The Status of Palestine in the United Nations System: A Comprehensive Legal and Diplomatic Assessment (December 2025)
1. Introduction: The Paradox of Presence and Membership
The question of whether Palestine is a member of the United Nations constitutes one of the most intricate and contentious issues in contemporary international law and diplomacy. As of December 16, 2025, the formal answer remains legally distinct from the functional reality. De jure, the State of Palestine is not a full Member State of the United Nations Organization; it holds the status of a Non-Member Observer State. However, de facto, through a series of unprecedented procedural upgrades, legislative maneuvers, and successful accession to specialized agencies, Palestine operates with a diplomatic capacity that far exceeds that of a traditional observer, functioning as a virtual member in all but the right to vote in the General Assembly and the Security Council.1
This report provides an exhaustive analysis of this status. It dissects the constitutional mechanisms of UN admission, traces the historical trajectory from the Palestine Liberation Organization's (PLO) initial observer status in 1974 to the "rights upgrade" of May 2024, and maps the fragmented landscape of the UN system where Palestine is a full member in some bodies (UNESCO, UNIDO) while remaining an observer in others (FAO, ICAO).4 Furthermore, it analyzes the "diplomatic tsunami" of 2024 and 2025, where a wave of recognitions from European and Caribbean states fundamentally altered the baseline of Palestinian sovereignty, culminating in the "New York Declaration" of September 2025.7
To understand Palestine's position, one must navigate a complex ecosystem of resolutions, vetoes, and treaty accessions. This analysis proceeds from the central institutions in New York—the Security Council and General Assembly—outward to the specialized agencies in Geneva, Paris, and Vienna, revealing a strategy of "creeping statehood" designed to bypass the deadlock of the Security Council veto.9
2. The Constitutional Framework of United Nations Membership
The distinction between "Member State" and "Observer State" is not merely semantic; it is grounded in the Charter of the United Nations, which functions as the constituent treaty of the organization. Accession to membership is a rigorous legal process, not an automatic consequence of declaring independence.
2.1 Article 4 and the Gatekeeper Function
The admission of new members is governed exclusively by Article 4 of the UN Charter. This article establishes both the substantive criteria for membership and the procedural mechanism for admission.
Substantive Criteria (Article 4, Paragraph 1):
Membership is open to "peace-loving states which accept the obligations contained in the present Charter and, in the judgment of the Organization, are able and willing to carry out these obligations".2 In the context of the Palestinian application, debates have historically centered on the definition of "statehood." Opponents, primarily the United States and Israel, argue that Palestine does not meet the "Montevideo criteria" for statehood—specifically the capacity to exercise effective control over its territory and borders—due to the ongoing occupation and the governance split between the West Bank and Gaza.8 Proponents argue that the inability to exercise control is a result of an illegal act (occupation) and should not invalidate the state's existence, pointing to the admission of other states under occupation or with contested borders in UN history.11
Procedural Mechanism (Article 4, Paragraph 2):
The Charter mandates that admission is effected "by a decision of the General Assembly upon the recommendation of the Security Council".12 This clause creates a dual-key system where the Security Council acts as the gatekeeper. Even if a prospective state commands the support of 100% of the General Assembly, it cannot be admitted without a prior affirmative recommendation from the Security Council.
This recommendation requires nine affirmative votes out of fifteen members and, crucially, no veto from the five permanent members (P5): China, France, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom, and the United States.13 This structural reality has been the primary impediment to Palestinian membership. While the Palestinians have long commanded a distinct majority in the General Assembly, the United States has consistently signaled its intent—and exercised its power—to veto any membership resolution that is not the product of a negotiated bilateral peace treaty with Israel.14
2.2 The Evolution of Observer Status
The UN Charter does not explicitly define "Observer Status." It is a practice that evolved to accommodate states (like Switzerland prior to 2002) and organizations (like the Red Cross or the Arab League) that needed to interface with the UN without full membership.
