Forest City, Malaysia: An Autopsy of a $100 Billion Ghost City and its Quest for a Second Life
Executive Summary
Forest City, a colossal $100 billion megaproject in Johor, Malaysia, represents one of the most ambitious and cautionary tales in modern urban development. Launched in 2016 as a joint venture between Chinese property giant Country Garden and Malaysian state-linked entities, it was envisioned as a futuristic, eco-friendly metropolis on four reclaimed islands, designed to house 700,000 people. Positioned as a flagship of China's Belt and Road Initiative, its business model was almost entirely predicated on sales to upper-middle-class Chinese buyers seeking overseas assets.
This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the project's trajectory, from its grand conception to its widely reported status as a "ghost city." The stagnation of Forest City was not the result of a single failure but a cascading series of interconnected shocks that exploited its foundational vulnerabilities. These included a sudden policy reversal by the Chinese government imposing strict capital controls in 2017, which severed the project's primary revenue stream; significant political turbulence in Malaysia following the 2018 election, which created sovereign risk and undermined investor confidence; and the subsequent financial meltdown of its principal developer, Country Garden, amid a broader crisis in China's property sector. Compounding these issues were fundamental market disconnects, including property prices misaligned with local incomes and a persistent lack of robust public transport infrastructure.
The on-the-ground reality today is one of stark contrasts. With a resident population of around 20,000—a small fraction of its target—the city is characterized by pristine but eerily empty residential towers. Yet, it is not entirely defunct. High-end amenities such as its international school and golf courses remain operational, and the development has attracted unconventional inhabitants, including a community of tech entrepreneurs experimenting with "network state" concepts. The project also carries a heavy, unpriced ecological liability, having been built upon reclaimed land that destroyed one of Malaysia's most significant seagrass meadows and mangrove ecosystems, devastating local fishing communities.
In a dramatic strategic pivot, the Malaysian government is now leading a comprehensive effort to revitalize the project. By designating Forest City as a Special Financial Zone (SFZ) and a duty-free island, it has introduced an aggressive package of tax and visa incentives. The new strategy abandons the mass-residential model in favor of attracting a niche market of family offices, fintech firms, and high-net-worth individuals, positioning Forest City as a competitive alternative to neighboring Singapore. This state-led intervention aims to salvage a massive sunk cost by fundamentally reinventing the city's economic identity.
The future of Forest City remains uncertain and hinges on overcoming formidable challenges, including the developer's precarious financial health, a massive oversupply of residential units, and significant reputational damage. Its story offers critical lessons on the perils of speculative, developer-led urbanism, the importance of aligning megaprojects with local economic and environmental realities, and the complex interplay of capital, politics, and development in a globalized world.
Section 1: The Genesis of a Transnational Dream
The conception of Forest City was not merely a real estate venture; it was a grand statement of intent, born from a unique confluence of geopolitical ambition, economic opportunism, and powerful political alliances. It was marketed as a paradigm-shifting urban model, strategically positioned to capitalize on the economic symbiosis between Malaysia and Singapore, and fueled by the immense outward flow of Chinese capital. This section details the ambitious blueprint, the key players, and the strategic underpinnings that defined the project's spectacular launch.
1.1 A Vision of the Future: The "Living Paradise" Blueprint
Officially launched in 2016, Forest City was presented to the world with a staggering $100 billion price tag, a figure that immediately signaled its monumental scale and ambition.1 The project was envisioned as a "role model of future cities," a self-contained, eco-friendly metropolis built from the sea up.4 The master plan, developed in collaboration with the renowned international design firm Sasaki, called for the construction of four man-made islands spanning a total area of 30 square kilometers—a landmass roughly the size of Macau and nearly three times that of Singapore's Ang Mo Kio residential town.4
The core marketing narrative was built upon a foundation of four cutting-edge planning principles: "Green," "Smart," "Dynamic," and "Harmonious".5 This was not to be a conventional city. The design promised a multi-layered mobility system where vehicular traffic—roads, flyovers, and parking—would be relegated to lower levels, leaving the ground level as a verdant, pedestrian-friendly haven of parks and recreational spaces.6 Buildings were to be draped in vertical greenery, creating a "forest-like environment" that would purify the air, conserve rainwater, and reduce noise.5 This aesthetic was coupled with promises of advanced sustainability features, including comprehensive water recycling systems and renewable energy sources.1
Smart city technology was another cornerstone of the vision, with plans for an urban operating system to enhance all facets of life and create a seamlessly connected, high-tech environment.5 The ultimate goal was to create a complete urban ecosystem, a "living paradise" that would include not just residential towers but also commercial hubs, offices, luxury hotels, shopping malls, a waterpark, and a world-class international school.1 The project set an audacious population target: to be home to approximately 700,000 people by the year 2035.1
1.2 The Strategic Alliance: A Public-Private Conglomerate
The entity behind this grand vision is Country Garden Pacificview Sdn Bhd (CGPV), a powerful joint venture that fused Chinese corporate might with Malaysian political influence.5 The majority stakeholder, with a 66% share, is Country Garden Group, which at the time was China's largest and one of the world's most formidable integrated real estate developers.1 Founded in 1992 and listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, Country Garden had a proven track record of delivering massive projects across China and was aggressively expanding its overseas portfolio.4
The remaining 34% stake is held by Esplanade Danga 88 Sdn Bhd (EDSB), a Malaysian-government-backed entity with deep ties to the ruling elite of Johor state.8 This connection is not merely bureaucratic; it is royal. The largest shareholder of EDSB, with a controlling 64.4% stake, is the Sultan of Johor, Ibrahim Ismail. This effectively made Forest City a direct joint venture between the Chinese developer and the Johor monarch, a partnership that provided immense political capital and local influence.8 Further cementing its ties to the state, Kumpulan Prasarana Rakyat Johor (KPRJ), a Johor state government investment arm, also holds a significant stake in EDSB.4
This powerful local backing was instrumental in the project's early momentum. The political endorsement was unambiguous and came from the highest level of the Malaysian government. At the grand opening ceremony in March 2016, then-Prime Minister Najib Razak was the guest of honor. In a clear signal of federal support, he announced that Forest City would be designated a duty-free zone and would be granted special tax breaks, further enhancing its appeal to foreign investors.1 This high-profile endorsement created an aura of invincibility around the project, suggesting a seamless alignment of corporate, state, and federal interests. The project's initial success was therefore predicated on a fragile, three-legged stool: the financial power of Country Garden, the unwavering support of Malaysian political elites, and the sustained demand from a specific class of Chinese investors. The inherent vulnerability in this structure was that the failure of any single leg would threaten the stability of the entire enterprise—a foundational flaw that would later prove catastrophic.
