The Elders: An Institutional and Operational Analysis of Independent Global Leadership
1. Introduction: The Genesis of Supranational Wisdom
1.1 The Conceptual Origins: From Traditional Village to Global Governance
The architecture of modern international relations is characteristically defined by the Westphalian state system, multilateral institutions like the United Nations, and the interplay of hard power dynamics—military strength and economic leverage. However, in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, a distinct gap emerged in global governance: the absence of a mechanism that could transcend national interests, electoral cycles, and diplomatic protocols to address existential threats with moral rather than coercive authority. It was within this lacuna that the concept of 'The Elders' was conceived, representing a deliberate attempt to transpose the anthropological and sociological construct of the "village elder"—a custodian of wisdom, continuity, and dispute resolution in traditional societies—onto the complex stage of the "global village".1
The genesis of the organization traces back to a conversation in 1999 between British entrepreneur Sir Richard Branson and musician-activist Peter Gabriel. Confronted with the intractability of conflicts and the short-termism inherent in democratic political cycles, they hypothesized that a small, dedicated cadre of senior statespeople, liberated from the constraints of office, could intervene in deadlocked situations where traditional diplomacy had failed.2 This idea was not merely about conflict resolution but about creating a repository of "independent wisdom" that could operate outside the rigid structures of the UN Security Council or bilateral negotiations.
The realization of this vision required a figure of unimpeachable global moral authority. Branson and Gabriel approached Nelson Mandela, the former President of South Africa and Nobel Peace Laureate, who, along with his wife and fellow activist Graça Machel, agreed to convene such a group. The recruitment process was rigorous and quiet, supported by Archbishop Desmond Tutu, aimed at identifying individuals who possessed not only high-level political experience but also a demonstrated commitment to ethical leadership and human rights.2
1.2 The Launch: A Mandate for Independence
On July 18, 2007, coinciding with his 89th birthday, Nelson Mandela officially launched The Elders in Johannesburg, South Africa. His founding charge to the group established the philosophical bedrock that continues to guide the London-based Secretariat today:
"This group can speak freely and boldly, working both publicly and behind the scenes on whatever actions need to be taken. We will support courage where there is fear, foster agreement where there is conflict, and inspire hope where there is despair." 4
This mandate emphasized two critical operational modalities that distinguish The Elders from other NGOs or think tanks: "independence" and the dual approach of "public and private" engagement. Unlike UN envoys who report to the Secretary-General or state diplomats bound by national policy, The Elders are answerable to no government, donor, or institution, theoretically allowing them to speak "truth to power" without fear of diplomatic retribution.1
The inaugural composition of the group was a carefully curated demographic of the "Global South" and "Global North," deliberately challenging the Western-centric hegemony of international affairs. Founding members included former US President Jimmy Carter, former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, former Irish President Mary Robinson, and microfinance pioneer Muhammad Yunus.2 A potent symbol of the group's commitment to human rights was the "empty chair" left on stage during the launch, representing Aung San Suu Kyi, the Burmese opposition leader then under house arrest, signaling the group’s intent to amplify the voices of the silenced.2
1.3 The Strategic Pivot to London
While the spiritual home of The Elders is arguably South Africa, the operational exigencies of coordinating a global group of high-profile individuals necessitated a strategic headquarters with connectivity to major diplomatic hubs. London was selected as the administrative base, a decision driven by its status as a nexus for international media, finance, and travel, as well as its time zone centrality.
The establishment of the Secretariat in London marked the institutionalization of the "Elders" concept. It transformed a loose coalition of individuals into a structured legal entity capable of sustaining long-term advocacy campaigns and complex logistical operations. The current registered office is located at 3 Tilney Street, London, W1K 1BJ, situated in the Mayfair district, a location that places the Secretariat in proximity to key embassies, high commissions, and philanthropic foundations.7 This physical presence in London serves as the nerve center for an organization that operates virtually and globally, bridging the gap between the Elders' remote residences and the crisis zones they address.
2. Institutional Architecture: The London Secretariat and Governance
To understand The Elders is to recognize the bifurcation between the public-facing "Elders"—the former heads of state—and the operational machine that powers them: the London Secretariat. This section analyzes the administrative, legal, and financial structures that sustain the organization's work.