For Palestine, this evolution has been a multi-decadal process of incremental gains:
1974: The PLO was granted observer status as a "national liberation movement" (Resolution 3237).
1988: Following the Palestinian Declaration of Independence in Algiers, the designation was changed from "PLO" to "Palestine" in the UN system (Resolution 43/177), though the status remained that of an observer entity, not a state.16
1998: Resolution 52/250 conferred additional rights, including the right to participate in the general debate, though still without voting power.2
2012: The pivotal shift occurred with Resolution 67/19, which accorded Palestine "Non-Member Observer State" status. This was a recognition of statehood by the General Assembly, allowing Palestine to sign international treaties (such as the Rome Statute of the ICC), yet it stopped short of full membership.7
This distinctive status—Non-Member Observer State—places Palestine in a unique category, historically shared only by the Holy See (Vatican). It acknowledges Palestine as a state under international law for the purposes of the UN system, but denies it the voting rights and full privileges of a Member State.7
3. The 2024-2025 Membership Bid: A Diplomatic Collision
The period from April 2024 to December 2025 marked the most concerted effort to secure full membership since the initial application in 2011. Driven by the urgency of the war in Gaza and the perceived collapse of the bilateral peace process, the Palestinian leadership, supported by the Arab Group, launched a "maximum pressure" campaign to force the issue through the Security Council.
3.1 The Security Council Deadlock (April 2024)
On April 2, 2024, the State of Palestine formally requested that the Security Council reconsider its 2011 application for membership.18 This request was referred to the Committee on the Admission of New Members, which met twice but failed to reach a unanimous consensus, necessitating a vote in the full Council.
The vote on the draft resolution (S/2024/312), submitted by Algeria, took place on April 18, 2024. The resolution text was simple: it recommended to the General Assembly that the State of Palestine be admitted to membership in the United Nations.19
The Voting Alignment:
The results of the vote highlighted the growing isolation of the United States on this issue.
In Favor (12): Algeria, China, Ecuador, France, Guyana, Japan, Malta, Mozambique, Russia, Sierra Leone, Slovenia, South Korea.
Abstentions (2): United Kingdom, Switzerland.
Against (1): United States.16
The vote was historically significant for several reasons. First, major U.S. allies—including France, Japan, and South Korea—voted in favor of immediate full membership. This signaled a fracture in the Western bloc, which had previously insisted that recognition should only follow a negotiated solution. Second, the United Kingdom, usually aligned with the U.S. on this file, chose to abstain rather than vote against, further isolating the American position.14
Because the United States is a permanent member, its solitary negative vote constituted a veto, blocking the recommendation. In its Explanation of Vote, the U.S. delegation argued that "sustainable peace in the region can be achieved only through a two-state solution, with Israel's security guaranteed... the most expeditious path toward statehood and UN membership... is through direct negotiations".15
3.2 The "Uniting for Peace" Response (May 2024)
Following the veto, the General Assembly convened an Emergency Special Session under the "Uniting for Peace" mechanism (Resolution 377A), which allows the Assembly to act when the Security Council fails to exercise its primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security due to a lack of unanimity among permanent members.21
On May 10, 2024, the Assembly adopted Resolution ES-10/23. The resolution was sponsored by the Arab Group and co-sponsored by dozens of other states. The vote was a landslide endorsement of Palestinian statehood:
In Favor: 143
Against: 9 (United States, Israel, Argentina, Czechia, Hungary, Micronesia, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea)
Abstentions: 25.16
Content of Resolution ES-10/23:
The resolution accomplished two primary objectives:
Determination of Eligibility: The Assembly explicitly determined that "the State of Palestine is qualified for membership in the United Nations in accordance with Article 4 of the Charter" and recommended that the Security Council "reconsider the matter favourably".2 This was a direct political challenge to the U.S. assessment that Palestine was not ready for statehood.
