Functie Elders: The Four Words That Exposed a Crisis in Dutch Politics
Introduction: The Four Words That Shook The Hague
On March 25, 2021, amidst the delicate preliminary stages of forming a new Dutch government, a single photograph triggered a political earthquake. As government formation 'scout' Kajsa Ollongren hastily departed the parliamentary complex in The Hague after a positive COVID-19 test, her briefing notes were inadvertently exposed to the lens of an alert ANP news agency photographer, Bart Maat.1 Among the mundane procedural points, four words stood out in stark relief: "Positie Omtzigt, functie elders" — "Position Omtzigt, function elsewhere".4
The immediate impact was explosive. The phrase became an instant media sensation, dominating news cycles for weeks and mentioned over 1,800 times on radio and television alone.1 It was a flashpoint in a political landscape already destabilized by a major government scandal and a highly fragmented election result. This incident, however, was far more than a momentary political gaffe. It served as a powerful catalyst, exposing deep-seated tensions between the executive and legislative branches of government, crystallizing a simmering crisis of public trust, and ultimately redrawing the political map of the Netherlands. The 'Functie Elders' affair laid bare what some commentators described as the "betonrot" (concrete rot) at the heart of The Hague's political culture, revealing a system perceived to be more concerned with self-preservation than with democratic accountability.5 This report will examine the critical context that gave these four words their power, dissect the incident and the dramatic parliamentary showdown it provoked, and analyze the profound and lasting consequences for its key protagonists and for the nation's political health.
Part I: The Political Crucible - Precursors to a Crisis
The 'Functie Elders' incident did not occur in a vacuum. It was the culmination of years of mounting political and institutional pressure, primarily fueled by a devastating scandal that had already eroded the foundations of trust between the Dutch state and its citizens.
Section 1.1: The Toeslagenaffaire: A Scandal of Unprecedented Injustice
The crucial backdrop to the 2021 political crisis was the Dutch childcare benefits scandal, or toeslagenaffaire. This was a systemic failure of governance in which the Dutch Tax and Customs Administration (Belastingdienst), over several years, wrongly accused tens of thousands of families of fraud related to their childcare benefits.6 Driven by a harsh anti-fraud legislative framework that lacked a "hardship clause" to allow for reasonable exceptions, the tax authority pursued minor administrative errors with extreme prejudice, forcing families into financial ruin, causing immense psychological distress, and in some cases, leading to children being removed from their homes.6 The process was often discriminatory, with dual nationality being used as a risk factor in algorithms designed to detect fraud.6
A parliamentary inquiry into the scandal concluded that the victims had suffered an "unprecedented injustice".6 The inquiry's report revealed a pattern of "institutional bias" and a "total lack of checks and balances" within the government.8 It also found that government officials had deliberately hidden information from and misled Parliament during its investigation, demonstrating a profound breakdown in accountability.9 The scandal was so severe that it led to the collective resignation of the third cabinet of Prime Minister Mark Rutte on January 15, 2021, just two months before the general election.11
This affair was more than a policy failure; it fundamentally damaged the social contract. The state was revealed to be not a protector but a punitive and opaque force, hostile to the very citizens it was meant to serve. This created a fertile ground of public cynicism. When the government resigned, many saw it as a symbolic act without genuine accountability, especially as the same parties and leader were poised to return to power. Therefore, when the 'Functie Elders' note was revealed, the public was already primed to interpret it not as an isolated gaffe, but as a continuation of the same culture of power that produced the toeslagenaffaire—a culture that prioritized protecting the system over protecting citizens and their elected representatives.