2.1 The Secretariat: The Operational Engine
The London Secretariat is not merely an administrative support unit; it is the strategic brain of the organization. While the Elders themselves provide the moral authority and the "face" of interventions, the Secretariat staff are responsible for the rigorous policy analysis, diplomatic back-channeling, and logistical choreography that make such interventions possible.
Core Functions of the Secretariat:
Strategic Intelligence and Policy Formulation: Before any Elder engages in a conflict zone (e.g., Ukraine or Gaza) or a thematic debate (e.g., climate finance), the Secretariat produces detailed briefing papers. These documents synthesize the latest geopolitical intelligence, legal frameworks (such as the Rome Statute or the Paris Agreement), and stakeholder analyses. The staff must anticipate the nuances of "private diplomacy," ensuring that Elders are briefed not just on the facts but on the psychology of the leaders they are set to meet.5
Diplomatic Logistics and Protocol: Moving former heads of state into volatile environments requires complex security and protocol arrangements. The Secretariat manages these logistics, often liaising with host governments, UN missions, and private security firms to ensure safe passage.
Communications and Advocacy: The "public" arm of the Elders' work is managed by a sophisticated communications team in London. This team handles media relations, digital branding, and the drafting of op-eds and press releases. For instance, the Director of Communications leads a team responsible for "catalysing the influence of the Elders," managing reputation, and ensuring the group’s message penetrates the crowded global media landscape.5
Institutional Memory: As Elders retire and new members join, the Secretariat provides continuity. It maintains the records of past interventions (e.g., the 2008 Zimbabwe report or the 2011 Côte d'Ivoire mission), ensuring that lessons learned are applied to future strategies.6
Staffing and Leadership:
The Secretariat is deliberately lean to maintain agility. As of recent reports, the team consists of approximately 18 to 20 staff members.11 The leadership structure includes a Chief Executive Officer (currently Alistair Fernie), a Director of Programmes (serving as Deputy CEO), and a Director of Communications.11 The staff charter emphasizes a culture of "service," acknowledging that the Secretariat exists to amplify the Elders' voices rather than to pursue an independent agenda.9
Financial Implications of Operations:
The operational costs of the Secretariat reflect its reliance on high-level human capital. Financial data from the 2024 annual review indicates that the organization’s primary expenditure is on wages and salaries, rather than capital assets.
Operational Cost Category
2023 (£'000)
2024 (£'000)
Wages and Salaries
1,289
1,403
Social Security Costs
141
153
Pension Costs
125
142
Total Staff Costs
1,555
1,698
Governance Costs
20
10
Table 1: Comparative Staffing and Governance Costs for The Elders Foundation.6
The data reveals a steady increase in staff costs, likely reflecting inflationary pressures in London and the need to retain high-caliber experts capable of engaging with global leadership. The low "Governance" cost suggests a streamlined board structure relative to the organization's global footprint.
2.2 Legal Status and Corporate Governance
The Elders operates under a dual legal structure in the United Kingdom to satisfy both regulatory compliance and charitable objectives.
The Elders Foundation: This is the primary charitable vehicle (Registered Charity Number: 1132397). Its charitable status allows it to receive tax-efficient donations and mandates a public benefit requirement—specifically, the advancement of conflict resolution, human rights, and reconciliation.7
The Elders (LDN) Limited: This is a company limited by guarantee (Company Number: 06317151), which likely handles the operational liabilities, employment contracts, and leases (such as the Tilney Street premises).7
Directors and Trustees: The Elders themselves serve as the directors for company law purposes and trustees for charity law purposes. This ensures that the strategic direction remains firmly in the hands of the members (e.g., Mary Robinson, Gro Harlem Brundtland, Juan Manuel Santos appear as active directors in Companies House filings).6
2.3 The Advisory Council: Funding and Strategic Support
A critical component of The Elders' independence is its funding model. To avoid the political leverage that comes with government grants, the organization relies on a diverse pool of private donors and foundations, organized into an Advisory Council. This council acts as a financial buttress and a strategic sounding board.15
Composition of the Advisory Council (2024-2025):
The donor list reflects a mix of high-net-worth individuals and progressive philanthropic foundations, largely from the Western world.
