The Anthropocene Extinction: An Analysis of Earth's Sixth Great Biodiversity Crisis

I. Introduction: Defining the Sixth Extinction in Earth's History

The Earth is currently experiencing a profound biological crisis, an ongoing and accelerating loss of life that many scientists have termed the sixth mass extinction.1 Officially known as the Holocene extinction, or increasingly as the Anthropocene extinction, this event represents a severe departure from the planet's normal rhythm of species loss.2 It is a global phenomenon, impacting a vast and diverse array of organisms across every ecosystem, from the deepest oceans to the highest mountains, and affecting mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish, invertebrates, and plants alike.1 The widespread degradation of critical biodiversity hotspots, such as tropical rainforests and coral reefs, serves as a stark and visible indicator of the crisis's pervasive scale.1

A mass extinction is formally defined as a period in which the Earth loses more than 75% of its species in a geologically short interval, a timeframe that can span up to a few million years.4 These events are distinct from the planet's natural "background" rate of extinction, the slow but steady turnover of species that occurs as a normal part of evolution in the absence of a global catastrophe.4 The current crisis is characterized by extinction rates estimated to be 100 to 1,000 times higher than this natural background rate, with some analyses suggesting the disparity could be even greater.1 This dramatic acceleration has led to a broad scientific consensus that humanity is precipitating a global extinction event of a magnitude not seen in 66 million years.1

The term "Anthropocene" is increasingly used to contextualize this crisis, signifying a new geological epoch in which human activity has become the dominant force shaping the Earth's systems.10 This extinction event is the primary biological manifestation of the Anthropocene, a direct consequence of humanity's transformation of the planet's climate, landscapes, and the chemical composition of its atmosphere, oceans, and soils.10

While the scientific community overwhelmingly agrees that human activities are driving an unprecedented loss of biodiversity, a nuanced academic discourse continues regarding the event's formal classification.13 Some researchers argue that while the crisis is severe, the total percentage of species lost has not yet crossed the conventionally accepted 75% threshold that defines the "Big Five" mass extinctions of the geological past.13 Others contend that the current rate of loss, the "biological annihilation" of populations, and the disappearance of entire branches of the evolutionary tree of life already signify that we are in the midst of such an event.16 This report will explore this scientific debate in detail, presenting the evidence that supports both the alarming reality of the crisis and the calls for precision in its classification.

Ultimately, what distinguishes the Anthropocene extinction from all previous mass extinctions is its fundamental cause. The five great extinctions of the past were driven by immense, non-biological, natural cataclysms: colossal volcanic eruptions, asteroid impacts, and dramatic shifts in planetary climate triggered by geological and astronomical forces.17 The current event, by contrast, is caused exclusively and unequivocally by the activities of a single species: Homo sapiens.1 This fundamental distinction between past and present crises is critical. The rate of species loss is an anomaly of speed, but its origin is an anomaly of agency. This shifts the phenomenon from the realm of an unavoidable natural disaster to that of a direct consequence of human choices and societal structures. It implies that the causal agent—humanity—is also the only agent capable of understanding, responding to, and potentially mitigating the crisis, framing the sixth extinction not only as a geological event but as a profound ethical and existential challenge.

II. A Legacy of Loss: The Five Great Mass Extinctions of the Phanerozoic Eon

To fully comprehend the scale and significance of the current biodiversity crisis, it is essential to place it within the context of Earth's deep history. The geological record reveals five previous episodes of catastrophic biodiversity loss during the Phanerozoic Eon (the last ~540 million years), which serve as the scientific benchmark for what constitutes a "mass extinction." Each of these events fundamentally reshaped the trajectory of life on the planet.

Extinction Event

Age (mya)

Percentage of Species Lost

Primary Causes

Key Taxa Affected

End-Ordovician

~444

86%

Intense glacial/interglacial cycles; rapid sea-level fall; tectonic uplift and weathering drawing down $CO_2$.

Small marine organisms: trilobites, brachiopods, corals, graptolites.

Late Devonian

~360

75%

Rapid diversification of land plants leading to global cooling; potential volcanism; ocean anoxia.

Marine species: reef-building corals, armored fish (placoderms).

End-Permian ("The Great Dying")

~252

96%

Massive volcanic eruptions (Siberian Traps); catastrophic global warming; ocean acidification and anoxia.

Vast majority of life: trilobites, sea scorpions, many synapsids ("mammal-like reptiles"), insects.

End-Triassic

~201

80%

Volcanic activity (Central Atlantic Magmatic Province); rapid global warming; changes in ocean chemistry.

Many large archosaurs (non-dinosaurian reptiles), large amphibians, conodonts.

End-Cretaceous

~66

76%

Asteroid impact (Chicxulub); potential contributing volcanism (Deccan Traps); "impact winter" and rapid cooling.

Non-avian dinosaurs, pterosaurs, mosasaurs, plesiosaurs, ammonites.

Table 1: The "Big Five" Mass Extinction Events. This table summarizes the key characteristics of the five universally recognized mass extinctions, providing a comparative baseline for the current crisis. Data synthesized from.17

The Ordovician-Silurian Extinction (~444 mya)

The first of the "Big Five," this event occurred in two distinct pulses and primarily devastated marine life, which at the time dominated the planet.17 An estimated 86% of all marine species were lost, including many families of trilobites, brachiopods, and graptolites.17 The leading hypothesis points to a period of intense glaciation centered on the supercontinent Gondwana. This ice age locked up vast quantities of water, causing a dramatic fall in global sea levels that destroyed shallow marine habitats.17 The tectonic uplift of the Appalachian mountains may have also played a role by increasing rock weathering, a process that draws down atmospheric carbon dioxide ($CO_2$), further contributing to global cooling.17

The Late Devonian Extinction (~360 mya)

This was a prolonged crisis, potentially lasting for millions of years, that again disproportionately affected marine ecosystems.21 It led to the extinction of approximately 75% of all species, dealing a severe blow to the planet's burgeoning reef systems, built by corals and stromatoporoids, and wiping out many groups of armored fish like the placoderms.17 The most widely accepted cause is linked to the evolutionary success of land plants. The rapid diversification and spread of forests across the continents drew down massive amounts of $CO_2$ from the atmosphere, triggering a period of severe global cooling and glaciation.17 This process also likely led to nutrient runoff into the oceans, causing widespread anoxia (oxygen depletion).21

The Permian-Triassic Extinction (~252 mya)

Known grimly as "The Great Dying," this was the most devastating extinction event in Earth's history, bringing the Paleozoic Era to a close.18 It is estimated that up to 96% of marine species and 70% of terrestrial vertebrate species vanished.17 Life on Earth was nearly extinguished. The dominant terrestrial fauna, the synapsids (ancestors of mammals), were decimated, and iconic marine groups like the trilobites were wiped out forever.18 The primary cause was a cataclysmic episode of volcanic activity in modern-day Siberia, known as the Siberian Traps.23 These eruptions released immense quantities of greenhouse gases, triggering runaway global warming. The oceans absorbed vast amounts of $CO_2$, leading to severe acidification, while warming waters lost their ability to hold oxygen. In the most extreme phase, the oceans may have become euxinic, saturated with toxic hydrogen sulfide ($\ce{H2S}$) that could have even gassed terrestrial life.17

The Triassic-Jurassic Extinction (~201 mya)

This event occurred at the boundary of the Triassic and Jurassic periods, clearing the ecological stage for the dinosaurs to rise to global dominance.18 An estimated 80% of species were lost, including many large non-dinosaurian archosaurs (crocodile relatives) that had been the top terrestrial predators, as well as the last of the large amphibians.17 The cause is linked to another massive volcanic episode, this time associated with the rifting of the supercontinent Pangaea and the formation of the Atlantic Ocean. The eruptions of the Central Atlantic Magmatic Province (CAMP) released huge volumes of greenhouse gases, causing rapid global warming and dramatic changes to ocean chemistry.17

