The Anthropocene Extinction: A Comprehensive Analysis of Earth's Sixth Great Biotic Crisis

I. Introduction: Defining a Planetary State Shift

The biosphere of planet Earth is currently undergoing a period of profound and rapid change, characterized by a loss of biological diversity at a rate that is orders of magnitude greater than the long-term historical average. This ongoing event, widely referred to as the sixth mass extinction, represents a biotic crisis of a magnitude not seen since the disappearance of the non-avian dinosaurs 66 million years ago. Unlike the great extinction events of the geological past, which were precipitated by abiotic planetary catastrophes, the current crisis is distinguished by a singular, unprecedented cause: the global-scale activities of a single species, Homo sapiens. This report provides a comprehensive analysis of this event, examining its geological context, historical precedents, anthropogenic drivers, quantitative scale, and cascading consequences for both natural ecosystems and human civilization. It further explores the multi-faceted strategies, from global governance to technological innovation, that are being proposed and implemented to mitigate what is arguably the most significant existential challenge of our time.

1.1 The Holocene vs. the Anthropocene: Terminology and Geological Context

The current extinction event is most commonly referred to by two distinct but related terms: the Holocene extinction and the Anthropocene extinction.1 The term "Holocene" situates the crisis within the current, formally recognized geological epoch, which commenced approximately 11,700 to 12,000 years ago following the end of the last glacial period, or ice age.1 This epoch has been characterized by a relatively stable and warm climate, which facilitated the development of human agriculture and civilization.2 The use of "Holocene extinction" thus frames the event as a crisis occurring

within this established geological timeframe.

However, an increasing number of scientists argue that the term "Anthropocene" more accurately captures the nature and cause of this biotic crisis.4 The Anthropocene, derived from the Greek

anthropos (human) and kainos (new), is a proposed geological epoch defined by the moment human activity became the dominant force shaping Earth's physical, chemical, and biological systems.4 Proponents of this designation point to a host of planetary-scale changes that will leave a permanent signature in the geological record, including altered sedimentation rates from urbanization, fundamental changes to the global nitrogen and carbon cycles, ocean acidification, and the widespread dispersal of novel materials like plastics and radioactive isotopes from nuclear testing.5

The debate over these terms is more than a matter of semantics; it reflects a fundamental shift in the scientific understanding of humanity's role on the planet. To label the event the "Anthropocene extinction" is to make a profound geological claim: that human impact is now so pervasive and powerful that it has pushed the Earth system out of its Holocene state and into a new, human-dominated epoch.5 The extinction event itself is the primary biological evidence for this proposed epochal transition. Therefore, the choice of the term "Anthropocene extinction" is a deliberate act of framing that emphasizes human agency as a geological force on par with the volcanoes and asteroids that triggered past mass extinctions. The scientific community continues to debate the formal stratigraphic designation of the Anthropocene, with ongoing research focused on identifying a "golden spike"—a clear, globally synchronous marker in the rock record—with leading candidates including the radionuclide fallout from mid-20th century nuclear bomb tests or the first appearance of widespread plastic pollution.6 Regardless of its formal designation, the concept of the Anthropocene correctly identifies the exclusive driver of the sixth extinction: human activity.3

1.2 Defining a Mass Extinction: Thresholds and Characteristics

To comprehend the severity of the current crisis, it is essential to define what constitutes a "mass extinction." In geological terms, a mass extinction is a widespread and rapid decrease in the planet's biodiversity, identified in the fossil record by a sharp decline in the diversity and abundance of multicellular organisms.9 These are not merely periods of elevated extinction; they are events that fundamentally and permanently restructure the biosphere.10 While there is some variation in definition, the most widely accepted quantitative threshold for a mass extinction event is the loss of approximately 75% or more of all extant species within a geologically short period, which can span thousands or even a few million years.8

This catastrophic rate of loss must be understood in contrast to the "background extinction rate." Extinction is a normal and continuous feature of evolution; species are always disappearing as environments change, competition shifts, or new, better-adapted species evolve.11 The background rate is the standard, long-term average at which this process occurs, absent a catastrophic event. Based on analysis of the fossil record, this rate is estimated to be very low, roughly one to five species per year across all taxa globally, which can also be expressed as approximately 0.1 to 1 extinction per million species-years (E/MSY).13 Mass extinctions are identified as dramatic statistical outliers that soar far above this natural background rate, representing a fundamental disruption of the normal evolutionary balance between speciation and extinction.9 The five great extinction events of the Phanerozoic Eon—the last 540 million years—all meet this criterion, each representing a profound biotic crisis that reshaped the tree of life.11

1.3 The Unique Signature of the Sixth Extinction: A Human-Driven Phenomenon

The current biodiversity crisis is consistently referred to as the "sixth" mass extinction, placing it in the lineage of the five great biotic catastrophes of the geological past.3 However, it is distinguished from its predecessors by its cause. The "Big Five" were all triggered by natural, abiotic phenomena: massive volcanic eruptions that poisoned the atmosphere and oceans, catastrophic asteroid impacts that plunged the planet into darkness, or rapid climatic shifts associated with glaciation and continental movement.2

In stark contrast, the Anthropocene extinction is uniquely and exclusively driven by the activities of a single biological agent: Homo sapiens.3 The primary drivers of modern species loss—habitat destruction, overexploitation, pollution, the introduction of invasive species, and anthropogenic climate change—are all direct or indirect consequences of human civilization's expansion and intensification.3 This makes the current event the first major biotic crisis in Earth's history for which a single species is almost wholly responsible.19 This fact carries profound philosophical and ethical weight, as it is the first mass extinction event in which the causative agent is sentient and aware of its actions and their consequences.6 The central theme of this crisis is thus one of a planetary-scale event driven by conscious, albeit often uncoordinated, action, presenting a challenge that is not only ecological and geological but also deeply rooted in human behavior, economics, and societal values.

II. A Legacy of Loss: Earth's Previous Five Mass Extinctions

To fully appreciate the magnitude and novelty of the Anthropocene extinction, it is imperative to place it within the deep-time context of Earth's history. The planet's biosphere has been punctuated by five previous catastrophic biodiversity collapses, known collectively as the "Big Five." A detailed examination of these events provides a critical scientific baseline, allowing for a comparative analysis of causes, scale, affected taxa, and long-term consequences. This historical perspective is not merely an academic exercise; it reveals recurring patterns and provides stark warnings about the potential trajectory and ultimate severity of the current human-driven crisis.

