The Eridu Genesis: An Exhaustive Analysis of the Sumerian Primeval History
1. Introduction: The Primordial Charter of Mesopotamia
The rediscovery of the ancient Near East in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries fundamentally altered the modern understanding of human origins, religious history, and the development of civilization. Among the myriad of cuneiform tablets unearthed from the sands of Iraq, few possess the gravity and the transformative power of the text now known to scholars as the Eridu Genesis. This ancient Sumerian composition, fragmentary yet monumentally significant, represents the earliest known literary attempt to weave together the disparate threads of cosmogony (the creation of the universe), anthropogony (the creation of humanity), the institution of kingship, and the cataclysmic undoing of creation via the Great Flood.1
Dated to the Old Babylonian period (c. 1600 BCE) but unquestionably rooted in oral and literary traditions spanning back to the Early Dynastic III period (c. 2600 BCE) and arguably to the dawn of Sumerian literacy itself, the Eridu Genesis serves as the Ur-text for the deluge motif that would later permeate the consciousness of the Mediterranean and Near Eastern worlds.3 It is the philological ancestor of the Akkadian Atrahasis Epic, the eleventh tablet of the Epic of Gilgamesh, and the biblical flood narrative found in the Book of Genesis.3
However, to reduce the Eridu Genesis to a mere precursor or a "Sumerian Noah story" is to overlook its primary function within its own cultural milieu. This text was not simply a myth of survival; it was a political and theological charter. It legitimized the social structure of the Sumerian city-state by anchoring the institutions of the priesthood and the monarchy in the antediluvian (pre-flood) deep time. It established the city of Eridu as the omphalos of civilization—the first city, the seat of the water-god Enki, and the point where the divine realm first touched the earth.5
This report provides an exhaustive, multi-dimensional analysis of the Eridu Genesis. We will traverse the archaeological history of its discovery by the University of Pennsylvania, dissect the philological nuances of its Sumerian terminology, and reconstruct the broken narrative column by column. We will explore the theological tensions between the gods Enlil and Enki, analyze the "Noise" motif as a justification for genocide, and situate the figure of Ziusudra—the Sumerian flood hero—within the broader context of ancient wisdom traditions. Furthermore, we will rigorously compare this text with its Semitic successors, highlighting the profound shifts in theology and anthropology that occurred as the story migrated from Sumer to Babylon to Jerusalem.
2. Textual Archaeology: The Witness of the Tablets
The reconstruction of the Eridu Genesis is a triumph of Assyriological deduction, pieced together from broken clay shards that lay silent for nearly four millennia. Unlike the relatively complete Epic of Gilgamesh preserved in the library of Ashurbanipal, the Eridu Genesis survives primarily through a single, heavily damaged tablet, supplemented by two smaller fragments.
2.1 The Nippur Tablet (CBS 10673)
The primary witness to the text is the tablet cataloged as CBS 10673, currently held in the collection of the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology in Philadelphia.7 This artifact was recovered during the university's third expedition to the holy city of Nippur (modern Nuffar, Iraq) in 1893.4 Nippur was the religious capital of Sumer, the seat of the supreme god Enlil, and its scribal schools (Edubba) were the custodians of the highest literary traditions of Mesopotamia.
The tablet itself measures approximately 5 inches by 7 inches, though originally it would have been significantly larger. It represents the lower portion of a six-column tablet (three columns on the obverse, three on the reverse).8 The top third of the tablet is entirely missing, meaning that the opening lines of every column—crucial for understanding the transitions between narrative beats—are lost to history.1
The script is written in a cursive Sumerian characteristic of the Old Babylonian period, specifically dating to around 1600 BCE.4 This dating is critical. It places the written recension of the text in the same temporal horizon as the famous Code of Hammurabi and the rise of Babylon as a political power. However, the language and distinctively Sumerian theology indicate that the scribes were copying a text that had already existed for centuries, likely originating in the Ur III period (c. 2100 BCE) or earlier.2
2.2 The Decipherment of Arno Poebel (1912)
For nearly twenty years after its excavation, CBS 10673 remained an unintelligible fragment among thousands of others in the Pennsylvania museum's basement. It was not until 1912 that the German Assyriologist Arno Poebel (1881–1958) identified the text's significance.3
Poebel, working as a curator and researcher, recognized that the fragmented lines contained distinct references to the creation of man, the founding of five specific cities, and a divine decree for a flood. He published his translation and analysis in 1914 in Historical and Grammatical Texts (PBS V, No. 1), presenting the world with the first known Sumerian account of the Deluge.8 Poebel's initial assessment was that this text represented an independent creation account that differed "greatly" from the later Babylonian Enuma Elish, which focused on the supremacy of Marduk. Instead, this text focused on the older Sumerian pantheon: An, Enlil, Enki, and Ninhursag.8
2.3 The "Eridu Genesis" Designation
The text was referred to for decades simply as the "Sumerian Flood Story" or the "Sumerian Creation Myth." It was the renowned scholar Thorkild Jacobsen who, in a landmark 1981 article in the Journal of Biblical Literature, coined the term "Eridu Genesis".1
Jacobsen's reasoning for this title was twofold:
Thematic Parity: He argued that the text covered the same primeval history as the biblical Book of Genesis: the creation of the world, the institution of human order, the corruption/failure of that order, and the divine attempt to reset creation through a Flood.
