illusion of Permanence
The roots of the 1973 war lay in the overwhelming Israeli victory of June 1967. In six days, Israel had defeated three Arab armies and tripled the territory under its control, occupying the Sinai Peninsula, the Golan Heights, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip.1 This victory created a dangerous sense of invincibility within the Israeli defense establishment. The assumption was that Arab armies were incapable of modern warfare and that the new "strategic depth" provided by the occupied territories would deter any major aggression.
This period was not peaceful, however. The "War of Attrition" (1967–1970) along the Suez Canal saw constant artillery duels and commando raids, deepening the animosity and hardening the resolve of the frontline states.7 Yet, by 1973, the prevailing view in Tel Aviv, articulated by Defense Minister Moshe Dayan, was that the Arabs knew they could not win and therefore would not fight. Dayan famously remarked in July 1973 that no general war was expected for the next ten years.8 This hubris was institutionalized in what became known as "The Concept" (HaKonseptzia).
Sadat’s "Year of Decision"
Following the death of Gamal Abdel Nasser in 1970, Anwar Sadat assumed the presidency of Egypt. Sadat was underestimated by both Israel and the superpowers, viewed as a transitional figure. However, Sadat possessed a clear strategic vision: the status quo of "no war, no peace" was intolerable for Egypt. It drained the economy and humiliated the nation. Sadat recognized that a diplomatic solution required US intervention, but the US was content with the status quo as long as the region remained quiet. To force the US to engage, Sadat needed a crisis.4
Sadat engaged in a complex diplomatic dance. In 1972, in a move that baffled Western observers, he expelled 15,000 Soviet military advisors from Egypt. Israeli intelligence interpreted this as a sign of Egyptian weakness and a rupture in relations with their primary arms supplier. In reality, Sadat was clearing the deck for independent action, removing the Soviet veto over his decision to go to war.4 He proclaimed 1971 the "Year of Decision," and although the deadline passed without war, his intent remained fixed on breaking the stalemate through military force.
The Intelligence Failure: Anatomy of the Konseptzia
The failure to predict the war was not due to a lack of information but a failure of interpretation. The Intelligence Branch (AMAN), led by Major General Eli Zeira, adhered rigidly to "The Concept." This paradigm held two axioms:
Syria would not go to war without Egypt.
Egypt would not go to war until it possessed long-range bombers (like the Tupolev Tu-22) and Scud missiles capable of striking deep into Israel to neutralize the Israeli Air Force (IAF).8
Since the Soviets had withheld these specific offensive weapons (until very late), AMAN assessed the probability of war as "low," even as the signs of mobilization became undeniable.
The Signals Ignored
In the months leading up to October, the warnings were stark:
May 1973: A massive Egyptian mobilization caused a "blue-white" alert in Israel, costing the economy millions. When war did not break out, it reinforced the belief that Sadat was bluffing, leading to complacency in October.9
September 1973: Eleven specific warnings were received from well-placed sources. King Hussein of Jordan clandestinely met with Prime Minister Golda Meir in late September to warn that Syria was on a war footing. His warning was dismissed as lacking specific actionable details.10
Ashraf Marwan: Perhaps the most controversial figure, Marwan, the son-in-law of Nasser and a high-level aide to Sadat, provided Mossad with the specific date and time of the attack. Known as "The Angel," his warning arrived late on the night of October 5/6, sparking a frantic early morning consultation on Yom Kippur day.11
Despite these signals, General Zeira assured the cabinet that the Arab buildup was merely an annual exercise. The Konseptzia acted as a cognitive filter, rejecting any data that contradicted the established model.