2.1 The End-Ordovician Extinction (~440 Ma)

The first of the Big Five mass extinctions occurred approximately 440 million years ago, at the boundary between the Ordovician and Silurian periods. At this time, life was almost entirely confined to the oceans, which teemed with a diversity of marine invertebrates.20 The extinction unfolded in two distinct pulses, separated by roughly one million years, and was the second-largest of the five in terms of the percentage of life lost.21 It is estimated that this event eliminated over 85% of all marine species, which corresponded to about 27% of families and 57% of genera.9

The primary driver is widely believed to be a period of intense, rapid climate change.23 The leading hypothesis suggests that the supercontinent of Gondwana drifted over the South Pole, triggering a major ice age.17 This glaciation locked up vast quantities of water in ice sheets, causing a dramatic global cooling and a precipitous drop in sea levels—perhaps by as much as 100 meters.18 This sea-level fall drained the extensive warm, shallow epicontinental seas that were the primary habitat for most Ordovician life, leading to the first wave of extinctions.18 The second pulse of extinction occurred as the ice age ended, and the climate rapidly warmed. As glaciers melted, sea levels rose quickly, flooding the newly exposed continental shelves with oxygen-poor (anoxic) waters from the deep ocean, creating a second, distinct environmental stressor.21 The primary victims of this one-two punch of cooling and warming were groups of sessile, shallow-water organisms, including many species of brachiopods, trilobites, reef-building tabulate and rugose corals, and graptolites.17

2.2 The Late Devonian Extinction (~372-359 Ma)

The second great biotic crisis was not a single, sudden event but rather a prolonged series of extinction pulses that spanned several million years during the latter part of the Devonian Period.26 Cumulatively, this protracted event is estimated to have wiped out 70-85% of all marine species, which included about 19% of all families and 50% of all genera.9

The causes of the Late Devonian extinction are less certain than for other events and are likely multifactorial. Evidence points to a combination of environmental stressors, including significant global cooling, episodic sea-level fluctuations, and widespread ocean anoxia.28 A particularly compelling hypothesis links the crisis to a major evolutionary innovation on land: the rise of the first complex forests. The proliferation of deep-rooted trees during the Devonian would have dramatically increased rates of rock weathering. This, in turn, would have released large amounts of nutrients into rivers and, ultimately, the oceans. This nutrient influx would have triggered massive algal blooms, a process known as eutrophication. As the algae died and decomposed, it would have consumed vast amounts of dissolved oxygen, creating the widespread anoxic "dead zones" implicated in the marine extinctions.29

The most severely affected groups were tropical, warm-water marine organisms. The great Devonian reef ecosystems, built by stromatoporoid sponges and tabulate and rugose corals, collapsed so completely that their geographic extent was reduced by a factor of 5000; reef systems of similar scale would not reappear on Earth until the Mesozoic era, over 100 million years later.28 Other hard-hit groups included the placoderms (a class of armored fish), many species of trilobites, and brachiopods.17 Adding a layer of scientific nuance, some analyses suggest that the Late Devonian biodiversity loss was driven less by a spike in the extinction rate and more by a prolonged depression in the rate of speciation—the origination of new species. In this view, it was more of a "biodiversity crisis" than a classic mass extinction, a period where the evolutionary engine of novelty stalled in the face of persistent environmental stress.29

2.3 The End-Permian Extinction ("The Great Dying," ~252 Ma)

The End-Permian extinction was the most profound biotic catastrophe in the last 540 million years, an event so severe it is often called "The Great Dying".31 Occurring with shocking rapidity in geological terms—perhaps in as little as 20,000 years—it brought the biosphere to the brink of total collapse.31 The sheer scale of the devastation is difficult to comprehend: estimates indicate the extinction of up to 96% of all marine species and 70% of terrestrial vertebrate species.16 Overall, more than half of all biological families on the planet vanished.32

The scientific consensus attributes this near-total annihilation to one of the largest known volcanic events in Earth's history: the eruption of the Siberian Traps, a massive flood basalt province that covered an area larger than western Europe with lava.32 Over a relatively short period, these eruptions vented colossal quantities of greenhouse gases, particularly carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide, into the atmosphere.32 This triggered a cascade of deadly environmental effects. The massive injection of CO2 led to runaway global warming, with evidence suggesting a rise in ocean temperatures of 8°C or more.32 This warming, in turn, reduced the ocean's ability to hold dissolved oxygen, leading to widespread anoxia and, in some areas, the buildup of toxic hydrogen sulfide (euxinia).32 Simultaneously, the absorption of atmospheric CO2 by the oceans caused severe ocean acidification, making it difficult for marine organisms with calcium carbonate shells or skeletons to survive.32 Additional stressors may have included the ignition of vast coal seams by the lava flows and the release of methane by specialized microbes that thrived in the altered ocean chemistry.32

The toll was indiscriminate and widespread. In the oceans, iconic Paleozoic groups like the trilobites, rugose corals, and sea scorpions were driven to final extinction.17 On land, the dominant synapsids (often called "mammal-like reptiles") were decimated. Apex predators like

Gorgonops and large herbivores disappeared, along with two-thirds of all therapsid families.39 This catastrophic clearing of terrestrial ecosystems created an ecological vacuum that, in the subsequent Triassic period, was filled by the archosaurs, a group that would ultimately give rise to the dinosaurs.35 The End-Permian event thus not only represented the biosphere's closest brush with total annihilation but also fundamentally reset the course of vertebrate evolution on land.

2.4 The End-Triassic Extinction (~201 Ma)

Occurring at the boundary of the Triassic and Jurassic periods, this event ranks as the fourth-largest of the Big Five. It resulted in the extinction of an estimated 70-80% of all species, which included about 23% of all families and nearly 50% of all genera.9

The primary cause of the End-Triassic extinction is strongly linked to another massive volcanic episode: the eruption of the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP). This large igneous province was associated with the initial rifting and breakup of the supercontinent Pangea.12 Similar to the Siberian Traps, the CAMP eruptions released immense volumes of CO2 into the atmosphere over a geologically short period, triggering rapid global warming and ocean acidification.12

In the oceans, the extinction was particularly severe for reef-building organisms, conodonts (an extinct group of eel-like vertebrates), and many species of ammonoids.12 On land, the event had a transformative effect on the hierarchy of life. It eliminated many of the large non-dinosaurian archosaurs (such as the crocodile-like phytosaurs) and most of the remaining large amphibians that had been dominant groups during the Triassic.17 The disappearance of these groups removed the primary ecological competitors of the early dinosaurs. This cleared a wide array of ecological niches, allowing the dinosaurs to diversify rapidly and establish the terrestrial dominance they would maintain for the next 135 million years throughout the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods.16

2.5 The End-Cretaceous Extinction (K-Pg, ~66 Ma)

The most recent and certainly the most famous of the Big Five is the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) extinction event, which occurred 66 million years ago. This event is responsible for the demise of an estimated 75-76% of all species on Earth.2

The primary cause of the K-Pg extinction is now understood with a high degree of scientific certainty to have been the impact of a large asteroid or comet, approximately 10 kilometers in diameter, which struck the Earth in the vicinity of the present-day Yucatán Peninsula in Mexico.2 The impact created the massive Chicxulub crater, a 180-kilometer-wide scar still visible in geophysical surveys.44 The immediate effects of the impact were cataclysmic, including a massive thermal pulse, continent-spanning earthquakes, and colossal tsunamis.46 However, the primary kill mechanism was the subsequent "impact winter." The collision ejected trillions of tons of dust, soot from global wildfires, and sulfate aerosols into the upper atmosphere, enshrouding the planet in a dark, cold cloud.11 This blockage of sunlight would have halted photosynthesis for months or years, causing a near-total collapse of both terrestrial and marine food webs.46 While there was contemporaneous large-scale volcanism in the Deccan Traps in India, climate modeling and the abrupt nature of the extinction in the fossil record strongly support the asteroid impact as the primary and decisive cause.49

The K-Pg extinction is iconic for bringing an end to the "Age of Reptiles." All non-avian dinosaurs, from Tyrannosaurus rex to Triceratops, became extinct.2 The giant marine reptiles (mosasaurs and plesiosaurs) and the flying reptiles (pterosaurs) also vanished.17 In the oceans, the ammonites, a diverse and abundant group of shelled cephalopods, were wiped out completely, along with many species of plankton.47 The demise of the dinosaurs created an unprecedented ecological opportunity for the small, shrew-like mammals that survived the cataclysm. In the post-impact world, mammals underwent a spectacular adaptive radiation, diversifying into the myriad forms—from bats to whales to primates—that dominate the planet today.2