Geographic Centrality: The text elevates the city of Eridu to the status of the "firstling of cities".1 Just as Genesis centers on Eden and the patriarchal lineage, this text centers on Eridu and the lineage of kingship.
Jacobsen's translation and commentary remain the standard for understanding the theological depth of the text, particularly his reconstruction of the fragmentary lines based on parallels in the Sumerian King List and Berossus.1
2.4 Supplementary Fragments
While CBS 10673 is the primary source, our understanding is enriched by two other textual witnesses:
The Ur Fragment (UET VI 61): Excavated at Ur, this fragmentary tablet dates to the same Old Babylonian period as the Nippur text. It provides crucial overlapping text that helps restore the section on the creation of man and the animals.4
The Ashurbanipal Bilingual (CT 46.5): Discovered in the famous library of the Assyrian king Ashurbanipal (c. 600 BCE) at Nineveh, this fragment contains a bilingual version (Sumerian with Akkadian translation). Its existence proves that the Eridu Genesis was not an obscure, forgotten text but remained part of the "stream of tradition" for over a thousand years, studied by Assyrian scholars alongside the Enuma Elish and Gilgamesh.4
3. Cosmogony and Anthropogony: The Creation of the Black-Headed People
The narrative of the Eridu Genesis commences with creation, but unlike the biblical ex nihilo (out of nothing) or the violent theomachy (god-war) of the Enuma Elish, the Sumerian account focuses on the amelioration of a primitive, chaotic state.
3.1 The Lacuna of Origins
The first column of the Nippur tablet is missing approximately 36 lines.4 Based on standard Sumerian literary conventions, scholars infer that these lines described the separation of An (Heaven) and Ki (Earth) and the generation of the lesser gods. The existence of the universe is assumed; the focus is on the organization of that universe.4
When the text becomes legible, we are introduced to Nintur (an epithet for Ninhursag, the "Lady of the Mountain/Foothills"), the mother goddess. She is depicted in a state of contemplation and compassion, a stark contrast to the often capricious deities of later Akkadian myth.
3.2 The Redemption of the Nomad
Nintur's opening monologue reveals the anthropological worldview of the Sumerians. She looks upon the pre-civilized state of humanity with pity. The text implies that humans (or proto-humans) already existed but were living in a "vagrant existence" as nomads, without clothing, houses, or proper cultic observance.4
"Let me bethink myself of my humankind, all forgotten as they are; and mindful of mine, Nintur's, creatures let me bring them back, let me lead the people back from their trails." 5
This passage suggests a "failed" initial creation or a primitive state that required divine intervention to upgrade. Nintur expresses a desire to "cool herself in their shade," a metaphor for the construction of temples and cities. In the blistering heat of the Mesopotamian alluvium, the temple provides shade and rest for the deity. Thus, humanity's purpose is defined: to build the infrastructure that allows the gods to dwell comfortably on earth.4
3.3 The Four Creators
The text explicitly identifies the tetrad of high gods responsible for this new order:
An (Anu): The sky god and nominal head of the pantheon.
Enlil: The god of wind and storms, the executive power who decrees fate.
Enki (Ea): The god of subterranean freshwater (Abzu) and wisdom.
Ninhursag (Nintur): The earth-mother and womb-goddess.1
Together, they "fashioned the dark-headed people" (sag-giga). This term, "dark-headed" or "black-headed," is the standard Sumerian ethnonym for themselves.1 It distinguishes the civilized urbanites of Sumer from the "barbarian" nomads of the mountains and deserts.
Simultaneously, the gods create the zoological order. They cause the "small animals that come up from out of the earth" to abound, filling the desert with gazelles, wild donkeys, and four-footed beasts.1 This establishes a dichotomy: the wild animals belong to the steppe (the edin), while the black-headed people belong to the cities and canals.