Section 1.2: Pieter Omtzigt: The People's Tribune and Thorn in the Government's Side
At the center of the storm was Pieter Omtzigt, a Member of Parliament for the Christian Democratic Appeal (CDA). Alongside Socialist Party MP Renske Leijten, Omtzigt was the relentless driving force behind the exposure of the toeslagenaffaire.11 Known for his tenacious, detail-oriented approach, he had cultivated a reputation as a "luis in de pels" (literally, a louse in the fur—a persistent nuisance) to the establishment, a role for which he had won numerous awards.14
His critical work, however, created a fraught relationship with his own party, which was a senior partner in the Rutte government. Omtzigt narrowly lost a contentious party leadership election and was later passed over again in favor of Wopke Hoekstra.11 A subsequent 78-page memo leaked from Omtzigt revealed the extent of this internal pressure; he documented being called a "psychopath," "sick man," and "rabid dog" by party insiders who viewed his independent scrutiny as a threat to party and coalition stability.16
Despite this internal opposition, Omtzigt's work made him a public hero. In the March 2021 election, he became an electoral powerhouse, securing an astonishing 342,472 preference votes—enough to win five parliamentary seats on his own merit.4 This gave him an enormous personal mandate from voters to continue his role as a government watchdog. The conflict surrounding him thus became a proxy war over the very function of a parliamentarian. His actions represented the constitutional ideal of the legislature holding the executive to account. The establishment's reaction, culminating in the 'Functie Elders' note, revealed a preference for party discipline and coalition stability over this fundamental principle of democratic oversight. The affair brought this latent tension into the open, forcing a national conversation about the erosion of the "dualism" that is supposed to separate the cabinet from the parliament.
Section 1.3: The 2021 General Election: A Mandate in a Fractured Landscape
The general election held on March 17, 2021, produced a complex and seemingly contradictory result. Mark Rutte's center-right VVD party remained the largest with 34 seats, while its main coalition partner, the progressive-liberal D66 led by Sigrid Kaag, surged to become the second-largest party with 24 seats.12 Despite the toeslagenaffaire and the cabinet's resignation, the incumbent coalition parties collectively retained their majority in the House of Representatives.11
However, the political landscape became extremely fragmented, with a record 17 parties winning seats, the highest number since 1918.20 This meant that any stable majority government would require a coalition of at least four parties, making the formation process inherently delicate.11 The outcome presented a paradox: voters had simultaneously returned the leader of the government responsible for the toeslagenaffaire to power for a fourth term, while also handing an overwhelming personal mandate to his most effective critic, Pieter Omtzigt. This set the stage for an immediate and unavoidable clash between the forces of continuity, represented by Rutte, and the forces of accountability, embodied by Omtzigt.
Part II: The Unraveling - Anatomy of the 'Functie Elders' Affair
The crisis unfolded with remarkable speed, moving from an accidental leak to a full-blown political firestorm in a matter of days. A categorical denial from the Prime Minister set a trap from which he could not escape once documentary evidence came to light.
Date
Event
Significance
March 17, 2021
General Election
Rutte's VVD wins, but parliament is highly fragmented, setting the stage for complex negotiations.12
March 25, 2021
The Leak
Scout Kajsa Ollongren is photographed with notes: "Positie Omtzigt, functie elders," sparking immediate controversy.2
March 25, 2021
Rutte's Denial
Prime Minister Rutte unequivocally tells reporters he had not discussed Omtzigt's position during the talks.23
March 25, 2021
Scouts Resign
Ollongren and fellow scout Annemarie Jorritsma step down, deepening the crisis.2
April 1, 2021
Notes Published
Official notes from the formation talks are released to Parliament, directly contradicting Rutte's denial.25
April 1, 2021
The Debate
A marathon parliamentary debate begins, forcing Rutte to defend himself against accusations of lying.23
April 2, 2021
The Votes
Rutte narrowly survives a motion of no confidence but is formally censured by a majority, including his future coalition partners.24
Section 2.1: A Fateful Photograph: The Accidental Revelation
The chain of events began on Thursday, March 25, 2021. Kajsa Ollongren, a senior D66 politician serving as a scout for the cabinet formation, was informed of a positive COVID-19 test and rushed from the Binnenhof, the parliamentary complex.4 As she hurried to her car, the now-infamous photograph was taken, capturing the notes she was carrying.2 The image spread rapidly through Dutch media, and the phrase 'functie elders' immediately became a political catchphrase, a symbol of backroom dealing that was seen as deeply cynical so soon after an election.1
Section 2.2: "Position Omtzigt, Function Elsewhere": Deciphering the Cryptic Note
The phrase was immediately interpreted in its most damaging light: that the political establishment was conspiring to neutralize a critical and popular MP by "promoting him away" (wegpromoveren).4 The suggestion was that by giving Omtzigt a ministerial post or some other function outside of parliament, his ability to conduct independent, troublesome oversight would be curtailed.9 This was perceived by many, including Omtzigt's wife, Ayfer Koç, as a direct attack on a hardworking representative and an "affront to the Dutch voter" who had just given him such strong backing.19
Later, an alternative, more benign interpretation was offered: that "function elsewhere" could simply refer to a potential ministerial role within the new cabinet.19 However, this was widely dismissed as a post-hoc rationalization. Furthermore, the very act of discussing the future of an individual MP—derisively referred to as dealing with "poppetjes" (puppets or personalities)—during the initial exploratory phase of a formation was a serious breach of political norms.4 That phase is meant to be about mapping out policy agreements between parties, not deciding the fates of individual parliamentarians.