The history of these five events reveals critical patterns. Firstly, the biosphere's recovery from a mass extinction is a process that unfolds over millions of years.10 The current human-caused crisis is therefore not a temporary problem that can be quickly "fixed" on human timescales; it is an event that is setting the evolutionary trajectory of the planet for a period far longer than the entire existence of our own species. The recovery does not simply replace what was lost but fundamentally reshuffles the evolutionary deck, often leading to the rise of entirely new dominant groups. Secondly, there is a recurring and ominous link between massive, rapid injections of carbon into the atmosphere (from volcanism) and some of the most severe mass extinctions (Permian, Triassic). This provides a powerful geological analogue for the current crisis, which is also driven by a massive, rapid injection of carbon, albeit from industrial civilization rather than volcanoes. The fossil record thus provides a direct and sobering warning: rapid, large-scale carbon release is a proven recipe for global biotic catastrophe.12

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Phanerozoic Mass Extinctions

Event Name

Timeline (Ma)

Primary Driver(s)

Estimated Species Loss (%)

Key Affected Taxa

Source(s)

End-Ordovician

~440

Glaciation (global cooling, sea-level fall) followed by rapid warming

~85%

Trilobites, brachiopods, corals, graptolites

9

Late Devonian

~372-359

Global cooling, ocean anoxia (potentially driven by evolution of land plants)

~70-85%

Reef-builders (corals, stromatoporoids), placoderms (armored fish), trilobites

9

End-Permian

~252

Massive volcanism (Siberian Traps), leading to global warming, ocean anoxia, and acidification

90-96% (marine), 70% (terrestrial)

Trilobites, rugose corals, sea scorpions, most therapsids

16

End-Triassic

~201

Massive volcanism (CAMP), leading to global warming and ocean acidification

~70-80%

Non-dinosaurian archosaurs, large amphibians, conodonts, reef-builders

9

End-Cretaceous (K-Pg)

~66

Asteroid impact (Chicxulub), causing "impact winter"

~75%

Non-avian dinosaurs, pterosaurs, mosasaurs, plesiosaurs, ammonites

2

Anthropocene

Current

Human Activity (habitat loss, overexploitation, climate change, etc.)

Ongoing, potentially >75%

Amphibians, mammals, birds, corals, insects, plants

3

III. The Anthropogenic Engine: Primary Drivers of the Modern Biodiversity Crisis

Unlike the abiotic catastrophes of the past, the sixth mass extinction is driven by a complex and interconnected suite of pressures originating from a single source: human activity. To understand the crisis, it is necessary to deconstruct this general term into its specific, measurable components. From the transformation of landscapes for food production to the alteration of the global climate, these drivers are collectively pushing the Earth's ecosystems beyond their capacity for resilience. The timeline of these drivers reveals a dramatic and undeniable acceleration, particularly since the mid-20th century, a period known as the "Great Acceleration," which has seen exponential growth in human population, consumption, and technological power, pushing planetary systems to their breaking point.3

3.1 The Transformation of the Biosphere: Habitat Destruction, Fragmentation, and Land Use Change

The primary driver of modern biodiversity loss is the physical alteration and destruction of natural habitats.3 The scale of this transformation is planetary; human activities have already severely altered 75% of the Earth's ice-free land surface and 66% of its marine environments.51

The single greatest cause of this transformation is agriculture. The development of agriculture approximately 10,000 years ago was the foundation of human civilization, enabling population growth through the conversion of natural ecosystems into managed landscapes.2 In the modern era, this process has reached an industrial scale. Today, an estimated 40% of all terrestrial land has been converted for food production.8 This agricultural enterprise is responsible for an estimated 90% of global deforestation and accounts for 70% of all planetary freshwater use, placing immense stress on both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.8 Biodiversity hotspots such as tropical rainforests and wetlands have been particularly devastated. Rainforests are being cleared at an alarming rate for commodity crops and cattle ranching, while an estimated 85% of the world's wetlands have been lost to human activity since the 1700s.3

Beyond agriculture, the expansion of urban areas and infrastructure, such as roads and dams, further contributes to habitat loss. These developments not only destroy habitats outright but also fragment them into smaller, isolated patches. This fragmentation isolates populations, restricts genetic flow, and makes species more vulnerable to extinction from localized events.4

3.2 Overexploitation: The "Superpredator" Effect

The direct exploitation of organisms through hunting, fishing, and harvesting continues to be a major driver of extinction.3 The history of human expansion is a history of overexploitation. The arrival of modern humans on continents and islands over the past 50,000 years shows a strong correlation with the extinction of large-bodied animals, or "megafauna".3 From the mammoths and saber-toothed cats of North America to the giant moa birds of New Zealand and the elephant birds of Madagascar, megafaunal extinctions followed in the wake of human colonization, a pattern strongly suggesting that hunting pressure was a primary cause.3 The impact on mammals has been particularly severe; since the rise of humans, the total biomass of wild terrestrial mammals has declined by an estimated 85%.57

This pattern continues in the modern era. Overfishing has depleted marine populations worldwide and is a primary threat to marine biodiversity.3 On land, poaching and the illegal wildlife trade threaten iconic species like rhinoceroses and elephants, while unsustainable harvesting of timber and other forest products degrades ecosystems.11 Human activity has effectively established

Homo sapiens as an "unprecedented global superpredator," one that not only preys on a vast array of species but also systematically targets adult apex predators, disrupting food webs from the top down.3

3.3 The Chemical Assault: Pollution

Pollution in its various forms represents a pervasive and insidious threat to biodiversity.3 Industrial and agricultural chemicals, including pesticides and excess fertilizers, contaminate soil and run off into freshwater and marine ecosystems, causing direct harm to organisms and creating vast anoxic "dead zones".53 Heavy metals and other industrial wastes can accumulate in the environment and move up the food chain, leading to reproductive failure and death in top predators.20

In addition to chemical contamination, other forms of pollution have significant impacts. Light and noise pollution from urban areas can disrupt the behavior, migration, and reproductive cycles of many species.58 Perhaps the most novel and enduring form of modern pollution is plastic. Millions of tons of plastic waste are produced annually, and because it does not biodegrade, it accumulates in virtually every ecosystem on Earth, from the deepest ocean trenches to the highest mountains.6 Plastic pollution poses a direct physical threat to wildlife through ingestion and entanglement and is now forming a distinct and permanent layer in the geological record, a potential marker for the Anthropocene epoch itself.6

3.4 A Shifting Climate: Global Warming as an Accelerant

Anthropogenic climate change, driven by the emission of greenhouse gases from the burning of fossil fuels, is a rapidly intensifying driver of biodiversity loss.3 While historically ranked behind habitat loss and overexploitation, many models predict that climate change will become the primary cause of extinction in the coming decades.51

Global warming is altering ecosystems in multiple ways. It increases the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events such as heatwaves, droughts, wildfires, and floods.4 It causes shifts in temperature and precipitation patterns, forcing species to migrate towards more suitable climates.54 Species that are unable to move fast enough, or whose path is blocked by fragmented landscapes, face the risk of extinction.56 Marine ecosystems are particularly vulnerable. Rising ocean temperatures cause coral bleaching, a stress response that can lead to the death of entire reef ecosystems. Coral reefs, which are among the most biodiverse habitats on Earth, are so sensitive that up to 99% are projected to be lost if global warming is not limited to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels.51 Furthermore, the absorption of atmospheric CO2 is causing ocean acidification, threatening the survival of corals, shellfish, and plankton that form the base of marine food webs.32

