The Fabric of Existence: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Concept of Time

Introduction

Time presents a fundamental paradox at the heart of human experience. It is the most familiar and intimate aspect of our existence, the continuous progression that dictates every action, thought, and sensation from the past, through the present, and into the future.1 Yet, despite its ubiquity, time remains one of the most enigmatic and fiercely debated concepts in science and philosophy. This report navigates the central tension that defines our struggle to understand time: the conflict between the subjective, flowing "mind time" of our conscious experience and the objective, static "clock time" described by physics.3 Our intuitive sense is of a river flowing, carrying us from a fixed past toward an open future. In stark contrast, modern physics often portrays time as a dimension within a static, four-dimensional block, where the distinction between past, present, and future is merely a "stubbornly persistent illusion".4

To unravel this paradox, a singular perspective is insufficient. A comprehensive understanding of time demands a multidisciplinary expedition, synthesizing insights from the precise measurements of physics, the foundational inquiries of philosophy, the subjective explorations of psychology and neuroscience, and the diverse frameworks of cultural and linguistic studies. This report undertakes such a journey. It begins with the practicalities of measurement, tracing the human quest to quantify duration, before plunging into the revolutionary upheavals in physics that transformed time from a universal constant into a relative, malleable fabric. From there, it explores the deep mystery of time's unidirectional flow, the metaphysical debates about what is truly real, the intricate neural machinery that constructs our inner sense of time, and the cultural lenses that shape our collective temporal realities. The expedition concludes on a cosmic scale, examining the origin of time in the crucible of the Big Bang and its potential fate at the end of the universe. Through this synthesis, the report aims to construct a holistic, nuanced, and exhaustive portrait of time, not as a single entity, but as a complex tapestry woven from the threads of physical law, conscious experience, and human thought.

Part I: The Measure of All Things: Quantifying and Defining Time

Before the abstract and counter-intuitive nature of time can be explored, it is essential to first establish its role as a fundamental, measurable quantity. The history of defining and quantifying time is a story of increasing abstraction, moving from the concrete cycles of the cosmos to the intangible oscillations of atoms. This progression reveals a persistent human effort to create a universal, uniform standard against which change can be measured, a practical endeavor that nonetheless exposes the circularity at the heart of time's scientific definition.

Section 1.1: The Quest for a Universal Clock

Humanity's earliest attempts at chronometry, or temporal measurement, were rooted in the observation of natural, periodic phenomena.5 The most accessible of these were astronomical. The apparent motion of the sun across the sky gave rise to the gnomon and sundial, dividing the day into measurable units.5 The regular phases of the moon formed the basis for the first calendars, with artifacts suggesting such practices as early as 6,000 years ago.1 Ancient cultures, from the Mayans with their intricate, interlocking calendars to the Babylonians, noted the recurrences of seasons and the motions of the stars to organize their agricultural and religious lives.1 These early methods established a foundational concept that would persist through the history of science: time is inextricably linked to motion and change, a principle later formalized by thinkers like Aristotle who defined time as a "measure of movement".7

While astronomical cycles were suitable for organizing days and years, the need for more precise measurements of shorter intervals spurred technological innovation. Water clocks (clepsydras) and sandglasses allowed for more accurate timekeeping within a day, independent of sunlight.5 A pivotal moment in this technological evolution occurred in the 14th century with the invention of the first mechanical clocks, which used gears and ratchets to display the time in European town squares.5 However, it was Galileo Galilei's discovery in 1583 that a pendulum's swing has a constant period, or isochronism, that truly transformed timekeeping into a science.5 This principle allowed for the creation of far more accurate pendulum clocks, which became widespread in the 18th and 19th centuries and enabled the precise experiments that would form the bedrock of classical mechanics.5 This historical trajectory—from observing the sun's variable path to engineering the regular swing of a pendulum—illustrates a deliberate move away from concrete, local, and variable natural cycles toward an abstract, uniform, and human-engineered standard. It was an effort to create a practical version of an idealized, universal time long before the concept was formally articulated in physics.

Section 1.2: The Second as a Standard

The modern scientific approach to time is operational. In physics, time is defined by its measurement: it is, quite simply, "what a clock reads".1 This practical definition avoids the philosophical quagmire of defining time's essence and instead focuses on establishing a reliable, universal standard. Time is designated as one of the seven fundamental physical quantities in the International System of Units (SI).1 The SI base unit of time is the second.

The contemporary definition of the second represents the apex of the historical trend toward abstraction. It is no longer tied to the Earth's rotation or any macroscopic motion. Instead, it is defined by measuring the electronic transition frequency of caesium-133 atoms. Specifically, one second is the duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium-133 atom.1 This atomic metronome provides an extraordinarily stable and universally accessible standard. Atomic clocks based on this principle can theoretically keep accurate time for millions of years.5 This definition, however, rests on the crucial assumption that these atomic oscillations are unvarying periodic events, constant across all of space and for all of history.11 While this provides an invaluable tool for science and technology, it highlights a critical distinction: science has defined a method for measuring time with incredible precision, but it has not defined what time is.

Section 1.3: The Lexicon of Time

The gap between operational definition and essential meaning is vividly illustrated in the multifaceted and often contradictory ways the word "time" is used in language.12 An analysis of its dictionary definitions reveals a concept that is simultaneously:

• A Duration: A measured or measurable period during which an action or process continues, as in "a long time".12

• A Continuum: A nonspatial continuum where events succeed one another from past through present to future.12

• A Point or Occasion: A specific moment indicated by a clock or calendar, as in "what time is it?" or "the time of the accident".12

• An Era: A historical period or age, as in "in ancient times".14

• A Resource: A finite commodity that can be spent, saved, wasted, or managed, as in the aphorism "time is money" or the experience of being "on company time".1

This collection of linguistic uses, combined with common phrases and metaphors, constitutes what philosophers term the "manifest image" of time.3 This is our intuitive, pre-scientific, and commonsense understanding. It is an assortment of tacit beliefs that time flows like a river, that it possesses an intrinsic arrow pointing toward the future, and that reality is fundamentally divided into a fixed past, a vivid present, and an open future.3 As the following sections will show, this manifest image is often in direct conflict with the "scientific image" of time derived from modern physics.

The very need for an operational definition in science exposes a foundational circularity. Physics defines time as "what a clock reads," while a clock is defined as a device that measures time by counting periodic events.1 This self-referential loop reveals that science, at its core, does not offer an ontological definition of time's essence. Instead, it establishes an agreed-upon convention for its measurement.11 The official definition from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) perfectly encapsulates this conventionalist nature, defining time as "The designation of an instant on a selected time scale," where a time scale is "An agreed upon system for keeping time".18 This is not a failure of science, but rather a demarcation of its boundaries. It is precisely this void—the space between the measurement of time and the nature of time itself—that opens the door for the profound philosophical and psychological inquiries that attempt to understand the fabric of existence that clocks can only count.

Part II: The Physical Reality of Time: From Absolute Stage to Relative Fabric

The scientific understanding of time underwent a seismic shift in the early 20th century, a revolution that dismantled a centuries-old worldview and replaced it with a new, deeply counter-intuitive reality. This transformation took time from its conceptual pedestal as a universal, absolute arbiter of existence and recast it as a relative, dynamic, and inseparable component of the physical universe. The journey from Isaac Newton's absolute stage to Albert Einstein's relative fabric represents one of the most profound intellectual developments in human history.