Richard Branson (Virgin Unite): As a founder, his foundation remains a key pillar of support.15
Peter Gabriel (The Peter Gabriel Foundation): The co-founder continues to support the organization.15
Don Gips (Skoll Foundation): Representing the social entrepreneurship sector.15
Srik Gopal (Humanity United): A foundation focused on peacebuilding and conflict transformation.15
Judith Lingeman (Dutch Postcode Lottery): A significant European philanthropic entity known for supporting human rights and environmental causes.15
Randy Newcomb (The Omidyar Group): Philanthropy established by eBay founder Pierre Omidyar.15
Other Individual Members: Shannon Sedgwick Davis, Jean Oelwang, and others provide private support.15
Implications of Funding:
While this model secures independence from state interference, it introduces a potential vulnerability regarding "Western bias." The concentration of funding from US, UK, and Dutch sources could be perceived as aligning the organization with Western liberal democratic values. The Elders mitigate this perception through the diversity of their membership and their willingness to critique Western powers (e.g., the US and Israel), but the structural reliance on Western capital remains a defining feature of their institutional architecture.3
3. The Elders Membership: A Profile of Collective Wisdom
The efficacy of The Elders is not derived from hard power but from "moral capital." This capital is the aggregate sum of the members' past achievements, their reputation for integrity, and their continued relevance in global discourse. The membership strategy focuses on balancing regional representation, gender, and thematic expertise.
3.1 The Current Leadership (2024-2025)
As of 2025, the leadership structure has transitioned from the founding generation to a new cohort of leaders who navigated the geopolitical complexities of the late 20th and early 21st centuries.
Chair: Juan Manuel Santos (Colombia):
Taking the helm in 2024, Santos brings the prestige of a Nobel Peace Laureate awarded for his role in ending the 50-year civil war with the FARC. His chairmanship signals a focus on negotiated settlements and conflict transformation. His background makes him particularly credible in discussions regarding peace processes (e.g., Ukraine, Middle East) where "victory" is elusive and compromise is necessary.11Deputy Chair: Graça Machel (Mozambique):
A founding member, Machel provides the essential link to the Mandela legacy. As a former freedom fighter, Minister for Education, and advocate for women's rights, she anchors the group's conscience, particularly regarding the rights of women and children in conflict. Her presence ensures the "human" dimension of policy remains central.6Deputy Chair: Ban Ki-moon (South Korea):
The former UN Secretary-General brings unmatched institutional knowledge of the multilateral system. His tenure at the UN (encompassing the Paris Agreement and the SDGs) aligns him closely with the Elders' focus on climate and sustainable development. His diplomatic style—cautious, persistent, and protocol-aware—complements the more activist approaches of other members.6Mary Robinson (Ireland):
Serving as Chair from 2018 to 2024, Robinson remains a powerhouse within the group. Her evolution from a legal scholar and President of Ireland to the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, and subsequently a climate justice champion, mirrors the Elders' own strategic shift. She is arguably the group's most visible spokesperson on the "Climate and Nature Crisis," framing environmental degradation as a fundamental human rights violation.6Gro Harlem Brundtland (Norway):
Known as the "mother of sustainable development" for her work on the Brundtland Commission, she brings technical and political expertise on public health (as former WHO Director-General) and environmental policy. Her background is crucial for the Elders' work on pandemics and planetary boundaries.8Newer Members and Regional Diversity:
Ellen Johnson Sirleaf (Liberia): The first elected female head of state in Africa and Nobel Laureate, bringing expertise in post-conflict reconstruction and democratic governance.11
Ernesto Zedillo (Mexico): Former President, providing a Latin American perspective and expertise on globalization, drug policy, and nuclear disarmament.11
Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein (Jordan): A staunch defender of human rights and international law, known for his outspoken criticism of populism and authoritarianism during his time at the UN.11
Hina Jilani (Pakistan): A pioneering lawyer and human rights defender, representing civil society rather than state power.11
Helen Clark (New Zealand): Former PM and UNDP Administrator, specializing in development and gender equality.11
Elbegdorj Tsakhia (Mongolia): Joined in 2022, he represents a strategic voice from Central Asia, with a focus on democracy promotion in the face of authoritarian neighbors.8
Denis Mukwege (DRC): The most recent addition (2024), a Nobel Laureate and gynecologist. His inclusion signals a robust commitment to addressing conflict-related sexual violence, a pervasive issue in modern warfare.2
3.2 Elders Emeritus and the Legacy of the Deceased
To maintain organizational vitality, members who can no longer commit to the rigorous travel schedule transition to "Emeritus" status. This includes Jimmy Carter (a founding member whose post-presidency defined the modern model of the elder statesman), Fernando Henrique Cardoso (Brazil), and Lakhdar Brahimi (Algeria), the master UN negotiator.