3.5 The Biological Invasion: The Role of Non-Native Species

Through global trade and travel, humans have transported thousands of species beyond their native ranges, both intentionally and accidentally.3 When these non-native species become established in new environments, they can become "invasive," wreaking havoc on native ecosystems that have no evolutionary defenses against them.24 Invasive alien species are considered the second-biggest cause of biodiversity loss worldwide.58

Invasive species drive native species to extinction through a variety of mechanisms: they can be superior competitors for resources, they can be novel predators, or they can introduce new diseases and parasites.24 For example, the introduction of the brown tree snake to Guam after World War II led to the extinction of most of the island's native forest bird species. In the world's freshwater systems, invasive species are a primary threat. Perhaps one of the most devastating examples is the chytrid fungus, which is believed to have been spread globally through human trade. This pathogen has caused catastrophic declines and extinctions in over 500 species of amphibians, representing one of the greatest disease-driven losses of biodiversity ever recorded.51

These drivers do not operate in isolation but interact in complex and destructive ways, creating synergistic effects that are often greater than the sum of their parts. Habitat fragmentation makes populations more vulnerable to the effects of climate change by preventing them from migrating to more suitable areas. Pollution can weaken the immune systems of organisms, making them more susceptible to invasive diseases. Climate change can facilitate the spread of invasive species into new regions. Understanding these dangerous feedback loops is critical to comprehending the full, accelerating nature of the Anthropocene extinction.24

The current crisis can be viewed fundamentally as a crisis of energy and biomass appropriation. Through the drivers outlined above, humanity has systematically reconfigured the planet's ecosystems to channel an ever-increasing proportion of its primary productivity towards a single species and its associated livestock. The stark reality of this reconfiguration is captured in biomass statistics: of the total mass of mammals on Earth today, humans account for 36% and our livestock (primarily cattle and pigs) account for a staggering 60%. All of the world's wild mammals—from mice to elephants to whales—now constitute a mere 4% of the total.3 This demonstrates that habitat destruction and species loss are not accidental byproducts of human civilization; they are the direct and necessary consequences of a global trophic system that has been artificially simplified and monopolized to support the exponential growth of one species.

Table 2: Primary Drivers of the Anthropocene Extinction

Driver

Primary Mechanism(s)

Key Statistics/Evidence

Example

Source(s)

Land Use Change

Conversion of natural habitats for agriculture, forestry, urbanization, and infrastructure.

- 40% of terrestrial land converted for food production. - 90% of global deforestation driven by agriculture. - 75% of ice-free land surface severely altered by humans.

Deforestation of the Amazon rainforest for cattle ranching and soy cultivation.

8

Overexploitation

Unsustainable hunting, fishing, and harvesting of species.

- 85% decline in wild terrestrial mammal biomass since the rise of humans. - Global fisheries are widely overexploited or have collapsed.

Poaching of rhinoceroses for their horns, driving them to the brink of extinction.

11

Climate Change

Greenhouse gas emissions causing global warming, ocean acidification, and extreme weather.

- Global temperatures ~1.2°C above pre-industrial levels. - Up to 99% of coral reefs may be lost if warming exceeds 1.5°C.

Widespread coral bleaching events on the Great Barrier Reef due to marine heatwaves.

51

Pollution

Contamination of air, water, and soil with chemicals, plastics, and other pollutants.

- Widespread pesticide and fertilizer use. - Millions of tons of plastic waste entering ecosystems annually.

Accumulation of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in the tissues of apex predators like polar bears.

3

Invasive Species

Introduction of non-native species that outcompete, prey upon, or introduce disease to native biota.

- Second-biggest cause of biodiversity loss globally. - Contribute to 60% of species extinctions.

The chytrid fungus causing mass extinction of amphibian species worldwide.

51

IV. Quantifying the Crisis: Evidence, Scale, and Scientific Debate

While the drivers of the sixth extinction are clear, the assertion that it constitutes a mass extinction on par with the Big Five rests on quantitative evidence. This evidence is drawn from multiple lines of inquiry, including direct observation of recent extinctions, statistical analysis of threatened species lists, and measurements of population declines. Together, they paint a picture of a biosphere under extreme stress, with rates of loss far exceeding the natural background level. However, there remains a nuanced scientific debate regarding the precise severity of the crisis and whether the formal threshold of a mass extinction has already been crossed.

4.1 The Pace of Disappearance: Contrasting Background vs. Modern Extinction Rates

The central piece of evidence for a mass extinction is the rate at which species are vanishing. When compared to the background extinction rate of approximately 0.1 to 1 extinction per million species-years (E/MSY), modern rates are alarmingly high.14 The scientific consensus, based on documented extinctions over the past few centuries, is that the current rate of species loss is

100 to 1,000 times higher than the background rate.3 Some studies, taking into account projected future extinctions of species currently listed as critically endangered, suggest the rate could be as high as

10,000 times the background level, though this higher figure remains a subject of debate.3

To place this in the context of past catastrophes, one analysis of vertebrate extinctions over the last 500 years found that species are being lost at a rate 24 to 85 times faster than during the End-Cretaceous mass extinction event that eliminated the dinosaurs.11 A more recent study focusing on the extinction of entire genera (the taxonomic rank above species) concluded that the current rate of generic extinction is 35 times higher than the expected background rate prevailing over the last million years. The study calculated that the number of genera that have disappeared since 1500 CE would have taken 18,000 years to go extinct under normal background conditions.3 This dramatic acceleration is the quantitative signature of a biosphere in crisis.

4.2 Reading the Red List: Insights and Limitations of IUCN Data

The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species is the world's most comprehensive inventory of the global conservation status of biological species and a critical tool for quantifying the extinction crisis.55 The Red List uses a rigorous set of criteria to classify species into categories ranging from "Least Concern" to "Extinct."

According to IUCN data and related studies, at least 680 vertebrate species are documented to have gone extinct since the 16th century.51 The list reveals that a substantial fraction of assessed species groups are currently threatened with extinction. Globally, an estimated 1.2 million plant and animal species are under threat.51 The peril is particularly acute for certain groups: 41% of all amphibian species, 37% of sharks and rays, 34% of conifers, 36% of reef-forming corals, and 27% of mammals are currently classified as threatened.62

Despite its importance, the IUCN Red List has significant limitations that mean its figures represent a conservative underestimate of the true scale of loss. The most critical limitation is that the IUCN has, to date, evaluated the extinction risk for less than 5% of the world's approximately 2 million described species.62 The vast majority of life, particularly invertebrates (which may constitute over 95% of animal species), fungi, and microorganisms, remains unassessed. Many of these species are likely going extinct before they are even discovered and formally described by science, a phenomenon known as "cryptic extinction".3 Therefore, while the Red List provides invaluable data on the plight of well-studied groups, the true number of extinctions and threatened species is certainly far higher than what is officially documented.

4.3 Beyond Extinction: Population Decline, Range Contraction, and "Mass Rarity"

Focusing solely on the finality of species-level extinction provides an incomplete and lagging indicator of the true health of the biosphere. Extinction is the endpoint of a long process of decline.51 A more immediate and telling metric of the ongoing crisis is the widespread decline in the abundance and geographic range of species that have not yet gone extinct.