1.3 The China-Malaysia Nexus: BRI Ambitions and a Targeted Market
Forest City was strategically positioned as a flagship project under China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), President Xi Jinping's signature foreign policy and infrastructure strategy.9 This branding elevated it from a mere real estate development to a project of geopolitical significance, symbolizing the deepening economic ties between China and Malaysia and serving as a prominent example of Chinese capital shaping urban landscapes abroad.
Crucially, the project's business model was explicitly and almost exclusively targeted at an external market. It was not designed for local Malaysians.9 The primary demographic was the burgeoning upper-middle class from mainland China, who were seeking to diversify their assets and park their wealth abroad.3 For these buyers, Forest City offered relatively affordable seafront properties compared to the hyper-inflated prices in major Chinese coastal cities like Shanghai.9 This strategy was a direct attempt to capitalize on the immense wealth generated by China's domestic property boom and the strong desire of its citizens to secure overseas investments.12
The project's geographical location was its premier selling point. Situated within the Iskandar Malaysia special economic zone (SEZ), it lies at the southernmost tip of Peninsular Malaysia, separated from Singapore by a bridge and just 2 kilometers away as the crow flies.5 This proximity was heavily leveraged in marketing materials, which framed the development as a unique "2 Cities 1 Economic Life Circle".4 The pitch was simple and compelling: residents could enjoy the significantly lower cost of living and property prices in Malaysia while benefiting from easy access to the high wages and dynamic economic opportunities of Singapore.14 This transnational lifestyle proposition was the cornerstone of its appeal to a global, and specifically Chinese, clientele. The "eco-city" branding was also a powerful marketing tool that helped position the project on the global stage, though it masked a fundamental environmental contradiction. While the vision was of a green, sustainable metropolis, its very foundation required an act of profound ecological disruption—the reclamation of the sea and the destruction of vital marine habitats. This inherent paradox between its green image and its gray reality was a core tension that would later attract significant criticism and regulatory scrutiny.1
Section 2: The Anatomy of a Megaproject's Stagnation
The transformation of Forest City from a symbol of boundless ambition to a cautionary tale of speculative excess was not caused by a single event but by a perfect storm of political, economic, and financial crises. A series of cascading failures, originating in both Beijing and Putrajaya, exploited the project's pre-existing structural weaknesses, leading to a rapid and near-total collapse of its business model. This section dissects the confluence of factors that derailed the $100 billion dream.
2.1 The Great Wall of Capital: Beijing's Policy Reversal
The most decisive and immediate blow to Forest City's viability came not from Malaysia, but from China. In 2017, the Chinese government, concerned about capital flight and the stability of its currency, implemented a series of strict capital controls.7 These new regulations sharply restricted the ability of Chinese citizens to move money out of the country, imposing an annual limit of $50,000 on foreign spending and making it exceedingly difficult to finance large overseas purchases like real estate.3
For Forest City, a project whose sales strategy was almost entirely dependent on this specific demographic, the impact was catastrophic. The primary pipeline of buyers and capital was effectively severed. The flow of funds that had fueled the project's initial boom "dried up overnight," leaving the developer with thousands of units and a business model that was suddenly obsolete.3 This policy shift was not a minor headwind; it was an existential threat that directly attacked the project's most critical vulnerability—its over-reliance on a single, foreign market.