III. The Earthquake: October 6, 1973
The Hour of Zero
At 14:00 on October 6, the silence of Yom Kippur was shattered. The timing was deliberate; Sadat chose the day when Israel would be shut down, with radio and television off and public transportation halted. Paradoxically, this timing aided Israeli mobilization. Reservists were easily located in synagogues or at home, and the empty roads allowed for rapid movement of units to the front once the call-up orders were finally issued.8
Operation Badr, the Egyptian plan, commenced with a massive aerial and artillery bombardment. Over 200 Egyptian aircraft struck Israeli airbases, command centers, and radar installations in the Sinai, while 2,000 artillery pieces opened fire on the Bar-Lev Line.2
The Collapse of the Bar-Lev Line
The Bar-Lev Line was a chain of fortifications along the Suez Canal, designed to act as a tripwire and a base for fire support. It was manned by fewer than 500 reservists from the Jerusalem Brigade, supported by a mere three tanks in the immediate vicinity.2
The Egyptian crossing was a triumph of engineering. The primary obstacle was the massive sand ramparts constructed by Israel, some reaching 25 meters in height. Israeli engineers estimated it would take 24 to 48 hours to breach these with explosives. However, the Egyptians employed a novel solution: high-pressure water cannons. Importing pumps from Britain and East Germany under the guise of agricultural use, Egyptian engineers used water drawn from the canal to blast through the sand, clearing breaches in a matter of hours.2
Through these breaches poured the Egyptian Second and Third Armies—100,000 men and 1,000 tanks crossing in the first 24 hours. The Israeli defenders in the forts were bypassed, surrounded, and systematically reduced. The "invincible" line had fallen.
The Missile Umbrella and the Sagger Shock
Crucial to the Egyptian success was the neutralization of the Israeli Air Force and Armored Corps. Learning from 1967, the Egyptians did not attempt to match Israel in the air. Instead, they brought the air defense battle to the ground. A dense network of Surface-to-Air Missiles (SAMs)—including the stationary SA-2 and SA-3 and the mobile, deadly SA-6—created a "missile umbrella" over the canal zone. This prevented the IAF from providing close air support to the beleaguered ground forces.2
Simultaneously, the Egyptian infantry decimated Israeli armor. Armed with vast quantities of RPG-7s and the wire-guided AT-3 Sagger anti-tank missile, Egyptian infantry teams swarmed the approaching Israeli tanks. The Sagger, operable by a single soldier, had a range of 3,000 meters. Israeli tank commanders, trained to fight other tanks, found themselves engaging invisible infantrymen who could destroy a Patton or Centurion from long range. The first Israeli counterattacks, launched in accordance with pre-war doctrine which emphasized "shock action" by independent tank formations, were suicidal. Without infantry or artillery support to suppress the Sagger teams, the Israeli armored brigades were ground down, losing hundreds of tanks in the first 48 hours.2
IV. The Battle for the Golan Heights
While the Sinai front offered Israel strategic depth—hundreds of kilometers of desert to trade for time—the Golan Heights offered no such luxury. The distance from the Purple Line to the Jordan River and the populated Galilee was less than 25 kilometers. A Syrian breakthrough here represented a direct existential threat to the Israeli heartland.14
The Disparity of Forces
The correlation of forces on the Golan was staggering. On the afternoon of October 6, the Israeli defense rested on two armored brigades: the 7th Armored Brigade in the northern sector and the 188th "Barak" Armored Brigade in the south. Together, they fielded approximately 177 operational tanks.
Facing them was the full weight of the Syrian Army: three infantry divisions (the 5th, 7th, and 9th) spearheading the assault, backed by two armored divisions (the 1st and 3rd) in reserve. The Syrian force comprised nearly 1,400 tanks, over 1,000 artillery pieces, and a dense air defense network.14 The Syrian plan was simple and brutal: a massive frontal assault to overwhelm the defenders by sheer weight of numbers and reach the Jordan River bridges within 24 hours.
The Valley of Tears (Emek HaBakha)
The northern sector, defended by the 7th Armored Brigade under Colonel Avigdor Ben-Gal, witnessed one of the most intense tank battles in military history. The Syrians focused their attack on the "Booster" and "Hermonit" ridges, a gap that became known as the "Valley of Tears."