The Cretaceous-Paleogene Extinction (~66 mya)

The most recent and famous of the "Big Five," this event ended the 150-million-year reign of the dinosaurs and marked the boundary between the Mesozoic and Cenozoic Eras.2 It resulted in the loss of about 76% of the world's species, including all non-avian dinosaurs, the flying pterosaurs, and the great marine reptiles like mosasaurs and plesiosaurs.17 The primary cause is now overwhelmingly accepted to be the impact of a 10-kilometer-wide asteroid in what is now the Yucatán Peninsula of Mexico.17 The impact ejected vast quantities of dust and aerosols into the atmosphere, blocking sunlight and creating a global "impact winter" that caused the collapse of photosynthesis-based food webs. Some evidence suggests that ecosystems may have already been under stress from long-term climate change and massive volcanic activity in India's Deccan Traps, making them more vulnerable to the asteroid's cataclysmic effects.17

III. The Anthropocene Defaunation: Unpacking the Human-Driven Causes of the Current Crisis

Unlike the "Big Five" extinctions, which were precipitated by external geological or extraterrestrial forces, the sixth extinction is unique in its singular, biological cause: the global expansion and activity of Homo sapiens. The crisis is not the result of a single cataclysm but rather a multifaceted and intensifying assault on the biosphere, driven by a combination of foundational pressures and direct mechanisms of destruction.

Foundational Drivers: Population Growth and Overconsumption

The deep roots of the crisis lie in the exponential growth of the human enterprise. For most of its history, the human population was a minor component of the planet's biomass. The advent of agriculture around 10,000 years ago enabled a significant increase, but the most dramatic change occurred with the Industrial Revolution.1 The global human population grew from an estimated 1 billion in 1800 to over 8 billion today, a trajectory that has fundamentally reshaped the planet's ecology.2 This growth was made possible by technological innovations that allowed humanity to bypass the natural carrying capacity that limits other species, leading to an ever-increasing demand for space, food, water, and energy.2

However, population growth alone does not tell the full story. Since the mid-20th century, a period dubbed the "Great Acceleration," the primary engine of environmental pressure has shifted from sheer numbers to rapidly increasing per capita consumption, particularly in affluent societies.10 Economic growth and rising living standards have fueled a demand for resources that far outstrips population growth.1 For instance, high-income nations, despite representing a minority of the global population, were responsible for 74% of the world's excess material use between 1970 and 2017.10 This pattern of inequitable consumption means that a relatively small fraction of the global population is driving a disproportionate share of the ecological damage that underpins the extinction crisis.10

The Primary Direct Drivers of Biodiversity Loss

These foundational pressures manifest through several direct drivers that cause species populations to decline and disappear. Global analyses have quantified the relative impact of these drivers, providing a clear picture of the primary mechanisms of extinction in the Anthropocene.

Driver

Estimated Global Impact (%)

Key Mechanisms

Land-Use Change

30%

Conversion of forests, wetlands, and grasslands for agriculture (cropland and pasture), urbanization, mining, and infrastructure.

Overexploitation

20%

Overhunting, overfishing, and overharvesting of species for food, medicine, timber, and the illegal wildlife trade.

Climate Change & Pollution

14%

Global warming altering habitats and species ranges; ocean acidification; increased extreme weather events. Chemical, plastic, nutrient, light, and noise pollution.

Invasive Alien Species

11%

Introduction of non-native species that predate, compete with, or spread disease to native wildlife.

Table 2: Primary Anthropogenic Drivers of Biodiversity Loss and Their Estimated Global Impact. This table outlines the main direct causes of the current extinction crisis, ranked by their approximate contribution to global biodiversity decline. Data synthesized from.25

1. Land-Use Change (Habitat Destruction and Fragmentation): This is unequivocally the largest single driver of biodiversity loss globally, responsible for an estimated 30% of the decline.25 The relentless conversion of natural ecosystems into human-dominated landscapes is the most direct way in which humanity eliminates other species. The primary engine of this conversion is agriculture; currently, 40% of the planet's land surface has been repurposed for food production.19 This transformation of biodiversity-rich habitats like forests and wetlands into monoculture fields and pastures dramatically reduces the Earth's carrying capacity for wild species.1 It is estimated that agriculture alone threatens half of all species at risk of extinction.25 Beyond farming, urban sprawl, mining operations, and the construction of roads and dams further fragment and destroy the habitats that species need to survive.24

2. Direct Overexploitation: The unsustainable harvesting of wild populations is the second-largest driver, accounting for roughly 20% of biodiversity decline.25 This includes industrial-scale overfishing that has depleted marine stocks, overhunting for bushmeat and the lucrative illegal wildlife trade, and the overharvesting of timber and medicinal plants.1 From the historical extinction of the passenger pigeon to the current plight of rhinos and pangolins, direct exploitation has been a potent force of extinction throughout human history.1

3. Anthropogenic Climate Change: While currently ranked third (alongside pollution), climate change is a rapidly accelerating driver that many models predict will become the primary cause of biodiversity loss in the coming decades.25 Human-induced global warming, which has already raised average global temperatures by approximately 1.2°C, is fundamentally altering ecosystems worldwide.10 It forces species to shift their ranges to track suitable climates, disrupts synchronized ecological relationships (like the timing of flowering and pollinator emergence), increases the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events like droughts and heatwaves, and causes ocean acidification, which is devastating to marine life like coral reefs.10

4. Pollution: The introduction of harmful substances into the environment is a pervasive and multifaceted threat. This includes chemical pollution from the widespread use of pesticides and fertilizers, which have increased 6-fold and 12-fold, respectively, since 1961.25 These chemicals can have direct toxic effects on wildlife and cause nutrient runoff that leads to "dead zones" in aquatic systems. Plastic pollution has become ubiquitous, physically harming animals and potentially introducing toxins into the food web.11 Other forms, such as light and noise pollution, can disrupt the behavior, migration, and reproduction of many species.28

5. Invasive Alien Species and Disease: Human trade and travel have broken down biogeographic barriers, allowing species to move into ecosystems where they did not evolve.25 These invasive species are the second-biggest cause of biodiversity loss in the world according to the United Nations Development Programme.28 They can wreak havoc by outcompeting native species for resources, preying on them directly, hybridizing with them, or introducing novel diseases to which native fauna and flora have no immunity.1 The dodo, for example, was pushed to extinction in part by invasive rats and pigs introduced by humans that preyed on its eggs.30

These drivers do not operate in isolation. Their true destructive power lies in their synergistic interactions, which create feedback loops that accelerate the pace of biodiversity loss. Climate change, in particular, acts as a "threat multiplier." For example, a species whose habitat has already been fragmented by logging is far more vulnerable to an extreme drought caused by climate change. Similarly, the spread of a deadly fungal pathogen affecting amphibians appears to be exacerbated by warming temperatures.9 The global food system is a prime example of this synergy, as it simultaneously drives land-use change, contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions, and is a major source of chemical pollution.31 This interconnectedness means that the total impact of these pressures is far greater than the sum of their individual parts, helping to explain the unprecedented acceleration of the crisis.3

IV. Quantifying the Crisis: Evidence, Rates, and the Scale of Global Biodiversity Loss

The declaration of a sixth mass extinction is not based on speculation but on a vast and growing body of quantitative evidence from multiple independent lines of scientific inquiry. Syntheses from the world's leading conservation and scientific bodies paint a stark picture of a biosphere under unprecedented strain, characterized by extinction rates far exceeding the natural background level and a catastrophic decline in the abundance of life.