The World Wide Fund for Nature's (WWF) Living Planet Report, which tracks the population trends of thousands of vertebrate species, provides a stark measure of this phenomenon. The 2022 report documents a staggering 69% average decline in the monitored population sizes of mammals, birds, reptiles, fish, and amphibians between 1970 and 2018.51 The situation is even more dire for freshwater ecosystems, where vertebrate populations have plummeted by an average of 83% over the same period.51

This widespread hemorrhaging of wildlife populations has been termed "biological annihilation" or "mass rarity".10 It signifies a crisis where even once-common species are becoming increasingly rare and their geographic ranges are contracting. This is a profoundly damaging process in its own right, as the loss of populations leads to the degradation of ecosystem functions and services long before the last individual of a species dies.10 A recent global analysis of population trends for over 70,000 species found that 48% are currently undergoing population declines, while only 3% are increasing.64 Critically, this study revealed that 33% of species currently classified as "Least Concern" (i.e., non-threatened) by the IUCN are, in fact, experiencing declining populations.64 This demonstrates that the crisis is systemic, affecting a broad swath of the tree of life, not just a few well-known endangered species. In the deep time of the fossil record, a period of such pervasive mass rarity would be indistinguishable from a mass extinction event itself.10

4.4 The Debate on Severity: Are We in or approaching a Mass Extinction?

Given the evidence of accelerated extinction rates and widespread population declines, there is a broad consensus among biologists that humanity has initiated an extinction event of unprecedented severity.3 However, a nuanced scientific debate exists regarding its formal classification. The core of the debate is whether the crisis has already crossed the 75% species loss threshold to be categorized as one of the "Big Five" mass extinctions.3

Some scientists argue that, while the current rates are catastrophic, the cumulative loss of species to date has not yet reached that level. From this perspective, we are "on the edge of" a mass extinction but not yet fully in it.3 This view often highlights that the majority of modern extinctions have, so far, affected geographically restricted species (like island endemics), which is more characteristic of an intensified "background extinction" regime rather than the indiscriminate, widespread losses seen in past mass extinctions like the K-Pg event.66

Conversely, many other scientists argue that this distinction is semantic and dangerously complacent. They contend that the current rate of extinction is the critical factor. Given that modern extinction rates are already within the range of, or even exceed, those estimated for past mass extinctions, it is only a matter of time—perhaps only a few centuries—before the 75% threshold is crossed if current trends continue.3 From a geological perspective, a crisis that unfolds over a few hundred years is instantaneous. This viewpoint asserts that we are unequivocally in the opening stages of the sixth mass extinction.

This debate is partly fueled by the inherent difficulty of comparing modern, real-time data on often rare species over decadal timescales with the coarse, million-year resolution of the fossil record, which is dominated by abundant marine invertebrates.10 Regardless of the precise terminology, the scientific community is united in its assessment that the ongoing biodiversity loss is a crisis of the first order, driven by human activity and threatening the stability of the biosphere.3 The focus on species-level extinction as the sole metric is a conservative and lagging indicator. The more profound and immediate phenomenon is the biological annihilation occurring through the collapse of populations and the contraction of ranges for both common and rare species alike. This mass rarity is the unmistakable leading indicator of an unfolding mass extinction.

V. The Unraveling Web: Cascading Consequences for Ecosystems and Humanity

The loss of biodiversity is not merely an aesthetic or ethical concern; it represents a fundamental threat to the stability of ecosystems and the persistence of human civilization. The intricate web of life, built up over millions of years of evolution, provides essential functions and services that are the foundation of human health, security, and economic prosperity. The accelerating unraveling of this web has profound and often irreversible consequences, creating dangerous feedback loops and jeopardizing the planetary systems upon which humanity depends.

5.1 Ecosystem Instability and Collapse: The Loss of Resilience and Function

Biodiversity is the bedrock of ecosystem health, stability, and resilience.65 Each species plays a role, however subtle, in the functioning of its ecosystem. The interactions between species—predation, pollination, seed dispersal, decomposition—create complex, self-regulating systems. As species are lost, these systems become simplified and less resilient to disturbances such as climate change, disease outbreaks, or pollution.54

A diverse ecosystem has functional redundancy; if one species that performs a key role (like pollination or nutrient cycling) declines, other species may be able to compensate, maintaining the overall function of the system. As biodiversity erodes, this redundancy is lost. The disappearance of a "keystone" species—one that has a disproportionately large effect on its environment relative to its abundance—can trigger a cascade of secondary extinctions, leading to the collapse of the entire ecosystem.8 This phenomenon, known as an "extinction cascade," means that biodiversity loss can become a self-perpetuating process, with each extinction increasing the likelihood of further extinctions.8 The decline in biodiversity lowers an ecosystem's overall productivity and degrades its ability to perform its essential functions.65

5.2 The Depletion of Natural Capital: Degradation of Ecosystem Services

Healthy ecosystems provide a suite of life-sustaining benefits to humanity known as "ecosystem services." The loss of biodiversity directly threatens the provision of these services, which are often treated as free and limitless but are, in fact, the products of functioning biological systems.63 The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment categorizes these services into four types, all of which are currently under threat:

• Provisioning Services: These are the direct products obtained from ecosystems. Biodiversity loss threatens global food security through the decline of wild fisheries, the loss of genetic diversity in crops (which is vital for developing new, resilient varieties), and, most critically, the decline of pollinators.60 More than 75% of global food crops, including most fruits, vegetables, and nuts, rely on animal pollination. The economic value of this single service is estimated to be between $235 billion and $577 billion annually.60 Biodiversity is also a vast library of chemical compounds, and its loss threatens future medical innovation. Over 50% of modern medicines, from antibiotics derived from fungi to painkillers from plants, have their origins in natural sources.60

• Regulating Services: These are the benefits obtained from the regulation of ecosystem processes. Biodiversity loss impairs the planet's ability to regulate its climate, as forests and oceans are critical carbon sinks that absorb vast amounts of atmospheric CO2.54 Deforestation and the degradation of marine ecosystems reduce this capacity, accelerating climate change. Wetlands and forests play a crucial role in water purification and flood control; their destruction increases the risk of natural disasters and degrades water quality.54 The loss of natural predators can lead to outbreaks of pests that damage crops and spread disease.60

• Cultural Services: These are the non-material benefits people obtain from ecosystems, including spiritual enrichment, cognitive development, recreation, and aesthetic experiences.63 For many cultures, particularly Indigenous communities, biodiversity is inextricably linked to cultural identity, traditional knowledge, and spiritual well-being. Its loss represents an irreplaceable cultural impoverishment.54

• Supporting Services: These are the fundamental processes necessary for the production of all other ecosystem services, such as soil formation, photosynthesis, and nutrient cycling.54 The disruption of these foundational processes by biodiversity loss undermines the entire ecological infrastructure of the planet.

5.3 Human Health and Security: Zoonotic Diseases, Conflict, and Cultural Loss

The degradation of ecosystems has direct and severe consequences for human health and security. One of the most alarming of these is the increased risk of pandemics. Intact, biodiverse ecosystems can act as a buffer against the transmission of infectious diseases from wildlife to humans through a phenomenon known as the "dilution effect," where a high diversity of non-host species dilutes the ability of a pathogen to find a suitable host.54 As habitats are destroyed and fragmented, wildlife is forced into smaller areas and into closer, more frequent contact with humans and livestock. This creates ideal conditions for pathogens to "spill over" from animal reservoirs to the human population.63 An estimated 60-75% of all emerging human infectious diseases, including HIV/AIDS, Ebola, and COVID-19, are zoonotic in origin.63 Therefore, biodiversity conservation is not just an environmental issue; it is a critical component of global public health security and a form of preventative medicine on a planetary scale.