Section 2.1: The Newtonian Worldview: Absolute Time

For over two centuries, the dominant scientific conception of time was that articulated by Sir Isaac Newton in his 1687 masterpiece, Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica.5 Newton posited the existence of an "absolute, true, and mathematical time," which, in his words, "of itself, and from its own nature flows equably without regard to anything external".5 This absolute time was conceived as a universal clock, ticking at the same constant rate for every observer, everywhere in the universe, from the beginning of existence.5

In the Newtonian framework, time and space form a fixed, unchanging background—an absolute stage upon which the drama of physics unfolds.19 Time is a one-dimensional continuum, entirely independent of the matter and events that occur within it. It is an imperceptible, objective reality that can only be understood mathematically.20 Newton drew a crucial distinction between this true, absolute time and the "relative, apparent, and common time" that we measure using the motions of celestial bodies or mechanical clocks. These measurements, he argued, are merely imperfect, sensible measures of the true, underlying duration.5 For Newton and the classical physics he founded, the absolute nature of time was a necessary foundation, providing a universal timeline against which all motion could be definitively measured.5

Section 2.2: The Einsteinian Revolution: The Relativity of Time

The elegant and intuitive Newtonian worldview was shattered in 1905 with the publication of Albert Einstein's special theory of relativity.4 This theory was built on two postulates, the second of which was revolutionary: the speed of light in a vacuum, denoted by $c$, is the same for all observers in uniform motion, regardless of the motion of the light source.26 This seemingly simple principle had radical consequences, forcing a complete re-evaluation of the relationship between space and time and leading to the conclusion that time is not absolute but relative.

2.2.1 Time Dilation: The Elasticity of Duration

One of the most famous predictions of relativity is time dilation, the idea that the passage of time is not constant but depends on an observer's motion and gravitational environment.27 This elasticity of time manifests in two ways:

• Velocity Time Dilation: According to special relativity, a clock that is moving relative to an observer will be measured to tick more slowly than a clock that is at rest in the observer's frame of reference.2 This effect is reciprocal; each observer in relative motion sees the other's clock as running slow.26 The classic "light clock" thought experiment illustrates why this must be so. Imagine a clock that measures time by bouncing a pulse of light between two mirrors. For an observer moving with the clock, the light travels a simple up-and-down path. For a stationary observer watching the clock move by, the light pulse must travel a longer, diagonal path to keep up with the moving mirrors. Since the speed of light must be the same for both observers, the only way to reconcile the longer path is if time itself passes more slowly for the moving clock from the stationary observer's perspective.26 While negligible at everyday speeds, this effect becomes dramatic as an object approaches the speed of light, at which point its time would appear to an external observer to slow to a stop.25

• Gravitational Time Dilation: Einstein's 1915 general theory of relativity extended this concept, showing that time is also affected by gravity. Time passes more slowly in stronger gravitational fields.4 A clock at sea level will tick infinitesimally slower than a clock on a mountaintop, and both will tick slower than a clock on an orbiting satellite. This effect, once a theoretical curiosity, is now a measurable reality confirmed by ultra-precise atomic clocks and is a critical correction factor for technologies like the Global Positioning System (GPS) to function accurately.30

2.2.2 The Relativity of Simultaneity: Shattering the Universal "Now"

Perhaps the most profound and philosophically disruptive consequence of relativity is the destruction of absolute simultaneity.35 The notion that two events happen "at the same time" is not an objective fact of the universe but depends entirely on the observer's frame of reference.

Einstein's famous train-and-platform thought experiment demonstrates this concept.36 Imagine an observer standing on a platform, exactly halfway between two points, A and B. Two lightning bolts strike points A and B simultaneously. Because the observer is equidistant, the light from both strikes reaches their eyes at the same moment, and they correctly conclude the strikes were simultaneous. Now, consider a second observer on a train moving rapidly past the platform, who is at the train's midpoint. At the exact moment this observer passes the platform observer, the same two lightning bolts strike. From the platform observer's perspective, the strikes are still simultaneous. However, the observer on the train is moving toward the light coming from the front of the train (strike B) and away from the light coming from the rear (strike A). Consequently, the light from strike B reaches them before the light from strike A. Since the speed of light is constant in their frame, and they are at the midpoint of the train, they must conclude that the lightning struck the front of the train before it struck the back. The events were not simultaneous.36

This simple thought experiment demolishes the Newtonian idea of a universal "now"—a single, privileged present moment that slices across the entire cosmos.23 There is no absolute fact of the matter about whether two spatially separated events happen at the same time.

Section 2.3: Spacetime: The Unified Fourth Dimension

The relativity of time and space demanded a new framework for physics. In 1908, the mathematician Hermann Minkowski provided it by proposing that space and time should not be considered separate entities but should be fused into a single, four-dimensional continuum known as "spacetime".41

2.3.1 The Minkowski Continuum

In this new model, time is often referred to as the "fourth dimension".1 A point in this continuum is not just a location in space but an "event," specified by four coordinates: three for space ($x, y, z$) and one for time ($t$).41 The fundamental reason for this merger is that space and time, when considered separately, are not invariant; different observers will disagree on the distance between two events (length contraction) and the duration between them (time dilation).41 However, special relativity provides a new invariant that all observers can agree on: the spacetime interval. This quantity, calculated using a modified version of the Pythagorean theorem that treats the time dimension differently from the spatial ones, combines space and time into a single, objective measure of the "separation" between two events.41 The equation for the squared spacetime interval ($\Delta s^2$) between two events is given by:

$$\Delta s^2 = (c\Delta t)^2 - (\Delta x^2 + \Delta y^2 + \Delta z^2)$$

where $\Delta t$ is the time separation, $c$ is the speed of light, and $\Delta x, \Delta y, \Delta z$ are the spatial separations.

2.3.2 General Relativity: Gravity as the Curvature of Spacetime

Einstein's theory of general relativity took the concept of spacetime even further. It described gravity not as a force acting between masses, as in Newton's theory, but as a consequence of the curvature of the spacetime fabric itself.4 Massive objects like stars and planets warp the spacetime around them, much like a bowling ball placed on a trampoline creates a dimple in the fabric.45 Other objects then move along the straightest possible paths—called geodesics—through this curved spacetime. The Earth orbits the Sun not because it is being pulled by a force, but because it is following a geodesic in the spacetime curved by the Sun's mass.43 Gravitational time dilation is a direct consequence of this geometry: time runs more slowly deeper inside a gravitational well, where spacetime is more significantly curved.4

The progression from Newton to Einstein thus represents a profound shift in the status of time. In the Newtonian model, time is an absolute, primary, and independent entity—the ultimate background against which reality plays out. In the Einsteinian model, time is demoted. It becomes a relative, local, and malleable variable, its rate dependent on an observer's specific circumstances of motion and gravity. It is no longer a universal master clock but one coordinate within the more fundamental, unified geometry of spacetime.

While relativity dismantled the absolutes of Newtonian physics, it established a new, more fundamental absolute: the causal structure of the universe, which is defined by the speed of light. The invariance of the spacetime interval means that while observers may disagree on the specific temporal or spatial measurements between two events, they will always agree on the nature of the causal relationship between them.41 If the interval is "time-like," it means one event is in the causal past or future of the other, and all observers will agree on the order of cause and effect. If it is "space-like," the events are causally disconnected, and their temporal ordering can be relative. The speed of light thus acts as the ultimate cosmic speed limit, preserving causality and preventing paradoxes. In the relativistic universe, the objective structure that underpins reality is not a shared moment of "now," but the inviolable web of causal connections that light speed dictates.1

Part III: The Unidirectional Flow: The Arrow of Time

One of the most profound and persistent mysteries surrounding time is its apparent unidirectionality. Our experience is unequivocally that of a forward progression: we remember the past, experience the present, and anticipate the future. Events unfold in an irreversible sequence—an egg shatters but never reassembles, smoke disperses but never gathers back into a flame.2 This perceived one-way direction is known as the "arrow of time," a concept that stands in stark contrast to the apparent time-symmetry of the fundamental laws of physics.