Extinction Rates: A Stark Departure from the Norm

The most fundamental metric for assessing an extinction event is its rate. By studying the fossil record, paleontologists have established a "background" extinction rate—the normal pace at which species disappear over geological time. This rate is estimated to be roughly 0.1 to 1 extinction per million species-years (E/MSY).6 This means that, under normal conditions, one would expect one species to go extinct out of every million species over the course of a million years.

Against this baseline, the current rate of extinction is alarmingly high. Conservative estimates place the contemporary rate at 100 to 1,000 times the background rate, while some analyses suggest it could be as high as 10,000 times greater.1 This acceleration is so profound that some scientists have described it as a "biological annihilation".16 A 2023 study provided a particularly striking perspective by examining extinctions at the genus level—a higher taxonomic rank than species, representing a greater loss of evolutionary history. The study found that since 1500, the extinction rate for vertebrate genera has been 35 times higher than the background rate over the last million years. This represents an accumulation of evolutionary loss in just 500 years that would naturally have taken 18,000 years to occur.1

The IPBES Global Assessment Report: A Landmark Synthesis

In 2019, the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) released its landmark Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. This exhaustive synthesis, analogous to the IPCC reports on climate change, was compiled by 145 experts from 50 countries and drew upon over 15,000 scientific and governmental sources, as well as indigenous and local knowledge.34 Its findings represent the most authoritative scientific consensus on the state of global biodiversity.

The report's headline finding was that an estimated 1 million animal and plant species are now threatened with extinction, many within decades—more than at any other point in human history.34 This staggering number includes an estimated 40% of all amphibian species, more than a third of all marine mammals, and almost a third of reef-building corals.34 The report confirmed that this crisis is overwhelmingly human-driven, noting that our actions have "significantly altered" 75% of the land-based environment and 66% of the marine environment.37 One of the report's most powerful illustrations of humanity's impact was its analysis of mammalian biomass: the total weight of wild mammals has declined by 82%, to the point where humans (36%) and their livestock (60%) now constitute 96% of all mammalian biomass on Earth, with wild mammals making up a mere 4%.34

The WWF Living Planet Report: Tracking the Decline in Abundance

While extinction is the ultimate endpoint, the decline in the abundance of living organisms is a more immediate and dynamic measure of ecosystem health. The World Wildlife Fund's (WWF) biennial Living Planet Report tracks this trend using the Living Planet Index (LPI), which aggregates data from thousands of monitored vertebrate populations worldwide.38 This index serves as a crucial early warning indicator, revealing the "emptying" of ecosystems long before species are formally declared extinct.38

The 2024 report revealed a catastrophic 73% average decline in the population sizes of monitored mammals, birds, fish, reptiles, and amphibians between 1970 and 2020.38 This does not mean 73% of individual animals have been lost, but rather that the average size of thousands of distinct populations has shrunk by this amount. The declines are not uniform across the globe; they are most severe in the tropics, with Latin America and the Caribbean experiencing a staggering 95% average decline, followed by Africa at 76%.38 Freshwater ecosystems have been hit hardest, showing an average population decline of 85%.38

This focus on population abundance reveals a critical aspect of the crisis. Extinction is a binary state—a species is either extant or it is not. However, the ecological function of a species diminishes progressively as its population shrinks. A forest with only a handful of its keystone predators or seed dispersers is already functionally broken, even if those species are not yet technically extinct. The dramatic population declines reported by the LPI are therefore arguably a more meaningful and urgent metric of ongoing ecosystem collapse than the number of confirmed extinctions. They signify a widespread loss of ecological integrity that is already undermining the stability and services of the biosphere, representing the process of extinction in action.

The IUCN Red List: A Global Barometer of Extinction Risk

The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species is the world's most comprehensive inventory of the conservation status of biological species.44 It serves as a global barometer of extinction risk, categorizing species into tiers such as Critically Endangered, Endangered, and Vulnerable.

As of late 2024, the Red List has assessed over 169,000 species, of which more than 47,000 are classified as threatened with extinction.44 This represents over a quarter of all assessed species. The threat levels are particularly high for certain groups: 41% of amphibians, 37% of sharks and rays, 34% of conifers, 26% of mammals, and 12% of birds are considered threatened.44 While these numbers are alarming, the IUCN itself notes that they are a significant underestimate of the true scale of the crisis. This is because less than 5% of the world's approximately 1.9 million described species have been evaluated for the Red List, and the vast majority of unevaluated species are invertebrates and plants, which are known to be facing immense pressures.7

V. The Scientific Discourse: Is This Truly a Sixth Mass Extinction?

While there is overwhelming agreement on the severity of the human-caused biodiversity crisis, a vigorous scientific discourse exists regarding whether the event has officially met the criteria to be classified as the Earth's sixth mass extinction. This debate is not about whether a crisis is happening, but about the precise scientific definition, the thresholds of evidence required, and the implications of applying such a stark label. Understanding this discourse is crucial for appreciating the nuances of the science and the process by which such conclusions are reached.

The Argument for a Sixth Mass Extinction

Proponents of the "sixth mass extinction" classification argue that the available evidence, particularly the rate of species loss, is so anomalous that it places the current event in the same category as the "Big Five" of the geological past. Their case rests on several key lines of evidence:

1. Unprecedented Extinction Rates: The core of the argument is the stark contrast between the current extinction rate and the natural background rate. With contemporary rates estimated to be 100 to 10,000 times higher than the norm, the pace of loss is seen as qualitatively consistent with the onset of a mass extinction.1

2. Projections to the 75% Threshold: While the 75% species loss threshold has not yet been crossed, projections based on current trends suggest it is a plausible future. A landmark 2011 review paper calculated that if all species currently listed as "threatened" by the IUCN were to go extinct within the next century, and that rate of loss continued, the 75% threshold for most vertebrate groups would be surpassed in as little as 550 years.13 From a geological perspective, this is an exceptionally short period.

3. Loss of Deeper Evolutionary History: The crisis extends beyond the species level. A 2023 study by Gerardo Ceballos and Paul Ehrlich found that 73 genera of terrestrial vertebrates have gone extinct since 1500. This rate is 35 times higher than the background rate, representing a loss of evolutionary history that should have taken 18,000 years.16 The loss of entire genera and families signifies a "mutilation of the tree of life," a profound pruning of evolutionary branches that is a hallmark of past mass extinctions.16

4. Population Declines as the Real Metric: Scientists on this side of the debate argue that focusing strictly on the final extinction of a species misses the more immediate ecological reality. They contend that the catastrophic decline in wildlife populations—the "biological annihilation"—is a more meaningful indicator of a mass extinction in progress. From this perspective, waiting for the last individual of a species to die before declaring a crisis is akin to waiting for a patient's heart to stop before diagnosing a fatal illness.14

The Argument for Scientific Restraint

A contrasting viewpoint, held by other scientists, urges caution in applying the "mass extinction" label. This position does not deny the severity of the biodiversity crisis but argues that the term should be reserved for events that meet the strict, quantitative definition derived from the paleontological record. The core arguments for this restraint are:

1. The 75% Threshold Has Not Been Met: The most direct counterargument is that, based on confirmed extinctions, we are "nowhere close" to the 75% species loss that defines the "Big Five".13 While the current rate is high, the cumulative loss to date is a small fraction of this benchmark.