The 77th Battalion, commanded by Lt. Col. Avigdor Kahalani, bore the brunt of the assault. For four days and three nights, the Israeli Centurion (Sho't Kal) crews fought continuously. Utilizing prepared firing ramps that allowed them to fire from "hull-down" positions (exposing only the turret), the Israelis used their superior gunnery and depression angles to destroy Syrian T-55s and T-62s at long range. However, the Syrians possessed night-vision equipment, which the Israelis lacked, allowing them to close the distance under cover of darkness. The battle devolved into chaotic, point-blank engagements at ranges of less than 50 meters.14
By the fourth day, October 9, the 7th Brigade was on the verge of collapse. It had fewer than 20 operational tanks remaining. The Syrian 7th Infantry Division was pushing hard. In a desperate final effort, Kahalani rallied his surviving tanks to retake the ramparts. Miraculously, the Syrians, themselves exhausted and unaware that the Israeli line was essentially a phantom, broke and began to retreat. They left behind over 500 burning armored vehicles in the valley.15
The Southern Collapse and the 188th Brigade
In the southern Golan, the situation was catastrophic. The terrain was flatter and harder to defend. The 188th Brigade was overwhelmed. Its commander, Colonel Yitzhak Ben-Shoham, was killed, and the brigade was virtually wiped out as a fighting force. Syrian tanks broke through the lines, bypassing the Israeli strongpoints and advancing toward the headquarters at Nafakh. Syrian forward elements reached the cliffs overlooking the Sea of Galilee.15
The situation was saved by the "Force Zvicka" phenomenon—improvisation amidst chaos. Lt. Zvi Greengold, an unassigned officer, took command of two damaged tanks and fought a delaying action for 24 hours, constantly moving and firing to create the illusion of a larger force. His actions, along with the desperate stand of the remnant of the 188th, bought critical hours for the reserve divisions of Generals Dan Laner and Moshe Peled to reach the front.15
The Counter-Offensive and Arab Intervention
By October 10, the Israeli reserves had pushed the Syrians back to the Purple Line. On October 11, the IDF launched a counter-offensive into Syria, driving toward Damascus. This threat to the Syrian capital triggered an intervention by other Arab states. Iraq dispatched an expeditionary force of 30,000 troops and 500 tanks, and Jordan committed its elite 40th Armored Brigade.
The Iraqi and Jordanian forces engaged the IDF flank, slowing the Israeli advance. However, poor coordination between the Arab allies allowed the Israelis to trap the Iraqi armor in an ambush, destroying over 80 tanks. The Jordanian 40th Brigade fought professionally but was unable to alter the strategic picture. By October 14, the front stabilized, with Israeli artillery capable of shelling the outskirts of Damascus.1
V. The Battle for the Sinai: Turning the Tide
While the Golan burned, the Sinai front saw a frantic Israeli effort to stabilize the situation. The failure of the first counterattack on October 8, led by General Avraham Adan ("Bren"), was a wake-up call. The IDF realized it could not simply charge the Egyptian bridgeheads. A pause ensued as both sides built up their strength.
The Tank Battle of October 14
Under intense pressure from Syria to relieve the bombardment of Damascus, President Sadat ordered his generals to launch a major offensive out of their bridgeheads toward the strategic Sinai passes (Mitla and Gidi). This order was opposed by General Shazly, who knew that leaving the SAM umbrella would be suicidal.
On October 14, the Egyptians launched their attack with over 400 tanks. It was the largest tank battle since Kursk in World War II. As predicted, once the Egyptian armor moved beyond the range of their missile batteries, they fell prey to Israeli air power and long-range tank fire. The Egyptians lost over 250 tanks in a single day, while Israeli losses were light. This tactical victory handed the initiative back to Israel and set the stage for Operation Gazelle: the crossing of the Suez Canal.2
Operation Gazelle and the "Chinese Farm"
The Israeli plan was audacious: punch a corridor through the Egyptian lines to the canal north of the Great Bitter Lake, bridge the canal, and cross a division into Africa to destroy the SAM sites from the rear.