Section 3.1: The Fundamental Asymmetry

The core of the problem lies in a deep discrepancy between the microscopic and macroscopic worlds.49 The fundamental laws of physics that govern the interactions of particles—such as classical mechanics, electromagnetism, and even relativity—are, for the most part, time-reversal invariant. This means that the equations describing these processes work just as well if the variable for time is run forwards or backwards.49 A video of two billiard balls colliding, for example, would look physically plausible whether played forwards or in reverse. Yet, the macroscopic world we inhabit is overwhelmingly irreversible. The shattering of a glass, the cooling of coffee, and the process of aging all define a clear and unambiguous direction in time.48 This conflict between microscopic reversibility and macroscopic irreversibility is the central paradox of the arrow of time.

Section 3.2: The Thermodynamic Arrow: Entropy and the March of Disorder

The most powerful physical explanation for the arrow of time comes from the field of thermodynamics, specifically the Second Law of Thermodynamics.2 This law states that in an isolated system, a quantity called entropy—a measure of disorder, randomness, or the number of microscopic arrangements a system can have—will tend to increase over time, or at best, stay the same. It never spontaneously decreases.48

This statistical law provides a robust physical basis for time's directionality.52 The "future" is simply the direction of increasing entropy. A system naturally moves from a state of order (low entropy) to a state of disorder (high entropy). For example, ice cubes in a glass of water (an ordered state with hot and cold regions) will melt and reach a uniform temperature (a disordered state of thermal equilibrium).55 The reverse process—water spontaneously separating into ice cubes and warmer liquid—is not forbidden by the fundamental laws of particle motion, but it is so fantastically improbable that it is never observed in practice.48

However, the thermodynamic arrow is not a complete explanation in itself. For entropy to consistently increase from a past state to a future one, the universe must have started in a state of extremely low entropy—that is, a state of incredible order. This necessary initial condition is known as the "Past Hypothesis".4 The hot, dense, and remarkably uniform state of the early universe following the Big Bang represents this required low-entropy beginning. Without this specific starting point, the Second Law would not produce a consistent, universe-wide arrow of time. Therefore, the mystery of time's direction is inextricably linked to the mystery of the universe's origin.

Section 3.3: The Cosmological and Psychological Arrows

The thermodynamic arrow is believed to be the foundation for other observed asymmetries in time.

• The Cosmological Arrow: This arrow points in the direction of the universe's expansion.50 Since the Big Bang, the universe has been expanding, providing a clear temporal direction on the largest possible scale. This is deeply connected to the thermodynamic arrow, as the expansion from a hot, dense, uniform state allows for the formation of structures and temperature gradients, creating the conditions necessary for entropy to increase globally.50

• The Psychological Arrow: This is our subjective experience of time's one-way flow. It is defined by two key features: we have memories of the past but not the future, and we feel we can influence the future but not the past.2 This mental arrow is also thought to be a consequence of the thermodynamic arrow. The process of forming a memory in the brain is a complex, irreversible physical process that consumes energy and increases the total entropy of the universe.50 We remember the past because the past is the direction of lower entropy, and our brains create ordered memory traces by increasing disorder elsewhere.

The various "arrows" of time are not independent. They appear to be causally intertwined, with the unique initial condition of the universe at the Big Bang setting the stage. The cosmological expansion allows for a global increase in entropy, and this thermodynamic asymmetry provides the physical basis for irreversible macroscopic processes, including the neurological functions of memory and volition that create our subjective psychological arrow. Our inner sense of time's direction is not an arbitrary feature of consciousness but is likely grounded in the same fundamental cosmic asymmetry that governs the evolution of stars and galaxies.

Section 3.4: A Philosophical Divide: Is the Arrow Intrinsic or Extrinsic?

The physical explanation for the arrow of time has given rise to a philosophical debate about its fundamental nature. The disagreement centers on whether time's directionality is a property of time itself or a property of the contents of the universe.59

• The Intrinsic Camp: Proponents of this view argue that the arrow of time is an intrinsic, built-in feature of time itself. Time, by its very nature, flows or passes from past to future.59 The irreversible physical processes described by thermodynamics do not create the arrow; they merely align with it and exemplify its existence.59 This perspective resonates strongly with our intuitive, "manifest image" of time as a flowing river.

• The Extrinsic Camp: This view, which is more popular among physicists, contends that time itself has no inherent direction. The "arrow" is an emergent or extrinsic property, derived entirely from the asymmetrical patterns of events that occur within time.59 The primary source of this asymmetry is the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which in turn relies on the low-entropy state of the early universe.59 According to this view, in a hypothetical universe at maximum entropy (a state of "heat death"), where no net change occurs, the arrow of time would effectively cease to exist, even if time as a dimension continued.61

Part IV: The Metaphysics of Being: Philosophical Debates on the Nature of Time

While physics grapples with the measurement and behavior of time, philosophy probes its fundamental nature, asking not how time works, but what it is. These metaphysical inquiries explore whether time is a fundamental component of reality or a construct of the mind, and, most contentiously, which parts of time—past, present, or future—are truly real. These debates have evolved in a dynamic interplay with scientific discoveries, with modern physics profoundly reshaping the landscape of plausible philosophical theories.

Section 4.1: Foundational Inquiries: From Plato to Kant

The philosophical investigation of time has ancient roots. Plato, in his Timaeus, characterized time as "a moving likeness of eternity," viewing it as a feature of our imperfect, changing world—a dynamic shadow of a perfect, timeless, and eternal realm of Forms.7 In contrast, his student Aristotle offered a more naturalistic and scientific definition, linking time directly to the physical world. In his Physics, Aristotle defined time as a "measure of movement" or "the number of motions in relation to the past and the future".7 For Aristotle, time is inseparable from change; without motion and change, time would not exist. This early dichotomy established a foundational debate that persists to this day: is time an independent entity, or is it merely a relation between events?

Centuries later, Immanuel Kant proposed a radical reorientation of the entire discussion. He argued that time is not a feature of the external world at all, but rather a fundamental structure of the human mind. For Kant, time, like space, is an a priori form of intuition—a sort of innate mental framework that our consciousness uses to organize the raw data of sensory experience.7 We do not perceive time "out there"; rather, the concept of a sequence of events is a precondition for us to have any coherent experience of the world. Time is not discovered in the world but brought to it by the mind.

Section 4.2: The Container and the Contained: Absolute vs. Relative Time

The classical debate between Plato and Aristotle evolved into a more formalized dispute in the early modern period, mirroring the scientific frameworks of the time. This debate centers on whether time is a substance-like container or merely the relations among its contents.

• Substantivalism (Absolute Time): This view, championed philosophically by Plato and scientifically by Isaac Newton, holds that time is a real, independent entity.62 It is conceived as a kind of container that exists on its own, regardless of whether there are any events or objects placed within it. A key implication of this view is the possibility of "empty time"—a period in which no change occurs, yet time itself continues to pass.62 Newton's concept of "absolute, true, and mathematical time" is the quintessential expression of substantivalism.19

• Relationism (Relative Time): This view, defended by Aristotle and, most famously, by Newton's contemporary Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, argues that time is nothing over and above the temporal relations—such as "before," "after," and "simultaneous with"—that hold between physical events.62 According to a relationist, if there were no events and no change, there would be no time. Leibniz mounted powerful arguments against Newton's absolute space and time, contending that their existence would violate core metaphysical principles like the Principle of Sufficient Reason (there would be no reason for the universe to exist now rather than one hour later) and the Identity of Indiscernibles (a universe where everything happens one hour later would be indistinguishable from our own, and thus the same universe).62

Section 4.3: The Ontology of Tense: What is Real?

The advent of modern physics, particularly Einstein's relativity, shifted the philosophical focus. The contemporary debate is less about whether time is a container and more about the ontological status of different moments in time. This is a conflict between two fundamentally different ways of understanding temporal reality: one that is dynamic and tensed (A-theory) versus one that is static and tenseless (B-theory).63 This conflict gives rise to three main competing theories.