Procedural Upgrade: Recognizing that the Security Council veto blocked full membership, the Assembly decided to grant Palestine a series of "additional rights and privileges" within the General Assembly, effectively upgrading its status to that of a "super-observer" or "virtual member".23
4. The Anatomy of "Enhanced Observer" Status
The rights granted by Resolution ES-10/23, which took effect at the opening of the 79th Session in September 2024, created a new precedent in UN protocol. While the resolution carefully avoided granting the right to vote—which would have required Charter amendment or full admission—it systematically removed almost every other distinction between Palestine and full Member States.
4.1 Specific Rights Granted
The Annex to Resolution ES-10/23 detailed the new modalities for Palestine's participation. These changes fundamentally altered the visual and procedural reality of the General Assembly Hall 2:
Seating Order: Previously, Palestine sat at the back of the hall or to the side with other observers (like the Holy See and the EU). Under the new rules, Palestine is seated "among Member States in alphabetical order." This seemingly minor protocol change is symbolically profound, visually integrating the Palestinian delegation into the body of sovereign states.2
Introduction of Proposals: Palestine now possesses the right to "submit proposals and amendments and introduce them." Previously, a friendly Member State (usually from the Arab Group or Non-Aligned Movement) had to formally introduce Palestinian drafts. Now, the Palestinian ambassador can act directly.
Agenda Setting: Palestine gained the right to "propose items to be included in the provisional agenda" of regular or special sessions.
Group Representation: The resolution granted the right to "make statements on behalf of a group." This allows Palestine to speak not just for itself, but as the chair of blocs like the Group of 77 (G77) or the Arab Group, a role it had previously held with procedural difficulties.3
Full Participation in Debates: Palestine was granted the right to be inscribed on the list of speakers for all agenda items, not just those related to the "Question of Palestine" or the Middle East.
4.2 The Remaining Red Lines
Despite these upgrades, the resolution contained explicit caveats to preserve the legal distinction of non-membership, primarily to avoid triggering U.S. domestic funding laws that mandate cutting contributions to UN bodies that grant "full membership" to the PLO.25
No Right to Vote: The resolution explicitly states: "The State of Palestine, in its capacity as an observer State, does not have the right to vote in the General Assembly".2 This applies to resolutions, budgetary matters, and elections.
No Candidature: Palestine does not have the right to "put forward its candidature to United Nations organs." It cannot run for a seat on the Security Council, the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), or the Human Rights Council as a member.23
5. Specialized Agencies: The Patchwork of Membership
While the U.S. veto blocks membership in the central UN organization, the "United Nations System" comprises over a dozen specialized agencies—autonomous organizations linked to the UN by special agreements. Each has its own constitution and membership rules, often requiring only a majority vote of its own general conference. Palestine has successfully utilized these bodies to secure full membership or enhanced status, creating a fragmented reality where it is a full state in Paris (UNESCO) and Vienna (UNIDO), but an observer in New York.
5.1 Full Member State Status
Palestine has achieved full membership in several high-profile agencies. In these bodies, it pays dues, votes on all matters, and has full rights to elect and be elected.
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization):
Admitted in October 2011. This was the first major breakthrough in the "Palestine 194" campaign. The vote was 107 in favor, 14 against, and 52 abstentions. The admission triggered immediate U.S. funding cuts under the Foreign Assistance Act, which prohibits funding to any UN agency that accords the PLO the same standing as member states.25 The U.S. subsequently lost its voting rights in UNESCO and eventually withdrew (later rejoining under a waiver, then facing renewed complications).UNIDO (United Nations Industrial Development Organization):
Admitted in May 2018. Palestine joined as a full member, further solidifying its economic statehood credentials.26OPCW (Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons):
While technically a related organization rather than a specialized agency, the OPCW admitted Palestine as a State Party in 2018. This allowed Palestine to accede to the Chemical Weapons Convention.26
5.2 The "Enhanced Observer" Compromise (WHO and ILO)
In agencies where the threat of U.S. defunding is existential or where political resistance is higher, Palestine has recently negotiated a status of "Enhanced Observer," mirroring the UNGA model. This status provides the optics and voice of a state without the technical "membership" label that triggers U.S. sanctions.