Section 2.3: The Initial Denial: Prime Minister Rutte's Categorical "No"
Later on the same day, March 25, Prime Minister Rutte was confronted by journalists and asked directly if he had discussed Pieter Omtzigt's position during his meeting with the scouts. He gave an unequivocal and categorical "No".3 This firm denial was the pivotal moment that transformed a serious political embarrassment into a crisis of personal credibility for the Prime Minister. By making such a definitive public statement before all the facts were known, Rutte locked himself into a position from which he could not retreat once the official minutes of the meetings were inevitably demanded by Parliament.
This defense strategy was not an isolated incident but was consistent with a political method that had come to define Rutte's long tenure. In previous controversies, such as the civilian deaths from a Dutch bombing in Hawija, Iraq, or a debate over dividend tax memos, Rutte had relied on a claimed lack of memory or recollection to deflect accountability.5 This approach was so well-known that opponents had already identified it as a "pattern of forgetfulness".23 The Prime Minister's later-revealed practice of systematically deleting text messages from his phone further cemented a public perception of a leader who actively curated the official record to maintain plausible deniability.31 His denial on March 25 was an automatic deployment of this tactic, likely made under the assumption that the confidential notes of the meeting would remain private. The subsequent publication of those notes created a rare, politically fatal situation: his denial was directly and publicly falsified by official documentation, exposing not just a single falsehood, but the entire political method.
Part III: The Reckoning - A Prime Minister on Trial in Parliament
The release of the official meeting notes on April 1, 2021, confirmed that Rutte had indeed discussed Omtzigt, stating that "something needs to happen with Omtzigt".4 This revelation set the stage for a dramatic parliamentary reckoning.
Section 3.1: The 'Night of Rutte': A Marathon Debate on Truth and Memory
The debate that began on April 1 and stretched late into the night was a moment of high political theater, with the country's longest-serving Prime Minister fighting for his political survival.23 The accusations were blistering and came from all sides. Geert Wilders, leader of the far-right PVV, called Rutte a "born liar" and caustically told him to "seek a job elsewhere yourself".24
More damaging, however, was the condemnation from his prospective coalition partners. Sigrid Kaag of D66 spoke of a "pattern of forgetfulness, amnesia" and openly questioned how trust in his leadership could possibly be restored.23 Wopke Hoekstra, leader of Omtzigt's own CDA party, expressed deep skepticism, finding it incredible that all three key participants—Rutte, Ollongren, and the other scout, Annemarie Jorritsma—could simultaneously forget discussing such a uniquely sensitive and politically explosive topic.5
Section 3.2: "I Did Not Lie": Deconstructing the 'Faulty Memory' Defense
Cornered by the documentary evidence, Rutte was forced to pivot from his initial denial. His defense rested on a subtle but critical distinction. He repeatedly and forcefully insisted, "Ik heb niet gelogen" ("I did not lie") and "Ik sta hier niet te liegen" ("I am not standing here lying").23 Instead of admitting to a lie, he claimed his initial denial to the press was an honest mistake based on a flawed memory. "Ik heb daar een verkeerde herinnering aan," he stated, meaning "I have a wrong memory of that".33 He argued that he had answered the reporters' questions "naar eer en geweten"—in good conscience, or to the best of his knowledge and belief at that moment.23
This defense was met with profound disbelief across the political spectrum. The notion that he and the two highly experienced scouts could all collectively forget such a non-trivial part of their conversation just days after it occurred was dismissed by opponents as "totaal ongeloofwaardig" (totally unbelievable).25 The defense was seen not as a credible explanation but as the last available lifeline for a leader caught in a direct contradiction.