4.3.1 Presentism: The Primacy of the "Now"

Presentism is the theory that most closely aligns with our everyday intuition. Its core tenet is that only the present exists.63 According to this view, the past has ceased to be real, and the future has not yet come into being. Dinosaurs no longer exist, and future human colonies on Mars do not yet exist.3 The special vividness of our present experience is taken as evidence for the unique and privileged reality of the "now".3

However, presentism faces formidable challenges. Philosophically, it struggles to account for truths about the past (if Socrates does not exist, what makes the statement "Socrates was a philosopher" true?) and to explain relationships that span across time (such as causation).63 Its most significant challenge, however, comes from physics. Presentism requires a single, objective, universal present moment that is the same for everyone. As discussed in Part II, Einstein's theory of relativity, specifically the relativity of simultaneity, directly contradicts this notion, showing that there is no absolute "now" that slices across the universe.40

4.3.2 Eternalism: The Block Universe

In direct opposition to presentism stands eternalism, often visualized as the "block universe" theory.72 The core tenet of eternalism is that past, present, and future are all equally real.40 The universe is conceived as a static, four-dimensional block of spacetime, and all events—from the Big Bang to the final state of the cosmos—have an equal claim to existence.72

The primary argument for eternalism is its compatibility with modern physics. Many philosophers and physicists argue that it is a direct and necessary consequence of Einstein's theory of relativity.40 The block universe is essentially the philosophical interpretation of the spacetime manifold described by physics. However, eternalism is deeply counter-intuitive. It implies that the passage or "flow" of time is a subjective illusion of human consciousness.4 Furthermore, it raises profound questions about free will; if the future is as fixed and real as the past, it seems to suggest a deterministic universe in which our choices are already written into the fabric of spacetime.73

4.3.3 The Growing Block Universe: A Hybrid Model

Attempting to reconcile the fixedness of the past with the openness of the future, the growing block universe theory offers a hybrid model. Its core tenet is that the past and the present exist, but the future does not.65 In this view, reality is an expanding block of spacetime. The present is the objective, privileged "edge of becoming," where new moments are continuously added to the block, thus converting the unreal, potential future into the real, fixed past.77

This theory captures the intuition that the past is unchangeable while the future remains open. It is supported by arguments from causality, which suggest that for a cause to genuinely bring about an effect, the effect cannot already be real at the time of the cause.78 Like presentism, however, the growing block theory requires a universal, privileged "now" (the edge of the block), and therefore faces the same fundamental conflict with the relativity of simultaneity.78 It also introduces its own unique paradox: if past moments are real but inactive, how could a conscious being ever be certain they are in the "live" present and not in a "dead" past moment, merely possessing the memory of a flow that has long since passed them by?.78

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Ontological Theories of Time

Feature

Presentism

Eternalism (Block Universe)

Growing Block Universe

Core Tenet

Only the present exists.

Past, present, and future are all equally real.

The past and present exist, but the future does not.

Ontological Status: Past

Does not exist.

Exists.

Exists.

Ontological Status: Present

Exists (and is all that exists).

Exists (but is not ontologically special).

Exists (as the "edge" of reality).

Ontological Status: Future

Does not exist.

Exists.

Does not exist.

Nature of "Now"

An objective, universal, privileged moment.

A subjective, indexical concept, like "here".

An objective, universal, privileged "edge of becoming".

Temporal Passage

A fundamental feature of reality (becoming is real).

An illusion of human consciousness.

A fundamental feature of reality (the "growing" of the block).

Compatibility with Relativity

Poor. Conflicts with the relativity of simultaneity.

High. Considered by many to be a direct implication of relativity.

Poor. Conflicts with the relativity of simultaneity.

Key Proponents

Augustine, A.N. Prior

Parmenides, Albert Einstein, Hilary Putnam

C.D. Broad, Michael Tooley

Intuitive Appeal

High. Aligns with the "manifest image" of time.

Low. Deeply counter-intuitive.

Medium. A compromise between intuition and a fixed past.

Part V: The Inner Clock: The Psychology and Neuroscience of Time Perception

While physics and philosophy debate the objective nature of time, a parallel field of inquiry explores its subjective reality: how the human brain constructs our personal experience of duration, sequence, and passage. This internal sense of time, known as chronoception, is not a simple reflection of external reality but a complex and malleable construction, shaped by our biology, attention, emotions, and age.

Section 5.1: Chronoception: The Subjective Experience of Time

There is a profound distinction between "clock time," the objective, regular intervals measured by physical devices, and "mind time," our subjective experience of its flow.81 This subjective experience is notoriously flexible. It is a common human phenomenon that time seems to "fly" during enjoyable or engaging activities, yet "drags" during moments of boredom or suffering.82 This variability demonstrates that our perception of time is not a veridical reading of an external clock but an active construction of the brain. This construction is so pliable that it is susceptible to a wide range of temporal illusions, where perceived duration is compressed or expanded relative to objective measurement, further exposing the neural mechanisms that underpin our sense of time.83

Section 5.2: The Brain's Timekeepers

Unlike the five primary senses, which are tied to specific sensory organs, time perception is not localized to a single brain region. Instead, it is governed by a highly distributed system involving multiple, complementary neural circuits.83 Key areas implicated in timing include the cerebral cortex (especially the prefrontal cortex), the cerebellum, and the basal ganglia.83 On a longer timescale, the suprachiasmatic nucleus in the hypothalamus acts as the master clock for our circadian (daily) rhythms.2

The dominant theoretical framework for explaining how we judge short durations (from seconds to minutes) is the "internal clock" model, often referred to as Scalar Expectancy Theory (SET).88 This model proposes a three-stage process:

1. Clock: A neural "pacemaker" emits a steady stream of pulses.

2. Accumulator: During an event to be timed, a switch or "gate" opens, allowing these pulses to be collected in an accumulator.

3. Memory/Decision: The final count of pulses is compared to previously stored counts for known durations in memory, leading to a judgment of elapsed time.88

While influential, this model is not the only one. Alternative theories suggest that time perception is an emergent property of the general activity of neural networks ("population clocks") 91 or that the brain acts more like a "counter" of discrete events or changes in experience rather than a continuous clock.87 This latter "counter" model suggests that our sense of duration is a byproduct of the density and complexity of information processing, rather than the output of a dedicated timekeeping mechanism.

Section 5.3: The Distortions of Mind-Time

The flexibility of our internal clock is most evident in the ways it is systematically distorted by various internal and external factors.

5.3.1 The Influence of Age

One of the most widely reported temporal experiences is the feeling that time speeds up as we get older.93 Research suggests two primary explanations for this phenomenon. The novelty hypothesis posits that the brain processes and encodes new experiences more deeply and richly than familiar, routine ones. Childhood is saturated with novelty, leading to dense memory formation and a high rate of information processing, which "stretches out" the subjective experience of time. In contrast, adulthood often becomes more routine, leading to less new information being processed and a corresponding perception that time is passing more quickly.2 A second explanation, the proportionality hypothesis, suggests that our perception of a unit of time (e.g., a year) is relative to the total length of our life. For a 5-year-old, one year is a significant 20% of their entire existence, whereas for a 50-year-old, it is a mere 2%, making it feel comparatively shorter.85

5.3.2 The Influence of Emotion and Arousal

Our emotional state has a powerful effect on time perception.86 The internal clock model explains this primarily through the mechanism of physiological arousal. High-arousal emotions, such as fear, anger, or excitement, are thought to increase the speed of the internal pacemaker. This causes more pulses to be accumulated over a given objective interval, leading to an overestimation of duration—the subjective feeling that time has slowed down.90 This effect is closely linked to the neurotransmitter dopamine.90 This perceived slowing during dangerous events, a phenomenon known as tachypsychia, may be an evolutionarily adaptive trait, affording the brain more subjective time to process information and make critical survival decisions.83 More nuanced models also consider the roles of emotional valence (positive vs. negative) and motivation (approach vs. withdrawal), suggesting that approach-motivated states may hasten time perception while withdrawal-motivated states slow it down.86

5.3.3 The Influence of Attention

Attention acts as a critical modulator of time perception, a relationship formalized in the attentional gate model.99 This model proposes that an "attentional gate" controls the flow of pulses from the pacemaker to the accumulator.99 When attention is directed away from the passage of time and onto a non-temporal task (e.g., reading a book, playing a game), the gate partially closes. Fewer pulses are counted, leading to an underestimation of duration and the feeling that "time flies".99 This explains the common experience of losing track of time when fully immersed in an activity, a state known as "flow".99 Conversely, when attention is directed toward time itself—as when one is bored and watching a clock—the gate is held wide open, leading to a more accurate, and often seemingly slower, perception of time's passage.99

Ultimately, the study of chronoception reveals that our sense of time is not a passive reception of an external reality but an active, embodied, and adaptive process. The distortions we experience are not "errors" in our brain's clock but functional features that help modulate our cognitive resources in response to the demands of our environment and our internal state.