The corridor, however, ran through the junction of the 16th Infantry Division and the 21st Armored Division. The key feature was an agricultural research station filled with Japanese machinery, which Israeli troops mistook for Chinese characters, dubbing it the "Chinese Farm."
The Battle of the Chinese Farm (October 15–17) was the bloodiest of the war. General Ariel Sharon’s 143rd Division was tasked with opening the route. For three nights, Israeli paratroopers and tankers engaged in brutal close-quarters combat. Colonel Amnon Reshef’s 14th Brigade lost 56 of its 97 tanks in the initial assault. It was a chaotic melee where tank commanders fought with hatches open, engaging infantry with Uzis and grenades.20
Despite the heavy cost, the corridor was held open just long enough. On the night of October 15, Colonel Danny Matt’s paratroopers crossed the canal in rubber boats. They were followed by the specialized bridging equipment: the massive "Roller Bridge" and pontoon bridges.
Encirclement and "Checkmate"
Once across, General Adan’s division fanned out. They attacked the SAM batteries on the ground, dismantling the missile umbrella. With the skies clear, the IAF wreaked havoc on Egyptian supply lines.
Adan’s forces drove south toward Suez City, reaching the Gulf of Suez. This maneuver completely severed the supply lines of the Egyptian Third Army, which was still deployed on the east bank of the canal. By October 24, the Third Army was encircled, cut off from food and water. The Israeli forces were now 101 kilometers from Cairo, with no significant organized defense between them and the Egyptian capital.2
VI. The Superpower War: Logistics and Brinkmanship
The Yom Kippur War was a proxy conflict fueled by the superpowers. The consumption of materiel was unprecedented; by the fourth day, both Israel and the Arab states were running critically low on ammunition and spare parts.
The Battle of the Airlifts
On October 10, the Soviet Union initiated a massive resupply effort. Soviet An-12 and An-22 transport aircraft flew continuously to Cairo and Damascus, delivering approximately 15,000 tons of supplies, while a sealift delivered another 63,000 tons.25
Israel’s situation was dire. Golda Meir appealed to President Nixon, reportedly emphasizing that the "Third Temple" (a code for the State of Israel) was in danger. Nixon, overcoming initial hesitation from the State Department, ordered Operation Nickel Grass on October 14.
The US Air Force Military Airlift Command (MAC) executed a logistical miracle. Utilizing C-141 Starlifters and the gargantuan C-5 Galaxy, the US flew 567 missions, delivering 22,395 tons of cargo directly to Lod Airport. The C-5s were crucial, as they could carry M60 tanks and CH-53 helicopters directly. The airlift route was precarious; European allies, fearing the Arab oil weapon, refused landing rights. Only Portugal allowed the US to use Lajes Field in the Azores as a staging point. This aid—which included TOW missiles and electronic countermeasures—was critical in sustaining the Israeli war machine.26
DEFCON 3: The Nuclear Shadow
As the Israeli noose tightened around the Egyptian Third Army on October 24, the Soviet Union threatened to intervene directly. General Secretary Leonid Brezhnev sent a letter to Nixon, stating that if the US and USSR did not jointly enforce the ceasefire, "we should be faced with the necessity urgently to consider the question of taking appropriate steps unilaterally".29
Intelligence reports indicated Soviet airborne divisions were on alert and amphibious ships were moving in the Mediterranean. The US Navy’s Sixth Fleet was already in a tense standoff with the Soviet Fifth Eskadra. In Washington, with President Nixon distracted by the Watergate scandal ("The Saturday Night Massacre" had occurred just days prior), Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and the NSC took a bold step. They raised the alert status of all US forces to DEFCON 3—the highest peacetime readiness level—which included putting nuclear forces on alert.30
The gamble worked. The Soviets backed down, and the crisis de-escalated. However, the US pressured Israel to allow non-military supplies to reach the besieged Third Army to prevent a total Egyptian collapse that might force Soviet action.32
VII. The Economic War: The Oil Weapon
Parallel to the kinetic war, the Arab states unleashed a weapon that would reshape the global economy. On October 17, the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries (OAPEC) announced an oil embargo against nations supporting Israel—specifically the United States and the Netherlands.33
This was a calculated strategic move. Production was cut by 5% monthly, and the price of oil was quadrupled. The price per barrel rose from roughly $3 to nearly $12. In the United States, the embargo caused immediate fuel shortages, long lines at gas stations, and the implementation of a national 55 mph speed limit to conserve fuel. The economic shock triggered "stagflation"—high inflation coupled with economic stagnation—and signaled the end of the post-WWII era of cheap energy. It fundamentally shifted wealth to the oil-producing nations, altering the global balance of power permanently.34
VIII. The Aftermath: Reckoning and Peace
The Agranat Commission and Political Fallout
In Israel, the war ended not with celebration, but with trauma. The public demanded accountability for the surprise and the heavy casualties (2,656 dead). The Agranat Commission was established to investigate the failure.