The organization also deeply reveres its deceased members—Kofi Annan, Desmond Tutu, Ela Bhatt, and Martti Ahtisaari. Their speeches and principles continue to be cited in annual reports and strategic documents, functioning as a form of "common law" or guiding precedent for the current members.6
4. Strategic Framework: "Long-View Leadership"
The Elders do not function as a reactive "firefighting" brigade for every global crisis. Instead, they operate under multi-year strategic frameworks that prioritize issues where their specific leverage—independence and experience—can add value. The current strategy (2023-2027) is organized under the banner of "Long-View Leadership," a direct critique of the short-termism that plagues modern politics.
4.1 The Four Existential Pillars
The 2023-2027 strategy identifies four existential threats that place humanity at risk, arguing that these challenges transcend borders and cannot be solved by nations acting alone.6
The Climate and Nature Crisis:
The Elders have moved beyond the technical debates of carbon pricing to focus on Climate Justice. They argue that the climate crisis is a human rights crisis, disproportionately affecting those least responsible for it. Their advocacy targets "big emitters" and G20 nations, demanding they align with the 1.5°C limit of the Paris Agreement. They also champion the "Global Nature Goal," linking biodiversity loss to climate stability.6Pandemics:
Drawing on the lessons of COVID-19 and the expertise of members like Brundtland and Clark (who co-chaired the independent panel on pandemic preparedness), The Elders advocate for a binding "Pandemic Treaty." They warn against "bilateral pandemic deals" that could undermine multilateral cooperation and equity, arguing that "no one is safe until everyone is safe".4Nuclear Weapons:
In an era of renewed great power competition, The Elders are attempting to revive the moribund arms control agenda. They frame nuclear weapons not as assets of deterrence but as unacceptable liabilities. Their work focuses on the P5 nations (UN Security Council permanent members), urging a return to dialogue on non-proliferation and risk reduction, particularly regarding the "fail-deadly" risks of AI integration into nuclear command and control.6Conflict:
While the first three pillars are thematic, the fourth is geographic and responsive. The Elders engage in specific "intractable" conflicts—such as Ukraine, the Middle East, and Sudan—where they believe the international system has failed. Their goal is to promote "global solutions" and reinforce the norms of the UN Charter, specifically the prohibition of the acquisition of territory by force.16
4.2 Cross-Cutting Commitments
Underpinning these pillars are four methodological commitments that define how The Elders approach their work:
Multilateralism: A defense of the rules-based international order and the United Nations, which they view as imperfect but indispensable.16
Human Rights: The refusal to trade justice for peace; arguing that sustainable peace is impossible without accountability.17
Gender Equality: Promoting women's participation in peace processes, not just as victims but as architects of security.17
Intergenerational Dialogue: Recognizing that the "Elders" are, by definition, the older generation, they actively seek partnerships with "Youngers"—climate activists and youth leaders—to ensure their wisdom is forward-looking.6
5. Modalities of Intervention: The Mechanics of Influence
The Elders possess no "hard power." They cannot sanction economies, deploy peacekeepers, or offer development loans. Their power is exclusively "soft"—the power of persuasion, legitimacy, and access. To exercise this, they utilize a hybrid toolkit of "Private Diplomacy" and "Public Advocacy."
5.1 Private Diplomacy ("Deep Listening")
A significant portion of The Elders' work remains invisible to the public. This "silent diplomacy" involves small delegations visiting conflict zones to meet with leadership figures who may be isolated or distrustful of Western governments.