Part VI: The Cultural Lens: Time as a Social and Linguistic Construct

Beyond the universal laws of physics and the shared biology of the human brain, our understanding of time is profoundly shaped by the cultural and linguistic frameworks we inherit. These shared conceptual systems act as a lens, organizing our experience of time into patterns that can vary dramatically from one society to another. They dictate not only our philosophical views on time but also the practical rhythms of social life.

Section 6.1: Linear, Cyclical, and Procedural Time

One of the most fundamental distinctions in the cultural conceptualization of time is the contrast between linear and cyclical models.

• Linear and Monochronic Time: The dominant model in most Western cultures is that of linear time, often described as "monochronic".103 Rooted in the Judeo-Christian narrative of a world with a definitive beginning (Creation) and end (Judgment Day), this view portrays time as an arrow moving irreversibly forward.106 Time is seen as a finite, tangible resource that can be divided, measured, saved, and wasted—encapsulated in the idiom "time is money".103 This monochronic orientation fosters a focus on schedules, punctuality, efficiency, and completing one task at a time. It underpins the very idea of "progress," where the future is something to be planned for and built toward.103

• Cyclical and Polychronic Time: In contrast, many Eastern, indigenous, and traditional agrarian societies view time as cyclical, a perspective often described as "polychronic".104 This worldview is influenced by the recurring cycles of nature: the alternation of day and night, the turning of the seasons, and the rhythms of birth, death, and rebirth.105 In this framework, time is not a scarce resource to be managed but an endless, repeating pattern.105 Polychronic cultures tend to be more flexible with schedules and deadlines, prioritizing relationships and social interactions over rigid adherence to the clock. Multitasking is common, and life is organized around events rather than abstract appointments.104

These are not merely different philosophical stances but practical, operational systems for organizing society. A monochronic system is highly effective for coordinating complex tasks in an industrialized, goal-oriented society, while a polychronic system is well-suited to maintaining social harmony and adapting to the event-driven pace of community-oriented life. The friction often experienced in cross-cultural interactions can be understood as a conflict between these two distinct temporal "operating systems".109

Section 6.2: Linguistic Relativity and the Shaping of Temporal Thought

The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis posits that the language we speak influences how we think about reality.110 The domain of time provides some of the most compelling evidence for this principle of linguistic relativity. A universal cognitive strategy appears to be the use of spatial metaphors to conceptualize the abstract domain of time. However, the specific metaphors used are not universal, but are shaped by language and culture.

• The Hopi: A World of Manifestation: The debate around the Hopi language of northeastern Arizona is a classic case study. In the 1940s, linguist Benjamin Lee Whorf famously claimed that the Hopi language lacks words, grammar, or expressions that refer to time as a flowing continuum.112 He argued that instead of a past-present-future structure, the Hopi worldview distinguishes between the "manifested" (all that is and has been, accessible to the senses) and the "unmanifest" (that which is in the process of becoming, including the future).114 While later research by Ekkehart Malotki demonstrated that the Hopi language does indeed possess complex ways of expressing temporal concepts, refuting Whorf's more extreme claims, the controversy highlighted the possibility of fundamentally different temporal frameworks embedded in language.113

• The Aymara: Facing the Past: The Aymara people of the Andes provide a striking example of a different spatial metaphor for time. In most languages, the future is conceptualized as being "in front" of us and the past "behind" us. In Aymara, this is reversed. The word for past, nayra, also means "front" or "eye," while the word for future, qhipa, means "back" or "behind".117 This is reflected in their gestures as well. The underlying logic is that the past is known—it has been seen—and is therefore metaphorically "in front of your eyes." The future, being unknown and unseen, is "behind your back".120

• Mandarin: Time on a Vertical Axis: While English speakers predominantly use horizontal metaphors for time (e.g., "looking forward to the future," "putting the past behind us"), speakers of Mandarin Chinese frequently use vertical metaphors in addition to horizontal ones.124 The word 上 (shàng), meaning "up," is used to refer to earlier events (e.g., "last week"), while the word 下 (xià), meaning "down," refers to later events (e.g., "next week").124 Experiments have shown that this linguistic pattern correlates with a cognitive tendency among Mandarin speakers to arrange time vertically in non-linguistic tasks, an effect not typically found in monolingual English speakers.124

These examples demonstrate that while the human mind may universally rely on spatial metaphors to grasp the abstract concept of time, the specific orientation of that metaphor—whether time's arrow points forward, backward, or downward—is shaped by the contingent patterns of our language and culture.

Part VII: The Cosmic Timeline: The Beginning and End of Time

Having explored time from the human scale of measurement, perception, and culture, the final part of this analysis expands to the largest possible canvas: the cosmos itself. From this perspective, time is not an eternal, unchanging backdrop but an intrinsic property of the universe, a feature that had a definitive beginning and will have an equally definitive, though still uncertain, end.

Section 7.1: The Genesis of Time: The Big Bang

The prevailing scientific account of the origin of the universe is the Big Bang theory. According to this model, approximately 13.8 billion years ago, all of the space, matter, and energy in the observable universe was concentrated into an initial state of extreme density and temperature, known as a singularity.5 From this point, the universe began a rapid expansion that continues to this day.

A crucial and deeply counter-intuitive implication of this theory is that the Big Bang was not an explosion in space, but an explosion of space itself. Along with space and matter, time as we know it also began in this primordial event.128 Consequently, it is not meaningful to ask what happened "before" the Big Bang. The question is as logically incoherent as asking what lies north of the North Pole; the concept of "before" requires a temporal framework that simply did not exist prior to the singularity.133 The Big Bang represents the onset of time, the beginning of the cosmic clock. This cosmological perspective provides strong physical grounding for the philosophical view of relationism—that time is dependent on the state of the universe—over the substantivalist view of time as an independent, pre-existing container.

Section 7.2: The Ultimate Fate of the Universe and Time

Just as time had a beginning, it is expected to have an end, or at least a fundamental transformation. The ultimate fate of the universe—and with it, the fate of time—depends on several cosmological parameters that are still being precisely measured, most notably the universe's overall geometry and the nature of the mysterious "dark energy" that drives its accelerating expansion.135 There are three leading scenarios.

7.2.1 The Big Freeze: Heat Death and the Cessation of Meaning

The currently favored scenario, based on observations of an accelerating expansion, is often called the "Big Freeze" or "Heat Death".135 In this future, the expansion continues indefinitely. Over unimaginable timescales, galaxies will recede from one another, stars will exhaust their fuel and burn out, and matter will decay or be swallowed by black holes, which will themselves eventually evaporate through Hawking radiation.136

The universe will asymptotically approach a state of maximum entropy—a cold, dark, and empty void in thermodynamic equilibrium.136 In such a state, with all energy uniformly distributed, no temperature differences would exist to drive any physical processes. With no change and no events, the thermodynamic arrow of time would become meaningless. The very concept of time's passage would lose its physical foundation, rendering time a featureless, static dimension in a universe where nothing ever happens again.61

7.2.2 The Big Crunch: A Cyclical Rebirth?

An alternative scenario is the "Big Crunch".141 If the total density of matter and energy in the universe is high enough, gravity could eventually halt the cosmic expansion and reverse it. The universe would begin to contract, with galaxies rushing back together. In the final moments, the cosmos would collapse back into an infinitely hot and dense singularity, a mirror image of the Big Bang.142 In this final fireball, space and time as we know them would cease to exist.142

This scenario opens the speculative but compelling possibility of a "Big Bounce"—a cyclical universe in which each Big Crunch triggers a new Big Bang, leading to an eternal series of cosmic rebirths.142 In such a model, time would not have a final end but would be part of an infinite cycle of destruction and re-creation.