Its interim report (April 1974) was scathing toward the military but controversial in its treatment of politicians. It recommended the dismissal of Chief of Staff David Elazar and Intelligence Chief Eli Zeira for their roles in the "Concept" failure. However, it exonerated Golda Meir and Moshe Dayan, citing their lack of military expertise and reliance on professional advice.37
The public rejected this distinction. Massive protests led by reservist Motti Ashkenazi and others paralyzed the country. Golda Meir, bowing to public pressure, resigned on April 11, 1974. Her government fell, ending the dominance of the "Founding Fathers" generation in Israeli politics.5
The Road to Peace
The war, however, achieved Sadat’s ultimate aim. By crossing the canal and fighting the IDF to a standstill in the early days, Egypt had restored its honor. This psychological victory allowed Sadat to negotiate.
Diplomatic engagement began at Kilometer 101 on the Cairo-Suez road, leading to the Sinai I (1974) and Sinai II (1975) disengagement agreements. These accords created UN buffer zones and required Israeli withdrawals, establishing the principle of "land for peace".40
In November 1977, Sadat made his historic journey to Jerusalem, speaking at the Knesset to "break the psychological barrier" between the nations.42 This brave act culminated in the 1978 Camp David Accords and the 1979 Egypt-Israel Peace Treaty, formally ending the state of war and returning the Sinai to Egypt.1
IX. Conclusion
The Yom Kippur War was a crucible that forged the modern Middle East. It demonstrated the limits of military power: Israel’s military victory did not bring security, and Egypt’s military defeat did not prevent political success. It highlighted the fragility of the global order, dependent on energy flows and superpower restraint. Most importantly, it proved that the status quo is never static; it is a prelude to the next earthquake. The peace that exists today between Israel and Egypt, cold as it may be, stands as the enduring legacy of the blood spilled in October 1973.