Furthermore, the degradation of natural resources can be a significant driver of social instability and conflict. Competition over scarce resources like water, fertile land, and fish stocks can exacerbate tensions within and between communities, particularly in regions where livelihoods are directly dependent on the natural environment.54 This can lead to local migration and, in some cases, contribute to political conflict.54

5.4 Long-Term Planetary Implications: The Future of Evolution

The consequences of the Anthropocene extinction will extend far beyond the timescale of human civilization. As demonstrated by the recovery from past mass extinctions, the evolutionary trajectory of life on Earth will be permanently altered.10 The recovery of biodiversity to pre-crisis levels is a process that takes millions of years.10 The current extinction event is not just selectively removing species; it is disproportionately affecting certain branches of the tree of life, particularly large-bodied animals and habitat specialists.

The likely outcome is an impoverished biosphere dominated by a smaller number of generalist, "weedy" species that are well-adapted to thrive in human-altered landscapes (e.g., rats, pigeons, cockroaches).35 The current crisis is not merely erasing the present state of biodiversity; it is foreclosing future evolutionary possibilities and setting the course for life on this planet for millions of years to come. The deep and dangerous feedback loop between biodiversity loss and climate change further complicates this long-term picture. Climate change is a primary driver of biodiversity loss, but biodiversity loss, in turn, exacerbates climate change by impairing the biosphere's capacity for carbon sequestration.53 This interconnectedness means that failing to address one crisis makes it impossible to solve the other. Any effective long-term strategy must tackle both simultaneously through integrated approaches like nature-based solutions that protect carbon-rich, biodiverse ecosystems.

VI. Navigating the Future: A Multi-Pronged Approach to Mitigation

Addressing a crisis as vast and systemic as the Anthropocene extinction requires a response of commensurate scale and complexity. There is no single solution; rather, an effective strategy must be integrated and multi-pronged, combining top-down global governance with bottom-up changes in technology, on-the-ground conservation, and the fundamental structures of the global economy and food systems. While the challenge is immense, a growing body of research and policy points toward pathways that could mitigate the worst outcomes and begin to "bend the curve" of biodiversity loss.

6.1 Global Governance and Policy: The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)

At the highest level, the primary international legal framework for addressing biodiversity loss is the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Adopted at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, the CBD has three main objectives: the conservation of biodiversity, the sustainable use of its components, and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from the use of genetic resources.68 With 196 parties, it has near-universal participation, although the United States remains a notable non-signatory.69

The CBD operates through a governing body known as the Conference of the Parties (COP), which meets periodically to review progress and set global targets. The previous strategic plan (2011-2020) established the 20 Aichi Biodiversity Targets, but a 2020 assessment revealed that none of these targets were fully met globally.72 In response to this shortfall, at the COP15 meeting in 2022, parties adopted the new and more ambitious Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. This framework sets out four long-term goals for 2050 and 23 action-oriented targets for 2030. Among the most significant of these is Target 3, commonly known as the "30 by 30" goal, which calls for the effective conservation and management of at least 30% of the world's lands, inland waters, coastal areas, and oceans by 2030.71 Another key target aims to restore at least 30% of degraded terrestrial and marine ecosystems.72 The ultimate success of the framework hinges on its implementation at the national level, requiring each party to develop and execute national biodiversity strategies and action plans that align with the global goals.70

6.2 Technological Frontiers in Conservation

Rapid advancements in technology are providing powerful new tools for monitoring, protecting, and restoring biodiversity. These innovations can increase the efficiency and effectiveness of conservation efforts, though they are not a substitute for addressing the root drivers of loss.

• Monitoring and Data Analysis: Technologies like remote sensing (from satellites) and drones provide real-time, high-resolution data on habitat change, deforestation, and ecosystem health.73 Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms are being deployed to rapidly analyze vast datasets, such as automatically identifying species in millions of camera trap images or predicting poaching hotspots.73 A revolutionary tool is environmental DNA (eDNA), which allows scientists to detect the presence of species, including rare or invasive ones, simply by analyzing the genetic material they leave behind in samples of water, soil, or air.73

• Genetic and Restoration Technologies: Genetic tools are playing an increasingly important role. DNA barcoding helps to quickly identify species and is used to combat the illegal wildlife trade by verifying the origin of animal and plant products.75 At the frontier of science, gene-editing technologies like CRISPR are being explored for "genetic rescue," with the potential to introduce beneficial traits (such as disease resistance) into threatened populations to help them adapt to changing conditions.73 On the restoration front, innovations like reforestation drones can dramatically scale up tree-planting efforts by firing biodegradable seed pods into the ground at a rate far exceeding manual planting.77

• Innovative Tracking and Enforcement: Blockchain technology is being explored as a way to create transparent and secure systems for tracking conservation funding and ensuring sustainable, legal supply chains for products like timber and seafood.76 Miniaturized GPS and radio trackers allow for the monitoring of individual animals to understand their behavior and protect them from poaching, with some efforts even embedding trackers in 3D-printed fake sea turtle eggs to lead authorities to poachers.78

6.3 On-the-Ground Interventions: Restoration, Rewilding, and Protected Areas

While global policy and technology are crucial, conservation ultimately happens on the ground. The establishment and effective management of protected areas remains a cornerstone of biodiversity conservation. The "30 by 30" goal aims to significantly expand the global network of protected areas, including Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), which are critical for conserving ocean life.71 A key challenge is ensuring these areas are adequately funded and managed to avoid becoming "paper parks"—protected in name only.79

Beyond protection, active restoration of degraded ecosystems is essential. Large-scale reforestation of degraded lands with native species can restore habitats while sequestering significant amounts of carbon.80 The restoration of coastal "blue carbon" ecosystems, such as mangroves, seagrass beds, and salt marshes, is particularly valuable as it provides a triple benefit: biodiversity conservation, climate change mitigation, and protection for coastal communities from storms.79 Other key interventions include "rewilding"—the reintroduction of keystone species (like wolves in Yellowstone National Park) to restore natural ecological processes—and the creation of wildlife corridors that connect fragmented habitats, allowing species to move and adapt, especially in response to a changing climate.73

6.4 Systemic Change: Reforming Economies, Consumption, and Food Systems

Ultimately, on-the-ground conservation efforts can only succeed if the systemic drivers of biodiversity loss are addressed. This requires a fundamental transformation of the global economic and food systems. Research has shown that even the most ambitious conservation and restoration efforts will fail to halt biodiversity loss by 2050 without a simultaneous, radical transformation of how the world produces and consumes food.81

• Economic Transformation: A critical shift involves moving away from economic models that prioritize short-term growth (as measured by GDP) at the expense of the natural world. This requires formally recognizing nature as a form of capital and integrating the economic value of ecosystem services into all financial and policy decisions, a concept detailed in landmark reports like The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review.82

• Food System Transformation: This is arguably the most critical lever for change. Key strategies include shifting dietary patterns, particularly reducing the overconsumption of high-impact foods like beef in wealthy nations; transitioning to more sustainable agricultural methods like regenerative agriculture and agroforestry that enhance rather than degrade biodiversity; and drastically reducing the vast amount of food that is wasted globally.77 Technological innovations such as lab-grown (cultured) meat and vertical ocean farming offer potential pathways to produce protein with a significantly smaller environmental footprint.77

• Addressing Overconsumption: The crisis is fundamentally driven by unsustainable levels of consumption, disproportionately concentrated in high-income nations, which are responsible for the vast majority of excess global resource use.52 Addressing this requires a cultural and behavioral shift towards reduced consumption. This can be supported by policies that promote a circular economy, such as establishing a "right to repair" for consumer goods to reduce waste, and providing consumers with clear information about the environmental impact of the products they buy.82

There is a fundamental mismatch between the scale of the problem—which is global and systemic, driven by the core functions of our civilization—and the scale of many proposed solutions, which are often local and project-based. While individual actions, protected areas, and new technologies are essential components of the solution, they are insufficient on their own. An effective strategy must be deeply integrated, combining top-down global policy and financial commitments with bottom-up transformations in production, consumption, and land management, all enabled and accelerated by technology. A focus on any single element in isolation is destined to fall short of the transformative change required.