2.2 The Shifting Sands of Malaysian Politics
While the financial shock from China was crippling, it was soon compounded by a political earthquake in Malaysia. The project had been launched and championed under the government of Prime Minister Najib Razak, which had provided high-level endorsements and favorable policies.9 However, the general election of May 2018 resulted in a historic and unexpected defeat for the long-ruling Barisan Nasional coalition, bringing to power a new government led by the veteran statesman Dr. Mahathir Mohamad.11
Dr. Mahathir adopted a publicly skeptical and often hostile stance towards large-scale Chinese-backed projects, including Forest City. He voiced concerns that the development was not benefiting local Malaysians and was instead creating an enclave for foreigners, famously declaring that his government would not allow foreigners to be sold visas to live in Forest City.16 While this policy was not fully enacted in law, the statement from the Prime Minister's office sent a chilling message to the international market, introducing a significant degree of sovereign risk and creating profound uncertainty for existing and potential investors.11
This federal-level opposition also exposed a deep-seated tension within Malaysia's political structure. The project had always enjoyed powerful backing from the Johor state government and its Sultan, who viewed it as a vital engine for local economic growth.8 The Sultan publicly criticized what he perceived as federal interference in Johor's development affairs, highlighting a tug-of-war between state ambitions and the priorities of the central government in Putrajaya.11 Forest City thus became a political football, caught in the crossfire of Malaysia's evolving federal-state power dynamics and its broader reassessment of its relationship with China. This complex and fluid political landscape proved treacherous for Country Garden, which found itself navigating not just a challenging market but also a contested political terrain.11
2.3 The Developer's Crisis: Country Garden's Financial Meltdown
The external shocks from Chinese capital controls and Malaysian political instability were soon followed by an internal crisis that struck at the heart of the project: the financial collapse of its lead developer. Country Garden, once a titan of the industry, became a major casualty of the severe downturn that swept through China's domestic property sector.7
The company's financial deterioration was swift and staggering. By the end of 2022, its total liabilities had ballooned to nearly $200 billion (USD).2 In October 2023, the company officially defaulted on $11 billion of its offshore bonds after failing to make interest payments, sending shockwaves through global financial markets.19 Its financial statements painted a grim picture of record-breaking losses, including a staggering 178 billion yuan (approx. $24.7 billion USD) in 2023.7 The company's market value evaporated, with its stock price falling by as much as 97% from its 2018 peak.7
This liquidity crisis has had a direct and devastating impact on its ability to execute projects, both at home and abroad. The company itself has acknowledged that it faces challenges in completing developments even within mainland China, making the prospect of finishing the remaining three islands of Forest City seem remote.7 As of 2023, only 15% of the total Forest City project had been constructed, and with the developer mired in debt restructuring, the future of the remaining 85% is in serious doubt.2
2.4 A Market Disconnect and Foundational Flaws
Beyond the major political and financial shocks, the project was also plagued by fundamental flaws in its market positioning and design. The residential units were priced according to the standards of China's then-booming property market, rendering them prohibitively expensive for the vast majority of local Malaysians.9 With a median household income in Johor of around RM 6,879 per month in 2021, a starting price of RM 670,000 for a two-bedroom apartment in Forest City was well beyond the reach of the local population.21 This pricing strategy created a product with virtually no domestic demand, reinforcing its dependence on foreign buyers.23
The city's location, while marketed as a strategic asset due to its proximity to Singapore, was perceived by locals as isolated and inconveniently far from established employment centers in Johor Bahru.24 This isolation was exacerbated by a critical and widely criticized infrastructure gap: the lack of robust public transportation links to the rest of Johor and to Singapore.1 Without an integrated rail or bus rapid transit system, the city is car-dependent, which undermines its "eco-friendly" and "smart city" branding and makes it an impractical choice for daily commuters.
Finally, the COVID-19 pandemic, which began in 2020, acted as the final blow. The global lockdowns froze international travel, making it impossible for prospective buyers to visit the site and halting any residual sales momentum.9 The pandemic also brought construction to a standstill, cementing the project's status as a half-finished dream. The series of events—capital controls, political hostility, developer insolvency, and a global pandemic—were not independent misfortunes. They formed a devastating sequence where each crisis compounded the last, exposing and exploiting the project's fragile foundations until it ultimately collapsed.
Section 3: On-the-Ground Reality: Life in a Half-Empty Metropolis
Today, Forest City exists in a state of surreal duality. It is simultaneously a globally recognized symbol of a failed real estate dream and a functioning, albeit sparsely populated, community with pockets of surprising vitality. The lived experience on the ground is a complex tapestry of eerie emptiness, high-end amenities, and the emergence of unconventional inhabitants who are repurposing the space for their own unique ends. This section provides a detailed snapshot of the city's current reality, exploring the chasm between its original vision and its present state.
3.1 A City by the Numbers: The Chasm Between Vision and Reality
The quantitative gap between Forest City's planned scale and its current occupancy is immense. Conceived to house a bustling population of 700,000, the reality is a stark contrast. By late 2019, estimates placed the number of residents as low as 500.9 This figure has since grown, with reports from 2023 and 2024 indicating a population of approximately 9,000 people.1 More recent developer and government statements in early 2025 suggest this number has risen to around 20,000 residents.9 While this represents growth, it is still less than 3% of the city's ultimate population target.
A curious paradox lies in the sales data. Of the roughly 28,000 residential units that have been completed, a high percentage—73% according to a statement from Malaysia's Deputy Finance Minister—have been sold.25 However, this ownership is overwhelmingly foreign. Chinese nationals account for 70% of all sold properties, with other foreigners making up another 20%, and local Malaysians owning a mere 10%.7 This data reveals a critical disconnect between property ownership and physical residency. For many foreign buyers, the apartments were purchased as investments or potential holiday homes, not as primary residences. This has resulted in thousands of owned but empty units, which is the core reason for the city's "ghost town" appearance.