World Health Organization (WHO):
On June 1, 2024, the World Health Assembly adopted Resolution WHA77.15 titled "Aligning the participation of Palestine in the World Health Organization with its participation in the United Nations."
The Vote: 101 in favor, 5 against.
The Rights: The resolution granted Palestine the right to be seated among member states, to co-sponsor proposals, to make statements, and to raise procedural motions. Crucially, it did not grant the right to vote or put forward candidates for WHO organs.27 This careful calibration allowed the WHO to upgrade Palestine's status while attempting to safeguard U.S. financial contributions, which are vital to the agency's operations.
International Labour Organization (ILO):
In June 2025, during the 113th International Labour Conference, the body adopted a resolution to upgrade Palestine's status from a "National Liberation Movement" to a "Non-Member Observer State".10
Historical Context: Since 1974, the PLO had participated as an observer movement. The 2025 resolution aligned the ILO with the UNGA practice.
Implications: Palestine now participates in the tripartite structure (Government, Employers, Workers) with the protocol of a state delegation, though it remains non-voting. The resolution was hailed by trade unions and the Global South as a rectification of an "obsolete" status.29
5.3 Observer Status (Standard)
In several other specialized agencies, Palestine retains a standard observer status, often due to the specific constitutional requirements of those bodies or the strategic decision not to push for upgrades that might paralyze the organization's funding.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization): Palestine participates as an observer. While it collaborates extensively with the FAO on food security in Gaza and the West Bank, it has not yet secured full membership or the "enhanced" status seen in the WHO.4
ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization): Palestine holds observer status. The U.S. has historically strongly opposed PLO membership in ICAO due to the organization's focus on aviation security and the PLO's past history; this remains a red line for many Western states.31
IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency): In September 2023, the IAEA General Conference adopted a resolution adopting the designation "State of Palestine" for the observer, replacing "Palestine." However, the status remains that of an observer state, not a member state.32
IMF and World Bank: Palestine is not a member. It receives technical assistance and funding through special trust funds but cannot access standard sovereign loans or voting shares, as membership in these International Financial Institutions (IFIs) is strictly tied to defined statehood and economic data reporting that requires full sovereignty.33
Summary of Status Across UN System (Table 1)
Organization
Status of Palestine (Dec 2025)
Rights Held
Key Limitations
UN General Assembly
Non-Member Observer State
Speak, Sponsor, Seating, Group Rep
No Vote, No Candidacy
UN Security Council
Invited Observer
Speak (at invitation)
No Vote, No Closed Sessions
UNESCO
Full Member State
Full Voting Rights, Elect/Elected
None
UNIDO
Full Member State
Full Voting Rights
None
ICC (Rome Statute)
State Party
Refer cases, Vote in Assembly of States Parties
None
WHO
Enhanced Observer
Sponsor, Speak, Seating
No Vote, No Candidacy
ILO
Enhanced Observer
Tripartite participation, Speak
No Vote
FAO
Observer
Speak (limited)
No Vote
IAEA
Observer State
Speak, Receive Tech Co-op
No Vote, No Safeguards Vote
IMF / World Bank
Non-Member
Recipient of Trust Funds
No Vote, No Sovereign Loans
6. The International Criminal Court: A "State" for Justice
While legally distinct from the UN system, the International Criminal Court (ICC) is intimately tied to the question of UN membership. The Rome Statute is open to "States."
6.1 Accession and Jurisdiction
Palestine acceded to the Rome Statute in January 2015, following the UNGA's 2012 recognition of it as a "Non-Member Observer State." The UN Secretary-General, acting as the depository of the treaty, accepted the accession. This sparked a legal battle over whether Palestine qualified as a "State" capable of delegating criminal jurisdiction to the Court.