4. The Descent of Institutions: Kingship and the Five Cities
A defining feature of the Eridu Genesis is its linkage of creation to political legitimacy. The creation of man is not an end in itself; it is a prelude to the establishment of Kingship (nam-lugal) and the founding of urban centers.
4.1 The Celestial Origin of the State
The text famously declares:
"When the royal scepter was coming down from heaven, the august crown and the royal throne being already down from heaven..." 1
This is the central tenet of Sumerian political theology. The state is not a social contract formed by men; it is a divine institution lowered from the realm of An. The king is the custodian of a celestial office. This concept of "kingship descending from heaven" is mirrored verbatim in the Sumerian King List, which lists the kings who reigned before the Flood.12 By utilizing this motif, the Eridu Genesis presents itself as a historical document explaining the origins of the political order current in 1600 BCE.4
4.2 The Five Antediluvian Cities
Following the institution of kingship, Nintur and the gods establish the five primal cities. This section serves as a geographical charter, mapping the sacred landscape of Sumer. Each city is founded in a "pure spot" and assigned to a patron deity.11
The hierarchy of the cities is precise and reflects the theological priorities of the text 1:
Eridu: The "firstling of cities." It is given to Nudimmud (Enki). Eridu was archaeologically the oldest city in southern Mesopotamia (founded c. 5400 BCE), and its primacy here acknowledges it as the source of tradition. Enki, as the god of the Abzu (freshwater), is the provider of the water essential for life.6
Bad-tibira: "Fortress of the Coppersmiths." Assigned to the "Prince and the Sacred One." Jacobsen identifies this pair as the shepherd god Dumuzi and the goddess Inanna.14 This city was a center of early metallurgy and trade.
Larak: A city whose location is still not definitively identified but was likely on the Tigris. It is assigned to Pabilsag, a warrior god and husband of the healing goddess Gula.11
Sippar: The city of the sun. Assigned to Utu (Shamash), the sun god and the lord of justice. Sippar was a major religious center in the north of the Sumerian heartland.11
Shuruppak: The "City of Healing." Assigned to Sud (an epithet for Ninlil or a distinct grain goddess). Crucially, this is the city of Ziusudra, the hero of the story. Its inclusion as the final city sets the stage for the narrative's climax.3
The text describes these cities as centers of agricultural abundance, where canals are dredged and "blocked with purplish wind-borne clay" to carry water to the fields.1 This detail emphasizes the fragility of the Sumerian ecosystem: civilization is a constant battle against silt and the drying wind, a battle that requires the organization provided by kings and gods.
5. The Antediluvian Crisis: The Noise of Mankind
Following the establishment of the cities, another major lacuna interrupts the text. When the narrative resumes, the situation has deteriorated catastrophically. The gods have made a decision: "mankind is to be destroyed".5
5.1 The Missing Motive: The Problem of "Noise"
The Eridu Genesis fragment itself does not preserve the lines explaining why the gods decided on genocide. However, comparative analysis with the Atrahasis Epic (which is essentially an Akkadian expansion of this Sumerian core) allows us to reconstruct the motive with high confidence.4
In Atrahasis, the motive is explicitly stated as Noise (rigmu) and Uproar (huburu).
"The country was as noisy as a bellowing bull. The god grew restless at their racket. Enlil had to listen to their noise. He addressed the great gods: 'The noise of mankind has become too much for me! With their racket I am deprived of sleep.'" 16
This "noise" is not merely acoustic volume. In Mesopotamian thought, it represents overpopulation and ontological rebellion. Humanity, created to serve the gods, has become so numerous and so energetic that they have infringed upon the divine prerogative of rest. The "noise" is the sound of human life expanding beyond its allotted boundaries, threatening the static order Enlil desires. This stands in sharp contrast to the biblical Genesis, where the motive is moral corruption ("the wickedness of man was great," Gen 6:5) and violence (hamas).4
5.2 The Divine Council and the Oath
The decision to destroy humanity is not made by Enlil alone but by the Divine Assembly. The text references "a verdict, a command of the assembly" that "cannot be revoked".15 This illustrates the bureaucratic nature of the Sumerian pantheon; even the apocalypse must be processed through the proper legislative channels.
Crucially, the gods swear an oath to uphold this decision. Even Enki, the friend of humanity, is forced to swear with the others. This oath sets up the central dramatic tension of the story: How can Enki save humanity without breaking his sworn word to Enlil?.13
6. The Soteriological Intervention: Enki and Ziusudra
In the midst of this divine conspiracy against mortal life, the text introduces the hero: Ziusudra.