Mechanism: The Elders emphasize "Deep Listening." Unlike state diplomats who arrive with a set of demands or a communiqué to be signed, Elders often begin by asking parties to share their narratives. This disarming approach, facilitated by the Elders' status as "formers" (who are no longer competitors for power), can unlock psychological barriers to negotiation.10
Access: Their status grants them access to pariah leaders (e.g., Hamas leadership, Iranian officials, or sanctioned heads of state) that sitting Western officials cannot meet due to domestic political constraints. This allows them to act as a bridge or back-channel.3
5.2 Public Advocacy and Media Engagement
When private channels are blocked, or when a norm is being flagrantly violated, The Elders shift to public advocacy.
Statements and Op-Eds: The Secretariat coordinates the release of high-impact statements. These are not frequent; they are timed to maximize impact, such as immediately before a G7 summit or a UN Security Council vote.18
Moral Shaming: They utilize their reputation to "call out" leaders. For example, their explicit criticism of the Trump administration's withdrawal from the Iran Deal or the UK government's threats to international law regarding refugees. The theory is that while leaders may ignore NGOs, they are more sensitive to criticism from peers—fellow former heads of state.1
6. Case Study Analysis: The Middle East – A Paradigm Shift
The Middle East, particularly the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, has been a central focus of The Elders since their inception. Their recent evolution on this issue demonstrates a shift from supporting traditional "peace processes" to demanding a rights-based "paradigm shift."
6.1 Historical Context and Evolution
Initially, The Elders supported the established framework of the Oslo Accords and the two-state solution negotiation process. However, over nearly two decades of failed negotiations and expanding settlements, their analysis has hardened. They began to argue that the "peace process" had become a fig leaf for permanent occupation.21
6.2 The Post-October 7 Stance (2023-2025)
Following the Hamas attacks of October 7 and the subsequent devastation of Gaza, The Elders adopted a position of staunch defense of international law, criticizing both Hamas's war crimes and Israel's "disproportionate" response.
"Genocide" and "Apartheid" Terminology: By 2025, The Elders' language had become strikingly direct. Following a visit to the Rafah border crossing in August 2025, Mary Robinson and Helen Clark issued a statement warning of an "unfolding genocide and famine" in Gaza.22 This usage of the term "genocide" by such high-ranking former officials added significant weight to the legal accusations facing Israel at the ICJ.
Political Proposals: Under Juan Manuel Santos, the group has called for specific political moves, such as the release of Marwan Barghouti from Israeli prison, arguing that he represents a credible Palestinian leader capable of unifying factions for a two-state solution.16
Critique of the US: They have openly criticized the United States for providing military aid while acknowledging humanitarian violations, terming this "complicity." In October 2025, they urged the US to enforce a deal to end the occupation, rejecting the "conflict management" approach.16
This case illustrates the Elders' willingness to break with the Western diplomatic consensus (which often avoids such terminology) to uphold their interpretation of universal human rights.
6.3 Iran: The Defense of Multilateralism
The Elders viewed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) as the "gold standard" of multilateral diplomacy—a negotiated solution to a proliferation threat.
Intervention: When the US withdrew in 2018, The Elders did not merely issue a press release. Kofi Annan (then Chair) wrote private letters to the leaders of the E3 (France, Germany, UK), Russia, and China, urging them to hold the line and protect the agreement despite US pressure.20
Current Status: With the election of Masoud Pezeshkian in Iran in 2024, The Elders have tentatively re-engaged, probing whether the new Iranian administration has the latitude from the Supreme Leader to re-enter negotiations, while simultaneously warning the West that "pressure" alone will not yield results.23
7. Case Study Analysis: Sub-Saharan Africa – Interventions and Limits
Given the African heritage of the organization (Mandela, Tutu, Machel), The Elders have been deeply involved in the continent's crises, using their "African wisdom" credentials to navigate post-colonial sensitivities.
7.1 Zimbabwe (2008): The Diplomatic Power of Rejection
The Zimbabwe crisis of 2008 remains a definitive case study in how The Elders turn diplomatic failure into a public relations victory.
The Context: Zimbabwe was reeling from hyperinflation, a cholera epidemic, and state-sponsored violence following disputed elections.