Section 3.3: Motions of Censure and No Confidence: A Leader Wounded but Surviving
At the culmination of the debate in the early hours of April 2, two motions were put to a vote. The first, a motion of no confidence filed by Geert Wilders, would have forced Rutte's immediate resignation. He narrowly survived, with 72 MPs voting in favor and 76 against. His political life was saved by the tenuous support of the four parties that would eventually, after many more months, form his fourth cabinet: his own VVD, D66, CDA, and the Christian Union (CU).24
The second vote, however, was politically devastating. A motion of censure, or disapproval (motie van afkeuring), passed with an overwhelming majority. Critically, it was supported by D66 and the CDA, the very parties Rutte needed to form a new government.24 This was an unprecedented act in modern Dutch politics: future coalition partners formally condemning their prospective Prime Minister for untrustworthy behavior before negotiations had even begun. This was a calculated political act. It allowed D66 and the CDA to publicly distance themselves from Rutte's conduct and appease their voters' outrage, while acknowledging the political reality that there was no viable governing coalition possible without Rutte's VVD. It was a strategic move designed to wound, but not kill, the Prime Minister, weakening his position and giving them more leverage in the formation talks to come. After the vote, a chastened Rutte acknowledged the "serious message" from Parliament and pledged that he would "work terribly hard to regain trust".24
Part IV: The Aftermath - Political Fortunes Remade
While Mark Rutte survived the immediate crisis, the 'Functie Elders' affair left deep and lasting scars on the Dutch political landscape. It paralyzed the state, shattered political careers, and created a new political force.
Section 4.1: The Longest Formation: How a Crisis of Trust Paralyzed the State
The affair and the subsequent motion of censure poisoned the political atmosphere, creating a deep crisis of trust that brought the cabinet formation process to a grinding halt.11 The damage was so severe that an elder statesman and independent informateur, Herman Tjeenk Willink, had to be appointed for the specific purpose of exploring "ways to restore confidence" among the parties.11 The ensuing negotiations were fraught with blockades and mutual suspicion, dragging on for a record-breaking 299 days—the longest formation in Dutch history.11 The new Rutte IV cabinet was finally sworn in on January 10, 2022, nearly ten months after the election.11
Section 4.2: The Omtzigt Trajectory: From Burnout to a New Political Force
The affair took a heavy personal toll on Pieter Omtzigt, who was already suffering from burnout due to the immense pressure of his investigative work and the internal conflicts within his party.11 The 'Functie Elders' incident was the final straw. He took a formal leave of absence in May 2021.16 In June, after his damning 78-page memo detailing the toxic internal culture of the CDA was leaked, Omtzigt officially left the party he had served for decades, continuing his term as an independent MP.16
This break, however, set the stage for a remarkable political rebirth. In August 2023, Omtzigt founded a new party, Nieuw Sociaal Contract (New Social Contract, or NSC), based on his 2021 manifesto calling for good governance and a restored relationship between the state and its citizens.14 In the November 2023 general election, NSC achieved a stunning result, winning 20 seats and becoming the fourth-largest party in parliament.14 The establishment's attempt to sideline Omtzigt had backfired spectacularly. The public confirmation that the political elite viewed him as a threat to be managed gave him the moral justification to break from the old system. The immense media attention from the affair provided him with a national platform to build a new political movement centered on the very issues of accountability and transparency that the scandal had brought to the fore. In a profound irony, the phrase 'functie elders' inadvertently gave Pieter Omtzigt his true new function: leader of a major political force that directly challenged the parties that had sought to marginalize him.
Section 4.3: The Rutte Doctrine Under Scrutiny: A Legacy of Eroding Trust
For years, Mark Rutte had cultivated a reputation as "Teflon Mark," a pragmatic leader to whom scandals did not seem to stick.27 While he survived the 'Functie Elders' crisis and went on to lead a fourth cabinet, the affair marked a definitive turning point. It crystallized years of public and political frustration with his leadership style, creating a persistent and damaging narrative of untrustworthiness and a convenient "pattern of forgetfulness" that would dog the remainder of his premiership.23
The incident became a powerful symbol of a political culture that many citizens felt was broken. A poll by EenVandaag found that the public overwhelmingly voted the photograph of the 'Functie Elders' note as the "Political Moment of 2021," an event that encapsulated a widespread feeling that politicians in The Hague were more concerned with their own power games than with the interests of the country.37 This sentiment was reflected in broader polling data, which shows a marked and sustained decline in public trust in Parliament and in politicians beginning in 2021.38 While multiple factors, including the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, contributed to this decline, the 'Functie Elders' affair served as a key, emblematic event that accelerated the erosion of public faith in government.