6.1 Ziusudra: The King-Priest
Ziusudra (Sumerian: zi-ud-sura) is a name rich in meaning. It translates variously as "Life of Long Days" or "He Who Laid Hold of Life of Distant Days".3 This name foreshadows his ultimate fate of immortality.
The text identifies him as the King of Shuruppak and also as a Gudug (lustration priest).18 This dual role is significant. As king, he represents the political leadership; as priest, he represents the cultic bridge between the human and divine. He is described as a "seer" who fashions a statue of the "god of giddiness" (likely a mistranslation or obscure reference to a specific ecstatic deity) and worships in awe.15
Ziusudra's defining characteristic is his piety. He stands "regularly day after day" in attendance to the gods, listening for a sign. This piety is what attracts Enki's attention and makes him the candidate for salvation.1
6.2 The Wall Trick
Enki, bound by his oath not to speak to any human about the coming flood, utilizes a clever legal loophole. He does not speak to Ziusudra; he speaks to the wall of Ziusudra's reed hut, knowing the king is listening on the other side.
"Step up to the wall to my left and listen! Let me speak a word to you at the wall and may you grasp what I say... By our hand a flood will sweep over the cities of the half-bushel baskets, and the country; the decision, that mankind is to be destroyed, has been made." 1
This "Wall Speech" is one of the most enduring motifs in Near Eastern literature, appearing in Atrahasis and Gilgamesh as well. It absolves Enki of perjury—he was merely talking to a wall—while effectively warning the hero. It underscores the character of Enki as the god of cunning wisdom (metis), the force that navigates around the rigid, destructive laws of Enlil.3
6.3 The Instructions for the Boat
Enki commands Ziusudra to build a "huge boat" (ma-gur-gur) to save "the seed of mankind".1 The term ma-gur-gur implies a vessel of immense size, distinct from the standard river skiffs.
While the specific dimensions are lost in the Eridu Genesis lacuna, parallel texts suggest a specific geometry. In Gilgamesh, the boat is a perfect cube; in Atrahasis, it is a roofed vessel "like the Apsu" (submersible-like). The Eridu text emphasizes that it must survive "evil winds" and "stormy winds," necessitating a robust, covered design.1
7. The Cataclysm: The Seven-Day Deluge
The description of the Flood in the Eridu Genesis is terrifyingly concise. It is not a rainstorm (as often depicted in children's Bibles) but a cosmic convulsion involving wind and water.
"All evil winds, all stormy winds gathered into one and with them, the Flood was sweeping over the cities of the half-bushel baskets for seven days and seven nights." 1
The duration is key: seven days. This is a standard symbolic number in Sumerian culture, representing a complete cycle or a period of intense transition. It is significantly shorter than the biblical 40 days/nights or the 150 days of water prevalence.4
The "evil wind" (im-hul) tosses the huge boat about on the "great waters." The imagery suggests a chaotic storm surge rather than a passive rising of water levels. The flood "sweeps over" the cities, obliterating the mud-brick civilization of Sumer and turning the ordered world back into the chaotic primeval ocean.1
8. Restoration and Apotheosis: The Path to Dilmun
The cessation of the Flood marks the beginning of a new epoch. The sun god Utu, who represents justice and light, reappears, signaling that the chaotic darkness has receded.
8.1 The Sacrifice
Ziusudra opens a window in his boat and sees the sun. His immediate reaction is cultic, not celebratory. He prostrates himself and kisses the ground.
"The king was butchering oxen, was being lavish with the sheep... he was crumbling for him juniper, the pure plant of the mountains he filled on the fire." 1
This sacrifice is an act of thanksgiving and propitiation. In the parallel accounts (Gilgamesh), the gods, starved of sacrifices during the flood, gather around the smoke "like flies." While the Eridu Genesis fragment is less explicit about the gods' hunger, the acceptance of the sacrifice is crucial for the restoration of the covenant between god and man.4
8.2 The Gift of Immortality
The denouement of the Eridu Genesis is radically different from the biblical account. In Genesis, Noah dies a mortal death. In the Eridu Genesis, Ziusudra is elevated to the status of a god.
Enlil, initially furious that a human survived, is placated (presumably by Enki, though the text is broken here). He and An then approach Ziusudra.
