The Legal Mandate of Inuy Nefesh: An Exhaustive Analysis of the Shabbat Shabbaton
1. Introduction: The Unique Legal Status of the Tenth of Tishrei
In the intricate tapestry of Jewish law (Halakha), no single day commands as much reverence, trepidation, and legal complexity as Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement. Observed on the tenth day of the seventh month (Tishrei), it stands as the apex of the High Holy Days (Yamim Noraim), a period dedicated to introspection, repentance, and the adjudication of human destiny. The Torah’s mandate for this day is twofold and absolute: the total cessation of productive labor (Melacha) and the requirement to "afflict the soul" (Inuy Nefesh). While the former aligns Yom Kippur with the weekly Sabbath, the latter introduces a unique dimension of asceticism that defines the day’s character.
The legal designation of Yom Kippur as Shabbat Shabbaton—a "Sabbath of Sabbaths"—places it at the pinnacle of the calendar’s hierarchy. This term serves not merely as a superlative of sanctity but as a precise legal classifier that establishes the day’s overriding authority. Unlike other festivals where the joy of food and drink is commanded, Yom Kippur demands a reversal of the human condition: a withdrawal from the biological imperatives of life to achieve a state of spiritual purity closer to that of celestial beings. This report provides an exhaustive analysis of these mandates, tracing their origins from the ambiguous verses of the Pentateuch through the hermeneutic rigorousness of the Oral Tradition, and finally into the codified laws that govern the minutiae of observance. By examining the philological roots, the statutory derivations, the specific prohibitions, and the philosophical rationales, we reveal how a day of physical deprivation is architected to produce the ultimate spiritual restoration.
2. Biblical Jurisprudence: The Statutory Framework
The legal obligation to observe Yom Kippur does not rest on a single commandment but is constructed from a trifecta of biblical passages found in the Books of Leviticus and Numbers. Each text contributes a distinct layer to the legal definition of the day, establishing its timing, its sacrificial order, and its behavioral requirements for the individual.
2.1 The Foundational Texts
The primary source for the mandate of affliction is found in the context of the High Priest’s service. Leviticus 16:29-31 dictates:
"And this shall be a statute for ever unto you: that in the seventh month, on the tenth day of the month, ye shall afflict your souls (te'anu et nafshoteichem), and do no work at all, whether it be one of your own country, or a stranger that sojourneth among you... For on that day shall the priest make an atonement for you, to cleanse you, that ye may be clean from all your sins before the Lord. It shall be a sabbath of rest (Shabbat Shabbaton) unto you, and ye shall afflict your souls, by a statute for ever." 1
This passage establishes the causal link between the "affliction of the soul" and the process of atonement. The individual’s physical denial parallels the High Priest’s ritual purification of the Sanctuary; both are necessary components of the collective expiation.
The second critical text, Leviticus 23:27-32, shifts the focus from the Temple service to the severity of non-compliance, introducing the penalty of excision:
"Also on the tenth day of this seventh month there shall be a day of atonement... and ye shall afflict your souls... And ye shall do no work in that same day... For whatsoever soul it be that shall not be afflicted in that same day, he shall be cut off from among his people (Karet)... It shall be unto you a sabbath of rest, and ye shall afflict your souls: in the ninth day of the month at even, from even unto even, shall ye celebrate your sabbath." 3
Here, the Torah expands the temporal boundaries of the obligation. The phrase "from even to even" establishes that the day begins at sundown on the ninth and continues until nightfall on the tenth, a principle that applies to all Jewish calendar days but is explicitly codified here. Furthermore, the threat of Karet elevates the refusal to afflict oneself to a capital offense in the heavenly court, a severity matched only by the prohibition of eating leavened bread on Passover and the failure to circumcise.
The third reference, Numbers 29:7, integrates Yom Kippur into the sacrificial order of the festivals:
"And ye shall have on the tenth day of this seventh month an holy convocation; and ye shall afflict your souls: ye shall not do any work therein." 1
This text confirms the day's status as a Mikra Kodesh (Holy Convocation), ensuring that despite its unique restrictions, it remains part of the cycle of festivals, requiring specific public offerings (Mussaf).