Visually, the city is a landscape of contradictions. The streets are often described as pristine and immaculately clean, yet they are unnervingly quiet, with hardly any vehicular traffic.1 At night, the imposing silhouettes of dozens of skyscrapers stand in near-total darkness, with only a few scattered lights indicating the presence of inhabitants—a haunting image captured in photographs taken from across the strait in Singapore.1 Visitors frequently comment on the jarring contrast between the glossy, futuristic models in the sales showroom and the deserted reality of the city itself.1
Metric
Planned / Vision
Actual / Current Status (as of early 2025)
Total Investment
$100 Billion (USD)
~$10 Billion (USD) invested 29
Total Area
4 man-made islands (30 sq km)
1 man-made island partially developed 7
Project Completion
100% by 2035
~15% of total project built 2
Target Population
700,000
~20,000 residents 9
Housing Units Built
700,000
~28,000 1
Occupancy Rate
High (implied)
<3% of target population
3.2 Infrastructure and Amenities: A Mixed Bag of Operational and Abandoned
The infrastructure that has been completed in Forest City is a mix of the fully operational and the deeply underutilized. On one hand, the development features several world-class amenities that continue to function and attract visitors. These include two award-winning 18-hole golf courses, which are popular with golfers from Malaysia, Singapore, and South Korea, and the luxurious Forest City Marina Hotel.1 A key piece of connectivity infrastructure, the shuttle bus service to and from Singapore, also remains operational, providing a crucial link for residents and visitors.30 Furthermore, the Forest City International School, which was established in 2018 as a campus of the prestigious American Shattuck-St. Mary's School, continues to operate, enrolling approximately 200 students from various nationalities and boasting a low 4:1 student-to-teacher ratio.9
On the other hand, many of the city's commercial and public spaces reflect its low population. The central shopping mall is frequently described as a ghost mall, with a vast majority of its retail units empty and its few restaurants and bars closed or struggling for customers.1 The public beach, while maintained, is often deserted, home to a surreal "staircase to nowhere" that has become an iconic image of the project's unfulfilled promise.1 There are also troubling reports of premature infrastructure decay. Some observers have noted cracks appearing in building facades and sections of roads sinking, raising concerns that the rapid construction on unsettled reclaimed land may have compromised structural integrity.34
Resident testimonials provide a qualitative dimension to this reality. The experience of living in such a vast, empty space can be psychologically taxing. One former resident, a computer engineer, recounted to the BBC his feeling of profound isolation, stating that the sense of abandonment was so overwhelming that he chose to flee and forfeit his deposit.1 However, for the small community that remains, there are niche attractions. Some residents appreciate the extreme peace and quiet, the abundant greenery, and the resort-like atmosphere.35 Others are drawn by practical perks, such as the availability of duty-free alcohol.34
3.3 The Unconventional Inhabitants: New Communities in the Void
The emptiness of Forest City has created a vacuum that is being filled by unconventional and unexpected communities, turning the development into a laboratory for alternative lifestyles and governance models. The most prominent of these is the "network state" experiment spearheaded by Balaji Srinivasan, a well-known venture capitalist and former Chief Technology Officer of Coinbase.10
Attracted by the city's isolation, low cost, and status as a "blank canvas," Srinivasan and his followers have repurposed a hotel into a makeshift campus for a community of crypto-entrepreneurs, coders, and tech innovators.10 The daily routine for this group blends intense work with ideological exploration. Mornings are dedicated to coding sessions and software development, while afternoons are spent in seminars on topics ranging from decentralized governance to the statecraft of Singapore.37 The community has a distinct culture, heavily influenced by Silicon Valley's obsessions with biohacking and longevity; participants follow protein-heavy diets inspired by Bryan Johnson's "Don't Die" movement and engage in rigorous workout routines in the city's underused gyms.10
This enclave of tech utopians represents a radical and organic repurposing of Forest City's original vision. What was designed as a tranquil, luxury haven for wealthy retirees has instead become a frontier for a group seeking to build new societies from scratch, governed by code rather than traditional laws. While critics raise concerns about the potential for such enclaves to exacerbate inequality and detach from local Malaysian communities, their presence signifies a fascinating second life for the development. It demonstrates that while the original top-down vision for the city failed, the physical infrastructure it created is proving fertile ground for bottom-up, niche communities with entirely different goals.
Section 4: The Ecological Cost of Ambition
Beneath the financial and political narrative of Forest City lies a profound and perhaps irreversible ecological story. The project's "eco-city" branding stands in stark contrast to its foundational act: the large-scale destruction of a critically important marine ecosystem. This section provides a detailed assessment of the environmental damage caused by the project's massive land reclamation, the resulting impact on local communities, and the contested effectiveness of subsequent mitigation efforts.
4.1 Reclaiming Paradise, Destroying Habitats
The four artificial islands that form the blueprint for Forest City were not built on barren seabed. They were constructed directly atop Malaysia's largest and most biodiverse seagrass meadow, Tanjung Kupang, and in close proximity to the Sungai Pulai mangrove forest, a wetland of global significance designated as a Ramsar site.15 These ecosystems were not merely scenic backdrops; they were the biological engines of the Johor Strait.
The process of land reclamation involved the dredging of the seabed and the dumping of enormous quantities of sand and sediment to create new land.15 This activity effectively buried and smothered the vast seagrass beds, which served as vital habitats, feeding grounds, and nurseries for a rich web of marine life, including endangered species like dugongs and sea turtles, as well as commercially important fish and prawns.29 The nearby mangroves, crucial for preventing coastal erosion and providing a unique habitat for species like the smooth otter and estuary crocodile, were also severely impacted by the construction, increased siltation, and altered water currents.15
This environmental destruction was exacerbated by a significant failure in regulatory oversight. The developer, Country Garden, was initially allowed to commence construction without a detailed environmental impact assessment (DEIA), a standard requirement for a project of this scale.38 It was only after months of work had already been done, and following a significant outcry from local fishing communities and, crucially, the government of Singapore—which raised concerns about the transboundary environmental and navigational impacts—that the Malaysian Department of Environment issued a stop-work order and compelled the developer to complete a proper assessment.12 This "develop first, ask for forgiveness later" approach was a direct result of the project's powerful local political backing, which allowed it to be treated as an "exceptional" case, bypassing standard environmental protections in the pursuit of rapid development.12
4.2 The Human Toll: Impact on Local Communities
The ecological devastation of the Johor Strait translated directly into a socio-economic crisis for the local communities that depended on it for their survival. For generations, the fishermen of coastal villages like Tanjung Kupang had relied on the rich bounty of the seagrass meadows and mangrove estuaries.12
The land reclamation project obliterated their traditional fishing grounds, leading to a drastic and immediate decline in their catches.39 Fishermen reported that their incomes were decimated, forcing them into financial hardship. This was not just a temporary disruption; as one fisherman noted during a public dialogue, the damage to their livelihoods was expected to last for the entire 30-year duration of the project, and no amount of financial compensation could replace the loss of their natural heritage.41 The impact extended beyond commercial fishing, as many in the community also depended on gleaning shellfish and other marine life from the mudflats and intertidal zones for their daily meals.41
In addition to the loss of their primary source of income and food, local villages also faced disruptions to basic utilities. Residents reported experiencing water and electricity shortages, leading to fears that these essential resources were being diverted from their established communities to service the new, luxurious apartments of Forest City.15 The project thus created a stark divide, with the promise of a high-tech future for wealthy foreigners coming at the direct expense of the well-being and sustainability of the local Malaysian population.