VII. Conclusion: A Planetary Reckoning and the Path Forward

7.1 Synthesis of the Evidence

The evidence presented in this report is unequivocal. The Earth is experiencing a biodiversity crisis of a magnitude that has few precedents in the geological record. The current rate of species extinction is conservatively estimated to be 100 to 1,000 times the natural background rate, a velocity of loss that is the hallmark of a mass extinction event. This crisis is not confined to the final disappearance of species; it is manifesting more immediately and pervasively as a "mass rarity," with monitored vertebrate populations having declined by an average of 69% since 1970. Unlike the five great extinctions of the deep past, which were caused by abiotic planetary shocks, the sixth extinction is unique in its cause. It is the direct and accelerating consequence of the activities of a single species, Homo sapiens. The primary drivers—habitat destruction for agriculture, overexploitation of resources, pollution, the spread of invasive species, and anthropogenic climate change—are all facets of a human enterprise that has reconfigured the planet's biosphere to channel a vast and unsustainable proportion of its biomass and energy toward itself.

7.2 A Reflection on the Anthropocene

The unfolding biotic crisis is the most compelling evidence for the proposition that humanity has ushered in a new geological epoch: the Anthropocene. This concept reframes the extinction event not merely as an environmental problem but as a planetary state shift. It signifies a moment in Earth's 4.5-billion-year history where a species has become a dominant geological force, capable of altering the chemical composition of the atmosphere and oceans, reshaping landscapes on a continental scale, and fundamentally redirecting the evolutionary trajectory of life for millions of years to come. The long-term consequences are profound. The recovery of the biosphere from such an event will take millions of years and will result in a world that is biologically impoverished and homogenized, permanently altered by the brief but powerful tenure of industrial civilization. The cascading effects of this unraveling—from the collapse of ecosystem services that underpin economic stability to the increased risk of global pandemics—demonstrate that the futures of biodiversity and humanity are inextricably linked.

7.3 Final Assessment

The trajectory of the sixth mass extinction is dire, and the scale of the required response is without precedent. Yet, pathways to mitigate the worst outcomes still exist. The scientific consensus is clear: halting and reversing biodiversity loss requires an immediate, ambitious, and integrated strategy. This strategy cannot be piecemeal. It must combine bold, top-down governance, exemplified by the global commitment to protect 30% of the planet by 2030, with a profound, bottom-up transformation of the systems that drive the crisis. The global food system, as the primary engine of habitat loss, must be fundamentally reformed. The global economic system must evolve to recognize the foundational value of natural capital. And patterns of overconsumption, driven largely by the world's wealthiest populations, must be addressed. Technology can and must play a role as an accelerator of these changes, but it is not a panacea. Ultimately, navigating the Anthropocene extinction requires a transformation in humanity's relationship with the planet's finite biosphere, moving from one of extraction and domination to one of stewardship and integration. The challenge is immense, but the stakes—the stability of civilization and the continuity of millions of years of evolutionary history—could not be higher.

Works cited

1. www.ebsco.com, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/science/holocene-extinction#:~:text=The%20Holocene%20extinction%2C%20also%20known,began%20around%2012%2C000%20years%20ago.

2. Holocene extinction | Research Starters - EBSCO, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/science/holocene-extinction

3. Holocene extinction - Wikipedia, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_extinction

4. 6th Mass Extinction Facts | What is Holocene Extinction? - Study.com, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://study.com/academy/lesson/sixth-mass-extinction-event-definition-causes-facts-evidence.html

5. The Anthropocene Debate: Marking Humanity's Impact - Yale E360, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://e360.yale.edu/features/the_anthropocene_debate__marking_humanitys_impact

6. What is the Anthropocene and why does it matter? - Natural History Museum, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/what-is-the-anthropocene.html

7. Anthropocene: the vital challenges of a scientific debate | The UNESCO Courier, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://courier.unesco.org/en/articles/anthropocene-vital-challenges-scientific-debate

8. What is the sixth mass extinction and what can we do about it ..., accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.worldwildlife.org/stories/what-is-the-sixth-mass-extinction-and-what-can-we-do-about-it

9. Extinction event - Wikipedia, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extinction_event

10. Rarity in mass extinctions and the future of ecosystems - Yale University, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://earth.yale.edu/sites/default/files/2024-12/Hull%20pdf%207.pdf

11. What Is The Sixth Mass Extinction And What Can I Do About It? - Mossy Earth, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.mossy.earth/rewilding-knowledge/sixth-mass-extinction

12. Triassic–Jurassic extinction event | Research Starters - EBSCO, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/science/triassic-jurassic-extinction-event

13. Background extinction rate - Wikipedia, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Background_extinction_rate

14. Extinction rate | biology and ecology | Britannica, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/extinction-rate

15. (PDF) Estimating the Normal Background Rate of Species Extinction. - ResearchGate, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265093702_Estimating_the_Normal_Background_Rate_of_Species_Extinction

16. Mass Extinction: What Happened 65 Million Years Ago? | AMNH, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/dinosaurs-ancient-fossils/extinction/mass-extinction

17. Earth's five mass extinctions | Oxford University Museum of Natural ..., accessed on September 23, 2025, https://oumnh.ox.ac.uk/earths-five-mass-extinctions

18. Late Ordovician Mass Extinction: Earth, fire and ice - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10799725/

19. How many species are we losing? | WWF - Panda.org, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://wwf.panda.org/discover/our_focus/biodiversity/biodiversity/

20. Ordovician–Silurian extinction events | Research Starters - EBSCO, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/science/ordovician-silurian-extinction-events

21. The Biodiversity Crisis - OER Commons, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://oercommons.org/courseware/lesson/15185/student-old/?task=3

22. Ordovician-Silurian Extinction | Overview & Causes - Lesson - Study.com, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://study.com/academy/lesson/ordovician-silurian-mass-extinction-causes-evidence-species.html

23. www.ebsco.com, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/science/ordovician-silurian-extinction-events#:~:text=Then%2C%20within%20the%20span%20of,sudden%20drop%20in%20sea%20levels.

24. Five Worst Mass Extinctions - Endangered Species International, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.endangeredspeciesinternational.org/overview.html

25. Mass Extinctions Through Geologic Time - Fossils and Paleontology (U.S. National Park Service), accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.nps.gov/subjects/fossils/mass-extinctions-through-geologic-time.htm

26. Late Devonian extinction | Research Starters - EBSCO, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/science/late-devonian-extinction

27. www.ebsco.com, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/science/late-devonian-extinction#:~:text=Paleontologists%20studying%20the%20fossil%20record,species%2C%20mainly%20the%20saltwater%20varieties.