2.2 Philological Ambiguity: The Root Anah
The central legal challenge presented by these verses lies in the ambiguity of the operative verb: te'anu (you shall afflict), from the root Anah (ע-נ-ה). In Biblical Hebrew, this root is polysemous, carrying meanings that range from "to answer" or "respond," to "oppress," "humble," or "violate." The Torah does not explicitly define how one is to afflict the soul. Unlike the command to eat Matzah, which involves a specific object, "affliction" is a qualitative state. To concretize this abstract command into actionable law, legal scholars rely on intertextual analysis, mapping the usage of Anah across the Tanakh to triangulate its specific meaning in the context of Yom Kippur.
The intertextual evidence points to a broad definition of "affliction" that encompasses various forms of deprivation and degradation:
Slavery and Servitude: In Genesis 15:13, the Egyptian exile is described with the words: "and they shall serve them; and they shall afflict (ve-inu) them four hundred years." Here, inuy denotes a loss of autonomy and subjection to harsh labor.
Interpersonal Conflict: In Genesis 16:6, Sarah is described as having "afflicted" (va-te'aneha) Hagar, causing her to flee. This implies harsh treatment or a lowering of social status.
Sexual Violation: The term appears in contexts of sexual degradation, such as the rape of Dinah (Genesis 34:2) and laws regarding the treatment of captives (Deuteronomy 22:24). This suggests that inuy can refer to a violation of bodily integrity or sexual dignity.
Hunger and Deprivation: The most critical parallel for the legal definition, however, is found in Deuteronomy 8:3, regarding the Manna: "And He humbled thee, and suffered thee to hunger (va-ye'ancha va-yar'ivecha), and fed thee with manna...".5
It is this final association—between inuy and ra'av (hunger)—that becomes the linchpin for the rabbinic determination. While the other forms of affliction (servitude, degradation) are relevant themes, the physiological sensation of hunger is identified as the primary mechanism of "afflicting the soul."
2.3 The Concept of Nefesh
Crucial to this definition is the object of the affliction: the Nefesh. In biblical anthropology, nefesh does not correspond to the Platonic, incorporeal "soul" separate from the body. Rather, it refers to the animating life force, often associated with the throat, the appetite, and the blood.
Proverbs 27:7: "The full soul (nefesh) loathes a honeycomb; but to the hungry soul (nefesh) every bitter thing is sweet." 1
Isaiah 56:11: "Yea, they are greedy dogs which can never satisfy their souls (nefesh)..." 1
In these contexts, nefesh is synonymous with the appetite. Therefore, the command te'anu et nafshoteichem acts legally as a directive to deny the life-force its sustenance. It is a biological restriction as much as a spiritual one. By restricting the nefesh (the appetitive soul), the Torah necessitates a state where the biological self is diminished to allow for the ascension of the spiritual self.
3. Rabbinic Hermeneutics: The Derivation of the Five Afflictions
While the written text provides the header "Afflict your souls," the content of this affliction is codified in the Oral Tradition (Torah Shebe'al Peh), specifically in the Mishnah, Tractate Yoma. The Sages identify five specific activities that constitute the legal definition of inuy.
3.1 The Mishnah's Categorization
Mishnah Yoma 8:1 states the prohibitions unequivocally:
"On Yom Kippur, it is forbidden to eat and to drink, to wash, to anoint, to wear shoes, and to have marital relations." 6
This list represents a total withdrawal from the physical comforts that define the human condition:
Eating and Drinking: The sustenance of life itself.
Washing: The maintenance of the body.
Anointing: The beautification and honoring of the body.
Wearing Shoes: Protection and comfort in movement (separation from the earth).
Marital Relations: The continuity of the species and physical intimacy.