4.3 Mitigation and Restoration: An Assessment of Efforts
Forced to address the environmental fallout by regulatory and public pressure, Country Garden announced a series of mitigation and restoration measures. These included downsizing the project's overall footprint, redesigning the islands to improve water flow, and making public commitments to restore damaged mangrove forests and seagrass beds.9 The company also promised to create new artificial habitats to support fish and prawn populations.38
In recent years, some of these commitments have been put into action. In 2020, Forest City officially launched a mangrove conservation project, which involves monitoring the coastline, collecting seeds, and cultivating seedlings in a nursery.40 The developer also invested approximately $600,000 (USD) in a partnership with local universities to establish protection zones for the remaining seagrass, aiming to improve the habitats for marine life.40
The effectiveness of these efforts remains a subject of debate. Some conservation scientists have noted that marine ecosystems like seagrass meadows are remarkably resilient and can show signs of recovery once destructive activities like dredging and sand-dumping cease in a particular area.29 However, many environmental groups and local stakeholders argue that these mitigation measures are a case of "too little, too late." They contend that the scale of the initial destruction was so vast that these small-scale restoration projects cannot adequately compensate for the loss of a mature, complex ecosystem.15 The credibility of the developer's commitments has also been questioned, as key promises, such as the removal of a sand causeway built directly across the main seagrass meadow, were not fulfilled for years.41 Ultimately, the long-term ecological and social costs of Forest City represent a significant, unpriced liability. This damage is not reflected in the project's $100 billion financial valuation but is instead borne by the local environment and communities—a classic example of unsustainable development where private profits are generated at the expense of public and natural capital.
Section 5: The Second Act: A Pivot to a Special Financial Zone
Facing the undeniable failure of its original residential model, Forest City is now the subject of a comprehensive, state-led reinvention. The Malaysian government, unwilling to let a $100 billion investment languish as a symbol of failure, has initiated a dramatic strategic pivot. This new vision seeks to transform the development from a deserted residential town into a specialized economic hub, leveraging aggressive policy incentives to attract a new wave of capital and talent. This section analyzes the government's revitalization strategy and the new, unconventional futures being imagined for the city.
5.1 A Lifeline from Putrajaya: The SFZ and Duty-Free Gambit
The turning point for Forest City's future came in August 2023, when Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim announced that the development would be designated a Special Financial Zone (SFZ).9 This declaration signaled a fundamental shift in government policy, from skepticism to active intervention, with the goal of breathing new life into the stalled project and enhancing its economic competitiveness.
This was followed in September 2024 by the official unveiling of a detailed and highly attractive package of fiscal and non-fiscal incentives designed to lure international investors and businesses.9 This package represents a deliberate strategy of regulatory arbitrage, aiming to offer more favorable conditions than regional competitors. In July 2024, the Malaysian Parliament further solidified this strategy by officially legislating to make Forest City Island 1 a duty-free island, expanding upon the duty-free status that had been granted at its launch but never fully realized.9
Target Group
Key Incentive
Additional Benefits
Skilled / Knowledge Workers
Special 15% flat individual income tax rate 44
Multiple-entry visas; fast-track entry for those based in Singapore 43
Corporations (Fintech, Financial Services, etc.)
Concessionary corporate tax rate of 0% to 5% 3
Special deductions on relocation costs; enhanced industrial building allowances; withholding tax exemptions 45
Family Wealth Offices
Groundbreaking 0% tax rate for up to 20 years 43
Lower minimum Assets Under Management (AUM) requirement (RM30 million) compared to Singapore 7
This aggressive incentive package is a clear and pragmatic attempt by the Malaysian government to salvage a massive sunk cost. With significant state-linked financial and reputational capital tied to the project, allowing it to "rot and to crumble" was not a viable option.7 The SFZ strategy is therefore an act of state-led economic alchemy, aiming to repurpose the high-quality physical infrastructure that already exists and transform a failed real estate asset into a functioning financial and commercial hub.
5.2 Courting New Capital: Targeting a Niche Market
The SFZ strategy marks a decisive pivot away from the failed mass-market residential model. The new target audience is a high-value, globally mobile, and niche demographic: family offices managing the wealth of the ultra-rich, innovative fintech companies, digital nomads, and other high-net-worth individuals.1
Malaysia is explicitly positioning Forest City as a competitive and complementary hub to its powerhouse neighbor, Singapore. The incentives are carefully calibrated to undercut Singapore's offerings. For example, the minimum AUM required to establish a family office and qualify for tax incentives in Forest City is RM30 million (approximately $6.4 million USD), a significantly lower barrier to entry than the S$20 million (approximately $14.8 million USD) threshold in Singapore.7 This strategy leverages Forest City's core geographical advantage—its proximity to Singapore—while using more favorable regulations to attract mobile capital and talent that might find Singapore too expensive or restrictive.