Works cited
Yom Kippur War | Summary, Causes, Combatants, & Facts | Britannica, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/event/Yom-Kippur-War
Yom Kippur War - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yom_Kippur_War
Israel Studies An Anthology : The 1973 Yom Kippur War, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/israel-studies-an-anthology-the-yom-kippur-war
Anwar Sadat and the Yom Kippur War. Course 1 - DTIC, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA440786.pdf
Yom Kippur War - Learn About Its History, Causes & Consequences, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://testbook.com/ias-preparation/yom-kippur-war-1973
After October War, Golda Meir Takes Responsibility for Missteps ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://israeled.org/golda-meir-voluntarily-resigns-as-israels-prime-minister-due-to-her-governments-errors-of-omission-and-commission-that-caused-massive-deaths-and-destruction-in-the-october-1973/
Six-Day War - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six-Day_War
Surprise Attack: The Case of the Yom-Kippur War, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.hsdl.org/c/view?docid=450840
Full article: The Yom Kippur intelligence failure after fifty years, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02684527.2023.2235795
Yom Kippur War, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://dlab.epfl.ch/wikispeedia/wpcd/wp/y/Yom_Kippur_War.htm
Eli Zeira, IDF intelligence chief widely blamed for Yom Kippur War ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.ynetnews.com/article/hksvzkag11x
Eli Zeira - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eli_Zeira
The 1973 Yom Kippur War and Lessons for the Israel-Hamas Conflict, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://fsi.stanford.edu/news/1973-yom-kippur-war-and-lessons-israel-hamas-conflict
The Saga of OZ 77 in the Arab-Israeli War of 1973: - Fort Benning, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.benning.army.mil/armor/earmor/content/issues/2019/Fall/4Kichen19.pdf
The Battle of Golan Heights: 'Israel's Survival at Stake', accessed on December 16, 2025, https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/the-battle-of-golan-heights-israels-survival-at-stake/
Valley of Tears - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valley_of_Tears
The fight for the Golan Heights - Morashá, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.morasha.com.br/en/history-of-israel/the-fight-for-the-gola-hills.html
The General Command of the jordanian armed forces the arab army, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://jaf.mil.jo/ContentstemplateC/War_of_1973.aspx
The Yom Kippur War: Insights Into Operational Theory bY Major ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://cgsc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/api/collection/p4013coll3/id/2032/download
Tank Clash in the Sinai - Warfare History Network, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://warfarehistorynetwork.com/article/tank-clash-in-the-sinai/
The Battle of Chinese Farm - The Past, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://the-past.com/feature/the-battle-of-chinese-farm/
Battle of the Chinese Farm - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Chinese_Farm
Overlooked, but not forgotten - The Jerusalem Post, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.jpost.com/features/overlooked-but-not-forgotten
Penetrate, Disintegrate, and Exploit: The Israeli Counteroffensive at ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://mwi.westpoint.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Penetrate-Disintegrate-and-Exploit.pdf
Operation Nickel Grass - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Nickel_Grass
Operation Nickel Grass - Air Mobility Command Museum, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.amcmuseum.org/history/operation-nickel-grass/
America's Airlift in the 1973 Yom Kippur War, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://blog.nixonfoundation.org/2023/10/americas-airlift-in-the-1973-yom-kippur-war/
It was justifiably called “the airlift that saved Israel.” - Nickel Grass, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.airandspaceforces.com/PDF/MagazineArchive/Documents/1998/December%201998/1298nickel.pdf
267. Message From Soviet General Secretary Brezhnev to President ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76v25/d267
DefCon III » Richard Nixon Foundation | Blog, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://blog.nixonfoundation.org/2014/10/defcon-iii/
The October War and U.S. Policy - The National Security Archive, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB98/index.htm
Joint Chiefs of Staff, Operations Planners Group, Status of Actions ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/document/20800-22
Arab oil embargo | History, Cause, Impact, & Definition - Britannica, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/event/Arab-oil-embargo
1973 oil crisis - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973_oil_crisis
Causes of the 1973 Oil Crisis and Its Effects on Economics, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/1973-energy-crisis-definition-5222090
The Politics of Oil in the Wake of Yom Kippur - U.S. Naval Institute, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/1974/july/politics-oil-wake-yom-kippur
Agranat Commission - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agranat_Commission
THE AGRANAT COMMISSION - Morashá, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.morasha.com.br/en/history-of-israel/the-agranat-commission.html
Golda Meir's Government and the Agranat Report, April 1974 |, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://catalog.archives.gov.il/site/en/chapter/golda-meirs-government-agranat-report-april-1974/
Shuttle Diplomacy and the Arab-Israeli Dispute, 1974–1975, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://history.state.gov/milestones/1969-1976/shuttle-diplomacy
Separation of Forces Agreement sinai 1 - Peaceau.org, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.peaceau.org/uploads/separation-forces-agreement-sinai-egypt-1974.pdf
Address by President Anwar Sadat to the Knesset, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.palquest.org/en/historictext/21734/address-president-anwar-sadat-knesset