Conclusion: Enduring Legacies of 'Functie Elders' on Dutch Political Culture
The four words captured by chance in a photograph acted as a political accelerant. They did not create the underlying problems of executive dominance, a lack of transparency, or declining public trust in the Netherlands, but they brought these issues into sharp, undeniable focus for the entire nation. The affair had immediate, tangible consequences, directly leading to the fracturing of the center-right with Omtzigt's departure from the CDA and the subsequent creation of the New Social Contract party. This fundamentally altered the dynamics of coalition-building in a country long defined by its "polder model" of consensus, demonstrating that this model is fragile when confronted with a crisis of fundamental trust.41
The incident leaves behind an enduring legacy. Mark Rutte completed his fourth term and moved on to become Secretary General of NATO, his reputation for political survival intact but his domestic legacy forever marked by questions of credibility.36 Pieter Omtzigt, propelled to the leadership of a major new party, ultimately announced his departure from politics in 2025, citing the toll of his burnout and the "poisonous political climate".16 Yet, the systemic issues the affair exposed—accountability, transparency, and the proper balance of power between government and parliament—remain at the heart of the Dutch political debate. The four words, 'Positie Omtzigt, functie elders', continue to echo in The Hague as a powerful cautionary tale about the high cost of political cynicism and the enduring importance of democratic oversight.
Works cited
'Functie elders' uitspraak hot topic op radio & televisie - RTV Monitor, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://rtvmonitor.nl/functie-elders-uitspraak-hot-topic-op-radio-televisie/
Parliamentary majority wants debate on leaked formation notes - NL Times, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://nltimes.nl/2021/03/26/parliamentary-majority-wants-debate-leaked-formation-notes
Inburgering with DN: Dutch scandals you should know (Part 2) - DutchNews.nl, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.dutchnews.nl/2023/11/inburgering-with-dn-dutch-scandals-you-should-know-part-2/
How 4 Words Caused a Political Crisis in the Netherlands - Transparent Language Blog, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://blogs.transparent.com/dutch/how-4-words-caused-a-political-crisis-in-the-netherlands/
TERUGKIJKEN: Kamerdebat over mislukte verkenning (1) - YouTube, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1TpcRnaI1ww
Dutch Childcare Allowance Scandal: The importance of investigation powers, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://equineteurope.org/netherlands-institute-for-human-rights-role-in-the-investigation-of-the-childcare-allowance-scandal/
Dutch childcare benefits scandal - Wikipedia, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_childcare_benefits_scandal
Dutch scandal serves as a warning for Europe over risks of using algorithms - Maryland, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/cmte_testimony/2025/fin/1vt2m_3uYt5g7TxwgpGLQK_hDCfirDmy3.pdf
Grinding the Orange Axe: Takeaways from the Venice Commission's Opinion on the Legal Protection of Citizens in the Netherlands - Verfassungsblog, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://verfassungsblog.de/grinding-the-orange-axe/
Dutch childcare benefits scandal sends warning sign to Europe - Observatório da LGPD, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://observatoriolgpd.com/2022/04/06/dutch-childcare-benefits-scandal-sends-warning-sign-to-europe/
2021–2022 Dutch cabinet formation - Wikipedia, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021%E2%80%932022_Dutch_cabinet_formation
2021 Dutch general election - Wikipedia, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Dutch_general_election
Provincial and Senate elections in the Netherlands - Groupe d'études géopolitiques, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://geopolitique.eu/en/articles/provincial-and-senate-elections-in-the-netherlands/
Wie is Pieter Omtzigt? | NPO Kennis, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://npokennis.nl/longread/8198/wie-is-pieter-omtzigt
Searching for the truth together - Alumni about tomorrow - Utrecht University, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.uu.nl/en/organisation/alumni/alumni-about-tomorrow/all-stories/eva-gonzalez-perez
Pieter Omtzigt - Wikipedia, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pieter_Omtzigt
Pieter Omtzigt - Wikiwand, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.wikiwand.com/en/articles/Pieter_Omtzigt