"An and Enlil did well by him, were granting him life like a god's, were making lasting breath of life, like a god's descend into him." 1
Ziusudra is given "eternal breath" (zi-da-ri). This is the ultimate reward for preserving the "seed of mankind." He is no longer a mere king of Shuruppak; he has transcended the human condition.
8.3 The Translation to Dilmun
The gods do not leave Ziusudra in Sumer. They transport him to a distant, mythical location:
"That day they made Ziusudra... live toward the east over the mountains in Mount Dilmun." 1
Dilmun is a place of immense significance in Sumerian theology. Physically, it is identified with the island of Bahrain in the Persian Gulf, a land of sweet water springs and trade.20 Mythologically, it is the "Place Where the Sun Rises," a prelapsarian paradise where predation and disease are unknown (as described in the myth Enki and Ninhursag).
By placing Ziusudra in Dilmun, the text removes him from history. He becomes a distant ancestor, accessible only to the greatest of heroes (like Gilgamesh) who dare to cross the Waters of Death to seek his wisdom. The phrase "Mount Dilmun" used by Jacobsen is notable; while Bahrain is flat, the "Mount" likely refers to the cosmic geography of the sunrise horizon, or perhaps the "mountain" of the ziggurat/temple that would have defined the sacred space.20
9. Comparative Mythology: A Synoptic View
The relationships between the Eridu Genesis and its successors are complex, revealing a "genealogy of narrative" that evolves to fit changing theological needs.
9.1 Eridu Genesis vs. The Bible (Genesis 6-9)
The parallels are structural and undeniably point to a shared tradition, likely transmitted through Amorite intermediaries (the ancestors of the Hebrews who migrated from Mesopotamia).
Structure: Creation -> Cities/Lineage -> Flood -> Salvation -> Covenant.
Divergence: The most profound shift is theological. The Sumerian flood is political (Enlil vs. Enki) and ontological (Noise/Overpopulation). The Biblical flood is moral (Sin/Violence) and monotheistic (One God grieving over His creation). In the Eridu Genesis, the gods depend on man (for food/sacrifice); in the Bible, God is self-sufficient but desires righteousness.17
9.2 Eridu Genesis vs. The Epic of Gilgamesh
The Gilgamesh flood account (Tablet XI) is essentially the Eridu/Atrahasis story inserted into the Gilgamesh narrative as a flashback.
Context: In Eridu Genesis, the flood is the central event of history. In Gilgamesh, it is a story told by the survivor to the hero.
The Hero: Ziusudra is a king-priest concerned with his people. Utnapishtim (the Gilgamesh hero) is somewhat more cynical, testing Gilgamesh's ability to stay awake and mocking his failure. The Eridu Genesis presents the "purest" version of the hero as a pious servant of the gods.3
10. Archaeological and Historical Context
Does the Eridu Genesis reflect a historical event?
10.1 The Shuruppak Flood Layer
Excavations at Shuruppak (Tell Fara), the city of Ziusudra, in 1931 revealed a substantial layer of alluvial sand and clay separating the Jemdet Nasr (c. 3000 BCE) and Early Dynastic I (c. 2900 BCE) occupation levels.4
Analysis: This indicates a massive local river flood of the Euphrates that likely devastated the city and interrupted its culture. Similar flood layers found at Kish, Uruk, and Ur date to slightly different periods, suggesting that "The Flood" was not a single global event but a cultural amalgamation of several devastating river floods that occurred in the 3rd millennium BCE.
Mythologization: The Shuruppak flood, being particularly severe, likely became the nucleus of the Ziusudra legend. Over centuries, a local disaster that wiped out a specific city-state was mythologized into a cosmic event that wiped out all of humanity.4
10.2 The King List Connection
The Sumerian King List (SKL) is the companion text to the Eridu Genesis. It lists eight kings who ruled for fabulous periods (e.g., 36,000 years) before the Flood. The final king is Ubara-Tutu of Shuruppak, the father of Ziusudra.
Synthesis: The Eridu Genesis serves as the narrative explanation for the cryptic line in the SKL: "Then the Flood swept over. After the Flood had swept over, and the kingship had descended from heaven, the kingship was in Kish." It bridges the gap between the mythical antediluvian era and the semi-historical post-diluvian dynasties.6
11. Conclusion
The Eridu Genesis is more than a fragmented clay tablet; it is a foundational document of human consciousness. It represents one of the earliest known attempts by our species to articulate a philosophy of history. In the Sumerian view, history is not a linear progression but a fragile stasis, maintained by the institutions of kingship and priesthood against the encroaching chaos of the natural world (the Flood) and the divine realm (Enlil's wrath).