2. The Atypical Nature of Recent Extinctions: Analysis shows that a large proportion of extinctions since 1500 have been concentrated on islands and have disproportionately affected vertebrates like mammals and birds.15 These island ecosystems are uniquely vulnerable to human arrival and the introduction of invasive species. Some scientists, like John Wiens, argue that this pattern of "weird" island-centric extinctions may not be a reliable "road map" for predicting future global, continental losses.15

3. Risk to Scientific Credibility: There is a concern that prematurely or inaccurately declaring a mass extinction could undermine scientific credibility, akin to "the boy who cried wolf".15 Proponents of this view, like population ecologist Leah Gerber, stress the need to be precise in measurement and communication, noting that while humanity is causing "profound biodiversity change... not every metric points to 'mass extinction'".15

4. A Question of Semantics vs. Action: Some in this camp argue that the debate over the label is a distraction from the necessary action. Wiens suggests that simply avoiding a mass extinction is a "low bar" and that the goal should be "zero percent extinction," regardless of whether a formal threshold has been crossed.15

The entire scientific discourse, however, may be shaped by fundamental biases in the data upon which it relies. The debate often centers on data from the IUCN Red List, which is heavily skewed towards well-studied and charismatic vertebrates. While almost all known bird and mammal species have been assessed, only a minute fraction of invertebrates—which constitute the vast majority of animal life—have been evaluated.49 This creates a "vertebrate-centric" view of the crisis. When researchers attempt to correct for this bias, the picture changes dramatically. One study, extrapolating from data on molluscs (the second-largest animal phylum), estimated that as many as 7.5% to 13% of all ~2 million known species may have already gone extinct since 1500.49 This figure is orders of magnitude greater than the officially recognized extinctions on the Red List and suggests the cumulative loss is far closer to mass extinction levels than the vertebrate-focused debate implies. This reveals that the argument over whether a threshold has been met may be a product of incomplete knowledge, and that the true scale of the crisis, unfolding largely unobserved in the world of insects, snails, and other invertebrates, could be far more catastrophic than the formal scientific debate suggests.

VI. The Unravelling Web: Ecological and Societal Consequences of Biodiversity Collapse

The loss of biodiversity is not merely an aesthetic or ethical concern; it represents the degradation of the Earth's fundamental life-support systems. The intricate web of life, evolved over billions of years, generates the clean air, fresh water, fertile soils, and stable climate upon which human civilization depends. As species disappear and ecosystems unravel, these critical "ecosystem services" are compromised, leading to a cascade of consequences that threaten human health, food security, economic stability, and geopolitical peace.

Ecological Consequences: The Destabilization of Ecosystems

At its core, biodiversity is the foundation of ecosystem stability and resilience. Complex ecosystems with a rich variety of species are better able to withstand and recover from disturbances like droughts, floods, or disease outbreaks.45 As species are lost, ecosystems become simplified and more brittle. This loss of resilience has several key ecological consequences:

• Trophic Cascades and Functional Loss: The removal of a "keystone species"—an organism that has a disproportionately large effect on its environment relative to its abundance—can trigger a domino effect known as a trophic cascade. The near-extinction of sea otters in the North Pacific provides a classic example. As top predators of sea urchins, their removal allowed urchin populations to explode, which in turn decimated the kelp forests upon which the entire coastal ecosystem depended, creating barren underwater landscapes.30 This illustrates how the loss of a single species can lead to the functional collapse of an entire habitat.

• Crossing Ecosystem Tipping Points: The cumulative pressure of biodiversity loss, combined with climate change and other stressors, can push entire biomes past critical thresholds, or "tipping points." Beyond these points, they may undergo a rapid, and potentially irreversible, shift to a new, degraded state.38 Scientists warn that iconic ecosystems like the Amazon rainforest and global coral reef systems are approaching such tipping points. The Amazon, for instance, generates much of its own rainfall; continued deforestation and degradation could disrupt this hydrological cycle to the point where vast swathes of the rainforest could permanently convert to a drier, savanna-like state, with catastrophic consequences for regional climate and global biodiversity.25

Societal Consequences: A Threat to Human Well-being

The degradation of ecosystems translates directly into tangible threats to human society. These impacts are multifaceted, affecting our food, health, and economies.

1. Compromised Food Security

The global food system is profoundly dependent on biodiversity, and its erosion threatens our ability to feed a growing population.

• Pollinator Decline: More than 75% of the world's leading food crops, including fruits, vegetables, coffee, and cocoa, rely on pollination by animals like bees, butterflies, and other insects.29 The widespread decline of these pollinators due to habitat loss and pesticide use directly threatens agricultural productivity, with an estimated $235 to $577 billion in annual global crop output at risk.29

• Fisheries Collapse: Marine and freshwater fisheries provide a critical source of protein for billions of people, accounting for 16% of the global protein supply.56 Overexploitation, pollution, and the destruction of coastal habitats like mangroves and coral reefs are leading to the collapse of fish stocks worldwide, jeopardizing the food security and livelihoods of coastal communities.57

• Loss of Agrobiodiversity: The modern food system has become dangerously homogenized. Three-quarters of the world's food is now generated from only 12 plant and five animal species.58 This lack of diversity makes global food supplies extremely vulnerable to new pests, diseases, and the impacts of climate change, echoing the historical tragedy of the Irish potato famine, where reliance on a single crop variety led to mass starvation.58 The extinction of wild relatives of our major crops erodes the genetic library needed to breed new varieties that are resilient to future challenges.59

2. Increased Risks to Human Health

The link between biodiversity and human health is deep and increasingly recognized by major health organizations.

• Emergence of Zoonotic Diseases: An estimated 60-75% of emerging human infectious diseases are zoonotic, meaning they originate in animals.45 The destruction of natural habitats, particularly deforestation, and the global wildlife trade increase the frequency of contact between humans, livestock, and wild animals. This creates more opportunities for pathogens like viruses and bacteria to "spill over" from animal hosts to humans, a process that is believed to have triggered pandemics such as COVID-19, SARS, and Ebola.45

• Loss of Natural Medicines: Nature is a vast pharmacopeia. Over 50% of modern drugs, including many cancer treatments and antibiotics, are derived from or inspired by natural compounds found in plants, animals, and microbes.29 With each species that goes extinct, we may be losing the potential for a future life-saving medicine before it is ever discovered.62

• Degradation of Environmental Health: Healthy ecosystems provide essential services that underpin public health, such as water purification and air filtration.29 The loss of wetlands, for example, diminishes nature's ability to filter pollutants from drinking water, increasing the risk of waterborne diseases.65 The degradation of nature has also been linked to negative mental health outcomes, including "ecological grief" and anxiety related to environmental loss.66

3. Economic Destabilization

The global economy is not separate from the environment; it is a wholly-owned subsidiary of it. The erosion of natural capital poses a direct and substantial threat to economic prosperity.

• Collapse of Ecosystem Services: A landmark report from the World Bank projected that the partial collapse of key ecosystem services—specifically wild pollination, marine fisheries, and native timber—could result in an annual decline in global GDP of $2.7 trillion by 2030.67

• Disproportionate Impact on the Poor: The economic consequences of biodiversity loss will not be felt equally. The World Bank's analysis shows that the poorest economies, which are most directly dependent on natural resources for livelihoods and GDP, stand to lose the most. Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia could face annual GDP contractions of 9.7% and 6.5%, respectively, under a partial ecosystem collapse scenario.57 This threatens to reverse decades of development gains and entrench poverty.