This revitalization effort is also integrated into a larger regional economic strategy. The Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone (JS-SEZ), for which a Memorandum of Understanding was signed in January 2024, aims to foster deeper economic integration, streamline cross-border trade and travel, and create a seamless business environment across the strait.7 Forest City is being framed as a vital gateway and a key investment destination within this broader economic corridor, which could drive demand for its commercial spaces and services.46
5.3 Unconventional Futures: From K-Culture to Crypto-States
Beyond the government's focus on finance and technology, Forest City is also attracting other large-scale, specialized investments that could further diversify its economic base. In a significant and unexpected development, the Korean investment firm GG56 Korea Ltd has announced a $1 billion (USD) investment to establish Malaysia's first "Korean Cultural Town" within Forest City.47 This ambitious project plans to include K-content production studios, an international cultural district, and residential areas, aiming to capitalize on the global popularity of Korean culture and position Forest City as a key cultural hub in Southeast Asia.14
This planned investment complements the organic emergence of the "network state" community of tech entrepreneurs already present in the city.10 While this community was not part of any official plan, its focus on digital innovation and decentralized technology aligns well with the government's new vision of attracting a global, tech-savvy population.
Together, these developments suggest a future for Forest City that is vastly different from its original monolithic blueprint. Instead of a homogenous residential city, it may evolve into an "archipelago" of distinct and specialized enclaves—a financial island, a tech hub, a cultural town, and a tourism zone—each with its own unique character and economic driver. This more fragmented but potentially more resilient model may be the key to its long-term survival.
Section 6: Strategic Analysis and Forward Outlook
The ambitious attempt to pivot Forest City from a residential ghost town to a thriving Special Financial Zone marks a critical juncture in its troubled history. While the new government-led strategy offers a plausible path to revitalization, the project's future is far from guaranteed. It remains encumbered by the legacy of its past failures and faces a formidable set of enduring challenges. This final section synthesizes the report's findings to provide a forward-looking assessment, outlining the key hurdles that must be overcome and considering potential scenarios for the city's future.
6.1 Synthesis of Enduring Challenges
Despite the new wave of optimism and policy support, Forest City's path to recovery is fraught with significant and deeply entrenched obstacles.
First and foremost is the precarious financial health of its lead developer, Country Garden. The company remains mired in a massive debt crisis, and despite ongoing restructuring efforts, its capacity to inject further capital into the project is severely limited.7 This raises critical questions about its ability to fund the construction of the remaining three islands or even to maintain the existing infrastructure to the world-class standard required to attract discerning international investors. The financial burden could increasingly fall on its Malaysian partner, Esplanade Danga 88, which may be forced to seek new joint venture partners to salvage the development.7
Second, the new commercial focus does not resolve the fundamental problem of the massive oversupply of residential properties. Even in the most optimistic scenario, a successful financial and tech hub would only require a fraction of the 28,000 apartments already built, let alone the 700,000 originally planned. These vast, empty residential towers will likely remain a persistent drag on the project's finances and its public image, a constant visual reminder of its past failures.3
Third, Forest City must overcome immense reputational damage. For years, it has been internationally branded as a "ghost city," a "massive boondoggle," and a cautionary tale of speculative folly.1 Erasing this deeply ingrained negative perception and convincing global talent and blue-chip companies that it is now a credible and vibrant place to live and work will be a monumental marketing and public relations challenge that requires more than just attractive tax policies.3
Finally, the project still suffers from fundamental connectivity and liveability deficits. A world-class financial center cannot thrive in isolation. The persistent lack of a robust public transport link, particularly a direct rail connection to Johor Bahru's central business district and Singapore, remains a critical infrastructure gap.1 Furthermore, a city needs more than offices and apartments to be truly alive. It requires a rich, organic ecosystem of high-quality schools, healthcare, retail, culture, and entertainment to attract and, more importantly, retain a high-skilled workforce and their families—an ecosystem that Forest City currently lacks.3
6.2 Scenarios for the Future
Given these challenges and opportunities, several potential futures can be envisioned for Forest City:
Scenario 1: The Successful Niche Hub. In this optimistic scenario, the aggressive SFZ incentives, combined with strategic investments like the K-Culture town, succeed in attracting a critical mass of family offices, fintech startups, and specialized communities. The government follows through with deep infrastructure investments, including a rail link. Forest City evolves into a functional, if somewhat eclectic, collection of distinct economic and cultural enclaves. It never reaches its 700,000 population target but becomes a financially sustainable, low-density commercial and lifestyle destination that successfully complements the Johor-Singapore economic corridor.
Scenario 2: Prolonged Stagnation. In this more probable scenario, the revitalization efforts yield mixed results. The incentives prove insufficient to overcome the deep-seated reputational damage and infrastructure gaps. While a handful of companies and investors are attracted by the tax benefits, the project fails to achieve the critical mass needed to create a vibrant, self-sustaining ecosystem. Forest City remains in a state of limbo: a partially occupied city, heavily reliant on ongoing government subsidies, with pockets of commercial activity surrounded by vast, empty residential areas. It sheds the "ghost town" label but never truly comes to life, existing as a monument to unrealized potential.
Scenario 3: State-led Repurposing or Gradual Decline. In a pessimistic scenario, Country Garden's financial situation deteriorates further, forcing it to completely divest from or abandon the project. The Malaysian government, through its state-linked entities, is compelled to take full control to prevent a total collapse. This could lead to a radical repurposing of the site for public or industrial use (e.g., a university campus, a logistics and data center hub, or affordable housing). In the worst-case scenario, if the financial burden of maintenance becomes unsustainable, large sections of the development could be mothballed or fall into a state of managed decline.