In February 2021, the ICC Pre-Trial Chamber I issued a landmark ruling (Decision on the 'Prosecution request pursuant to article 19(3) for a ruling on the Court's territorial jurisdiction in Palestine'). The judges ruled that for the strict purposes of the Rome Statute, Palestine is a State Party.34 Consequently, the Court has territorial jurisdiction over the territories occupied by Israel since 1967, namely Gaza and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem.
6.2 The 2024 Arrest Warrants
This legal status became operationally critical in 2024. Following the October 7 attacks and the subsequent war in Gaza, the ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan applied for arrest warrants for senior leaders of both Hamas and the Israeli government. In late 2024, warrants were issued for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, as well as Hamas leaders (some of whom were deceased by the time of issuance).35
The issuance of these warrants was predicated on Palestine's status as a State Party. If Palestine were not a state, the Court would have no jurisdiction over Israeli nationals (as Israel is not a member) for crimes committed on Palestinian territory. Thus, the ICC's actions serve as a robust international legal validation of Palestinian statehood, independent of the UN Security Council's paralysis.
7. The Global Recognition Tsunami (2024-2025)
Parallel to the procedural battles in New York, a massive wave of bilateral recognitions occurred in capitals around the world. Recognition is a unilateral act of sovereignty, and the cumulative weight of these recognitions creates a "constitutive" momentum for statehood.
7.1 The European Shift
Historically, the European Union was divided. Countries like Sweden and many Eastern European states (from the Soviet era) recognized Palestine, while Western European powers (France, UK, Germany, Spain) adhered to the position that recognition should be the outcome of negotiations.
This consensus shattered in May 2024. In a coordinated diplomatic move, Spain, Norway, and Ireland formally recognized the State of Palestine. They argued that the "Two-State Solution" was under existential threat from settlement expansion and the war in Gaza, and that recognition was necessary to preserve the legal standing of the Palestinian state as a negotiating partner.7
This triggered a domino effect:
Slovenia: Recognized in June 2024.
Armenia: Recognized in June 2024.
France and UK: By late 2025, both nations had shifted their rhetoric. President Macron stated France was prepared to recognize Palestine "at a useful moment" to trigger peace, and the UK government under Labour signaled it would not wait for a final deal to extend recognition. In September 2025, France and the UK, along with Canada, issued statements supporting the "irreversibility" of Palestinian statehood, stopping just short of immediate bilateral recognition but voting in favor of UN resolutions treating Palestine as a state.7
7.2 The Caribbean and Latin American Wave
Simultaneously, the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) solidified its support. In mid-2024, The Bahamas, Trinidad and Tobago, Jamaica, and Barbados extended full recognition.7 This effectively closed the "recognition gap" in the Western Hemisphere, leaving North America (US/Canada) as the only sub-region without formal diplomatic relations with the State of Palestine.
7.3 The Numbers: A Global Consensus
As of December 2025, approximately 157 to 159 of the 193 UN Member States have recognized the State of Palestine.1 This represents over 81% of the UN membership.
The Holdouts: The remaining non-recognizing states are concentrated in North America (USA, Canada), Western Europe (Germany, Italy, Netherlands), and the Pacific (Australia, New Zealand, though both have shifted to "actively considering" recognition).16
G7 Isolation: Within the G7, the United States, Germany, and Italy remain the firmest opponents of unilateral recognition. However, the fracture is visible, with France and Japan voting for UN membership in April 2024, isolating the US/Germany/Italy bloc.
8. The "Two-State Solution Conference" and Future Outlook (2025)
The diplomatic momentum culminated in the "High-Level International Conference for the Peaceful Settlement of the Question of Palestine," held in New York in mid-2025. Co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia, this conference was designed to operationalize the "Two-State Solution" despite the paralysis of the peace process on the ground.