• Undermining the Foundations of Growth: Over half of the world's total GDP is moderately or highly dependent on nature and its services.57 The ongoing destruction of this natural capital erodes the very foundation of economic activity, creating systemic risks for businesses, financial institutions, and national economies.71

These cascading consequences reveal a deeper, often overlooked threat: the potential for biodiversity loss to act as a driver of geopolitical instability. The erosion of food and water security, coupled with economic contraction and the displacement of communities, can exacerbate social tensions and create competition over scarce resources. This elevates the extinction crisis from a purely environmental issue to a critical matter of global peace and security, demonstrating that the stability of human societies is inextricably linked to the stability of the biosphere.29

VII. Case Studies in Extinction: From Global Icons to Unseen Losses

Abstract statistics and global trends can obscure the tangible reality of extinction. To fully grasp the nature of the crisis, it is essential to examine specific cases that illustrate the different mechanisms, scales, and consequences of biodiversity loss in the Anthropocene. These stories—of species lost, species on the brink, and entire ecosystems unravelling—provide powerful, concrete examples of the ongoing defaunation of the planet.

Ghosts of the Anthropocene: Cautionary Tales of Extinction

The species that have already vanished serve as stark warnings of the speed and finality of extinction.

• The Passenger Pigeon (Ectopistes migratorius): Perhaps the most dramatic cautionary tale from North America, the passenger pigeon was once the most abundant bird on the continent, with a population estimated in the billions.26 Their flocks were so vast they were said to darken the sky for days. This unimaginable abundance made them seem inexhaustible. However, a combination of relentless commercial hunting for cheap meat and the clearing of their forest habitat led to a shockingly rapid collapse. The last known individual, a female named Martha, died in the Cincinnati Zoo in 1914, marking the end of a species that had gone from billions to zero in a few decades.26 The passenger pigeon's story is a powerful lesson in how even the most numerous species are not immune to relentless human pressure.

• The Thylacine (Thylacinus cynocephalus): Commonly known as the Tasmanian tiger, the thylacine was the largest carnivorous marsupial of modern times, native to Australia and Tasmania.73 With the head of a wolf and stripes on its back, it was a unique product of evolutionary history. Following European settlement, it was systematically hunted and trapped under a bounty system, wrongly blamed for killing sheep.26 This direct persecution, combined with habitat loss and competition from introduced dogs, drove it to extinction. The last known thylacine, named Benjamin, died in captivity in the Hobart Zoo in 1936.74

• The Bramble Cay Melomys (Melomys rubicola): The story of this small rodent is a harbinger of the future. The melomys was found only on Bramble Cay, a tiny, low-lying coral island in Australia's Great Barrier Reef.73 In 2016, it was officially declared extinct, becoming the first mammal known to have been wiped out by contemporary, human-caused climate change.73 Rising sea levels and increased storm surges, driven by global warming, repeatedly inundated the small island, destroying its vegetation and, with it, the melomys' only source of food and shelter. Its extinction is a direct and unambiguous signal of climate change's growing power as a driver of biodiversity loss.

On the Brink: The Plight of Critically Endangered Species

For every species lost, thousands more stand on the precipice. The struggles of these critically endangered animals highlight the complex, interacting threats they face today.

• Amur Leopard (Panthera pardus orientalis): Considered one of the rarest big cats on Earth, the Amur leopard clings to survival in the temperate forests of the Russian Far East and adjacent areas of China.46 With a wild population of only around 100-120 adults, it is listed as Critically Endangered.46 The threats it faces are a textbook example of synergistic pressures. It is illegally poached for its stunning spotted coat and for its bones, which are used in traditional Asian medicine.76 Its forest habitat is being lost and fragmented by logging, agricultural expansion, and forest fires.75 Its prey base, such as roe deer, is depleted by human hunting.77 With such a small, isolated population, the species is also acutely vulnerable to the effects of inbreeding and disease outbreaks, such as Canine Distemper Virus, which could easily wipe out the remaining individuals.78

• Black Rhino (Diceros bicornis): This iconic African megaherbivore is a survivor of a catastrophic population collapse. Between 1960 and 1995, its numbers plummeted by a staggering 98%, from tens of thousands to fewer than 2,500, due to a massive wave of poaching.80 While intensive conservation efforts have helped the population rebound to over 6,000, it remains Critically Endangered.46 The primary threat continues to be poaching, driven by persistent demand for rhino horn in parts of Asia, where it is erroneously believed to have medicinal properties and is increasingly used as a symbol of wealth and status.80 This illegal trade makes every rhino a high-value target. Compounding this threat is ongoing habitat loss, which fragments rhino populations, restricting their range, reducing breeding rates, and making them more susceptible to disease.80 Three subspecies of black rhino have already been declared extinct.84

• Bornean Orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus): Asia's only great ape is facing a dire future. Listed as Critically Endangered, the Bornean orangutan population is estimated to have declined by more than 82% in just 75 years.85 The overwhelming driver of this decline is the wholesale destruction of its rainforest habitat.86 Vast areas of forest on the island of Borneo have been cleared for industrial-scale agriculture, most notably for palm oil plantations, as well as for logging and mining.85 This habitat loss is often accompanied by massive forest fires, which can kill thousands of orangutans at a time.85 Orangutans are also directly killed in human-wildlife conflict when they enter plantations in search of food, and their infants are captured for the illegal pet trade, a process that invariably involves killing the mother.87 Their extremely slow reproductive rate—females give birth only once every six to eight years—makes their populations exceptionally vulnerable and slow to recover from these relentless pressures.87

The Unravelling of an Ecosystem: The Sea Otter Trophic Cascade

The case of the sea otter in the North Pacific is a textbook example of the outsized role a keystone species can play and the cascading consequences of its removal. Sea otters are voracious predators of sea urchins, which in turn graze on kelp.52

1. The Disturbance: During the 18th and 19th centuries, the maritime fur trade hunted sea otters to near-extinction across most of their range.53

2. The Direct Effect: With their primary predator gone, sea urchin populations exploded.53

3. The Trophic Cascade: These unchecked urchin populations grazed voraciously on the giant kelp that formed the foundation of the nearshore ecosystem. Vast, productive kelp forests were transformed into barren, desert-like seascapes known as "urchin barrens".52

4. Ecosystem Collapse: The loss of the kelp forests—which provide critical food and three-dimensional habitat—led to the collapse of the entire ecosystem. Fish, invertebrates, and other marine animals that depended on the kelp disappeared.53 The cascade may have even reached up to the now-extinct Steller's sea cow, a massive marine mammal that fed on kelp and whose demise was likely accelerated by the destruction of its food source.92
   This case powerfully demonstrates that the impact of losing a species is not just the absence of that one animal, but the potential unravelling of an entire ecological community. Conversely, where sea otters have been successfully reintroduced, they have controlled urchin populations, allowing kelp forests to recover and demonstrating the potential for restoration.90

The Silent Apocalypse: The Decline of Insects

While large, charismatic vertebrates often dominate discussions of extinction, many entomologists argue that the most profound and consequential biodiversity crisis is happening largely unseen among insects.

• Scale of the Problem: Multiple long-term studies have revealed shocking declines in insect populations. A widely cited study from Germany found a 76% decline in the biomass of flying insects in protected nature reserves over just 27 years.93 Globally, it is estimated that one-third of all insect species are threatened with extinction, and total insect biomass may be declining by 2.5% per year.93

• Key Drivers: Insects face the same pressures of habitat loss and climate change as other animals, but they are uniquely and severely impacted by the widespread use of chemical pesticides, particularly systemic insecticides like neonicotinoids.93 These chemicals are highly toxic to insects and can contaminate entire landscapes, affecting non-target species like bees and butterflies.93 Herbicides also contribute by eliminating the wildflowers and "weeds" that many insects depend on for food and habitat.93

• Profound Consequences: The decline of insects is not a minor issue; it is a threat to the functional integrity of virtually all terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. Insects are the primary pollinators for the vast majority of flowering plants, including most of our food crops.93 They are critical decomposers that recycle nutrients, and they form the base of the food web for countless birds, fish, reptiles, and mammals.93 Their "silent apocalypse" threatens to disrupt these fundamental ecosystem services, with potentially devastating consequences for global food production and ecological stability.