3.2 The Gezeirah Shavah: Linking Manna to Atonement
The Talmud (Yoma 74b) provides the hermeneutic infrastructure for these prohibitions. The primary derivation is a Gezeirah Shavah—a specific rule of exegesis where a common word in two different texts implies that the laws of one apply to the other.
The Talmud links the "affliction" of Yom Kippur (Lev 16:29) to the "affliction" of the Manna (Deut 8:3). The Sages argue: Just as the "affliction" in the wilderness was explicitly linked to hunger ("And He afflicted thee, and suffered thee to hunger"), so too the "affliction" commanded for Yom Kippur must centrally involve hunger—i.e., the deprivation of food and drink.5
This derivation is not merely linguistic but conceptual. The Manna narrative describes a situation where the Israelites were fed directly by God, yet felt "afflicted" because they had no stockpile for the next day. They were dependent entirely on Divine grace. Similarly, on Yom Kippur, the Jew is commanded to enter a state of total dependency, stripping away the security of material sustenance to experience a vulnerability that leads to repentance.
3.3 Why Five Afflictions?
The Talmud further explores why there are exactly five prohibitions. Several explanations are offered:
Five Biblical Mentions: The phrase "afflict your soul" (or variations thereof) appears five times in the Torah regarding Yom Kippur (Lev 16:29, 16:31, 23:27, 23:32; Num 29:7). The Sages deduce that each mention corresponds to one of the specific prohibitions derived from oral tradition.6
Five Senses: Some commentators suggest the five afflictions correspond to the rectification of the five senses, representing a total consecration of the human being.
Five Books of Moses: Others see a parallel to the Five Books of the Torah, suggesting that the observance of Yom Kippur is equivalent to the fulfillment of the entire Torah.
This structured derivation underscores that the observances of Yom Kippur are not arbitrary customs but are legally rooted in the text through the interpretive authority of the Sages.
4. Affliction I: The Prohibition of Eating and Drinking
The prohibition against eating and drinking is the primary form of inuy and the only one for which the severe penalty of Karet applies. As such, the laws governing it are exceptionally detailed.
4.1 Legal Definitions and Measurements (Shiurim)
In Jewish law, prohibitions are often quantified by specific measurements (Shiurim). While eating any amount of food on Yom Kippur is forbidden (Assur) by Torah law, the liability for punishment—specifically Karet—is triggered only when a certain threshold is crossed.
The Volume of Food:
The critical measurement for food is the Kotevet HaGassa (a large date). This is larger than the standard Kezayit (olive size) used for most other Torah prohibitions (e.g., eating Matzah or forbidden fats).
Rationale: The Talmud explains that inuy is the negation of satisfaction. A person is not considered "settled" or satisfied by a morsel the size of an olive, but the volume of a large date is significant enough to calm the mind and reduce the sensation of "affliction".10
Time Interval: This volume must be consumed within a time span known as Kedei Achilat Pras (the time it takes to eat a half-loaf of bread), which is variously estimated between 2 and 9 minutes. Eating a large date's worth of food over several hours does not incur Karet, although it remains prohibited.
The Volume of Drink:
The measurement for liquids is Mlo Lugmav (a cheek-full). Unlike the fixed volume for food, this is a subjective measure relative to the person's size. It is the amount of liquid that can be held in one cheek.
Rationale: This amount is sufficient to alleviate the intensity of thirst for a specific individual. Therefore, a larger person has a larger allowance before incurring the full penalty, reflecting the personalized nature of "affliction".10
4.2 Medical Ethics and Pikuach Nefesh
The mandate to fast is absolute, with one overriding exception: Pikuach Nefesh (the preservation of life). The Torah commands "Example: V'chai bahem" (You shall live by them [the commandments], and not die by them). In cases where fasting poses a credible threat to life, the prohibition is suspended.
Determining Risk:
Expert Opinion: If a doctor determines that fasting could endanger a patient's life (e.g., a diabetic, a heart patient, or a pregnant woman with complications), the patient is obligated to eat. In this context, eating becomes a mitzvah (commandment).11
Patient's Perception: Even if a doctor says fasting is safe, if the patient asserts, "I feel I need to eat," the patient is believed. The heart knows its own bitterness (Prov 14:10), and in matters of mortal danger, we err on the side of caution.