28. Late Devonian mass extinction - Wikipedia, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_Devonian_mass_extinction

29. Speciation collapse and invasive species dynamics during the Late Devonian “Mass Extinction” - Geological Society of America, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.geosociety.org/gsatoday/archive/22/1/pdf/i1052-5173-22-1-4.pdf

30. GSA Today - Speciation collapse and invasive species dynamics during the Late Devonian “Mass Extinction” - Geological Society of America, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.geosociety.org/gsatoday/archive/22/1/article/i1052-5173-22-1-4.htm

31. Timeline of a mass extinction | MIT News | Massachusetts Institute of Technology, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://news.mit.edu/2011/mass-extinction-1118

32. Permian–Triassic extinction event - Wikipedia, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permian%E2%80%93Triassic_extinction_event

33. news.ncsu.edu, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://news.ncsu.edu/2017/10/mass-extinctions-led-to-low-species-diversity-dinosaur-rule/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CThe%20late%2DPermian%20event%20caused,in%20carbon%20dioxide%20and%20severe

34. Permian extinction | Overview & Facts - Britannica, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/Permian-extinction

35. Mass Extinctions Led to Low Species Diversity, Dinosaur Rule | NC State News, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://news.ncsu.edu/2017/10/mass-extinctions-led-to-low-species-diversity-dinosaur-rule/

36. What caused Earth's biggest mass extinction? | Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://sustainability.stanford.edu/news/what-caused-earths-biggest-mass-extinction

37. The great catastrophe: causes of the Permo-Triassic marine mass extinction - PMC, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10753410/

38. How survivors spanned the globe after Earth's biggest mass extinction, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://sustainability.stanford.edu/news/how-survivors-spanned-globe-after-earths-biggest-mass-extinction

39. 11.2: "The Big Five" - Geosciences LibreTexts, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://geo.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Geology/Historical_Geology_(Bentley_et_al.)/11%3A_Mass_Extinctions/11.02%3A_The_Big_Five

40. Triassic-Jurassic Extinction - (Earth Science) - Vocab, Definition, Explanations | Fiveable, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://fiveable.me/key-terms/hs-earth-science/triassic-jurassic-extinction

41. www.ebsco.com, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/science/triassic-jurassic-extinction-event#:~:text=The%20Triassic%2DJurassic%20extinction%20saw,ammonites%20were%20nearly%20wiped%20out.

42. End-Triassic extinction | Evidence & Facts - Britannica, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/end-Triassic-extinction

43. Triassic–Jurassic extinction event - Wikipedia, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triassic%E2%80%93Jurassic_extinction_event

44. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6058194/#:~:text=The%20Cretaceous%2DPaleogene%20(K%2D,Chicxulub%20impact%20crater6%2C7.

45. Rapid Recovery of Life at Ground Zero of the End Cretaceous Mass Extinction - PMC, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6058194/

46. Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event | Research Starters - EBSCO, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/science/cretaceous-paleogene-extinction-event

47. Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event - Wikipedia, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cretaceous%E2%80%93Paleogene_extinction_event

48. A brief history of mass extinctions (article) | Khan Academy, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.khanacademy.org/science/ap-biology/natural-selection/extinction/a/a-brief-history-of-mass-extinctions

49. Asteroid impact, not volcanism, caused the end-Cretaceous dinosaur extinction - PNAS, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2006087117

50. K–T extinction | Overview & Facts - Britannica, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/K-T-extinction

51. What are the extent and causes of biodiversity loss? - Grantham Research Institute on climate change and the environment - LSE, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/explainers/what-are-the-extent-and-causes-of-biodiversity-loss/

52. Exiting the Anthropocene? Exploring fundamental change in our relationship with nature, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/exiting-the-anthropocene

53. What is the human impact on biodiversity? - Royal Society, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://royalsociety.org/news-resources/projects/biodiversity/human-impact-on-biodiversity/

54. Biodiversity Loss (EN0501) - UNDRR, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.undrr.org/understanding-disaster-risk/terminology/hips/en0501

55. Past and future decline and extinction of species | Royal Society, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://royalsociety.org/news-resources/projects/biodiversity/decline-and-extinction/

56. How Humans Have Caused the Most Recent Wave of Extinction - Discover Magazine, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.discovermagazine.com/how-humans-have-caused-the-most-recent-wave-of-extinction-46805

57. Biodiversity - Our World in Data, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://ourworldindata.org/biodiversity

58. Biodiversity loss: causes, consequences and solutions - Iberdrola, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.iberdrola.com/sustainability/biodiversity-loss

59. Climate change factors in the fossil record that accelerate mass extinction - NSF, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.nsf.gov/news/climate-change-factors-fossil-record-accelerate

60. Biodiversity - World Health Organization (WHO), accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/biodiversity

61. www.britannica.com, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/extinction-rate#:~:text=Researchers%20estimate%20that%20the%20current,(see%20also%20biodiversity%20loss).

62. Summary Statistics - IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/summary-statistics

63. 5 Concerning Effects of Biodiversity Loss - Earth.Org, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://earth.org/effects-of-biodiversity-loss/

64. More losers than winners: investigating Anthropocene defaunation through the diversity of population trends - ResearchGate, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370779150_More_losers_than_winners_investigating_Anthropocene_defaunation_through_the_diversity_of_population_trends

65. Biodiversity loss | Causes, Effects, & Facts - Britannica, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/biodiversity-loss

66. Lessons from the past: Evolutionary impacts of mass extinctions - PMC, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC33224/

67. www.un.org, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/science/climate-issues/biodiversity#:~:text=This%20can%20create%20increased%20opportunities,and%20livelihoods%20provided%20by%20nature.

68. CHAPTER 14 Policy Issues in Biodiversity Conservation 1: The Convention on Biological Diversity - Commonwealth iLibrary, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.thecommonwealth-ilibrary.org/index.php/comsec/catalog/download/928/928/7994?inline=1

69. Convention on Biological Diversity - Wikipedia, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_on_Biological_Diversity

70. UN Convention on Biological Diversity - DCCEEW, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.dcceew.gov.au/environment/biodiversity/international/un-convention-biological-diversity

71. What are the UN Biodiversity Conference and Convention on Biological Diversity? - Grantham Research Institute on climate change and the environment - LSE, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/explainers/what-is-the-un-biodiversity-conference/

72. Biodiversity policies at the global level, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://biodiversity.europa.eu/policy/biodiversity-policies-at-the-global-level

73. Biodiversity Conservation Research: Latest Innovations Shaping the Future, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://ijoear.com/biodiversity-conservation-research-latest-innovations-shaping-the-future

74. Technology for Conserving Biodiversity in the Anthropocene, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://issues.org/perspective-technologies-for-conserving-anthropocene-biodiversity/

75. Unveiling the marvels of biodiversity: recent advancements in conservation efforts, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://medcraveonline.com/BIJ/unveiling-the-marvels-of-biodiversity-recent-advancements-in-conservation-efforts.html

76. Discover the Top 10 Biodiversity Conservation Trends in 2024 - StartUs Insights, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.startus-insights.com/innovators-guide/biodiversity-conservation-trends/

77. 7 Solutions to Biodiversity Loss - Earth.Org, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://earth.org/solutions-to-biodiversity-loss/

78. Preserving Biodiversity | Technology for Biology | SAP Insights, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.sap.com/blogs/technology-for-biology-preserving-biodiversity

79. Habitat and Biodiversity Loss Solutions - Our Shared Seas, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://oursharedseas.com/solutions/solutions-habitat-and-biodiversity/

80. Actions to halt biodiversity loss generally benefit the climate - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9303674/

81. Strategy for halting and reversing biodiversity loss revealed - UNEP-WCMC, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.unep-wcmc.org/news/strategy-for-halting-and-reversing-biodiversity-loss-revealed

82. How can you protect biodiversity? - Royal Society, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://royalsociety.org/news-resources/projects/biodiversity/how-can-you-protect-biodiversity/