VIII. Global Response and Future Trajectories: Conservation Efforts in the Anthropocene

The recognition of a global biodiversity crisis has prompted a range of responses from the international community, from the establishment of binding legal frameworks to the on-the-ground efforts of conservation organizations. However, these efforts are racing against the accelerating drivers of extinction, and their success will depend on an unprecedented level of global cooperation and a fundamental shift in humanity's relationship with the natural world.

International Legal and Policy Frameworks

At the heart of the global response is a suite of multilateral environmental agreements designed to foster international cooperation for conservation.

• The Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD): Adopted at the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, the CBD is the principal international treaty for biodiversity conservation.97 It operates on three main objectives: the conservation of biological diversity, the sustainable use of its components, and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from the use of genetic resources.98 The CBD provides a comprehensive legal framework that requires signatory nations to develop and implement National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans (NBSAPs), thereby integrating conservation goals into national policy.97

• The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF): This is the most recent and ambitious strategic plan adopted under the CBD in December 2022.97 The GBF sets out a roadmap to 2030 with four overarching goals and 23 specific targets. The most prominent of these is Target 3, known as the "30x30" target, which calls for the effective conservation and management of at least 30% of the world's lands, inland waters, coastal areas, and oceans by 2030.97 Other key targets include reducing the risk from pesticides and hazardous chemicals by at least half, cutting environmentally harmful subsidies by at least $500 billion annually, and ensuring the full participation of Indigenous Peoples and local communities in conservation efforts.97

• Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES): Established in 1973, CITES is a critical tool for addressing the threat of overexploitation driven by international demand.102 With 185 member parties, it is one of the world's most powerful wildlife conservation agreements.102 CITES regulates or bans international trade in over 38,000 species through a system of appendices that afford different levels of protection. It provides the legal mechanism to combat the illegal wildlife trade in products like rhino horn, elephant ivory, and pangolin scales.102

• Other Key Agreements: The international conservation architecture is further supported by several other specialized treaties. The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands (1971) focuses on the conservation and wise use of wetlands, which are critical habitats for biodiversity.103 The Bonn Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS) provides a framework for countries to cooperate on the protection of species that cross international borders during their migrations, such as birds, whales, and sea turtles.104

The Role of Conservation Organizations and Strategies

Translating the high-level goals of international treaties into tangible conservation outcomes often falls to a network of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), scientific institutions, and local community groups. Major global organizations like the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), The Nature Conservancy (TNC), and Conservation International work across multiple scales to address the biodiversity crisis.108 Their multifaceted strategies typically include:

• Science and Research: Conducting ecological research to identify critical habitats, monitor species populations, and understand threats, providing the scientific basis for conservation action.108

• Protected Area Management: Working with governments and local partners to establish and effectively manage protected areas, which remain a cornerstone of conservation.109

• Community-Based Conservation: Partnering with Indigenous Peoples and local communities, recognizing their rights, and integrating their traditional ecological knowledge into conservation planning. This approach acknowledges that local communities are often the most effective stewards of their environments.108

• Policy and Finance: Advocating for stronger environmental laws and policies at national and international levels, and developing innovative financial mechanisms, such as "debt-for-nature swaps," to fund conservation work.110

• Market Transformation: Engaging with the private sector to promote sustainable supply chains for commodities like palm oil, timber, and seafood, thereby reducing the corporate footprint on biodiversity.108

Future Projections and the Need for Transformative Change

Despite these global efforts, the overarching trends remain dire. The IPBES Global Assessment concluded that current trajectories are insufficient to meet the agreed-upon goals for 2030 and beyond.35 The WWF's Living Planet Report echoes this, noting a "lack of urgency" and slow progress on delivering commitments.38

Looking ahead, the pressures on biodiversity are set to intensify. Projections indicate that as the 21st century progresses, climate change will likely surpass land-use change to become the single dominant driver of biodiversity loss, adding a powerful and pervasive new layer of threat.25

This reality has led to a growing consensus within the scientific community that incremental changes and traditional conservation approaches, while important, will not be enough to avert a catastrophic outcome. The IPBES report explicitly calls for "transformative changes across economic, social, political and technological factors".35 This implies a fundamental paradigm shift away from economic models predicated on infinite growth and the externalization of environmental costs. It requires restructuring global systems of production and consumption—particularly in food, energy, and finance—to operate within planetary boundaries.38 It means recognizing that a healthy biosphere is not a luxury but the essential foundation for human development, economic prosperity, and long-term survival.34

IX. Conclusion: Navigating the Bottleneck

The evidence synthesized in this report leads to an unequivocal and deeply sobering conclusion: the planet is in the midst of the Anthropocene Extinction, a biodiversity crisis of a scale and nature unprecedented in the history of Homo sapiens. Defined not by an external cataclysm but by the pervasive and intensifying activities of a single species, this sixth great extinction event represents a fundamental rupture in the Earth's evolutionary trajectory. The data, from extinction rates soaring up to 10,000 times the natural background level to the 73% average decline in monitored wildlife populations since 1970, are not abstract figures; they are the vital signs of a biosphere in critical condition.

This crisis is not a distant or isolated environmental problem. It is an interconnected phenomenon, inextricably linked to the other great challenges of our time. The unravelling of ecosystems is a direct threat to global food security through the loss of pollinators and the collapse of fisheries. It is a threat to human health, creating new pathways for zoonotic pandemics and destroying the natural library from which future medicines might be discovered. It is a threat to economic stability, with the World Bank forecasting trillions of dollars in annual GDP loss from the collapse of essential ecosystem services. And it is a threat to geopolitical peace, as resource scarcity and environmental degradation can fuel conflict and instability. The biodiversity crisis, the climate crisis, and the crisis of human inequality are not separate issues; they are different facets of the same systemic failure to live within the planet's ecological means.

In the face of this monumental challenge, the path forward, though difficult, is clear. The solutions are not a mystery. They lie in fulfilling and exceeding the commitments of global frameworks like the Convention on Biological Diversity and its "30x30" target. They require a rapid and just transition of our global food and energy systems away from destructive practices and toward regenerative and sustainable models. They demand that we uphold the rights and empower the leadership of Indigenous Peoples and local communities, who are the stewards of a disproportionate share of the world's remaining biodiversity. Crucially, they necessitate a fundamental reorientation of our economic and political systems to recognize the foundational value of natural capital, moving beyond short-term profit motives to secure long-term human well-being on a livable planet.

The central challenge is not a deficit of knowledge but a deficit of will. Humanity finds itself in a historical bottleneck, a period of immense peril but also of immense possibility. We are the first generation to have a clear scientific understanding of the value of biodiversity and the full scale of the damage we are inflicting upon it. We may also be the last generation with the opportunity to reverse the trend. The Anthropocene Extinction is the story humanity is currently writing. Whether we can author a different ending will be the defining test of this century, determining not only the fate of millions of other species but the resilience and integrity of the civilization that depends entirely upon them.