The Mechanism of Le-Shiurim (Eating in Measures):
When a patient must eat but is not in immediate, catastrophic crisis, Jewish law prescribes a method to minimize the violation. The patient eats small amounts (less than the "large date" volume) at intervals (longer than the time to eat a half-loaf).
Legal Effect: By eating Le-Shiurim, the patient sustains their body but never technically commits the full act of "eating" that incurs Karet. They are eating "less than the measure" (Chatzi Shiur), which is still forbidden for a healthy person but is the preferred method for the sick.12
5. Affliction II: Washing (Rechitza)
The second affliction is the prohibition of washing the body. This restriction targets the comfort and refreshment derived from water, demanding that the day be focused solely on spiritual cleansing rather than physical hygiene.
5.1 Scope of the Prohibition
The prohibition encompasses washing any part of the body with water, whether hot or cold.
Pleasure vs. Hygiene: The core of the prohibition is washing for pleasure (Ta'anug). Therefore, washing to remove actual dirt, blood, or ink is permitted, as this is considered cleaning, not bathing.
Exceptions:
Ritual Washing: Upon waking in the morning or after using the restroom, one performs Netilat Yadayim (washing of hands), but only up to the knuckles (the connection of the fingers to the palm). This limited washing suffices for ritual purity without providing the refreshment of washing the entire hand.10
The Bride: As noted in the Mishnah, a bride within 30 days of her wedding was historically permitted to wash her face to ensure she remained attractive to her husband. However, the Sages generally ruled against this, prioritizing the uniformity of the law over individual circumstances.6
The King: A monarch was historically permitted to wash to maintain the dignity of his office, as a disheveled king might lose the respect of the populace.
6. Affliction III: Anointing (Sicha)
In the ancient Near East, the application of oil to the skin was a standard part of daily hygiene and grooming, serving as a moisturizer and a perfume. On Yom Kippur, this is forbidden.
6.1 Modern Applications
While the use of oil is less common today, this prohibition extends to all forms of creams, lotions, ointments, and perfumes.
Conceptual Root: Anointing is associated with joy, vitality, and status. Psalm 23:5 states, "Thou anointest my head with oil," symbolizing divine blessing and abundance. The removal of this luxury signifies a state of mourning and humility. It strips away the external "gloss" of the persona, forcing the individual to present their unadorned self before God.3
Medical Exception: Applying ointment for a medical condition (e.g., a rash or wound) is permitted, as the intent is therapeutic rather than pleasurable.
7. Affliction IV: Leather Footwear (Ne'ilat HaSandal)
The prohibition against wearing shoes specifically targets leather footwear. This seemingly minor detail carries profound symbolic and historical weight.
7.1 Symbolism of Leather
Leather shoes represent two things: human dominance over the animal kingdom and protection from the elements.
Dominance: By utilizing the skin of an animal, humans assert their superior status. On Yom Kippur, when we seek atonement for our failures, we relinquish this symbol of power.
Vulnerability: Shoes separate the person from the earth, smoothing over the rough terrain. Removing them signifies vulnerability and direct contact with reality. It recalls the command to Moses at the Burning Bush: "Put off thy shoes from off thy feet, for the place whereon thou standest is holy ground" (Exodus 3:5). On Yom Kippur, the entire world acts as a "holy ground".15
7.2 Non-Leather Alternatives
The prohibition is technically limited to leather. Footwear made of rubber, canvas, or synthetic materials (e.g., sneakers, Crocs) is permitted.
The "Comfort" Debate: Some later authorities (Acharonim) argue that modern synthetic shoes are so comfortable that they defeat the purpose of "affliction." While the letter of the law permits them, some stringent communities avoid even comfortable non-leather shoes to maintain the spirit of the day, wearing only thin socks or flimsy slippers to feel the hardness of the ground.13
8. Affliction V: Marital Relations (Tashmish HaMittah)
The final affliction is the prohibition of sexual intimacy.