6.3 Broader Lessons and Concluding Remarks
The saga of Forest City offers a powerful and multi-faceted case study for policymakers, investors, and urban planners worldwide. It serves as a stark warning about the hubris of top-down, developer-led urbanism that prioritizes speculative investment over the creation of genuine communities. The project's near-collapse underscores the profound risks of business models that are overly dependent on a single, volatile foreign market and highlights the critical importance of pricing in political and sovereign risk, particularly in projects entangled in complex federal-state dynamics.
Perhaps the most enduring lesson is that building a city is infinitely more complex than simply building infrastructure. A city is a living ecosystem that requires organic growth, social cohesion, and a sense of place. Forest City's initial vision failed because it was conceived as a product to be sold rather than a community to be nurtured. Its future, if it is to have one, will depend on whether its new architects can learn from this fundamental mistake. The pivot to a Special Financial Zone is a pragmatic and necessary step, but its success will ultimately be measured not by the number of companies it attracts, but by its ability to finally create a place where people genuinely want to live, work, and connect.
Appendix
Date
Event
Significance
2006
Forest City project is first announced as part of the broader Iskandar Malaysia plan.
Marks the conceptual origin of the development within a national economic strategy.9
2013
Country Garden makes its first major investment in Iskandar Malaysia (Danga Bay).
Signals the entry of the key Chinese developer into the Johor real estate market.8
2014
Large-scale land reclamation and construction begins.
The start of physical development, which immediately sparks environmental protests from local fishermen and Singapore.15
Mar 2016
Official grand opening ceremony with Prime Minister Najib Razak.
High-level political endorsement; Forest City is granted duty-free status, boosting its investment appeal.9
2017
The Chinese government imposes strict capital controls.
A critical turning point that severs the primary flow of capital and buyers from China, crippling the project's sales model.7
May 2018
Dr. Mahathir Mohamad becomes Prime Minister of Malaysia.
A major political shift that introduces sovereign risk, as the new government is openly critical of the project.11
Aug 2018
Shattuck-St. Mary's School opens its campus in Forest City.
A key amenity becomes operational, establishing an educational anchor in the development.9
2020
The COVID-19 pandemic leads to global travel restrictions.
Halts any remaining sales momentum and construction activity, further cementing the "ghost town" image.9
Aug 2023
Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim announces the designation of Forest City as a Special Financial Zone (SFZ).
A major policy pivot by the Malaysian government to actively intervene and revitalize the project.9
Oct 2023
Country Garden officially defaults on its offshore bonds.
Confirms the severe financial distress of the lead developer, raising doubts about its ability to complete the project.19
Jul 2024
The Malaysian Parliament passes legislation designating Forest City Island 1 as a duty-free island.
Provides a legal framework for the duty-free incentives, a key part of the revitalization strategy.9
Sep 2024
The government unveils the detailed incentive package for the Forest City SFZ.
Operationalizes the SFZ strategy by specifying the tax breaks and visa policies designed to attract new investment.43
2025
Revitalization efforts commence; population is reported to have reached ~20,000.
Marks the beginning of Forest City's "second act" as it attempts to transition into a financial and commercial hub.9
Works cited
Malaysia's 'Ghost City' Is A Futuristic Metropolis That Stands Mostly ..., accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.islands.com/1937777/malaysia-ghost-forest-city-futuristic-metropolis-stands-mostly-abandoned-today/
Forest City: Inside Malaysia's Chinese-built 'ghost city' - BBC News - YouTube, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=MiUIs8kgQX8
Forest City Malaysia: From Ghost Town to Financial Frontier - Resident Magazine, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://resident.com/business-and-finance/2025/04/28/forest-city-malaysia-from-ghost-town-to-financial-frontier
Forest City Country Garden Johor Properties | 碧桂园森林城市 - MySgProp, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.mysgprop.com/forest-city-country-garden-johor/
Forest City Johor | Forest City Iskandar | Forest City Malaysia - Forest City CGPV, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://forestcitysfz.com/about-forest-city/forest-city
Introduction to Forest City: A Role Model of Future Living - Estate123 Insight, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://insight.estate123.com/2017/05/29/introduction-to-forest-city-a-role-model-of-future-living/
What will it take to revive Forest City, Malaysia's US$100 billion ..., accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.channelnewsasia.com/cna-insider/forest-city-ghost-town-johor-malaysia-revive-us100-billion-5165751
company profile - Forest City By Country Garden Pacificview, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://forestcitycountrygarden.com.my/company-profile/
Forest City, Johor - Wikipedia, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forest_City,_Johor
From Ghost Town to Network State: Reviving Malaysia's Forest City - WebProNews, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.webpronews.com/from-ghost-town-to-network-state-reviving-malaysias-forest-city/
How Malaysian Politics Shaped Chinese Real Estate Deals and Economic Development, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2022/06/how-malaysian-politics-shaped-chinese-real-estate-deals-and-economic-development?lang=en
Chapter 8: The Future of Forest City - MIT Case Study Initiative, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://case-study.mit.edu/malaysia-8.php
Forest city | Smart Green City of the Future in Johor, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.forestcity.org/
7 Reason Why Forest City Is a Good Investment for Foreign Property Buyers - PropertyGenie, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.propertygenie.com.my/insider-guide/7-reason-why-forest-city-is-a-good-investment-for-foreign-property-buyers-ToEWnzCgF8aDW9uqhKRJ4b
Forest City Johor: Fishers struggle with land reclamation in Malaysia - Dialogue Earth, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://dialogue.earth/en/ocean/19303-fishers-struggle-land-reclamation-malaysia/