8.1 The "New York Declaration" (September 2025)
The conference produced the "New York Declaration," a document endorsed by the General Assembly in Resolution A/DEC/80/506.36
Content: The declaration reaffirmed the international consensus on the 1967 borders and called for the immediate recognition of the State of Palestine by all remaining nations as a contribution to peace.
Significance: It formalized the "irreversible pathway" language. The declaration absolved Hamas of governance (focusing on the Palestinian Authority) and prioritized the "unification of Gaza and the West Bank" under a single, recognized state structure.
US Reaction: The United States voted against the endorsement of the Declaration, maintaining its stance that such multilateral impositions are counterproductive. However, the vote (142 Yes, 10 No) once again underscored the limits of US influence on this specific issue in the General Assembly.36
8.2 Future Legal Implications
The aggressive use of the "Uniting for Peace" mechanism to grant "Member-like" rights suggests a new strategy for the Palestinian leadership. If the Security Council continues to block full membership, the General Assembly may continue to strip away the remaining distinctions.
The "South Africa" Precedent: Legal scholars note that in 1974, the General Assembly rejected the credentials of the South African delegation due to Apartheid, effectively suspending its participation. Conversely, the Assembly could theoretically accept the credentials of the State of Palestine as a full member for all procedural purposes, leaving the "Member State" title as a hollow distinction held by the Security Council.
Next Steps: The Palestinian strategy appears to be focused on triggering the "universality" clauses in other treaties (like the Geneva Conventions and Law of the Sea) to force Israel to engage with it as a state peer in international forums, rather than as an occupying power dealing with a non-state entity.
9. Conclusion
As of December 2025, the State of Palestine exists in a unique liminal space within the United Nations system—a space carved out by the collision of overwhelming international political support against the hard power of the Security Council veto.
Is Palestine a member of the United Nations?
Legally: No. It is a Non-Member Observer State. It does not pay membership dues to the regular budget, cannot vote on General Assembly resolutions, and cannot serve on the Security Council.
Functionally: Partially. In the General Assembly, it sits, speaks, and sponsors resolutions alongside members. In agencies like UNESCO and the ICC, it is a full member with equal rights.
Diplomatically: Yes. It is recognized by 159 states, maintains full embassies in most world capitals, and is treated as a sovereign equal by the vast majority of the international community.
The year 2024-2025 transformed Palestine from an "Observer Entity" into a "State in Waiting," possessing all the attributes of membership except the final, formal seal of the Security Council. The barrier to membership has shifted from a question of "existence" to a question of "voting power," with the international community increasingly willing to bypass the latter to affirm the former.
Works cited
‘You fuel antisemitism’: Netanyahu hits out at Australian PM; blames Palestine recognition for Bondi Beach shooting, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/middle-east/you-fuel-antisemitism-netanyahu-hits-out-at-australian-pm-blames-palestine-recognition-for-bondi-beach-shooting/articleshow/125966003.cms
A/RES/ES-10/23 - General Assembly - the United Nations, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://docs.un.org/en/a/res/es-10/23
Frequently Asked Questions: Palestine, the UN, and the U.S., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://betterworldcampaign.org/blog/frequently-asked-questions-palestine-the-un-and-the-us
UN Entities in Palestine, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://palestine.un.org/en/about/un-entities-in-country
List of specialized agencies of the United Nations - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_specialized_agencies_of_the_United_Nations
Member states of the International Atomic Energy Agency - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Member_states_of_the_International_Atomic_Energy_Agency
Mapping which countries recognise Palestine in 2025 - Al Jazeera, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/4/10/mapping-which-countries-recognise-palestine-in-2025
UPDATED: UN Two-State Solution Conference July to September ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://unwatch.org/background-to-june-2025-un-conference-on-two-state-solution/
The International Push to Recognize Palestinian Statehood, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://israelpolicyforum.org/2025/09/18/the-international-push-to-recognize-palestinian-statehood/