8.1 Theological Basis
Angelic Status: Yom Kippur is often described as a day when Israel rises to the level of angels. Angels are purely spiritual beings; they do not eat, drink, or procreate. By abstaining from the most primal biological drive for reproduction and intimacy, the Jewish people demonstrate that their essence is spiritual.
The "Holy of Holies": The High Priest was separated from his wife for seven days prior to Yom Kippur to ensure ritual purity. Similarly, every household mimics the Temple; the separation of spouses transforms the home into a sanctuary where the focus is exclusively on the relationship between the human and the Divine.3
9. The Legal Framework of Shabbat Shabbaton and Melacha
Beyond the five afflictions, Yom Kippur carries the designation of Shabbat Shabbaton—a "Sabbath of Sabbaths." This is not merely poetic rhetoric; it is a precise legal classification that distinguishes Yom Kippur from all other holidays (Yom Tov).
9.1 The "Super-Sabbath" Status
The duplication of the word "Shabbat" implies the highest possible degree of sanctity.
Comparison with Weekly Shabbat: The weekly Sabbath is a day of Oneg (pleasure), where eating and drinking are commanded. Yom Kippur is a day of Inuy (affliction).
The Override: When Yom Kippur falls on a Sabbath, the fast of Yom Kippur overrides the command to enjoy the Sabbath. This legal hierarchy proves that the sanctity of the "Sabbath of Sabbaths" supersedes that of the regular Sabbath. The fasting does not violate the Sabbath; rather, it elevates it to a level where physical pleasure is no longer the appropriate vehicle for holiness.4
9.2 The Prohibition of Labor (Melacha)
The prohibition of work on Yom Kippur is identical to that of Shabbat, covering the 39 categories of Melacha (creative labor) derived from the construction of the Tabernacle.
The Contrast with Festivals:
On festivals like Passover or Sukkot, the Torah permits Melacha for the purpose of Ochel Nefesh (food preparation). One may cook, carry fire, and carry objects in the public domain for the sake of the holiday meal.
Yom Kippur Restriction: Since eating is forbidden on Yom Kippur, the legal allowance for Ochel Nefesh logically collapses. There is no "food preparation" permitted because there is no food consumption. Consequently, the day reverts to the strict "no work" status of Shabbat. Lighting a fire, carrying keys in the street, or cooking are all strictly forbidden and carry the same severity as they would on the weekly Sabbath.18
10. The Metaphysics of Punishment: Karet vs. Sekilah
The Torah assigns different penalties to the various infractions of Yom Kippur, creating a legal hierarchy among the prohibitions that reveals deep theological insights.
10.1 The Definition of Karet (Excision)
The punishment for violating the prohibition of work (Melacha) or the prohibition of eating/drinking on Yom Kippur is Karet (Leviticus 23:29-30).
Spiritual Excision: Karet is unique in that it is not administered by a human court. It is a "cutting off" of the soul from its spiritual source. Maimonides defines it as the soul being denied entry into the World to Come (Olam Ha-Ba), effectively ceasing to exist spiritually.21
Premature Death: In the Talmudic tradition, Karet is also associated with dying young (traditionally before the age of 60) without leaving progeny, signifying a severance from the historical continuity of the Jewish people.24
10.2 The Paradox of Severity
A fascinating legal paradox exists: Working on the weekly Shabbat is punishable by Sekilah (Stoning)—the most severe form of court-imposed execution. Working on Yom Kippur, the "Sabbath of Sabbaths," is punishable only by Karet (Divine excision).