Forest City Malaysia: A $100 Billion Ghost Town: What Happened? - Resident Magazine, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://resident.com/real-estate/2024/12/01/forest-city-malaysia-a-100-billion-ghost-town-what-happened
Malaysia offers tax breaks to revive Forest City amid stalled Chinese project - Benar News, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.benarnews.org/english/news/malaysian/slew-of-incentives-to-revive-forest-city-09202024163549.html
Malaysia projects operating normally, says Country Garden as Forest City gets 'special zone' status | The Straits Times, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/country-garden-says-135-billion-malaysia-project-on-track
China's Country Garden forecasts bigger loss after deliveries slump By Reuters, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/chinas-country-garden-expects-bigger-loss-for-first-half-4207089
Exploring the Elements of Housing Price in Malaysia - ResearchGate, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283039488_Exploring_the_Elements_of_Housing_Price_in_Malaysia
FOREST CITY - Price & Details by Country Garden Pacificview Sdn Bhd, Cluster House for Sale and Rent - PropertyGuru Malaysia, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.propertyguru.com.my/condo/forest-city-7676
Johor - Household Income & Expenditure - OpenDOSM, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://open.dosm.gov.my/dashboard/household-income-expenditure/jhr
Commentary: The rise in Johor property prices and the myth that Singapore buyers are responsible - CNA, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/johor-property-prices-higher-foreigners-domestic-cost-pressures-832736
Why Don't Locals Buy in Forest City? : r/malaysia - Reddit, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/malaysia/comments/1hwick1/why_dont_locals_buy_in_forest_city/
Malaysia Property & Data Centers: Feeling the pulse in Johor - CIMB Preferred, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.cimbpreferred.com.my/content/dam/cimb-preferred/malaysia/documents/market-outlook-cio/past/msia-property-dc-johor-site-visits-28-oct-2024.pdf
Resort living reimagined: Waterfront homes in JB's Special Economic Zone minutes from Singapore | The Straits Times, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.straitstimes.com/business/property/luxury-waterfront-homes-near-second-link-johor-singapore-special-economic-zone-forest-city
Forest City to regain popularity after becoming duty-free island - News - My Sinchew, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://mysinchew.sinchew.com.my/news/20240719/mysinchew/5773582
What will it take to revive Forest City, Malaysia's US$100 billion 'ghost town'? - Reddit, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/malaysia/comments/1l4hpaj/what_will_it_take_to_revive_forest_city_malaysias/
As opposition wanes, a Malaysian land reclamation project pushes ahead - Mongabay, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://news.mongabay.com/2019/07/as-opposition-wanes-a-malaysian-land-reclamation-project-pushes-ahead/
Forest City JB – Special Financial Zone, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://forest-city-jb.com/
Snapshots of FC1--- Bus Service Between Forest City And ..., accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMEjHrLODUE
Forest City International School - CATS Global Schools, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://catsglobalschools.com/our-schools/forest-city-international-school/
SHATTUCK-ST. MARY'S - Forest City Golf Resort, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://fcgolfresort.com/shattuck-st-marys-forest-city/
A $100 Billion Dollar City Turned Into A Ghost Town - Stacked Homes, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://stackedhomes.com/a-100-billion-dollar-city-turned-into-a-ghost-town/
FOREST CITY, Iskandar Puteri (Nusajaya) - Reviews & Ratings | PropertyGuru Malaysia, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.propertyguru.com.my/condo/forest-city-7676/reviews
Megaprojects - Forest City: China Built a $100bn City in Malaysia ..., accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/malaysia/comments/1fka8kn/megaprojects_forest_city_china_built_a_100bn_city/
Techno-utopia rises in Malaysia's $100 billion Forest City flop - The Japan Times, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.japantimes.co.jp/business/2025/09/01/tech/tech-utopia-malaysia-forest-city/
A civic outcry in Malaysia forces a Chinese builder to live up to its eco-friendly tag, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://news.mongabay.com/2018/09/a-civic-outcry-in-malaysia-forces-a-chinese-builder-to-live-up-to-its-eco-friendly-tag/
Forest City: futuristic metropolis turned barren wasteland - The Climate, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://theclimatenews.co.uk/forest-city-futuristic-metropolis-turned-barren-wasteland/
Forest City Kicks Off Mangrove Conservation Project - FutureIOT, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://futureiot.tech/forest-city-kicks-off-mangrove-conservation-project/
The Socio-Cultural Impacts of Forest City - ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/ISEAS_Perspective_2017_42.pdf
Signature redacted - DSpace@MIT, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/105036/959623436-MIT.pdf
Malaysia's $100B “Ghost Town”: Can Forest City Be Revived? | Insight - YouTube, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41_Hs1nl9D8
Forest City's New Incentives: The Next Hotspot for Global Investors - MIDA, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.mida.gov.my/forest-citys-new-incentives-the-next-hotspot-for-global-investors/
Forest City Special Financial Zone : Everything You Need to Know - Nazmi Zaini Chambers, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://nzchambers.com/forest-city-special-financial-zone/
Forest City, Johor Bahru – Floor Plans, Facilities & Key Details – Limited Freehold Units in Johor Forest City, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://johorforestcity.com/
Major Investment Transforms Forest City into Malaysia's First Korean Cultural Town, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.propertygenie.com.my/insider-guide/major-investment-transforms-forest-city-into-malaysias-first-korean-cultural-town-pYTB9u44U7MFSWuQpmvZji
Country Garden - Progress in Restructuring and Financial Results Announcement, accessed on September 29, 2025, https://www.bondsupermart.com/bsm/article-detail/country-garden-progress-in-restructuring-and-financial-results-announcement-ARTIC0000001462