Works cited

1. Holocene extinction - Wikipedia, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_extinction

2. Holocene extinction | Research Starters - EBSCO, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/science/holocene-extinction

3. What Is The Sixth Mass Extinction And What Can I Do About It? - Mossy Earth, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.mossy.earth/rewilding-knowledge/sixth-mass-extinction

4. General Information | What is the Holocene Extinction? - U.OSU, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://u.osu.edu/holoceneexctinction/2023/11/08/general-information/

5. Holocene Extinction - RICKER STUDIO, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.rickerstudio.com/holocene-extinction

6. Comparing Extinction Rates Past, Present, and Future - Universidade de Lisboa, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.isa.ulisboa.pt/inbio/theoeco/publications/Proenca_2013_EncyclopediaBiodiversity.pdf

7. Species Extinction – The Facts - IUCN, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://iucn.org/sites/default/files/import/downloads/species_extinction_05_2007.pdf

8. Anthropocene extinction | McGraw Hill's AccessScience, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.accessscience.com/content/article/a039350

9. Are We in the Midst of the Sixth Mass Extinction? A View from the World of Amphibians - NCBI, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK214887/

10. Exiting the Anthropocene? Exploring fundamental change in our relationship with nature, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/exiting-the-anthropocene

11. What is the Anthropocene and why does it matter? - Natural History Museum, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/what-is-the-anthropocene.html

12. Anthropocene - Wikipedia, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropocene

13. Are we in a sixth mass extinction? | Popular Science, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.popsci.com/environment/are-we-in-a-sixth-mass-extinction/

14. www.sciencenews.org, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.sciencenews.org/article/sixth-mass-extinction-scientists-debate#:~:text=The%20existence%20and%20character%20of,of%20just%20such%20an%20event.

15. A sixth mass extinction? Not so fast, some scientists say, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.sciencenews.org/article/sixth-mass-extinction-scientists-debate

16. Human-driven mass extinction is eliminating entire genera | Stanford Report, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://news.stanford.edu/stories/2023/09/human-driven-mass-extinction-eliminating-entire-genera

17. There have been five mass extinctions in Earth's history - Our World ..., accessed on October 3, 2025, https://ourworldindata.org/mass-extinctions

18. Earth's five mass extinctions | Oxford University Museum of Natural History, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://oumnh.ox.ac.uk/earths-five-mass-extinctions

19. www.worldwildlife.org, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.worldwildlife.org/stories/what-is-the-sixth-mass-extinction-and-what-can-we-do-about-it#:~:text=Unlike%20previous%20extinction%20events%20caused,been%20converted%20for%20food%20production.

20. Mass Extinction: What Happened 65 Million Years Ago? | AMNH, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.amnh.org/exhibitions/dinosaurs-ancient-fossils/extinction/mass-extinction

21. The Five Mass Extinctions - ArcGIS StoryMaps, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/ed080d215edb4cfd82c03306e57496bb

22. Mass Extinctions - GeoKansas - The University of Kansas, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://geokansas.ku.edu/mass-extinctions

23. 11.2: "The Big Five" - Geosciences LibreTexts, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://geo.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Geology/Historical_Geology_(Bentley_et_al.)/11%3A_Mass_Extinctions/11.02%3A_The_Big_Five

24. Human impact on ecosystems review (article) - Khan Academy, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.khanacademy.org/science/ap-biology/ecology-ap/disruptions-to-ecosystems/a/hs-human-impact-on-ecosystems-review

25. What is the human impact on biodiversity? | Royal Society, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://royalsociety.org/news-resources/projects/biodiversity/human-impact-on-biodiversity/

26. Extinction Over Time | Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://naturalhistory.si.edu/education/teaching-resources/paleontology/extinction-over-time

27. iiasa.ac.at, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://iiasa.ac.at/news/apr-2024/climate-change-could-become-main-driver-of-biodiversity-decline-by-mid-century#:~:text=Global%20biodiversity%20has%20declined%20between,by%20the%20mid%2D21st%20century.

28. Biodiversity loss: causes, consequences and solutions - Iberdrola, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.iberdrola.com/sustainability/biodiversity-loss

29. Biodiversity - World Health Organization (WHO), accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/biodiversity

30. Role played by humans for Holocene Extinction - BYJU'S, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://byjus.com/biology/holocene-extinction/

31. What is the sixth mass extinction and what can we do about it? | Stories - World Wildlife Fund, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.worldwildlife.org/stories/what-is-the-sixth-mass-extinction-and-what-can-we-do-about-it

32. www.mossy.earth, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.mossy.earth/rewilding-knowledge/sixth-mass-extinction#:~:text=The%20past%20decades%20have%20witnessed,gone%20within%20a%20few%20decades.

33. (PDF) Estimating the Normal Background Rate of Species Extinction. - ResearchGate, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265093702_Estimating_the_Normal_Background_Rate_of_Species_Extinction

34. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services - Wikipedia, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Assessment_Report_on_Biodiversity_and_Ecosystem_Services

35. Key messages from the IPBES Global Assessment of particular relevance to Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://files.ipbes.net/ipbes-web-prod-public-files/inline-files/ILK_KeyMessages_IPBES_GlobalAssessment_final_ENGLISH_lo-res.pdf

36. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services - Zenodo, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://zenodo.org/records/3553579

37. Key Findings to Know from the IPBES Report on Biodiversity ..., accessed on October 3, 2025, https://unfoundation.org/blog/post/key-findings-to-know-from-the-ipbes-report-on-biodiversity/

38. Download & Key Findings | WWF - Living Planet Report 2024, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://livingplanet.panda.org/en-US/living-planet-report-2024-key-messages/

39. Living Planet Report reveals catastrophic wildlife decline | Nature Breaking Podcast | WWF, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.worldwildlife.org/podcast/nature-breaking/episodes/living-planet-report-reveals-catastrophic-wildlife-decline

40. LIVING PLANET REPORT 2024 KEY FINDINGS - Panda.org, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://wwflpr.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/lpr24_key-findings.pdf

41. Living Planet Report 2024 | WWF, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://livingplanet.panda.org/en-GB/

42. Catastrophic 73% decline in the average size of global wildlife populations in just 50 years reveals a 'system in peril' | Press Releases, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.worldwildlife.org/press-releases/catastrophic-73-decline-in-the-average-size-of-global-wildlife-populations-in-just-50-years-reveals-a-system-in-peril

43. Living Planet Report, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://livingplanet.panda.org/en-US/

44. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.iucnredlist.org/about

45. 5 Concerning Effects of Biodiversity Loss - Earth.Org, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://earth.org/effects-of-biodiversity-loss/

46. 7 of the world's most endangered species on the verge of extinction, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://indianexpress.com/article/lifestyle/pets-animals/7-of-the-worlds-most-endangered-species-on-the-verge-of-extinction-10285833/

47. Summary Statistics - IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/summary-statistics

48. (PDF) Questioning the sixth mass extinction - ResearchGate, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388997208_Questioning_the_sixth_mass_extinction

49. The Sixth Mass Extinction: fact, fiction or speculation? - PubMed, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35014169/

50. The Sixth Mass Extinction: Fact, fiction or speculation? - BES Net, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.besnet.world/library/the-sixth-mass-extinction-fact-fiction-or-speculation/

51. How biodiversity loss impacts ecosystems and what we can do to help - Green Earth, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.green.earth/blog/how-biodiversity-loss-impacts-ecosystems-and-what-we-can-do-to-help

52. Sea Otter | Defenders of Wildlife, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://defenders.org/wildlife/sea-otter

53. Causes and consequences of marine mammal population declines in southwest Alaska: a food-web perspective - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2685424/

54. WWF Living Planet Report 2024: A Planet in Crisis - WWF Arctic, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.arcticwwf.org/newsroom/news/wwf-living-planet-report-2024-a-planet-in-crisis/

55. Sixth mass extinction could destroy life as we know it– biodiversity expert | Horizon Magazine - Research and innovation, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://projects.research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/en/horizon-magazine/sixth-mass-extinction-could-destroy-life-we-know-it-biodiversity-expert