Why the Difference? The Talmud suggests that Shabbat represents the foundation of Creation. Violating it is a denial of God as Creator, a treasonous act against the Sovereign that demands immediate physical removal by the court. Yom Kippur, however, is a day of Atonement. Its very essence is forgiveness. While the violation is severe, the nature of the day implies a mechanism for mercy. The punishment is therefore left to the Heavenly Court, which can weigh the sinner's heart, rather than the earthly court, which judges only actions.25
10.3 Penalties for Other Afflictions
While eating/drinking and working carry the biblical penalty of Karet, the other three afflictions (washing, anointing, shoes) generally do not.
Rabbinic vs. Biblical: Most authorities (including Maimonides) rule that eating/drinking is the essence of the biblical command inuy nefesh. The other three are either Derabanan (Rabbinic enactments) or biblical prohibitions that do not carry the Karet penalty. Violation of these incurs "Lashes for Rebellion" (Makkat Mardut)—a disciplinary punishment from the Rabbinic court.6
11. Philosophical Rationales: The Purpose of Affliction
Why does the "Day of Atonement" require physical suffering? The classical commentators offer profound insights into the mechanism of inuy nefesh, moving beyond the legal technicalities to the spiritual core.
11.1 Maimonides: Discipline and Asceticism
In his philosophical magnum opus, The Guide for the Perplexed (III:43), and his legal code Mishneh Torah, Maimonides (Rambam) posits that the purpose of the fast is to break the dominance of the animal soul.
Rational Control: Sin often stems from the unbridled desires of the body. To atone, one must demonstrate mastery over these desires. The fast is not suffering for the sake of pain, but a re-calibration of the human will, subordinating the physical appetites to the intellect.26
Repentance (Teshuvah): Affliction creates the psychological state necessary for genuine repentance. A satiated body is prone to arrogance and complacency; a hungry body is humble, broken, and receptive to spiritual introspection.28
11.2 Sefer HaChinuch: The Substitute Sacrifice
The Sefer HaChinuch (Mitzvah 313) emphasizes the sacrificial aspect of the fast.
Vicarious Atonement: In the Temple era, animals were sacrificed to atone for sin. In the absence of the Temple, the individual's own body becomes the offering. The diminution of one's own fat and blood through fasting is considered a "minor death," a substitute for the punishment the sinner truly deserves. This physical offering demonstrates the sincerity of the penitent.29
11.3 The Angelic Ideal
A pervasive theme in Rabbinic thought is that on Yom Kippur, the Jewish people mimic the angels.
Transcending Biology: Angels are purely spiritual; they have no biological needs. By refraining from eating, drinking, and procreation, Israel declares that despite their physical form, their true essence is spiritual. This is symbolized by the custom of wearing the Kittel (a white robe resembling a shroud or angelic garment) and reciting "Baruch Shem Kevod Malchuto" aloud—a prayer usually whispered because it belongs to the angels.
12. Conclusion: The Architecture of Atonement
The legal mandate of inuy nefesh on Yom Kippur is a comprehensive statutory framework that transforms the human being from a biological creature into a spiritual entity. Through the prism of the Oral Tradition, the ambiguous biblical command to "afflict the soul" is crystallized into five specific prohibitions that systematically deconstruct the physical ego.
The designation of Shabbat Shabbaton serves as the legal bedrock, creating a "Super-Sabbath" where the standard imperative to enjoy the physical world is overridden by the imperative to transcend it. While the penalties for violation are severe, identifying the failure to afflict oneself as a capital spiritual offense, they underscore the magnitude of the opportunity: a chance for total expiation and a return to the pristine state of the soul.
Ultimately, the laws of Yom Kippur reveal the dynamic nature of Jewish jurisprudence, where text, tradition, and theology converge to create a day that is "out of time"—a moment of eternity experienced within the confines of the temporal world.