CDA MP 'puts bomb under party' with 76-page list of damaging claims - DutchNews.nl, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.dutchnews.nl/2021/06/cda-mp-puts-bomb-under-party-with-76-page-list-of-damaging-claims/
'Functie elders' had grote impact op vrouw Omtzigt Ayfer Koç: 'Je gelooft het niet', accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.nporadio1.nl/nieuws/politiek/d9aeefef-5ed1-430b-af94-4661a5e7ebe1/functie-elders-had-grote-impact-op-vrouw-omtzigt-ayfer-koc-je-gelooft-het-niet
Netherlands House of Representatives March 2021 | Election results - IPU Parline, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://data.ipu.org/parliament/NL/NL-LC01/election/NL-LC01-E20210317/
Parliamentary Election in Netherlands, 17 March 2021 | Cairn.info, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://shs.cairn.info/journal-blue-2021-1-page-52?lang=en
Pieter Omtzigt werd vanaf dag één als probleem gezien - YouTube, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6DUboCvHyGw
Dutch Prime Minister Fights for Political Life in Tough Debate - VOA, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.voanews.com/a/europe_dutch-prime-minister-fights-political-life-tough-debate/6204059.html
Dutch PM Rutte survives no-confidence vote despite censure ..., accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/4/2/dutch-pm-rutte-survives-no-confidence-vote-despite-rebuke
PM Rutte narrowly survives vote of no confidence - IamExpat, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.iamexpat.nl/expat-info/dutch-news/pm-rutte-narrowly-survives-vote-no-confidence
Netherlands PM Mark Rutte narrowly survives no-confidence vote - The Guardian, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/02/netherlands-pm-mark-rutte-narrowly-survives-no-confidence-vote
Functie Elders ® | Blog - Chiever, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://chiever.nl/en/blog-en/functie-elders
Renske Leijten over notitie 'Omtzigt, functie elders': 'Ontzettend pijnlijk' | NPO Radio 1, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.nporadio1.nl/nieuws/politiek/daf74f91-a9cd-43e7-9469-7757fb104b61/renske-leijten-over-notitie-omtzigt-functie-elders-ontzettend-pijnlijk
To Become NATO Chief, Mark Rutte Denied Israeli War Crimes - Jacobin, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://jacobin.com/2024/06/nato-mark-rutte-israel-war-crimes
Premier Rutte heeft last van geheugenverlies - RTL NIEUWS - YouTube, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHIa5I-FCts
Debat over de sms-berichten van de minister-president - Tweede Kamer, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.tweedekamer.nl/kamerstukken/plenaire_verslagen/kamer_in_het_kort/debat-over-de-sms-berichten-van-de-minister
Dutch PM fights for political life amid no-confidence motion - China Daily HK, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.chinadailyhk.com/hk/article/162169
Plenair verslag Tweede Kamer, 64e vergadering Donderdag 1 april 2021, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.tweedekamer.nl/kamerstukken/plenaire_verslagen/detail/2020-2021/64
Zijn taalgebruik hielp Rutte (toch) weer premier te worden - Neerlandistiek, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://neerlandistiek.nl/2021/12/zijn-taalgebruik-hielp-rutte-toch-weer-premier-te-worden/
Netherlands House of Representatives November 2023 | Election results - IPU Parline, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://data.ipu.org/parliament/NL/NL-LC01/election/NL-LC01-E20231122/
Mark Rutte - Wikipedia, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Rutte
Foto 'positie Omtzigt, functie elders' is Politiek Moment 2021 - EenVandaag, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://eenvandaag.avrotros.nl/opiniepanel/uitslagen/foto-positie-omtzigt-functie-elders-is-politiek-moment-2021-131280
Trust in Parliament at 10-year low | CBS, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.cbs.nl/en-gb/news/2023/19/trust-in-parliament-at-10-year-low
Political Trust and Democracy in the Netherlands - Universiteit van Amsterdam, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.uva.nl/binaries/content/documents/personalpages/a/l/c.r.a.vanalebeek/profiel-nl/profiel-nl/uva%3Afoldout/cpitem%5B3%5D/asset
Citizens no longer feel represented by politicians - Holland Times, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.hollandtimes.nl/2024-edition-7-october-2024/citizens-no-longer-feel-represented-by-politicians/
Netherlands - AARP International, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.aarpinternational.org/initiatives/aging-readiness-competitiveness-arc/netherlands
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/who_is_who_229125.htm
Gov't not "visibly solving Netherlands' core problems": Omtzigt as he leaves parliament, accessed on September 23, 2025, https://nltimes.nl/2025/05/13/govt-visibly-solving-netherlands-core-problems-omtzigt-leaves-parliament