Resolution on the status of Palestine in the ILO and participation ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/2025-06/ILC113-Resolution-II-%5BRELMEETINGS-250604-007%5D-EN.pdf
The strange story of the “conditional” admission of the State of ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-strange-story-of-the-conditional-admission-of-the-state-of-palestine-to-the-united-nations/
Security Council Fails to Recommend Full United Nations ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://reliefweb.int/report/occupied-palestinian-territory/security-council-fails-recommend-full-united-nations-membership-state-palestine-owing-veto-cast-united-states
United Nations Security Council veto power - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council_veto_power
US vetoes Palestinian request for full UN membership - The Guardian, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/apr/18/us-veto-palestine-membership-request-united-nations-council
Explanation of Vote at a UN Security Council Meeting on Palestinian ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://usun.usmission.gov/explanation-of-vote-at-a-un-security-council-meeting-on-palestinian-membership/
International recognition of Palestine - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_recognition_of_Palestine
Which are the 150+ countries that have recognised Palestine as of ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/9/23/which-are-the-150-countries-that-have-recognised-palestine-as-of-2025
U.S. Blocks U.N. Resolution to Recognize Palestine - Time Magazine, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://time.com/6968956/us-veto-vote-palestine-full-un-membership/
Security Council Fails to Recommend Full United Nations ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://press.un.org/en/2024/sc15670.doc.htm
Explanation of Vote Delivered at the UN General Assembly ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://usun.usmission.gov/explanation-of-vote-delivered-at-the-un-general-assembly-emergency-special-session-on-the-palestinian-un-membership-resolution/
UN General Assembly - Tenth Emergency Special Sessions, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.un.org/en/ga/sessions/emergency10th.shtml
A/RES/ES-10/23 – UN Watch Database, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://unwatch.org/database/resoltions/a-res-es-10-23/
Additional rights and privileges of participation of the State of Palestine, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.un.org/unispal/document/secretary-general-note-16jul24/
Aligning the participation of Palestine in the World Health ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://unwatch.org/database/resoltions/wha77-15/
What Palestinian Membership Means for UNESCO and the Rest of ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, http://static.heritage.org/2011/pdf/bg2633.pdf
The status of Palestine in the ILO and its participation rights in ILO ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/2024-10/GB352-INS-9-%5BJUR-240910-001%5D-Web-EN.pdf
Aligning the participation of Palestine in the World Health ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA77/A77_R15-en.pdf
WHA77 | WHO Tracker - People's Health Movement, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://who-track.phmovement.org/wha77
International Labour Organisation recognises Palestine as state, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.newarab.com/news/international-labour-organisation-recognises-palestine-state
LIST OF DELEGATES AND OBSERVERS LISTE DES DÉLÉGUÉS ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/bodies/CL_154/CL_154_List_of_Delegates.pdf
PLO Gets Observer Status in the Icao - Jewish Telegraphic Agency, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.jta.org/archive/plo-gets-observer-status-in-the-icao
Regarding General Conference Resolution “Status of Palestine in ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/regarding-general-conference-resolution-status-of-palestine-in-the-iaea
What Palestinian Membership Means for UNESCO and the Rest of ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.heritage.org/global-politics/report/what-palestinian-membership-means-unesco-and-the-rest-the-united-nations
What does the International Criminal Court's Decision to Hold its ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://law4palestine.org/what-does-the-international-criminal-courts-decision-to-hold-its-jurisdiction-in-palestine-mean/
International Criminal Court investigation in Palestine - Wikipedia, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Criminal_Court_investigation_in_Palestine
2025 UNGA Resolutions on Israel vs. Rest of the World - UN Watch, accessed on December 16, 2025, https://unwatch.org/2025-unga-resolutions-on-israel-vs-rest-of-the-world/
High-level International Conference for the Peaceful Settlement of ..., accessed on December 16, 2025, https://www.un.org/unispal/high-level-conference-two-state-solution-july2025/