56. LOSS OF BIODIVERSITY: THE BURGEONING THREAT TO HUMAN HEALTH - PMC, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6871202/

57. Biodiversity - World Bank, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/biodiversity

58. Sixth mass extinction of wildlife also threatens global food supplies - The Guardian, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/sep/26/sixth-mass-extinction-of-wildlife-also-threatens-global-food-supplies

59. Loss of biodiversity threatens world food security - Welthungerhilfe, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.welthungerhilfe.org/news/latest-articles/2021/the-loss-of-biodiversity-threatens-world-food-security

60. Biodiversity and human health: Less biodiversity, more infectious diseases? - Arctic Council, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://arctic-council.org/news/biodiversity-and-human-health-less-biodiversity-more-infectious-diseases/

61. Examining the Links between Biodiversity and Human Health: An Interdisciplinary Research Initiative at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - PMC, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7087626/

62. How Biodiversity Loss Harms Human Health | unfoundation.org, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://unfoundation.org/blog/post/how-biodiversity-loss-harms-human-health/

63. Four ways biodiversity loss impacts human health | Bupa Group, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.bupa.com/news-and-press/news-and-stories/2021/loss-of-biodiversity-and-human-health

64. www.who.int, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/biodiversity#:~:text=Threats%20to%20biodiversity%20and%20health&text=This%20is%20largely%20due%20to,direct%20consequences%20for%20human%20health.

65. Biodiversity and Human Health - Climate Change and Health, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.who.int/teams/environment-climate-change-and-health/climate-change-and-health/biodiversity

66. Biodiversity Loss - Planetary Health Alliance, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://planetaryhealthalliance.org/themes/biodiversity-loss/

67. World Bank: Economy faces huge losses if we fail to protect nature, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2021/07/climate-change-economic-cost-world-bank-environment/

68. Protecting Nature Could Avert Global Economic Losses of $2.7 Trillion Per Year, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2021/07/01/protecting-nature-could-avert-global-economic-losses-of-usd2-7-trillion-per-year

69. The Economic Case for Nature - The World Bank, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/81385f4e89ae1c1e2278e404728bc1d4-0320072021/original/GEEM-2pg-Jun28.pdf

70. Biodiversity - our strongest natural defense against climate change - the United Nations, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/science/climate-issues/biodiversity

71. The Economics of Biodiversity Loss - European Central Bank, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/sintra/ecb.forumcentbankpub2024_Kuchler_paper.fr.pdf

72. The economics of extinction | Green Economy Coalition, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.greeneconomycoalition.org/news-and-resources/the-economics-of-mass-extinction

73. We screwed up – 10 animals that went extinct the last 100 years - Hallgató Magazin, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://hallgatomagazin.hu/we-screwed-up-10-animals-that-went-extinct-the-last-100-years/

74. List of recently extinct mammals - Wikipedia, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_recently_extinct_mammals

75. Amur leopard: the world's rarest cat? - WWF, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.wwf.org.uk/learn/wildlife/amur-leopards

76. amur leopard - DID YOU KNOW FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS VIDEO, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.wwf.org.uk/sites/default/files/2018-01/WWF_WIW_2017_Factsheet_AmurLeopard%20FINAL.pdf

77. Amur Leopard | Species | WWF, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.worldwildlife.org/species/amur-leopard

78. Saving the Amur Leopard, the World's Most Endangered Big Cat - Wildlife Vets International, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.wildlifevetsinternational.org/projects/reintroduction-of-amur-leopard

79. Amur Leopard - Threats, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://conservewildcats.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2023/05/AmurLeopard_Facts_Threats.pdf

80. Black Rhino | Species | WWF, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.worldwildlife.org/species/black-rhino

81. Poaching of African rhinos down - but drought and other threats drive losses globally - IUCN, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://iucn.org/press-release/202508/poaching-african-rhinos-down-drought-and-other-threats-drive-losses-globally

82. Black Rhino Facts: Diet, Behaviour, And Conservation | IFAW, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.ifaw.org/animals/black-rhinos

83. Rhino: threats, conservation, and FAQs - IFAW, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.ifaw.org/animals/rhinos

84. Black rhinoceros - Wikipedia, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_rhinoceros

85. Bornean Orangutan Facts: Habitat, Diet, And Threats | IFAW, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.ifaw.org/animals/bornean-orangutans

86. Bornean orangutan - Wikipedia, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bornean_orangutan

87. Orangutan | Species | WWF - World Wildlife Fund, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.worldwildlife.org/species/orangutan

88. Bornean Orangutan | Species | WWF - World Wildlife Fund, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.worldwildlife.org/species/bornean-orangutan

89. Orangutan | Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://nationalzoo.si.edu/animals/orangutan

90. Sea Otters and Marine Biodiversity, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://seaotterfoundationtrust.org/sea-otters-and-marine-biodiversity/

91. Understanding Sea Otter Population Decline: Causes and Solutions, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://seaotterfoundationtrust.org/understanding-sea-otter-population-decline-causes-and-solutions/

92. Sea otters, kelp forests, and the extinction of Steller's sea cow - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4743786/

93. Insect decline: an ecological armaggedon | Heinrich Böll Stiftung | Brussels office, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://eu.boell.org/en/PesticideAtlas-insect-decline

94. Decline in insect populations - Wikipedia, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decline_in_insect_populations

95. Insect Apocalypse | Six-Legged Science - Museum of the Earth, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.museumoftheearth.org/six-legged-science/insect-apocalypse

96. Wildlife Conservation | Initiatives | WWF, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.worldwildlife.org/initiatives/wildlife-conservation

97. What is the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)? - Institute of Sustainability Studies, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://instituteofsustainabilitystudies.com/insights/lexicon/what-is-the-convention-on-biological-diversity-cbd/

98. Convention on Biological Diversity | JNCC - Adviser to Government on Nature Conservation, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://jncc.gov.uk/our-work/convention-on-biological-diversity/

99. Convention on Biological Diversity and its protocols | LDC Portal - the United Nations, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.un.org/ldcportal/content/convention-biological-diversity-and-its-protocols

100. Convention on Biological Diversity - Wikipedia, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_on_Biological_Diversity

101. Convention on Biological Diversity – CBD | IISD Earth Negotiations Bulletin, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://enb.iisd.org/negotiations/convention-biological-diversity-cbd

102. CITES | Pages | WWF - World Wildlife Fund, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.worldwildlife.org/pages/cites

103. International Wildlife Law: Protecting Global Biodiversity - L & C Environmental Law, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://environmentallaw.lclark.edu/blog/international-wildlife-law-protecting-global-biodiversity/

104. International agreements | Biodiversity-CHM.NL, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://nl.chm-cbd.net/en/policy-biodiversity-netherlands/international-agreements

105. International protection of species: DOC's international agreements - Department of Conservation, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.doc.govt.nz/about-us/international-agreements/species/

106. International Agreements - BAFU - admin.ch, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.bafu.admin.ch/bafu/en/home/topics/biodiversity/policy/biodiversity--international-affairs/international-agreements.html

107. Policy Conventions & Agreements - Global - International Fund for Animal Welfare, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.ifaw.org/projects/policy-conventions-agreements-global

108. Our Work | Conserving Natural Resources | WWF - World Wildlife Fund, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.worldwildlife.org/initiatives

109. The Nature Conservancy: A World Where People & Nature Thrive, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.nature.org/en-us/

110. Conservation International, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.conservation.org/

111. IPBES Transformative Change Assessment | SEI - Stockholm Environment Institute, accessed on October 3, 2025, https://www.sei.org/publications/ipbes-transformative-change-assessment/