The Mission: A delegation (Annan, Carter, Machel) planned a humanitarian assessment. However, the Mugabe government, fearing exposure, denied them entry visas.24
The Pivot: Rather than canceling, the delegation remained in Johannesburg. They convened a high-profile series of meetings with Zimbabwean civil society, exiled leaders, and regional donors. They produced a devastating report on the humanitarian collapse.24
The Impact: The visa denial became a global news story, far larger than the visit itself might have been. It embarrassed the Mugabe regime and forced the regional body, SADC, to take a tougher stance, accelerating the mediation that eventually led to the Government of National Unity.3
7.2 Côte d'Ivoire (2011): The "Freezing" Effect
In the aftermath of the Second Ivorian Civil War, the country was fractured between supporters of the ousted Laurent Gbagbo and the new President Alassane Ouattara.
The Intervention: The Elders (led by Tutu and Annan) arrived in May 2011, shortly after Gbagbo’s arrest. It was a moment of extreme volatility.
The Action: They met with Ouattara to preach reconciliation but insisted on visiting the detained Gbagbo. This visit to the prisoner was crucial; it provided proof of life and humane treatment to Gbagbo’s supporters, dampening rumors that could have sparked renewed fighting.10
Analysis: Analysts noted that while The Elders brought no money or troops, their sheer presence had a "freezing effect" on the conflict, creating a psychological pause that allowed tempers to cool.3
7.3 Sudan and South Sudan: A Long-Term Watch
The Elders have remained engaged with the Sudans since their very first mission in 2007. Currently, they are sounding the alarm on the 2023-2025 civil war in Sudan, criticizing the international community for "forgetting" this conflict in the shadow of Ukraine and Gaza. They view the Sudan crisis as a failure of the very structures (IGAD, AU) they helped to support in the past, highlighting the fragility of peace agreements that are not followed by robust institution-building.16
8. Case Study Analysis: Global Security and the Ukraine War
The Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 presented a fundamental challenge to The Elders' philosophy. Unlike civil wars where "both sides" must reconcile, this was an act of aggression by a nuclear-armed state against a sovereign neighbor, violating the core tenet of the UN Charter.
8.1 Clarifying the Moral Stance
The Elders adopted a position of "moral clarity" rather than neutrality.
Pre-Invasion: In January 2022, Ban Ki-moon issued a statement warning that a failure of diplomacy would be a "moral outrage," attempting to pressure Russia to de-escalate.27
The Visit: In August 2022, Ban Ki-moon and Juan Manuel Santos visited Kyiv. They toured the sites of atrocities in Bucha and Irpin. This visit was symbolic, signaling to the Global South (where both Ban and Santos originate) that the war was not just a "European problem" but a colonial-style aggression that all post-colonial nations should oppose.16
The Legal Argument: They have strongly supported the International Criminal Court (ICC) accountability mechanisms. In 2024, they explicitly linked the need for accountability in Ukraine to the need for accountability in Gaza, arguing that the "double standards" of Western powers (supporting the ICC in Ukraine but condemning it in Palestine) were fatal to the credibility of international law.29
9. Thematic Priorities: Climate Justice and Nature
Under the leadership of Mary Robinson, The Elders have transformed from a "peace and security" group into a leading voice on climate justice.
9.1 From Science to Justice
The Elders do not replicate the work of the IPCC (science) or the UNFCCC (negotiation technicalities). Their niche is Climate Justice. They frame carbon emissions as a violation of the rights of the poor and the young.
Strategy: They focus on high-level political will. In 2024, they targeted the G20 and the leadership of Brazil (host of COP30).
Brazil Engagement: A delegation met President Lula in August 2024. The objective was to leverage Brazil's dual role as a major economy and a biodiversity superpower to bridge the gap between the Global North (who must pay) and the Global South (who are suffering). They pushed for the "Global Nature Goal" to be integrated into climate targets, arguing that the climate crisis cannot be solved without halting the destruction of the Amazon.6
10. Critique, Challenges, and Limitations
To provide a balanced analysis, one must interrogate the limitations of The Elders' model.
10.1 The "Toothless" Critic
Realist scholars of international relations argue that "soft power" is increasingly irrelevant in a world dominated by "hard power" actors like Vladimir Putin or Benjamin Netanyahu.