7.2.3 The Big Rip: The Tearing of Spacetime

The most violent and speculative fate is the "Big Rip".146 This scenario depends on the existence of a hypothetical form of dark energy known as "phantom energy," whose repulsive force would grow stronger over time.146 If this were the case, the accelerating expansion of the universe would become so powerful that it would eventually overcome all other forces. First, it would tear apart clusters of galaxies, then individual galaxies. As the end approached, gravity would be too weak to hold stars and planets together, and they would disintegrate. In the final fractions of a second, the electromagnetic force would be overwhelmed, ripping apart atoms and their nuclei. Finally, spacetime itself would be torn asunder in a final singularity, at which point the progression of time itself would stop.146

While the Big Bang provides a robust and well-evidenced theory for the beginning of time, its ultimate end remains one of the greatest unsolved mysteries in physics. The choice between these dramatically different fates hinges on the precise nature of dark energy and dark matter, which together constitute approximately 95% of the universe's energy density but whose properties are almost entirely unknown.132 Thus, the distant future of time is not a settled matter but a frontier of intense scientific investigation and speculation.

Conclusion: A Synthesis of Time

This comprehensive analysis reveals that "time" is not a single, monolithic concept but a multifaceted phenomenon that manifests differently depending on the lens through which it is viewed. The report began by highlighting the central paradox: the chasm between the objective, geometric "clock time" of physics and the subjective, flowing "mind time" of human consciousness. The journey through physics, philosophy, neuroscience, and culture has not resolved this paradox but has illuminated its depth and complexity.

Physics, in its quest for objectivity, has progressively stripped time of its most intuitive qualities. Newton's absolute, universal flow was replaced by Einstein's relative, local, and malleable time, demoted to a coordinate within a unified spacetime fabric. The universal "now" dissolved into a relativity of simultaneity, and the intuitive flow of time was largely dismissed as an illusion. What physics leaves us with is a "block universe"—a static, four-dimensional map where causality, constrained by the speed of light, is the supreme organizing principle.

In stark contrast, psychology and neuroscience reveal a rich and dynamic inner world where time is an active construction of the brain. Our subjective sense of time is not a passive reading of a clock but an embodied and adaptive process, warped and stretched by attention, emotion, and the novelty of our experiences. This "mind time" is not an error or an illusion in a pejorative sense, but a functional feature of cognition, a tool that helps us navigate the world, survive threats, and manage our mental resources.

Philosophy serves as the critical battleground where these two realities collide. Debates over eternalism and presentism are, at their core, attempts to reconcile the static, tenseless time of physics with the dynamic, tensed time of experience. The "arrow of time" stands as a bridge between these worlds, a physical phenomenon rooted in the universe's unique initial conditions that provides a basis for the irreversible processes—including memory—that give our subjective experience its directional character. Meanwhile, cultural and linguistic studies demonstrate that even our shared, intuitive models of time are not universal, but are shaped by the metaphors and social structures we inherit.

Ultimately, no single discipline holds the complete answer to the question, "What is time?" It is simultaneously a dimension in a physical manifold, a fundamental structure of conscious experience, a deep metaphysical puzzle, and a pliable social convention. The quest to understand time is not a search for one correct definition but an ongoing exploration of the profound and often paradoxical intersections of these different realities. In studying the fabric of time, we find ourselves studying the very structure of the cosmos, the architecture of our own minds, and the enduring mystery of our place within the unfolding of existence.

Works cited

1. Time - Wikipedia, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time

2. What Is Time? A Simple Explanation - ThoughtCo, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-time-4156799

3. Time | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://iep.utm.edu/time/

4. What Is Time? : ScienceAlert, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.sciencealert.com/time

5. Time in physics - Wikipedia, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_in_physics

6. A Brief History of Time Measurement - NRICH, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://nrich.maths.org/articles/brief-history-time-measurement

7. The Philosophy of Time: Study the Nature of Past, Present, and ..., accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.thecollector.com/philosophy-of-time/

8. A Brief Introduction to the Philosophy of Time - Philosimplicity, accessed on October 26, 2025, http://philosimplicity.com/blog/2018/01/15/time-and-philosophy/

9. A very, very brief history of time | Pursuit by the University of Melbourne, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://pursuit.unimelb.edu.au/articles/a-very-very-brief-history-of-time

10. www.nist.gov, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.nist.gov/how-do-you-measure-it/how-do-you-measure-second#:~:text=Cesium%20atoms%20absorb%20microwaves%20with,We%20do%20so%20with%20clocks.

11. How do we measure time? - Physics Stack Exchange, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/675075/how-do-we-measure-time

12. TIME Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/time

13. Time Definition & Meaning | Britannica Dictionary, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/time

14. TIME definition in American English - Collins Dictionary, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/time

15. time - American Heritage Dictionary Entry, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=time

16. time, n., int., & conj. meanings, etymology and more | Oxford English Dictionary, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.oed.com/dictionary/time_n

17. TIME | definition in the Cambridge English Dictionary, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/time

18. (PDF) The scientific definition of time - ResearchGate, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342803439_The_scientific_definition_of_time

19. Newton's Views on Space, Time, and Motion (Stanford Encyclopedia ..., accessed on October 26, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/newton-stm/

20. Absolute space and time - Wikipedia, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_space_and_time

21. I know Newton believed in absolute time and relative time, I understand why he believed in relative time, but why did he believe in absolute time? : r/askscience - Reddit, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/uw84rp/i_know_newton_believed_in_absolute_time_and/

22. (PDF) The evolution of the concept of time in modern physics, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376867954_The_evolution_of_the_concept_of_time_in_modern_physics

23. absolute time - Quantum Physics Lady, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://quantumphysicslady.org/glossary/absolute-time/

24. What are absolute space & time? Why are they not absolute in reality?, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/154882/what-are-absolute-space-time-why-are-they-not-absolute-in-reality

25. Einstein States His Theory of Special Relativity | Research Starters - EBSCO, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/einstein-states-his-theory-special-relativity

26. Time dilation - Wikipedia, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation

27. Time dilation | Research Starters | EBSCO Research, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/physics/time-dilation

28. I still don't understand time dilation. Can anyone provide an easy explanation? - Reddit, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/comments/1mou5tt/i_still_dont_understand_time_dilation_can_anyone/

29. www.ebsco.com, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/physics/time-dilation#:~:text=Time%20dilation%20is%20a%20phenomenon,as%20speed%20and%20gravitational%20fields.

30. Slowing Time to a Standstill with Relativity - Dummies.com, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.dummies.com/article/academics-the-arts/science/physics/slowing-time-to-a-standstill-with-relativity-193289/

31. GRAVITATIONAL TIME DILATION EXPLAINED FOR BEGINNERS - viXra.org, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://vixra.org/pdf/1407.0092v2.pdf

32. 5.4: Time Dilation - Physics LibreTexts, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/University_Physics/University_Physics_(OpenStax)/University_Physics_III_-_Optics_and_Modern_Physics_(OpenStax)/05%3A__Relativity/5.04%3A_Time_Dilation

33. Einstein's General Relativity and Your Age | NIST, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.nist.gov/education/einsteins-general-relativity-and-your-age

34. www.nist.gov, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.nist.gov/education/einsteins-general-relativity-and-your-age#:~:text=Albert%20Einstein's%201915%20theory%20of,clocks%20located%20at%20different%20elevations.