The text establishes a worldview where humanity is created for service, where civilization is a divine mandate, and where survival depends on the interplay between the harsh decrees of authority (Enlil) and the saving grace of wisdom (Enki). Through the figure of Ziusudra, the Eridu Genesis offers a model of the ideal human: pious, attentive, and obedient, a figure whose legacy survived the death of the Sumerian language to be reborn as Atrahasis, Utnapishtim, and finally, Noah.
In reading the Eridu Genesis, we are reading the "first draft" of the apocalypse, a story that has haunted and comforted humanity for five thousand years. It reminds us that while the "evil winds" may gather and the waters may rise, the "seed of mankind" endures—often through the wisdom of a single individual listening at a wall.
Works cited
"Eridu Genesis": English Translation by Thorkild Jacobsen - Text, accessed on January 11, 2026, https://omnika.org/texts/718
Eridu Genesis - Myth - OMNIKA Mythology, accessed on January 11, 2026, https://omnika.org/myths/eridu-genesis
Eridu Genesis - World History Encyclopedia, accessed on January 11, 2026, https://www.worldhistory.org/Eridu_Genesis/
Eridu Genesis - Wikipedia, accessed on January 11, 2026, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eridu_Genesis
The Eridu Genesis - Mesopotamian Gods & Kings | PDF - Scribd, accessed on January 11, 2026, https://www.scribd.com/document/905141897/The-Eridu-Genesis-Mesopotamian-Gods-Kings
Eridu, the Bible's 'First City' and the Family of Cain: Archaeological, accessed on January 11, 2026, https://armstronginstitute.org/886-eridu-the-bibles-first-city-and-the-family-of-cain-archaeological-parallels-to-the-biblical-account
B10673 - Artifact - OMNIKA Museum, accessed on January 11, 2026, https://omnika.org/artifacts/b10673-flood-tablet
Eridu Genesis - JASON COLAVITO, accessed on January 11, 2026, https://www.jasoncolavito.com/eridu-genesis.html
Eridu Genesis | All chapters - intertextual.bible, accessed on January 11, 2026, https://intertextual.bible/book/eridu-genesis/chapter/all
ERIDU, DUNNU, AND BABEL: A STUDY IN COMPARATIVE ..., accessed on January 11, 2026, https://kb.osu.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/8a383096-2c54-5b51-a9ae-4277cc42fdd7/content
Eridu Genesis - Livius.org, accessed on January 11, 2026, https://www.livius.org/sources/content/oriental-varia/eridu-genesis/
The Flood story: translation - ETCSL, accessed on January 11, 2026, https://etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/section1/tr174.htm
primeval lists and stories - Brill, accessed on January 11, 2026, https://brill.com/display/book/9789004196124/Bej.9789004163805.i-610_004.pdf
The Harps that Once... 9780300161878 - DOKUMEN.PUB, accessed on January 11, 2026, https://dokumen.pub/the-harps-that-once-9780300161878.html
The Great Flood The Eridu Genesis | PDF - Scribd, accessed on January 11, 2026, https://www.scribd.com/document/365192294/The-great-Flood-the-Eridu-Genesis-docx
Eridu Genesis | Sumerian Flood Story Summary & Significance, accessed on January 11, 2026, https://study.com/academy/lesson/eridu-genesis-overview-summary-sumerian-flood-story.html
Is there any truth to the assertion that bibical creation stories ... - Reddit, accessed on January 11, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/ChristianApologetics/comments/nnjnvh/is_there_any_truth_to_the_assertion_that_bibical/
Eridu | George's Journal, accessed on January 11, 2026, https://georgesjournal.net/tag/eridu/
(PDF) Divine or Human Creation of Time? The Issue of Time as a ..., accessed on January 11, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351896435_Divine_or_Human_Creation_of_Time_The_Issue_of_Time_as_a_Factor_Determining_the_Relationship_of_Man_to_God
Dilmun: Gateway of the Gods in the Ancient Persian Gulf, accessed on January 11, 2026, https://brewminate.com/dilmun-ancient-polity-of-modern-bahrain-kuwait-qatar-and-saudi-arabia/
Jordan Peterson's contribution to Evolutionary Fall Theology - Page 4, accessed on January 11, 2026, https://discourse.biologos.org/t/jordan-petersons-contribution-to-evolutionary-fall-theology/37158?page=4
Eridu Genesis | Creation Myth, Sumerian Gods & Flood Story, accessed on January 11, 2026, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Eridu-Genesis