Works cited
Yom Kippur (The Day of Atonement) - Nehemia's Wall, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.nehemiaswall.com/yom-kippur-day-atonement
Yom Kippur - Jewish Theological Seminary, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.jtsa.edu/torah/yom-kippur/
Prohibitions of Yom Kippur | Texts & Source Sheets from ... - Sefaria, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.sefaria.org/topics/prohibitions-of-yom-kippur
Yom Kippur - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yom_Kippur
The Talmudic Discussion of the Yom Kippur Afflictions in B. Yoma, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/ajs-review/article/uncovering-covert-links-between-halakhah-and-aggadah-in-the-babylonian-talmud-the-talmudic-discussion-of-the-yom-kippur-afflictions-in-b-yoma/3E4E19C93F036AAC9B2F2215A51CB4E8
Guided Learning: Are the Yom Kippur Afflictions (Apart from Eating ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://torahmitzion.org/learn/guided-learning-yom-kippur-afflictions-apart-eating-drinking-prohibited-torah-law-5771/
English Explanation of Mishnah Yoma 8:1 - Sefaria, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.sefaria.org/English_Explanation_of_Mishnah_Yoma.8.1
: What the Manna Teaches about Life in the Land of Canaan, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.hartman.org.il/eikev-what-the-manna-teaches-about-life-in-the-land-of-canaan/
Yoma.74b.1-76a.15 - Sefaria, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.sefaria.org/Yoma.74b-76a
The Prohibitions of Yom Kippur - Jewish Holidays - Orthodox Union, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.ou.org/holidays/halacha-according-to-the-sephardic-practice-yom-kippur/
How should I eat on Yom Kippur if I cannot fast? - Exploring Judaism, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.exploringjudaism.org/holidays/yom-kippur/how-should-i-eat-on-yom-kippur-if-i-cannot-fast/
Laws of Yom Kippur | Israel National News, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.israelnationalnews.com/news/377419
Laws & Customs of Yom Kippur - Skokie Valley Agudath Jacob ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.svaj.org/lc-yom-kippur
Jerusalem Talmud Yoma 7:3:2-8 - Sefaria, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.sefaria.org/Jerusalem_Talmud_Yoma.7.3.2-8.1.3
The Five Afflictions | Sefaria, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.sefaria.org/sheets/45773
Some laws related to yom kippur, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.morasha.com.br/en/yom-kippur/some-laws-related-to-yom-kippur.html
Shabbat Shabbaton: Shabbat & Yom Kippur - Orthodox Union, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.ou.org/holidays/shabbas_shabbaton/
39 Melakhot - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/39_Melakhot
Laws of Yom Tov (advanced) « Pesach « - Ohr Somayach, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://ohr.edu/3467
Laws of Yom Tov - Rejoicing, enjoying, resting from work - Chabad.org, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/708510/jewish/Laws-of-Yom-Tov.htm
Karet: A Biblical Punishment - My Jewish Learning, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.myjewishlearning.com/article/karet/
accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.chabad.org/search/keyword_cdo/kid/10949/jewish/Karet.htm#:~:text=Karet%3A%20(lit.%20%E2%80%9C,G%2Dd%20on%20the%20spiritual%20plane
Karet: Can Someone Be Cut Off From G‑d? - Chabad.org, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/1340046/jewish/Karet-Can-Someone-Be-Cut-Off-From-G-d.htm
Kareth - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kareth
Yom Kippur more lenient than Shabbos? - Mi Yodeya, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/85864/yom-kippur-more-lenient-than-shabbos
Highlights of Rambam's Guide for the Perplexed: Part 1 - Torah Mitzion, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://torahmitzion.org/learn/highlights-rambams-guide-perplexed-1/
Rambam, Guide of the Perplexed 3:54 | ספריא, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.sefaria.org.il/sheets/115874
On the Problem of Sacrifices: Maimonides' Ladder of Enlightenment, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.thetorah.com/article/on-the-problem-of-sacrifices-maimonides-ladder-of-enlightenment
Sefer HaChinukh - Sefaria, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.sefaria.org/Sefer_HaChinukh
Sefer HaChinukh 313:1-2 - Sefaria, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://prod.sefaria.org.il/Sefer_HaChinukh.313.1-2
Leviticus 16:29 - Yom Kippur: eternal soul affliction?, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://sharetorah.com/torah/leviticus-vayikra/leviticus-1629/