35. Relativity of Simultaneity (Thought Experiment & Lorentz Transformations) - YouTube, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOSIGViCT-s

36. Relativity of simultaneity - Wikipedia, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativity_of_simultaneity

37. Relativity of simultaneity - (Principles of Physics IV) - Vocab, Definition, Explanations, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://fiveable.me/key-terms/principles-of-physics-iv/relativity-of-simultaneity

38. 3.4: Relativity of Simultaneity - Physics LibreTexts, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://phys.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Relativity/Spacetime_Physics_(Taylor_and_Wheeler)/03%3A_Same_Laws_for_All/3.04%3A_Relativity_of_Simultaneity

39. Special Relativity Simultaneity - University of Pittsburgh, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://sites.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/teaching/HPS_0410/chapters/Special_relativity_rel_sim/index.html

40. Eternalism | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://iep.utm.edu/eternalism/

41. Spacetime - Wikipedia, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime

42. Four-dimensional space - Wikipedia, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four-dimensional_space

43. Space-time | Definition & Facts | Britannica, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/space-time

44. www.reddit.com, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/comments/17cwp7y/what_exactly_does_time_is_the_fourth/#:~:text=The%20physicist%20explains%3A,to%20imagine%20anything%20too%20different.%22

45. What Exactly is Spacetime? Explained in Ridiculously Simple Words - YouTube, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3khY_bwf5FY

46. Spacetime: All the universe's a stage - Symmetry Magazine, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/spacetime-all-the-universes-a-stage?language_content_entity=und

47. Can anyone explain "space-time" to me? : r/Astronomy - Reddit, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Astronomy/comments/18rozyv/can_anyone_explain_spacetime_to_me/

48. Entropy as an arrow of time - Wikipedia, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy_as_an_arrow_of_time

49. Philosophy of space and time - Wikipedia, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_space_and_time

50. Arrow of time - Wikipedia, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time

51. en.wikipedia.org, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time#:~:text=The%20arrow%20of%20time%20is,tends%20to%20increase%20with%20time.

52. en.wikipedia.org, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy_as_an_arrow_of_time#:~:text=Entropy%20is%20one%20of%20the,can%20increase%2C%20but%20not%20decrease.

53. Second law of thermodynamics - Wikipedia, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_law_of_thermodynamics

54. Second law of thermodynamics and the arrow of time: why isn't time considered fundamental? - Physics Stack Exchange, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/33030/second-law-of-thermodynamics-and-the-arrow-of-time-why-isnt-time-considered-fu

55. Thermodynamics and the Arrow of Time - Puddles of Thought, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://puddlesofthought.blog/2024/01/05/thermodynamics-and-the-arrow-of-time/

56. The Second Law of Thermodynamics and the Psychological Arrow of Time | The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science: Vol 73, No 1, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1093/bjps/axz038

57. Thermodynamic Asymmetry in Time - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/time-thermo/

58. en.wikipedia.org, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time#:~:text=The%20cosmological%20arrow%20of%20time,Thermodynamic%20free%20energy%20becomes%20negligible.

59. The Arrow of Time | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://iep.utm.edu/arrow-of-time/

60. Eternalism and Its Ethical Implications - Essays on Reducing Suffering, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://reducing-suffering.org/eternalism-and-its-ethical-implications/

61. 003 : The Heat Death of the Universe, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dtaylor/articles/heatdeath.php

62. Time (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), accessed on October 26, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/time/

63. Philosophical presentism - Wikipedia, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_presentism

64. Philosophy of Time Eternalism vs. Presentism - Digital Commons@Georgia Southern, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=armstrong-philosopher-stone

65. Time and Truth: The Presentism-Eternalism Debate | Philosophy ..., accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/philosophy/article/time-and-truth-the-presentismeternalism-debate/5BA240CB04CE920D51E0BC4FA3B14CFD

66. relative merits of presentism, eternalism and the growing block universe [closed], accessed on October 26, 2025, https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/1683/relative-merits-of-presentism-eternalism-and-the-growing-block-universe

67. Philosophical presentism | Research Starters - EBSCO, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/religion-and-philosophy/philosophical-presentism

68. Presentism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), accessed on October 26, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/presentism/

69. How To Understand The Debate Over Presentism And Eternalism - Digital Commons @ Wayne State, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2801&context=oa_dissertations

70. Does presentism have ethical consequences? : r/askphilosophy - Reddit, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/74w5nu/does_presentism_have_ethical_consequences/

71. Question about presentism (philosophy of time) : r/askphilosophy - Reddit, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/t18iyr/question_about_presentism_philosophy_of_time/

72. Eternalism (philosophy of time) - Wikipedia, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eternalism_(philosophy_of_time)

73. The block universe is often understood as timeless. What exactly does timelessness mean in this context? : r/Metaphysics - Reddit, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Metaphysics/comments/1mf1x98/the_block_universe_is_often_understood_as/

74. digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=armstrong-philosopher-stone#:~:text=Eternalism%20is%20the%20belief%20that,never%20go%20out%20of%20existence.

75. The Reality of Time – Sean Carroll, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2015/04/03/the-reality-of-time/comment-page-2/

76. How does eternalism explain our experience of time? : r/askphilosophy - Reddit, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/66qct3/how_does_eternalism_explain_our_experience_of_time/

77. en.wikipedia.org, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Growing_block_universe#:~:text=By%20the%20passage%20of%20time,is%20continually%20coming%20into%20being.

78. Growing block universe - Wikipedia, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Growing_block_universe

79. Block Universe "theory" - what is it all about - your opinions : r/AskPhysics - Reddit, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/comments/1fs22vl/block_universe_theory_what_is_it_all_about_your/

80. Theories of the Universe: Presentism, Block Universe, and Growing Block | by Brian Liou, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://thebrianliou.medium.com/theories-of-the-universe-presentism-block-universe-and-growing-block-009c96e38e61

81. en.wikipedia.org, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_perception#:~:text=In%20psychology%20and%20neuroscience%2C%20time,referred%20to%20as%20perceived%20duration.

82. Time perception | Research Starters - EBSCO, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/psychology/time-perception

83. Time perception - Wikipedia, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_perception

84. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4830363/#:~:text=Time%20perception%20is%20a%20concept,the%20duration%20of%20an%20event.&text=Depending%20on%20the%20occasion%2C%20people,time%20passes%20quickly%20or%20slowly.

85. Time perception and age: Longevity's influence on 'mind time', accessed on October 26, 2025, https://blogs.bcm.edu/2017/09/15/time-perception-age-longevitys-influence-mind-time/

86. How Does Emotion Influence Time Perception? A Review of Evidence Linking Emotional Motivation and Time Processing - PMC - NIH, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9094696/

87. Human time perception and its illusions - PMC - NIH, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2866156/

88. Time Perception Mechanisms at Central Nervous System - PMC, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4830363/

89. The Neurology and Psychology of Time Perception | Frontiers Research Topic, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/research-topics/34281/the-neurology-and-psychology-of-time-perception/magazine

90. The time–emotion paradox - PMC, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2685815/

91. Feel the Time. Time Perception as a Function of Interoceptive Processing - Frontiers, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/human-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00074/full

92. Good Timing: UNLV Study Unravels How Our Brains Track Time, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.unlv.edu/news/release/good-timing-unlv-study-unravels-how-our-brains-track-time

93. Time Perception: How Our Brains Shape Our Sense of Reality | Psychology Today, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/parenting-from-a-neuroscience-perspective/202303/time-perception-how-our-brains-shape-our

94. Why We Feel Time Speed Up as We Start to Get Older | Psychology ..., accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/out-of-the-darkness/202409/why-does-time-seem-to-speed-up-as-we-get-older