The Critique: When a leader is willing to violate international law (as in Ukraine or Gaza), a stern letter from a retired president has little deterrent effect. The Elders can "witness" and "condemn," but they cannot "stop." Their influence is dependent on the target's capacity for shame—a commodity in short supply in modern geopolitics.3
10.2 Western Bias and the "White Savior" Shadow
Despite the diversity of the current board, the organization’s structural roots are Western.
Funding: The Advisory Council is dominated by Western philanthropists (Branson, Skoll, Omidyar). This raises questions about whether the group’s agenda—liberal democracy, human rights, multilateralism—is simply a projection of Western preferences.15
Cultural Interpretation: In some non-Western contexts, the concept of "Elders" intervening can be seen as neocolonial meddling. However, the organization combats this by ensuring that regional Elders lead regional interventions (e.g., Machel in Africa, Santos in Latin America).31
10.3 The Attribution Gap
Measuring the impact of The Elders is methodologically difficult. If a war is prevented by quiet diplomacy, the success is rarely public. If a war breaks out, the failure is visible.
Analysis: The organization often reports on "activities" (meetings held) rather than "outcomes" (lives saved) in its annual reports, a common struggle for advocacy groups. Their greatest successes (like Kenya 2008) are often shared victories where they played a catalytic but not exclusive role.3
11. Conclusion: The Conscience of the International System
As The Elders approach their third decade of operation, the geopolitical landscape is darker than at their founding. The optimism of the post-Cold War era has evaporated, replaced by fragmented multipolarity and existential environmental risk.
In this context, The Elders and their London Secretariat have evolved. They have transitioned from "conflict managers" to "system reformers." They no longer just mediate disputes; they advocate for a fundamental restructuring of the global order—reforming the UN Security Council, rewriting the financial architecture for climate, and enforcing a universal application of international law.
The London Secretariat serves as the vital fulcrum of this effort. It operationalizes wisdom, converting the moral authority of figures like Ban Ki-moon and Graça Machel into concrete policy pressure. While they lack the power to enforce peace, The Elders play an indispensable role as the conscience of the international system. In a world of short-term political calculations, they remain one of the few institutions dedicated to the "long view," reminding humanity that power without principle is ultimately self-destructive.
Note on Data Exclusion:
References to "Elders Limited" (Australian Agribusiness): Research snippets 33 referring to a commercial entity named "Elders" listed on the ASX were excluded as they are unrelated to the subject of the inquiry.
References to US "Elder Affairs": Snippets 39 referring to state-level geriatric care departments were excluded.
References to Religious Titles: Snippets 41 referring to ecclesiastical titles were excluded.
Works cited
Who we are | The Elders, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://theelders.org/who-we-are
The Elders is a group of world leaders that formed at the beginning of the 21st century in order to address global human rights issues and abuses. British musician Peter Gabriel and entrepreneur Sir Richard Branson first conceived of the idea for the Elders in 1999. | Britannica, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-Elders
The Big Question: Who are the Elders, and can they do anything to resolve world crises?, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/africa/the-big-question-who-are-the-elders-and-can-they-do-anything-to-resolve-world-crises-1033821.html
The Elders | Independent global leaders | Ethical Leadership, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://theelders.org/
The Elders Role Description, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://micro.green-park.co.uk/theelders/role-description/
LONG-VIEW LEADERSHIP FOR LONG-TERM THREATS - The Elders, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://theelders.org/sites/default/files/2025-04/12469%20The%20Elders%20Annual%20Report%202024.pdf
Contact Us | The Elders, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://theelders.org/contact-us
THE ELDERS FOUNDATION people - Find and update company information - GOV.UK, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06317151/officers
The Team | The Elders, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://theelders.org/who-we-are/the-team
Ten years of The Elders: Achievements and Impact, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://theelders.org/sites/default/files/2017_08_11-ten-years-of-the-elders-achievements-and-impact.pdf
The Elders (organization) - Wikipedia, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Elders_(organization)
Director of Programmes (and Deputy CEO) - The Elders, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://theelders.org/sites/default/files/2025-04/The%20Elders%20Director%20of%20Programmes%20%28and%20Deputy%20CEO%29%20-%20Candidate%20Brochure.pdf