95. Why time speeds up as you age - David R Hamilton PHD, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://drdavidhamilton.com/why-time-speeds-up-as-you-age/

96. Time perception and age - SciELO, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.scielo.br/j/anp/a/d6SvJK5tM6kCFPTmpVj5pSz/?lang=en

97. Effect of emotion on time perception in youth athletes | PRBM - Dove Medical Press, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.dovepress.com/the-effect-of-emotion-on-time-perception-in-youth-athletes-with-differ-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-PRBM

98. Emotion and Time Perception in Children and Adults: The Effect of Task Difficulty in - Brill, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://brill.com/view/journals/time/4/1/article-p7_2.xml

99. Time Flies When You're Having Fun: The Influence of Continuous ..., accessed on October 26, 2025, https://publications.kon.org/urc/v12/donaldson.html

100. Spatial attention modulates time perception on the human torso - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11965207/

101. Temporal attention - Frontiers, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cognition/articles/10.3389/fcogn.2023.1168320/full

102. (PDF) Attention Does Not Affect the Speed of Subjective Time, but Whether Temporal Information Guides Performance: A Large‐Scale Study of Intrinsically Motivated Timers in a Real‐Time Strategy Game - ResearchGate, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350332692_Attention_Does_Not_Affect_the_Speed_of_Subjective_Time_but_Whether_Temporal_Information_Guides_Performance_A_Large-Scale_Study_of_Intrinsically_Motivated_Timers_in_a_Real-Time_Strategy_Game

103. Cultural aspects of time and ageing - PMC, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1369268/

104. How do different cultures view the concept of time? - The Q&A Community, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://theqacommunity.quora.com/How-do-different-cultures-view-the-concept-of-time

105. How Different Cultures Understand Time | The LOTE Agency, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.loteagency.com.au/how-different-cultures-understand-time/

106. Linear and Cyclical Time: Time's Arrow or Boomerang? | The Endless Knot, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://endlessround.wordpress.com/2013/06/11/cyclical-and-linear-time/

107. Time & History: Cyclic or Linear?, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://vtorvich.com/cyclic-linear-history/

108. clockify.me, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://clockify.me/blog/managing-time/time-perception/#:~:text=Polychronic%20cultures%20perceive%20deadlines%20as,their%20schedules%20as%20plans%20change.

109. Time Orientation and Perception of Time in Different Cultures - Clockify, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://clockify.me/blog/managing-time/time-perception/

110. Linguistic relativity - Wikipedia, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistic_relativity

111. Effects of Linguistic Relativity on a Speaker's Perception - Language Testing International, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.languagetesting.com/blog/the-effects-of-linguistic-relativity-on-a-speakers-perception/

112. Hopi language | Native American, Uto-Aztecan, Southwest US - Britannica, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Hopi-language

113. Hopi time controversy - Wikipedia, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hopi_time_controversy

114. The Hopi Language – Time as a Cycle, Not a Line - MD Online, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://md-online.pl/en/language-trivia-hopi/

115. Hopi Time - Rexresearch1.com, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.rexresearch1.com/HopiLanguageLibrary/HopiTimeMalotki.pdf

116. Hopi Time: A Linguistic Analysis of the Temporal Concepts in the Hopi Language, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343558460_Hopi_Time_A_Linguistic_Analysis_of_the_Temporal_Concepts_in_the_Hopi_Language

117. Your Time Perception Can Be Radically Altered By The ... - IFLScience, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.iflscience.com/your-perception-of-time-and-space-is-radically-altered-by-the-language-you-speak-72000

118. www.theguardian.com, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/science/2005/feb/24/4#:~:text=The%20Aymara%20also%20feel%20time,as%20behind%20or%20the%20back.

119. A Unique Perspective on Time | The fascinating Language of Aymara | by Rogus - Medium, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://medium.com/@rogusblogus/a-unique-perspective-on-time-the-fascinating-language-of-aymara-a8b5eb7c074a

120. Aymara & Quechua | La cueva de español - The Spanish Cave, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://thespanishcave.com/2022/05/28/aymara-quechua/

121. Aymara, time backwards; comorant fishing - Then Do Better, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.thendobetter.com/blog/2019/12/6/aymara-time-backwards-comorant-fishing

122. How time flies | Science | The Guardian, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/science/2005/feb/24/4

123. TIL of the Aymara People, who have one of very few languages, in which speakers seem to represent the past as in front of them and the future as behind them. (X-post from TIL, thought it would be interesting to hear what r/linguistics has to say) - Reddit, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/linguistics/comments/6bmpa2/til_of_the_aymara_people_who_have_one_of_very_few/

124. How Linguistic and Cultural Forces Shape Conceptions of Time ..., accessed on October 26, 2025, https://web.stanford.edu/class/think53/mandarin-time-3D.pdf

125. Do English and Mandarin Speakers Think Differently About Time? - eScholarship, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://escholarship.org/content/qt5wb8p0nb/qt5wb8p0nb_noSplash_62e638f4467db830907675d7164cb83b.pdf

126. Full article: Conceptual and lexical effects on gestures: the case of vertical spatial metaphors for time in Chinese - Taylor & Francis Online, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23273798.2017.1283425

127. Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently? - PubMed, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21030013/

128. Big Bang Theory: Overview | Research Starters | EBSCO Research, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/physics/big-bang-theory-overview

129. Chronology of the universe - Wikipedia, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_the_universe

130. What is the Big Bang Theory? - Space, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.space.com/25126-big-bang-theory.html

131. Big Bang - Wikipedia, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

132. The early universe | CERN, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://home.cern/science/physics/early-universe

133. It all started with a Big Bang – the quest to unravel the mystery ..., accessed on October 26, 2025, https://physics.mit.edu/news/it-all-started-with-a-big-bang-the-quest-to-unravel-the-mystery-behind-the-birth-of-the-universe/

134. Does time have a beginning? If so, how do we know? : r/cosmology - Reddit, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/cosmology/comments/1e2fmey/does_time_have_a_beginning_if_so_how_do_we_know/

135. Ultimate fate of the universe - Wikipedia, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe

136. Heat death of the universe - Wikipedia, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universe

137. en.wikipedia.org, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universe#:~:text=The%20idea%20of%20heat%20death,all%20energy%20is%20evenly%20distributed.

138. What Is The Ultimate Fate Of The Universe - Consensus Academic Search Engine, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://consensus.app/questions/what-is-the-ultimate-fate-of-the-universe/

139. (PDF) Heat Death (The Ultimate Fate of the Universe) - ResearchGate, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299618320_Heat_Death_The_Ultimate_Fate_of_the_Universe

140. When heath death of the universe happens, and time doesn't exist anymore, will time ever have existed? : r/astrophysics - Reddit, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/astrophysics/comments/1mld7zo/when_heath_death_of_the_universe_happens_and_time/

141. Physicists Predict When The Universe Will End in a Reverse Big Bang - Science Alert, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.sciencealert.com/physicists-predict-when-the-universe-will-end-in-a-reverse-big-bang

142. Big Crunch - Wikipedia, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Crunch

143. WMAP- Fate of the Universe, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_fate.html

144. How to Predict the Big Crunch - Scientific & Academic Publishing, accessed on October 26, 2025, http://article.sapub.org/10.5923.j.ijtmp.20201002.02.html

145. The Universe May End With A Big Crunch – And There's Just 20 Billion Years To Go, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://www.iflscience.com/the-universe-may-end-with-a-big-crunch-and-theres-just-20-billion-years-to-go-81025

146. Big Rip - Wikipedia, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Rip

147. Big rip - (History of Science) - Vocab, Definition, Explanations | Fiveable, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://fiveable.me/key-terms/history-science/big-rip

148. [2106.12050] Classical and quantum $f(R)$ cosmology: The big rip, the little rip and the little sibling of the big rip - arXiv, accessed on October 26, 2025, https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.12050