The Elders Foundation | Charici, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://charici.org/the-elders-foundation
THE ELDERS (LDN) LIMITED people - Find and update company information - GOV.UK, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/15563177/officers
Advisory Council | The Elders, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://theelders.org/who-we-are/advisory-council
Conflict | The Elders, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://theelders.org/programmes/conflict
How we work | The Elders, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://theelders.org/how-we-work
Gaza and Sudan: Foreign Secretary statement, 18 November 2025 - GOV.UK, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/gaza-and-sudan-foreign-secretary-statement-18-november-2025
Annual Review 2024: Long-view leadership for long-term threats - The Elders, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://theelders.org/news/annual-review-2024-long-view-leadership-long-term-threats
Iran | The Elders, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://theelders.org/programmes/iran
A Pathway Towards Sustainable Peace in Palestine and Israel - The Elders, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://theelders.org/news/pathway-towards-sustainable-peace-palestine-and-israel
Elders call for decisive measures by states to halt unfolding genocide and famine in Gaza, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://theelders.org/news/elders-call-decisive-measures-states-halt-unfolding-genocide-and-famine-gaza
Iran's New President Supports Diplomacy, Rejects Pressure | Arms Control Association, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.armscontrol.org/blog/2024-07/p4-1-iran-nuclear-deal-alert
Current government cannot lead Zimbabwe out of humanitarian crisis - The Elders, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://theelders.org/news/elders-current-government-cannot-lead-zimbabwe-out-humanitarian-crisis
The Elders: Zimbabwe is failing its people - ReliefWeb, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://reliefweb.int/report/zimbabwe/elders-zimbabwe-failing-its-people
Succession Fever Deepens South Sudan's Malaise - International Crisis Group, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.crisisgroup.org/africa/south-sudan/b207-succession-fever-deepens-south-sudans-malaise
The Elders warn civilians will pay the price if diplomacy fails in Ukraine crisis, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://theelders.org/sites/default/files/newsarticaldocument/20220125-ELDERS-STATEMENT-The%20Elders%20warn%20civilians%20will%20pay%20the%20price%20if%20diplomacy%20fails%20in%20Ukraine%20crisis-.pdf
The Elders warn civilians will pay the price if diplomacy fails in Ukraine crisis, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://theelders.org/news/elders-warn-civilians-will-pay-price-if-diplomacy-fails-ukraine-crisis
The Elders warn that failures of political leadership risk collapse of international order, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://theelders.org/news/elders-warn-failures-political-leadership-risk-collapse-international-order
The Problem with Soft Power - Foreign Policy Research Institute, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.fpri.org/article/2020/09/the-problem-with-soft-power/
Western and non-western leadership styles and employee wellbeing: a case of a high-power distance context - Frontiers, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1261893/full
Broadening Soft Power in EU-US Relations - Scholarly Publications Leiden University, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/access/item%3A2911578/view
Elders, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://elders.com.au/
Elders Limited 2024 AGM Presentations and Proxy and Direct Voting - For personal use only, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://announcements.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20241219/pdf/06ctytl8ksxycn.pdf
Half Year Results Presentation for FY24 - Elders, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://elders.com.au/content/dam/eld/documents/results/fy24/Elders-HY24-Investor-Presentation.pdf
2025 Full Year Results Presentation - AFR, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://company-announcements.afr.com/asx/eld/a9446a55-c334-11f0-9b61-7a997eadca86.pdf
Appendix 4E and Annual Report for Year Ended 30/9/2025 - Elders Limited (ASX:ELD), accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.listcorp.com/asx/eld/elders-limited/news/appendix-4e-and-annual-report-for-year-ended-30-9-2025-3276665.html
ASX:ELD - Appendix 4E and Annual Report for Year Ended 30/9/2025 - Elders' Investor Hub, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://investors.elders.com.au/announcements/7263856
Florida Department of Elder Affairs, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://elderaffairs.org/
Council of Elders 2024 – Year in review - Department of Health, Disability and Ageing, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/2025-01/council-of-elders-second-term-achievements-report-2024.pdf
Meet the New Leaders Sustained at the April 2025 General Conference - Church Newsroom, accessed on November 26, 2025, https://newsroom.churchofjesuschrist.org/article/april-2025-general-conference-leadership-news
